Letter | Published:

Limited influence of climate change mitigation on short-term glacier mass loss

Nature Climate Changevolume 8pages305308 (2018) | Download Citation

Abstract

Glacier mass loss is a key contributor to sea-level change1,2, slope instability in high-mountain regions3,4 and the changing seasonality and volume of river flow5,6,7. Understanding the causes, mechanisms and time scales of glacier change is therefore paramount to identifying successful strategies for mitigation and adaptation. Here, we use temperature and precipitation fields from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 output to force a glacier evolution model, quantifying mass responses to future climatic change. We find that contemporary glacier mass is in disequilibrium with the current climate, and 36 ± 8% mass loss is already committed in response to past greenhouse gas emissions. Consequently, mitigating future emissions will have only very limited influence on glacier mass change in the twenty-first century. No significant differences between 1.5 and 2 K warming scenarios are detectable in the sea-level contribution of glaciers accumulated within the twenty-first century. In the long-term, however, mitigation will exert strong control, suggesting that ambitious measures are necessary for the long-term preservation of glaciers.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    Gregory, J. M. et al. Twentieth-century global-mean sea-level rise: is the whole greater than the sum of the parts? J. Clim. 26, 4476–4499 (2013).

  2. 2.

    Church, J. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. et al.) 1137–1216 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).

  3. 3.

    Richardson, S. D. & Reynolds, J. M. An overview of glacial hazards in the Himalayas. Quat. Int. 65, 31–47 (2000).

  4. 4.

    Huggel, C., Clague, J. J. & Korup, O. Is climate change responsible for changing landslide activity in high mountains? Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 37, 77–91 (2012).

  5. 5.

    Jansson, P., Hock, R. & Schneider, T. The concept of glacier storage: a review. J. Hydrol. 282, 116–129 (2003).

  6. 6.

    Immerzeel, W. W., van Beek, L. P. H. & Bierkens, M. F. P. Climate change will affect the Asian water towers. Science 328, 1382–1385 (2010).

  7. 7.

    Huss, M. Present and future contribution of glacier storage change to runoff from macroscale drainage basins in Europe. Water Resour. Res. 47, W07511 (2011).

  8. 8.

    Egholm, D., Nielsen, S., Pedersen, V. K. & Lesemann, J.-E. Glacial effects limiting mountain height. Nature 460, 884–887 (2009).

  9. 9.

    Thomson, S. N. et al. Glaciation as a destructive and constructive control on mountain building. Nature 467, 313–317 (2010).

  10. 10.

    Korup, O., Montgomery, D. R. & Hewitt, K. Glacier and landslide feedbacks to topographic relief in the Himalayan syntaxes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 5317–5322 (2010).

  11. 11.

    Oerlemans, J. Extracting a climate signal from 169 glacier records. Science 308, 675–677 (2005).

  12. 12.

    Kaser, G., Cogley, J. G., Dyurgerov, M. B., Meier, M. F. & Ohmura, A. Mass balance of glaciers and ice caps: consensus estimates for 1961–2004. Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L19501 (2006).

  13. 13.

    Marzeion, B., Jarosch, A. H. & Gregory, J. M. Feedbacks and mechanisms affecting the global sensitivity of glaciers to climate change. Cryosphere 8, 59–71 (2014).

  14. 14.

    Jóhannesson, T., Raymond, C. & Waddington, E. Time-scale for adjustment of glaciers to changes in mass balance. J. Glaciol. 35, 355–369 (1989).

  15. 15.

    Bahr, D. B., Pfeffer, W. T., Sassolas, C. & Meier, M. F. Response time of glaciers as a function of size and mass balance: 1. Theory. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 103, 9777–9782 (1998).

  16. 16.

    Pelto, M. S. The current disequilibrium of North Cascade glaciers. Hydrol. Process. 20, 769–779 (2006).

  17. 17.

    Huss, M. & Farinotti, D. Distributed ice thickness and volume of all glaciers around the globe. J. Geophys. Res. 117, F04010 (2012).

  18. 18.

    Grinsted, A. An estimate of global glacier volume. Cryosphere 7, 141–151 (2013).

  19. 19.

    New, M., Lister, D., Hulme, M. & Makin, I. A high-resolution data set of surface climate over global land areas. Clim. Res. 21, 1–25 (2002).

  20. 20.

    Mitchell, T. D. & Jones, P. D. An improved method of constructing a database of monthly climate observations and associated high-resolution grids. Int. J. Climatol. 25, 693–712 (2005).

  21. 21.

    Pfeffer, W. T. et al. The Randolph Glacier Inventory: a globally complete inventory of glaciers. J. Glaciol. 60, 537–552 (2014).

  22. 22.

    Zemp, M. et al. Historically unprecedented global glacier decline in the early 21st century. J. Glaciol. 61, 745–762 (2015).

  23. 23.

    Bahr, D. B., Dyurgerov, M. & Meier, M. F. Sea-level rise from glaciers and ice caps: a lower bound. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36, L03501 (2009).

  24. 24.

    Mernild, S. H., Lipscomb, W. H., Bahr, D. B., Radić, V. & Zemp, M. Global glacier retreat: a revised assessment of committed mass losses and sampling uncertainties. Cryosphere 7, 1565–1577 (2013).

  25. 25.

    Marzeion, B., Cogley, J. G., Richter, K. & Parkes, D. Attribution of global glacier mass loss to anthropogenic and natural causes. Science 345, 919–921 (2014).

  26. 26.

    Stocker, T et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. et al.) 33–115 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).

  27. 27.

    Marzeion, B., Jarosch, A. H. & Hofer, M. Past and future sea-level change from the surface mass balance of glaciers. Cryosphere 6, 1295–1322 (2012).

  28. 28.

    Giesen, R. H. & Oerlemans, J. Climate-model induced differences in the 21st century global and regional glacier contributions to sea-level rise. Clim. Dyn. 41, 3283–3300 (2013).

  29. 29.

    Bliss, A., Hock, R. & Radić, V. Global response of glacier runoff to twenty-first century climate change. J. Geophys. Res. 119, 717–730 (2014).

  30. 30.

    Huss, M. & Hock, R. A new model for global glacier change and sea-level rise. Front. Earth Sci. 3, 54 (2015).

  31. 31.

    Marzeion, B., Leclercq, P., Cogley, J. & Jarosch, A. Brief communication: global reconstructions of glacier mass change during the 20th century are consistent. Cryosphere 9, 2399–2404 (2015).

  32. 32.

    Ohmura, A. Physical basis for the temperature-based melt-index method. J. Appl. Meteorol. 40, 753–761 (2001).

  33. 33.

    Hock, R. Temperature index melt modelling in mountain areas. J. Hydrol. 282, 104–115 (2003).

  34. 34.

    Sicart, J., Hock, R. & Six, D. Glacier melt, air temperature, and energy balance in different climates: the Bolivian tropics, the French Alps, and northern Sweden. J. Geophys. Res. 113, D24113 (2008).

  35. 35.

    Bahr, D., Meier, M. & Peckham, S. The physical basis of glacier volume–area scaling. J. Geophys. Res. 102, 355–362 (1997).

  36. 36.

    Bahr, D. Global distributions of glacier properties: a stochastic scaling paradigm. Water Resour. Res. 33, 1669–1679 (1997).

  37. 37.

    Cogley, J. G. Geodetic and direct mass-balance measurements: comparison and joint analysis. Ann. Glaciol. 50, 96–100 (2009).

  38. 38.

    Fluctuations of Glaciers 2005–2010 (World Glacier Monitoring Service, 2012).

  39. 39.

    Morice, C. P., Kennedy, J. J., Rayner, N. A. & Jones, P. D. Quantifying uncertainties in global and regional temperature change using an ensemble of observational estimates: the HadCRUT4 data set. J. Geophys. Res. 117, D08101 (2012).

  40. 40.

    Andrews, T., Forster, P. M., Boucher, O., Bellouin, N. & Jones, A. Precipitation, radiative forcing and global temperature change. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, L14701 (2010).

  41. 41.

    Kraaijenbrink, P., Bierkens, M., Lutz, A. & Immerzeel, W. Impact of a global temperature rise of 1.5 degrees Celsius on Asia’s glaciers. Nature 549, 257–260 (2017).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (grant 01LS1602A) and German Research Foundation (grant MA 6966/1-1), and supported by the Austrian Federal Ministry of Science and Research as part of the UniInfrastrukturprogramm of the research platform Scientific Computing at the University of Innsbruck. We acknowledge the World Climate Research Programme’s Working Group on Coupled Modelling, which is responsible for the CMIP, and we thank the climate modelling groups (listed in Supplementary Table 1) for producing and making available their model output. For the CMIP, the US Department of Energy’s Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison provided coordinating support and led development of software infrastructure in partnership with the Global Organization for Earth System Science Portals. We thank R. Stauffer and A. Kreuter for help with the figure design.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Institute of Geography, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany

    • Ben Marzeion
    •  & Nicolas Champollion
  2. Department of Atmospheric and Cryospheric Sciences, Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria

    • Georg Kaser
    •  & Fabien Maussion

Authors

  1. Search for Ben Marzeion in:

  2. Search for Georg Kaser in:

  3. Search for Fabien Maussion in:

  4. Search for Nicolas Champollion in:

Contributions

B.M., G.K. and F.M. conceived the study and designed the experiments. B.M. performed the experiments and analysed the results. B.M. and N.C. wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ben Marzeion.

Supplementary information

  1. Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Table 1

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0093-1

Further reading