Research on climate change mitigation tends to focus on supply-side technology solutions. A better understanding of demand-side solutions is missing. We propose a transdisciplinary approach to identify demand-side climate solutions, investigate their mitigation potential, detail policy measures and assess their implications for well-being.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wilson, C., Grubler, A., Gallagher, K. S. & Nemet, G. F. Marginalization of end-use technologies in energy innovation for climate protection. Nat. Clim. Change 2, 780–788 (2012).
Roy, J., Dowd, A.-M., Muller, A., Pal, S. & Prata, N. in Global Energy Assessment (GEA) 1527–1548 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2012).
Anderson, K., Quéré, C. L. & Mclachlan, C. Radical emission reductions: the role of demand reductions in accelerating full decarbonization. J. Carbon Manage. 5, 321–323 (2014).
Stern, P. C., Sovacool, B. K. & Dietz, T. Towards a science of climate and energy choices. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 547–555 (2016).
Creutzig, F. et al. Beyond technology: demand-side solutions for climate change mitigation. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 41, 173–198 (2016).
Minx, J., Callaghan, M. W., Lamb, W. F., Kowarsch, M. & Edenhofer, O. Learning about climate change solutions in the IPCC and beyond. Environ. Sci. Policy 77, 252–259 (2017).
von Stechow, C. et al. 2° C and SDGs: united they stand, divided they fall? Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 034022 (2016).
Mattioli, G. Transport needs in a climate-constrained world. A novel framework to reconcile social and environmental sustainability in transport. Energy Res. Soc. Sci 18, 118–128 (2016).
Kunreuther, H. et al. in Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) 151–192 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).
Ebeling, F. & Lotz, S. Domestic uptake of green energy promoted by opt-out tariffs. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 868–871 (2015).
Shove, E. Beyond the ABC: climate change policy and theories of social change. Environ. Plan. A 42, 1273–1285 (2010).
Geels, F. W. Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective. Res. Policy 39, 495–510 (2010).
Nyborg, K. et al. Social norms as solutions. Science 354, 42–43 (2016).
Lichtenstein, S. & Slovic, P. The Construction of Preference (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2006).
Wood, R. et al. Prioritizing consumption-based carbon policy based on the evaluation of mitigation potential using input–output methods. J. Ind. Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12702 (2017).
Azevedo, I. M. Consumer end-use energy efficiency and rebound effects. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 39, 393–418 (2014).
Steinberger, J. K., Roberts, J. T., Peters, G. P. & Baiocchi, G. Pathways of human development and carbon emissions embodied in trade. Nat. Clim. Change 2, 81–85 (2012).
Lamb, W. F. & Steinberger, J. K. Human well-being and climate change mitigation. WIRES Clim. Change 8, e485 (2017).
Mattauch, L., Ridgway, M. & Creutzig, F. Happy or liberal? Making sense of behavior in transport policy design. Transp. Res. D 45, 64–83 (2016).
Gough, I. & McGregor, J. A. Wellbeing in Developing Countries: From Theory to Research (Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 2007).
Mastrucci, A. & Rao, N. D. Decent housing in the developing world: reducing life-cycle energy requirements. Energy Build 152, 629–642 (2017).
Sovacool, B. K. The political economy of energy poverty: a review of key challenges. Energy Sustain. Dev. 16, 272–282 (2012).
Dalkmann, H. & Brannigan, C. Transport and Climate Change. Module 5e. Sustainable Transport: A Sourcebook for Policy-Makers in Developing Cities (GTZ, 2007).
Acknowledgements
W.B.d.B. acknowledges financial support from the Swedish Foundation for the Humanities and the Social Sciences; J.K.S. and F.W.G. from the UK ESRC (ES/K006576/1 and EP/K011790/1); C.H. from the Oxford Martin School; O.Y.E. and M.T. from the EU ERC (no. 154 336155) and N.D.R. from the EU ERC (no. 637462); I.M.L.A. from the Center for Climate and Energy Decision Making (SES-1463492); J.C.M. from the German Ministry of Research and Education (03EK3046B) and L.M. from the German Academic Exchange Service.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Creutzig, F., Roy, J., Lamb, W.F. et al. Towards demand-side solutions for mitigating climate change. Nature Clim Change 8, 260–263 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0121-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0121-1
This article is cited by
-
The effect of sustainable mobility transition policies on cumulative urban transport emissions and energy demand
Nature Communications (2023)
-
Emission pathways and mitigation options for achieving consumption-based climate targets in Sweden
Communications Earth & Environment (2023)
-
Feasible supply of steel and cement within a carbon budget is likely to fall short of expected global demand
Nature Communications (2023)
-
Burden of the global energy price crisis on households
Nature Energy (2023)
-
Incentive based emergency demand response effectively reduces peak load during heatwave without harm to vulnerable groups
Nature Communications (2023)