Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Global carbon stocks and potential emissions due to mangrove deforestation from 2000 to 2012

Abstract

Mangrove forests store high densities of organic carbon, which, when coupled with high rates of deforestation, means that mangroves have the potential to contribute substantially to carbon emissions. Consequently, mangroves are strong candidates for inclusion in nationally determined contributions (NDCs) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), and payments for ecosystem services (PES) programmes that financially incentivize the conservation of forested carbon stocks. This study quantifies annual mangrove carbon stocks from 2000 to 2012 at the global, national and sub-national levels, and global carbon emissions resulting from deforestation over the same time period. Globally, mangroves stored 4.19 Pg of carbon in 2012, with Indonesia, Brazil, Malaysia and Papua New Guinea accounting for more than 50% of the global stock. 2.96 Pg of the global carbon stock is contained within the soil and 1.23 Pg in the living biomass. Two percent of global mangrove carbon was lost between 2000 and 2012, equivalent to a maximum potential of 316,996,250 t of CO2 emissions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Global distribution of mangrove ecosystem carbon stocks per pool for 2012.
Fig. 2: Global mangrove carbon losses, 2000–2012.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. IPCC. Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability: Regional Aspects (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 2014).

  2. Donato, D. C. et al. Mangroves among the most carbon-rich forests in the tropics. Nat. Geosci. 4, 293–297 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hamilton, S. E. Assessing the role of commercial aquaculture in displacing mangrove forest. Bull. Mar. Sci. 89, 585–601 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hamilton, S. E. & Casey, D. Creation of a high spatio-temporal resolution global database of continuous mangrove forest cover for the 21st century (CGMFC-21). Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 25, 729–738 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. van Bochove, J.-W., Sullivan, E. & Nakamura, T. The Importance of Mangroves to People: A Call to Action (UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, UK, 2014).

  6. Richards, D. R. & Friess, D. A. Rates and drivers of mangrove deforestation in Southeast Asia, 2000–2012. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 344–349 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hamilton, S. E. & Lovette, J. Ecuador’s mangrove forest carbon stocks: a spatiotemporal analysis of living carbon holdings and their depletion since the advent of commercial aquaculture. PLoS One 10, e0118880 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lovelock, C. E. et al. The vulnerability of Indo-Pacific mangrove forests to sea-level rise. Nature 526, 559–563 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pendleton, L. et al. Estimating global 'blue carbon' emissions from conversion and degradation of vegetated coastal ecosystems. PLoS One 7, e43542 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Murdiyarso, D. et al. The potential of Indonesian mangrove forests for global climate change mitigation. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 1089–1092 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. UNFCCC. Adoption of the Paris Agreement, Proposal by the President, Draft decision -/CP.21, report no. FCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev.1 (United Nations, Paris, France, 2015).

  12. Hiraishi, T. et al. 2013 Supplement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories: Wetlands (IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 2014).

  13. Wunder, S. Revisiting the concept of payments for environmental services. Ecol. Econ. 117, 234–243 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mcleod, E. et al. A blueprint for blue carbon: toward an improved understanding of the role of vegetated coastal habitats in sequestering CO2. Front. Ecol. Environ. 9, 552–560 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sutton-Grier, A. E. & Moore, A. Leveraging carbon services of coastal ecosystems for habitat protection and restoration. Coast. Manag. 44, 259–277 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Thompson, B. S., Clubbe, C. P., Primavera, J. H., Curnick, D. & Koldewey, H. J. Locally assessing the economic viability of blue carbon: a case study from Panay Island, the Philippines. Ecosyst. Serv. 8, 128–140 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Friess, D. A. & Webb, E. L. Variability in mangrove change estimates and implications for the assessment of ecosystem service provision. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 23, 715–725 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Harris, N. L. et al. Baseline map of carbon emissions from deforestation in tropical regions. Science 336, 1573–1576 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Donato, D. C. Perspective and parsimony in forest carbon management. Carbon Manag. 3, 227–230 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. IPCC. The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, USA, 2013).

  21. Siikamäki, J., Sanchirico, J. N. & Jardine, S. L. Global economic potential for reducing carbon dioxide emissions from mangrove loss. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 109, 14369–14374 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lovelock, C. E., Fourqurean, J. W. & Morris, J. T. CO2 emissions from coastal wetland transitions to other land uses: tidal marshes, mangrove forests, and seagrass beds. Front. Mar. Sci 4, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2017.00143 (2017).

  23. Datta, D., Chattopadhyay, R. & Guha, P. Community based mangrove management: a review on status and sustainability. J. Environ. Manag. 107, 84–95 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. US EPA. Energy and the Environment: Greenhouse Gas Equivalencies Calculator https://www.epa.gov/energy/greenhouse-gas-equivalencies-calculator (2016).

