Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Perspective
  • Published:

Short-lived climate pollutant mitigation and the Sustainable Development Goals

Nature Climate Change volume 7, pages 863–869 (2017)Cite this article

Subjects

An Author Correction to this article was published on 22 February 2018

This article has been updated

Abstract

The post-2015 development agenda is dominated by a set of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) that arose from the 2012 Rio+20 United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development. The 17 goals and 169 targets address diverse and intersecting aspects of human and environmental needs and challenges. Achieving the SDGs by 2030 requires implementing coordinated and concerted strategies and actions that minimize potential trade-offs and conflicts and maximize synergies to contribute to multiple SDGs. Measures to mitigate emissions of short-lived climate pollutants are an example of actions that contribute to multiple outcomes relevant to development. This Perspective highlights the interlinkages between these pollutants and the SDGs, and shows that implementing emissions reduction measures can contribute to achieving many of the SDGs.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Estimated annual benefits by 2030 from SLCP mitigation.

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 22 February 2018

    In the version of this Perspective originally published, Fig. 1 incorrectly had two entries of ‘Reduced rate of sea-level rise by 20% by 2050’; the first entry (row 2, column 3) should instead have read ‘Reduced disruption of weather patterns’. This has now been corrected in the online versions of the Perspective.

References

  1. Rogelj, J. et al. Energy system transformations for limiting end-of-century warming to below 1.5 °C. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 519–527 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shindell, D. T. et al. A climate policy pathway for near- and long-term benefits. Science 356, 493–494 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Xu, Y. & Ramanathan, V. Well below 2 °C: Mitigation strategies for avoiding dangerous to catastrophic climate changes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 10315–10323 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Integrated Assessment of Black Carbon and Tropospheric Ozone (UNEP, Nairobi, WMO, Geneva, 2011).

  5. Shindell, D. et al. Simultaneously mitigating near-term climate change and improving human health and food security. Science 335, 183–189 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Xu, Y., Zaelke, D., Velders, G. J. M. & Ramanathan, V. The role of HFCs in mitigating 21st century climate change. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13, 6083–6089 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Carvalho, S., Andersen, S. O., Brack, D., & Sherman, N. J. Alternative to High-GWP Hydrofluorocarbons (Institute for Governance & Sustainable Development, 2015).

  8. Lam, N. L. et al. Household light makes global heat: high black carbon emissions from kerosene wick lamps. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 13531–13538 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Reducing Global Health Risks through Mitigation of Short-Lived Climate Pollutants (CCAC, Paris, WHO, Geneva, 2015).

  10. AMAP Assessment 2015: Black Carbon and Ozone as Arctic Climate Forcers (AMAP, Oslo, 2015).

  11. Nilsson, M., Griggs, D. & Visbeck, M. Policy: Map the interactions between Sustainable Development Goals. Nature 534, 320–322 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Spreading the Net: the Multiple Benefits of Energy Efficiency Improvements (IEA, Paris, 2012).

  13. Avery, S., Mauzerall, D. L., Liu, J. & Horowitz, L. W. Global crop yield reductions due to surface ozone exposure: 1. Year 2000 crop production losses and economic damage. Atmos. Environ 45, 2284–2296 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hayes, F. et al. Consistent ozone-induced decreases in pasture forage quality across several grassland types and consequences for UK lamb production. Sci. Total Environ 543, 336–346 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Broberg, M. C., Feng, Z., Xin, Y. & Pleijel, H. Ozone effects on wheat grain quality—a summary. Environ. Pollution 197, 203–213 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kang, Y., Khan, S. & Xiaoyi, M. Climate change impacts on crop yield, crop water productivity and food security—a review. Prog. Nat. Sci. 19, 1665–1674 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shindell, D. Crop yield changes induced by emissions of individual climate-altering pollutants. Earth’s Future 4, 373–380 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Forouzanfar, M. H. et al. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks in 188 countries, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 386, 2287–2323 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Burden of Disease from Ambient and Household Air Pollution (WHO, Geneva, 2016).

  20. World Energy Outlook 2016 Special Report Energy and Air Pollution (IEA, Paris, 2016).

  21. Burning Opportunity: Clean Household Energy for Health, Sustainable Development, and Wellbeing of Women and Children (WHO, Geneva, 2016).

  22. Aleksandrowicz, L., Green, R., Joy, E. J. M., Smith, P. & Haines, A. The impacts of dietary change on greenhouse gas emissions, land use, water use, and health: a systematic review. PLoS ONE 11, e0165797 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Barnes, D. F., Samad, H. & Banerjee, S. G. In Energy Poverty Global Challenges and Local Solutions (eds Halff, A., Sovacoal, B. K. & Rozhon, J.) (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2014).

  24. Mills, E. The specter of fuel-based lighting. Science 308, 1263–1264 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Evaluation of the Dadaab Firewood Project, Kenya (UNHCR, Geneva, 2001).

  26. The United Nations World Water Development Report 2016: Water and Jobs (UNESCO, Paris, WWAP, Paris, 2016).

  27. Reid, M. C., Guan, K., Wagner, F. & Mauzerall, D. L. Global methane emissions from pit latrines. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 8727–8734 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Stohl, A. et al. Evaluating the climate and air quality impacts of short-lived pollutants. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 15, 10529–10566 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Yang, Y. et al. Mechanisms contributing to suppressed precipitation in Mt. Hua of Central China. Part I: Mountain valley circulation. J. Atmos. Sci. 73, 1351–1366 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Larsen, K., Delgado, M. & Marsters, P. Untapped Potential Reducing Global Methane Emissions from Oil and Natural Gas Systems (Rhodium Group, New York, 2015).

  31. Shah, N., Wei, M., Letschert, V. E. & Phadke, A. A. Benefits of Leapfrogging to Superefficiency and Low Global Warming Potential Refrigerants in Room Air Conditioning (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, 2015).

  32. Greentech Knowledge Solutions et al. Performance Assessment: A Roadmap for Cleaner Brick Production in India (2012).

  33. Low-GWP Alternatives in Commercial Refrigeration: Propane, CO 2 and HFO Case Studies (UNEP, Nairobi, CCAC, Paris 2014).

  34. Kemna, R. & Kemma, B. V. Ecodesign Impact Accounting: Part 1 (VHK, Delft, 2014).

  35. Shankar, A. et al. Maximizing the benefits of improved cookstoves: moving from acquisition to correct and consistent use. Glob. Health Sci. Pract 2, 268–274 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Karacan, C. Ö., Ruiz, F. A., Cote, M. & Phipps, S. Coal mine methane: A review of capture and utilisation practices with benefits to mining safety and to greenhouse gas reduction. Int. J. Coal Geol. 86, 121–156 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Hu, A., Xu, Y., Tebaldi, C., Washington, W. M. & Ramanathan, V. Mitigation of short-lived climate pollutants slows sea-level rise. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 730–734 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. WHO Global Urban Ambient Air Pollution Database (WHO, accessed 31 October 2017).

  39. IPCC Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2012).

  40. Fan, J. et al. Substantial contribution of anthropogenic air pollution to catastrophic floods in Southwest China. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 6066–6075 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Shepherd, A. et al. The Geography of Poverty, Disasters and Climate Extremes in 2030 (Overseas Development Institute, London, 2013).

  42. Cookstoves and REDD+ Understanding Woodfuel’s Impact on Tropical Forests (GACC, Washington DC, 2014).

  43. Hosonuma, N. et al. An assessment of deforestation and forest degradation drivers in developing countries. Environ. Res. Lett. 7, 4009 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Science (Climate and Clean Air Coalition, accessed 28 September 2017); http://www.ccacoalition.org/en/science-resources.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are members of the Scientific Advisory Panel of the CCAC, S.L. is the former Secretary of the SAP, and N.B.P. is the Science Affairs Officer of the CCAC.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Social and Environmental Health Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK

    Andy Haines

  2. Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK

    Andy Haines

  3. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria

    Markus Amann

  4. Climate and Clean Air Coalition, United Nations Environment, Paris, France

    Nathan Borgford-Parnell

  5. Climate and Clean Air Coalition, United Nations Environment, Paris, France

    Sunday Leonard

  6. Stockholm Environment Institute, Environment Department, University of York, York, UK

    Johan Kuylenstierna

  7. Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA

    Drew Shindell

Authors
  1. Andy Haines
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Markus Amann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nathan Borgford-Parnell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sunday Leonard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Johan Kuylenstierna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Drew Shindell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

A.H. had the original idea for the paper and coordinated the drafting process. All authors contributed to the drafting and approved the final draft for submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andy Haines.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

A correction to this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0073-5.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Haines, A., Amann, M., Borgford-Parnell, N. et al. Short-lived climate pollutant mitigation and the Sustainable Development Goals. Nature Clim Change 7, 863–869 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-017-0012-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-017-0012-x

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene