Dynamical processes in the atmosphere and ocean are central to determining the large-scale drivers of regional climate change, yet their predictive understanding is poor. Here, we identify three frontline challenges in climate dynamics where significant progress can be made to inform adaptation: response of storms, blocks and jet streams to external forcing; basin-to-basin and tropical–extratropical teleconnections; and the development of non-linear predictive theory. We highlight opportunities and techniques for making immediate progress in these areas, which critically involve the development of high-resolution coupled model simulations, partial coupling or pacemaker experiments, as well as the development and use of dynamical metrics and exploitation of hierarchies of models.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1.

    Bjerknes, J. Atlantic air-sea interaction. Adv. Geophys. 20, 1–84 (1964).

  2. 2.

    Bauer, P., Thorpe, A. & Brunet, G. The quiet revolution of numerical weather prediction. Nature 525, 47–55 (2015).

  3. 3.

    Meehl, G. et al. Decadal climate prediction: An update from the trenches. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 95, 243–267 (2014).

  4. 4.

    Andrews, T., Gregory, J., Webb, M. & Taylor, K. Forcing, feedbacks and climate sensitivity in CMIP5 coupled atmosphere–ocean climate models. Geophys. Res. Lett. http://doi.org/chpc (2012).

  5. 5.

    Feldl, N. & Bordoni, S. Characterizing the Hadley circulation response through regional climate feedbacks. J. Clim. 29, 613–622 (2016).

  6. 6.

    Shepherd, T. Atmospheric circulation as a source of uncertainty in climate change projections. Nat. Geosci. 7, 703–708 (2014).

  7. 7.

    Deser, C., Phillips, A., Bourdette, V. & Teng, H. Uncertainty in climate change projections: the role of internal variability. Clim. Dynam. 38, 527–546 (2012).

  8. 8.

    Collins, M. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) 1029–1136 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).

  9. 9.

    Masato, G., Woollings, T. & Hoskins, B. Structure and impact of atmospheric blocking over the Euro-Atlantic region in present-day and future simulations. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 1051–1058 (2014).

  10. 10.

    Zhang, X., Zwiers, F., Li, G., Wan, H. & Cannon, A. Complexity in estimating past and future extreme short-duration rainfall. Nat. Geosci. 10, 255–259 (2017).

  11. 11.

    van der Wiel, K. et al. The resolution dependence of contiguous US precipitation extremes in response to CO2 forcing. J. Clim. 29, 7991–8012 (2016).

  12. 12.

    Woollings, T., Gregory, J., Pinto, J., Reyers, M. & Brayshaw, D. Response of the North Atlantic storm track to climate change shaped by ocean–atmosphere coupling. Nat. Geosci. 5, 313–317 (2012).

  13. 13.

    Butler, A., Thompson, D. & Heikes, R. The steady-state atmospheric circulation response to climate change-like thermal forcings in a simple general circulation model. J. Clim. 23, 3474–3496 (2010).

  14. 14.

    Scaife, A. et al. Climate change projections and stratosphere-troposphere interaction. Clim. Dynam. 38, 2089–2097 (2012).

  15. 15.

    Manzini, E. et al. Northern winter climate change: Assessment of uncertainty in CMIP5 projections related to stratosphere-troposphere coupling. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 119, 7979–7998 (2014).

  16. 16.

    Li, M., Woollings, T., Hodges, K. & Masato, G. Extratropical cyclones in a warmer, moister climate: A recent Atlantic analogue. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 8594–8601 (2014).

  17. 17.

    Zappa, G., Shaffrey, L. C., Hodges, K. I., Sansom, P. G. & Stephenson, D. B. A multimodel assessment of future projections of North Atlantic and European extratropical cyclones in the CMIP5 climate models. J. Clim. 26, 5846–5862 (2013).

  18. 18.

    de Vries, H., Woollings, T., Anstey, J., Haarsma, R. & Hazeleger, W. Atmospheric blocking and its relation to jet changes in a future climate. Clim. Dynam. 41, 2643–2654 (2013).

  19. 19.

    Shaw, T. et al. Storm track processes and the opposing influences of climate change. Nat. Geosci. 9, 656–664 (2016).

  20. 20.

    Lehmann, J., Coumou, D., Frieler, K., Eliseev, A. & Levermann, A. Future changes in extratropical storm tracks and baroclinicity under climate change. Environ. Res. Lett. 9, 084002 (2014).

  21. 21.

    Swart, N., Fyfe, J., Gillett, N. & Marshall, G. Comparing trends in the southern annular mode and surface westerly jet. J. Clim. 28, 8840–8859 (2015).

  22. 22.

    Barnes, E. & Screen, J. The impact of Arctic warming on the midlatitude jet-stream: Can it? Has it? Will it? Wiley Inter. Rev. Clim. Chang. 6, 277–286 (2015).

  23. 23.

    Semmler, T. et al. Seasonal atmospheric responses to reduced Arctic sea ice in an ensemble of coupled model Simulations. J. Clim. 29, 5893–5913 (2016).

  24. 24.

    Barnes, E. & Polvani, L. CMIP5 Projections of Arctic amplification, of the North American/North Atlantic circulation, and of their relationship. J. Clim. 28, 5254–5271 (2015).

  25. 25.

    Deser, C., Tomas, R. & Sun, L. The role of ocean–atmosphere coupling in the zonal-mean atmospheric response to Arctic sea ice loss. J. Clim. 28, 2168–2186 (2015).

  26. 26.

    Francis, J. & Vavrus, S. Evidence linking Arctic amplification to extreme weather in mid-latitudes. Geophys. Res. Lett. http://doi.org/hq3 (2012).

  27. 27.

    England, M. et al. Recent intensification of wind-driven circulation in the Pacific and the ongoing warming hiatus. Nat. Clim. Chang. 4, 222–227 (2014).

  28. 28.

    Kosaka, Y. & Xie, S. Recent global-warming hiatus tied to equatorial Pacific surface cooling. Nature 501, 403–407 (2013).

  29. 29.

    Meehl, G. A., Hu, A., Arblaster, J., Fasullo, J. & Trenberth, K. E. Externally forced and internally generated decadal climate variability associated with the Interdecadal Pacific Oscillation. J. Clim. 26, 7298–7310 (2013).

  30. 30.

    Kucharski, F., Kang, I., Farneti, R. & Feudale, L. Tropical Pacific response to 20th century Atlantic warming. Geophys. Res. Lett. http://doi.org/dgcp47 (2011).

  31. 31.

    Li, X., Xie, S., Gille, S. & Yoo, C. Atlantic-induced pan-tropical climate change over the past three decades. Nat. Clim. Chang. 6, 275–279 (2016).

  32. 32.

    McGregor, S. et al. Recent Walker circulation strengthening and Pacific cooling amplified by Atlantic warming. Nat. Clim. Chang. 4, 888–892 (2014).

  33. 33.

    Han, W. et al. Intensification of decadal and multi-decadal sea level variability in the western tropical Pacific during recent decades. Clim. Dynam. 43, 1357–1379 (2014).

  34. 34.

    Booth, B., Dunstone, N., Halloran, P., Andrews, T. & Bellouin, N. Aerosols implicated as a prime driver of twentieth-century North Atlantic climate variability. Nature 485, 534–534 (2012).

  35. 35.

    Clement, A. et al. The Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation without a role for ocean circulation. Science 350, 320–324 (2015).

  36. 36.

    Zhang, R. et al. Have aerosols caused the observed Atlantic multidecadal variability? J. Atmos. Sci. 70, 1135–1144 (2013).

  37. 37.

    Zhang, R. et al. Comment on “The Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation without a role for ocean circulation”. Science 352, 1527 (2016).

  38. 38.

    Gulev, S., Latif, M., Keenlyside, N., Park, W. & Koltermann, K. North Atlantic Ocean control on surface heat flux on multidecadal timescales. Nature 499, 464–467 (2013).

  39. 39.

    Li, C., Stevens, B. & Marotzke, J. Eurasian winter cooling in the warming hiatus of 1998–2012. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 8131–8139 (2015).

  40. 40.

    Deser, C., Guo, R. & Lehner, F. The relative contributions of tropical Pacific sea surface temperatures and atmospheric internal variability to the recent global warming hiatus. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 7945–7954 (2017).

  41. 41.

    Kajtar, J. B., Santoso, A., McGregor, S., England, M. & Baillie, Z. Model under-representation of decadal Pacific trade wind trends and its link to tropical Atlantic bias. Clim. Dynam. http://doi.org/chph (2017).

  42. 42.

    Holland, P. & Kwok, R. Wind-driven trends in Antarctic sea-ice drift. Nat. Geosci. 5, 872–875 (2012).

  43. 43.

    Simpkins, G., McGregor, S., Taschetto, A., Ciasto, L. & England, M. Tropical connections to climatic change in the extratropical Southern Hemisphere: the role of Atlantic SST trends. J. Clim. 27, 4923–4936 (2014).

  44. 44.

    Purich, A. et al. Tropical Pacific SST drivers of recent Antarctic sea ice trends. J. Clim. 29, 8931–8948 (2016).

  45. 45.

    Ding, Q., Steig, E., Battisti, D. & Kuttel, M. Winter warming in West Antarctica caused by central tropical Pacific warming. Nat. Geosci. 4, 398–403 (2011).

  46. 46.

    Ciasto, L., Simpkins, G. & England, M. Teleconnections between Tropical Pacific SST anomalies and extratropical Southern Hemisphere climate. J. Clim. 28, 56–65 (2015).

  47. 47.

    Meehl, G., Hu, A., Santer, B. & Xie, S. Contribution of the Interdecadal Pacific Oscillation to twentieth-century global surface temperature trends. Nat. Clim. Chang. 6, 1005–1008 (2016).

  48. 48.

    Li, X., Holland, D., Gerber, E. & Yoo, C. Impacts of the north and tropical Atlantic Ocean on the Antarctic Peninsula and sea ice. Nature 505, 538–542 (2014).

  49. 49.

    Talento, S. & Barriero, M. Control of the South Atlantic Convergence Zone by extratropical thermal forcing. Clim. Dynam. http://doi.org/chpj (2017).

  50. 50.

    Hwang, Y.-T., Xie, S.-P., Deser, C. & Kang, S., M. Connecting tropical climate change with Southern Ocean heat uptake. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 9449–9457 (2017).

  51. 51.

    Roemmich, D. et al. Unabated planetary warming and its ocean structure since 2006. Nat. Clim. Chang. 5, 240–245 (2015).

  52. 52.

    Bodas-Salcedo, A. et al. Large contribution of supercooled liquid clouds to the solar radiation budget of the Southern Ocean. J. Clim. 29, 4213–4228 (2016).

  53. 53.

    Hawcroft, M. et al. Southern Ocean albedo, inter-hemispheric energy transports and the double ITCZ: global impacts of biases in a coupled model. Clim. Dynam. 48, 2279–2295 (2017).

  54. 54.

    Jin, F., Kim, S. & Bejarano, L. A coupled-stability index for ENSO. Geophys. Res. Lett. http://doi.org/c22zdv (2006).

  55. 55.

    Dommenget, D. & Latif, M. A cautionary note on the interpretation of EOFs. J. Clim. 15, 216–225 (2002).

  56. 56.

    Monahan, A., Fyfe, J., Ambaum, M., Stephenson, D. & North, G. Empirical orthogonal functions: The medium is the message. J. Clim. 22, 6501–6514 (2009).

  57. 57.

    Barsugli, J. & Battisti, D. The basic effects of atmosphere–ocean thermal coupling on midlatitude variability. J. Atmos. Sci. 55, 477–493 (1998).

  58. 58.

    Barreiro, M. Influence of ENSO and the South Atlantic Ocean on climate predictability over Southeastern South America. Clim. Dynam. 35, 1493–1508 (2010).

  59. 59.

    Minobe, S., Kuwano-Yoshida, A., Komori, N., Xie, S. & Small, R. Influence of the Gulf Stream on the troposphere. Nature 452, 206–251 (2008).

  60. 60.

    Nakamura, H., Sampe, T., Tanimoto, Y. & Shimpo, A. in Earth’s Climate: The Atmosphere–Ocean Interaction. (eds Wang, C. et al.) (American Geophysical Union, 2004).

  61. 61.

    Ma, X. et al. Western boundary currents regulated by interaction between ocean eddies and the atmosphere. Nature 535, 533–537 (2016).

  62. 62.

    O’Reilly, C. H., Minobe, S. & Kuwano-Yoshida, A. The influence of the Gulf Stream on wintertime European blocking. Clim. Dynam. 47, 1545–1567 (2016).

  63. 63.

    O’Reilly, C. H., Minobe, S., Kuwano-Yoshida, A. & Woollings, T. The Gulf Stream influence on wintertime North Atlantic jet variability. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 143, 173–183 (2016).

  64. 64.

    Pfahl, S., Schwierz, C., Croci-Maspoli, M., Grams, C. & Wernli, H. Importance of latent heat release in ascending air streams for atmospheric blocking. Nat. Geosci. 8, 610–614 (2015).

  65. 65.

    Kuwano-Yoshida, A. & Minobe, S. Storm-track response to SST fronts in the Northwestern Pacific region in an AGCM. J. Clim. 30, 1081–1102 (2017).

  66. 66.

    Ma, X. et al. Winter extreme flux events in the Kuroshio and Gulf Stream extension regions and relationship with modes of North Pacific and Atlantic variability. J. Clim. 28, 4950–4970 (2015).

  67. 67.

    Shaffrey, L. et al. UK HiGEM: The new UK high-resolution global environment model — model description and basic evaluation. J. Clim. 22, 1861–1896 (2009).

  68. 68.

    Masson, S. et al. Impact of intra-daily SST variability on ENSO characteristics in a coupled model. Clim. Dynam. 39, 681–707 (2012).

  69. 69.

    Cai, W. et al. Increasing frequency of extreme El Nino events due to greenhouse warming. Nat. Clim. Chang. 4, 111–116 (2014).

  70. 70.

    Cai, W. et al. Increased frequency of extreme La Nina events under greenhouse warming. Nat. Clim. Chang. 5, 132–137 (2015).

  71. 71.

    Latif, M., Semenov, V. & Park, W. Super El Ninos in response to global warming in a climate model. Clim. Chang. 132, 489–500 (2015).

  72. 72.

    Power, S., Delage, F., Chung, C., Kociuba, G. & Keay, K. Robust twenty-first-century projections of El Nino and related precipitation variability. Nature 502, 541–545 (2013).

  73. 73.

    Xie, S.-P. et al. Towards predictive understanding of regional climate change. Nat. Clim. Chang. 5, 921–930 (2015).

  74. 74.

    Ferrett, S., Collins, M. & Ren, H.-L. Understanding bias in the evaporative damping of El Nino-Southern Oscillation events in CMIP5 Models. J. Clim. 30, 6351–6370 (2017).

  75. 75.

    Small, R. et al. A new synoptic scale resolving global climate simulation using the Community Earth System Model. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 6, 1065–1094 (2014).

  76. 76.

    Haarsma, R. et al. High resolution model intercomparison project (HighResMIP v1.0) for CMIP6. Geosci. Model. Dev. 9, 4185–4208 (2016).

  77. 77.

    Kendon, E. et al. Heavier summer downpours with climate change revealed by weather forecast resolution model. Nat. Clim. Chang. 4, 570–576 (2014).

  78. 78.

    Brisson, E. et al. How well can a convection-permitting climate model reproduce decadal statistics of precipitation, temperature and cloud characteristics? Clim. Dynam. 47, 3043–3061 (2016).

  79. 79.

    Alexander, M. et al. The atmospheric bridge: The influence of ENSO teleconnections on air–sea interaction over the global oceans. J. Clim. 15, 2205–2231 (2002).

  80. 80.

    Chikamoto, Y. et al. Skilful multi-year predictions of tropical trans-basin climate variability. Nat. Commun. 6, 6869 (2015).

  81. 81.

    Sutton, R. & Mathieu, P. Response of the atmosphere-ocean mixed-layer system to anomalous ocean heat-flux convergence. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 128, 1259–1275 (2002).

  82. 82.

    Kwon, Y., Deser, C. & Cassou, C. Coupled atmosphere-mixed layer ocean response to ocean heat flux convergence along the Kuroshio Current Extension. Clim. Dynam. 36, 2295–2312 (2011).

  83. 83.

    Ding, H. et al. The variability of the East Asian summer monsoon and its relationship to ENSO in a partially coupled climate model. Clim. Dynam. 42, 367–379 (2014).

  84. 84.

    Boer, G. et al. The Decadal Climate Prediction Project (DCPP) contribution to CMIP6. Geosci. Model. Dev. 9, 3751–3777 (2016).

  85. 85.

    Frierson, D. & Hwang, Y. Extratropical influence on ITCZ shifts in slab ocean simulations of global warming. J. Clim. 25, 720–733 (2012).

  86. 86.

    Haywood, J. et al. The impact of equilibrating hemispheric albedos on tropical performance in the HadGEM2-ES coupled climate model. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 395–403 (2016).

  87. 87.

    Gleckler, P. et al. A more powerful reality test for climate models. EOS http://doi.org/chpp (2016).

  88. 88.

    Bordoni, S. & Schneider, T. Monsoons as eddy-mediated regime transitions of the tropical overturning circulation. Nat. Geosci. 1, 515–519 (2008).

  89. 89.

    Tamarin, T. & Kaspi, Y. The poleward motion of extratropical cyclones from a potential vorticity tendency analysis. J. Atmos. Sci. 73, 1687–1707 (2016).

  90. 90.

    Simpson, I., Seager, R., Ting, M. & Shaw, T. Causes of change in Northern Hemisphere winter meridional winds and regional hydroclimate. Nat. Clim. Chang. 6, 65–70 (2016).

  91. 91.

    Kaspi, Y. & Schneider, T. Winter cold of eastern continental boundaries induced by warm ocean waters. Nature 471, 621–624 (2011).

  92. 92.

    Collins, M. et al. Quantifying future climate change. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2, 403–409 (2012).

  93. 93.

    Farneti, R. & Vallis, G. Meridional energy transport in the coupled atmosphere–ocean system: compensation and partitioning. J. Clim. 26, 7151–7166 (2013).

  94. 94.

    Held, I. & Saurez, M. A proposal for the intercomparison of the dynamical cores of atmospheric general-circulation models. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 75, 1825–1830 (1994).

  95. 95.

    Frierson, D., Held, I. & Zurita-Gotor, P. A gray-radiation aquaplanet moist GCM. Part I: Static stability and eddy scale. J. Atmos. Sci. 63, 2548–2566 (2006).

  96. 96.

    Medeiros, B., Stevens, B. & Bony, S. Using aquaplanets to understand the robust responses of comprehensive climate models to forcing. Clim. Dynam. 44, 1957–1977 (2015).

  97. 97.

    Chemke, R. & Kaspi, Y. Poleward migration of eddy-driven jets. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 7, 1457–1471 (2015).

  98. 98.

    Yuval, J. & Kaspi, Y. The effect of vertical baroclinicity concentration on atmospheric macroturbulence scaling relations. J. Atmos. Sci. 74, 1651–1667 (2017).

  99. 99.

    Yuval, J. & Kaspi, Y. Eddy activity sensitivity to changes in the vertical structure of baroclinicity. J. Atmos. Sci. 73, 1709–1726 (2016).

  100. 100.

    Tamarin, T. & Kaspi, Y. Enhanced poleward propagation of storms under climate change. Nat. Geosci. 10, 908–913 (2017).

  101. 101.

    Walker, J., Bordoni, S. & Schneider, T. Interannual variability in the large-scale dynamics of the South Asian summer monsoon. J. Clim. 28, 3731–3750 (2015).

  102. 102.

    Sperber, K. et al. The Asian summer monsoon: an intercomparison of CMIP5 vs. CMIP3 simulations of the late 20th century. Clim. Dynam. 41, 2711–2744 (2013).

  103. 103.

    Levine, R., Turner, A., Marathayil, D. & Martin, G. The role of northern Arabian Sea surface temperature biases in CMIP5 model simulations and future projections of Indian summer monsoon rainfall. Clim. Dynam. 41, 155–172 (2013).

  104. 104.

    Held, I. & Soden, B. Robust responses of the hydrological cycle to global warming. J. Clim. 19, 5686–5699 (2006).

Download references


We acknowledge the support of CLIVAR in setting up the Climate Dynamics Panel and their travel support for hosting panel meetings. M.C. and S.M. conceived the paper and also co-chair the CLIVAR Climate Dynamics Panel. All other authors contributed to the writing. C.O.R. produced Fig. 2 and M.C. acknowledges support from NERC NE/N018486/1. N.K. acknowledges support from the ERC (grant 648982).

Author information


  1. College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK

    • Matthew Collins
  2. Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan

    • Shoshiro Minobe
  3. Departamento de Ciencias de la Atmósfera, Facultad de Ciencias — Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay

    • Marcelo Barreiro
  4. California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, USA

    • Simona Bordoni
  5. Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel

    • Yohai Kaspi
  6. Shirahama Oceanographic Observatory, Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University, Shirahama, Japan

    • Akira Kuwano-Yoshida
  7. Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen and Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research, Bergen, Norway

    • Noel Keenlyside
  8. Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie, Hamburg, Germany

    • Elisa Manzini
  9. Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

    • Christopher H. O’Reilly
  10. National Centre for Atmospheric Science, Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Earley Gate, Reading, UK

    • Rowan Sutton
  11. Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, USA

    • Shang-Ping Xie
  12. L’Institut des Géosciences de l’Environnement, L’Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France

    • Olga Zolina
  13. Shirshov Institute of Oceanology, RAS, Moscow, Russia

    • Olga Zolina


  1. Search for Matthew Collins in:

  2. Search for Shoshiro Minobe in:

  3. Search for Marcelo Barreiro in:

  4. Search for Simona Bordoni in:

  5. Search for Yohai Kaspi in:

  6. Search for Akira Kuwano-Yoshida in:

  7. Search for Noel Keenlyside in:

  8. Search for Elisa Manzini in:

  9. Search for Christopher H. O’Reilly in:

  10. Search for Rowan Sutton in:

  11. Search for Shang-Ping Xie in:

  12. Search for Olga Zolina in:

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew Collins.

About this article

Publication history






Further reading