  25. Breithaupt, J. L., Smoak, J. M., Smith, T. J., Sanders, C. J. & Hoare, A. Organic carbon burial rates in mangrove sediments: strengthening the global budget. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 26, GB3011 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chmura, G. L., Anisfeld, S. C., Cahoon, D. R. & Lynch, J. C. Global carbon sequestration in tidal, saline wetland soils. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 17, 1111 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jardine, S. L. & Siikamäki, J. V. A global predictive model of carbon in mangrove soils. Environ. Res. Lett. 9, 104013 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Atwood, T. B. et al. Global patterns in mangrove soil carbon stocks and losses. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 523–528 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Tong, L.-I., Chang, C.-W., Jin, S.-E. & Saminathan, R. Quantifying uncertainty of emission estimates in National Greenhouse Gas Inventories using bootstrap confidence intervals. Atmos. Environ. 56, 80–87 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. IPCC. 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, New York, USA, 2006).

  31. Harris, N. Global Forest Watch Climate: Summary of Methods and Data (2016); http://climate.globalforestwatch.org/downloads/about/technical-note/wri15_TECH_GFW-Climate-v3.pdf

  32. Angelsen, A. Moving Ahead with REDD: Issues, Options and Implications (Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia, 2008).

  33. Friess, D. A. et al. Policy challenges and approaches for the conservation of mangrove forests in Southeast Asia. Conserv. Biol. 30, 933–949 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Huettner, M., Leemans, R., Kok, K. & Ebeling, J. A comparison of baseline methodologies for ‘Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation’. Carbon Balance Manag. 4, 4 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sloan, S. & Pelletier, J. How accurately may we project tropical forest-cover change? A validation of a forward-looking baseline for REDD. Glob. Environ. Change 22, 440–453 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hansen, M. C. et al. High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science 342, 850–853 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Giri, C. et al. Status and distribution of mangrove forests of the world using Earth observation satellite data. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 20, 154–159 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Olson, D. M. et al. Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on Earth. BioScience 51, 933–938 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Twilley, R. R., Chen, R. H. & Hargis, T. Carbon sinks in mangroves and their implications to carbon budget of tropical coastal ecosystems. Water Air Soil Pollut. 64, 265–288 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Hutchison, J., Manica, A., Swetnam, R., Balmford, A. & Spalding, M. Predicting global patterns in mangrove forest biomass. Conserv. Lett. 7, 233–240 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hamilton, S. E., Lovette, J. P., Borbor-Cordova, M. J. & Millones, M. The carbon holdings of northern Ecuador’s mangrove forests. Ann. Am. Assoc. Geogr. 107, 54–71 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Saenger, P. & Snedaker, S. C. Pantropical trends in mangrove aboveground biomass and annual litterfall. Oecologia 96, 293–299 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Hijmans, R. J., Cameron, S. E., Parra, J. L., Jones, P. G. & Jarvis, A. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 25, 1965–1978 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Kauffman, J. B. & Donato, D. Protocols for the Measurement, Monitoring and Reporting of Structure, Biomass and Carbon Stocks in Mangrove Forests (Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia, 2012).

  45. Komiyama, A., Sasitorn, P. & Shogo, K. Common allometric equations for estimating the tree weight of mangroves. J. Trop. Ecol. 21, 471–477 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Komiyama, A., Ong, J. E. & Poungparn, S. Allometry, biomass, and productivity of mangrove forests: a review. Aquat. Bot. 89, 128–137 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Kauffman, J. B., Heider, C., Cole, T. G., Dwire, K. A. & Donato, D. C. Ecosystem carbon stocks of Micronesian mangrove forests. Wetlands 31, 343–352 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Alongi, D. M. Carbon sequestration in mangrove forests. Carbon Manag. 3, 313–322 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Caruana, R. & Niculescu-Mizil, A. An empirical comparison of supervised learning algorithms. Proc. 23rd Int. Conf. Machine Learning 161–168 (2006).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study benefited from access to some pre-existing remote sensing and modelling data sets, particularly the Global Forest Cover data set from the University of Maryland.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.E.H. developed the equations, designed the study and carried out the analysis. S.E.H. wrote the Methods section and created the figures and tables. D.A.F. designed the framework for the paper and wrote the majority of the main text apart from the Methods.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stuart E. Hamilton.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures 1–2, Error and Uncertainty Analysis, Supplementary Discussion, Supplementary Tables 3–5 and Supplementary References

Supplementary Table 1

Extends Table 1 in the manuscript to all 105 mangrove-holding level one administrative units globally

Supplementary Table 2

Extends Table 2 in the manuscript to all 752 mangrove-holding level one administrative units globally

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hamilton, S.E., Friess, D.A. Global carbon stocks and potential emissions due to mangrove deforestation from 2000 to 2012. Nature Clim Change 8, 240–244 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0090-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0090-4

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing