Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Balancing volumetric and gravimetric capacity for hydrogen in supramolecular crystals

Abstract

The storage of hydrogen is key to its applications. Developing adsorbent materials with high volumetric and gravimetric storage capacities, both of which are essential for the efficient use of hydrogen as a fuel, is challenging. Here we report a controlled catenation strategy in hydrogen-bonded organic frameworks (RP-H100 and RP-H101) that depends on multiple hydrogen bonds to guide catenation in a point-contact manner, resulting in high volumetric and gravimetric surface areas, robustness and ideal pore diameters (~1.2–1.9 nm) for hydrogen storage. This approach involves assembling nine imidazole-annulated triptycene hexaacids into a secondary hexagonal superstructure containing three open channels through which seven of the hexagons interpenetrate to form a seven-fold catenated superstructure. RP-H101 exhibits high deliverable volumetric (53.7 g l−1) and gravimetric (9.3 wt%) capacities for hydrogen under a combined temperature and pressure swing (77 K/100 bar → 160 K/5 bar). This work illustrates the virtues of supramolecular crystals as promising candidates for hydrogen storage.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Catenation analysis and crystal superstructures of RP-H100 and RP-H101.
Fig. 2: Interpenetration analysis of RP-H100 and RP-H101.
Fig. 3: Stability analysis of RP-H101.
Fig. 4: Porosity characterization and trade-off properties of RP-H100 and RP-H101.
Fig. 5: High-pressure H2 storage capacity of RP-H100 and RP-H101.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data supporting the findings of this investigation are available from the paper and its Supplementary Information. Crystallographic data for the structures reported in this article have been deposited at the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, under deposition nos. CCDC 2298776 (RP-H100) and 2298777 (RP-H101). Copies of the data can be obtained free of charge via https://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/structures/. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Target Explanation Document: Onboard Hydrogen Storage for Light-duty Fuel Cell Vehicles (US DOE, 2014); https://www.energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/downloads/target-explanation-document-onboard-hydrogen-storage-light-duty-fuel-cell

  2. Rosi, N. L. et al. Hydrogen storage in microporous metal–organic frameworks. Science 300, 1127–1129 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Murray, L. J., Dincă, M. & Long, J. R. Hydrogen storage in metal–organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 38, 1294–1314 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sculley, J., Yuan, D. & Zhou, H.-C. The current status of hydrogen storage in metal–organic frameworks—updated. Energy Environ. Sci. 4, 2721–2735 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cote, A. P. et al. Porous, crystalline, covalent organic frameworks. Science 310, 1166–1170 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Han, S. S., Furukawa, H., Yaghi, O. M. & Goddard, W. A. III. Covalent organic frameworks as exceptional hydrogen storage materials. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 11580–11581 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Furukawa, H. & Yaghi, O. M. Storage of hydrogen, methane and carbon dioxide in highly porous covalent organic frameworks for clean energy applications. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 8875–8883 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yuan, D., Lu, W., Zhao, D. & Zhou, H.-C. Highly stable porous polymer networks with exceptionally high gas-uptake capacities. Adv. Mater. 23, 3723–3725 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ben, T. et al. Targeted synthesis of a porous aromatic framework with high stability and exceptionally high surface area. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 9457–9460 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen, Z. et al. Balancing volumetric and gravimetric uptake in highly porous materials for clean energy. Science 368, 297–303 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yang, S. et al. Cation-induced kinetic trapping and enhanced hydrogen adsorption in a modulated anionic metal-organic framework. Nat. Chem. 1, 487–493 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu, S. et al. Hydrogen storage in incompletely etched multilayer Ti2CTx at room temperature. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 331–336 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kökçam-Demir, Ü. et al. Coordinatively unsaturated metal sites (open metal sites) in metal-organic frameworks: design and applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 49, 2751–2798 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sengupta, D. et al. Air-stable Cu(I) metal-organic framework for hydrogen storage. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 20492–20502 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ahmed, A. et al. Balancing gravimetric and volumetric hydrogen density in MOFs. Energy Environ. Sci. 10, 2459–2471 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Vantomme, G. & Meijer, E. W. The construction of supramolecular systems. Science 363, 1396–1397 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lin, R.-B. & Chen, B. Hydrogen-bonded organic frameworks: chemistry and functions. Chem 8, 2114–2135 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Batten, S. R. & Robson, R. Interpenetrating nets: ordered, periodic entanglement. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 37, 1460–1494 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen, B., Eddaoudi, M., Hyde, S. T., O’Keeffe, M. & Yaghi, O. M. Interwoven metal-organic framework on a periodic minimal surface with extra-large pores. Science 291, 1021–1023 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Meng, W. et al. An elastic metal–organic crystal with a densely catenated backbone. Nature 598, 298–303 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Perl, D., Lee, S. J., Ferguson, A., Jameson, G. B. & Telfer, S. G. Hetero-interpenetrated metal–organic frameworks. Nat. Chem. 15, 1358–1364 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang, B., Lin, R.-B., Zhang, Z., Xiang, S. & Chen, B. Hydrogen-bonded organic frameworks as a tunable platform for functional materials. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 14399–14416 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ma, S. et al. Framework-catenation isomerism in metal–organic frameworks and its impact on hydrogen uptake. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 1858–1859 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Shekhah, O. et al. Controlling interpenetration in metal–organic frameworks by liquid-phase epitaxy. Nat. Mater. 8, 481–484 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang, J., Wojtas, L., Larsen, R. W., Eddaoudi, M. & Zaworotko, M. J. Temperature and concentration control over interpenetration in a metal-organic material. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 17040–17041 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Farha, O. K., Malliakas, C. D., Kanatzidis, M. G. & Hupp, J. T. Control over catenation in metal-organic frameworks via rational design of the organic building block. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 950–952 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Maji, T. K., Matsuda, R. & Kitagawa, S. A flexible interpenetrating coordination framework with a bimodal porous functionality. Nat. Mater. 6, 142–148 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bobbitt, N. S., Chen, J. & Snurr, R. Q. High-throughput screening of metal–organic frameworks for hydrogen storage at cryogenic temperature. J. Phys. Chem. C 120, 27328–27341 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Healy, C. et al. The thermal stability of metal–organic frameworks. Coord. Chem. Rev. 419, 213388 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Osterrieth, J. W. M. et al. How reproducible are surface areas calculated from the BET equation? Adv. Mater. 34, 2201502 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Willems, T. F., Rycroft, C. H., Kazi, M., Meza, J. C. & Haranczyk, M. Algorithms and tools for high-throughput geometry-based analysis of crystalline porous materials. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 149, 134–141 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Suresh, K. et al. Optimizing hydrogen storage in MOFs through engineering of crystal morphology and control of crystal size. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 10727–10734 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Jagiello, J. & Jaroniec, M. 2D-NLDFT adsorption models for porous oxides with corrugated cylindrical pores. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 532, 588–597 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Pulido, A. et al. Functional materials discovery using energy–structure–function maps. Nature 543, 657–664 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang, G., Presly, O., White, F., Oppel, I. M. & Mastalerz, M. A permanent mesoporous organic cage with an exceptionally high surface area. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 1516–1520 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Rozyyev, V. et al. High-capacity methane storage in flexible alkane-linked porous aromatic network polymers. Nat. Energy 4, 604–611 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Allendorf, M. D. et al. Challenges to developing materials for the transport and storage of hydrogen. Nat. Chem. 14, 1214–1223 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kapelewski, M. T. et al. M2(m-dobdc) (M = Mg, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni) metal-organic frameworks exhibiting increased charge density and enhanced H2 binding at the open metal sites. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 12119–12129 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kapelewski, M. T. et al. Record high hydrogen storage capacity in the metal-organic framework Ni2(m-dobdc) at near-ambient temperatures. Chem. Mater. 30, 8179–8189 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge D. Kiska (Anton Paar), O. M. Yaghi and Z. Zheng (UC Berkeley), as well as Z. Lin, H. Xie and K. B. Idrees (Northwestern University), for experimental help and discussions. We also acknowledge support in carrying out the high-pressure characterization of RP-H101 by W. Wang, L. Long, Y.-B. Zhang and the Analytical Instrumentation Center (SPST-AIC10112914) at ShanghaiTech University. We thank Northwestern University (NU), the University of Hong Kong and H2MOF, Inc. for their financial support, and acknowledge the Integrated Molecular Structure Education and Research Centre at NU for providing access to equipment for relevant experiments. We acknowledge support from the US Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy under grant no. DE-EE0008816 (R.Q.S.). We also gratefully acknowledge the resources provided by the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Centre (NERSC), a DOE Office of Science User Facility supported by the Office of Science of the US Department of Energy under contract no. DE-AC02-05CH11231 using NERSC award BES-ERCAP0023154 (R.Q.S.). H.D. is supported by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) 2214-A (decision no. 1059B142200109).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

R.Z., C.T. and J.F.S. conceived the idea for this project. H.D. and R.Q.S. performed Monte Carlo and DFT calculations. R.Z. and C.T. synthesized and characterized the materials with the help of P.L., L.F., H.H., G.W., B.N.L., Y.W., S.Y. and A.X.-Y.C. C.L.S. performed the single-crystal X-ray diffraction. C.D.M. helped with the variable-temperature X-ray diffraction and thermal gravimetric analysis. R.Z., C.T. and J.F.S. wrote multiple drafts of the paper. J.F.S. directed the project. All authors participated in evaluating the results and commented on the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Chun Tang, Randall Q. Snurr or J. Fraser Stoddart.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

B.N.L. is an employee of H2MOF, Inc. Additionally, R.Z. and J.F.S. are inventors on a patent application related to this work filed by Northwestern University (US provisional patent application no. 63/673,595, filed 19 July 2024). The other authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Chemistry thanks Hoi Ri Moon and Sihai Yang for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Structure analysis of hexagonal modules in RP-H101.

a, The crystal superstructure of RP-H101 shows that seven 6.4-nm hexagonal motifs denoted in different colours are interpenetrated with each other. After interpenetration, every 6.4-nm hexagonal motif forms seven smaller hexagonal modules. b, c, The top-view and side-view of how the small hexagonal module is assembled. The small hexagonal module shows a three-layer structure and a pore diameter of 1.8 nm, assembled with nine IATH-2 molecules. d, e, Based on the top view and side view of a small hexagonal module, there are 12 [N−H···O] and 12 [O−H···N] hydrogen bonds between these nine IATH-2 molecules, which direct the interpenetration and the formation of the highly catenated structure.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Structure analysis of triangular modules in RP-H101.

a, The crystal superstructure of RP-H101 shows the interpenetration of 6.4-nm hexagonal motifs denoted in different colours. After interpenetration, every 6.4-nm hexagonal motif forms 12 triangular modules. b, c, The top-view and side-view of how the triangular module is assembled. Each triangular module shows a three-layer structure assembled with five IATH-2 molecules. d, Each triangular module has a triangular prism-shaped pore, with a pore diameter of 1.5 nm. e, From the side-view of the triangular module, there are six [N−H···O] and six [O−H···N] hydrogen bonds between these 5 IATH-2 molecules, directing the formation of the highly catenated structure.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–40, Discussion and Tables 1–10.

Supplementary Table 11

Atomic positions of RP-H100 (ND-I).

Supplementary Table 12

Atomic positions of RP-H100 (ND-II).

Supplementary Data 1

Crystallographic data for RP-H100; CCDC number 2298776.

Supplementary Data 2

Crystallographic data for RP-H101; CCDC number 2298777.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 3

The data include PXRD patterns for as-synthesized, activated, and after-adsorption RP-H101 shown in Fig. 3a, PXRD patterns for RP-H101 after soaking in different solvents for 24 h depicted in Fig. 3b, variable-temperature PXRD patterns for RP-H101 presented in Fig. 3c, and thermogravimetric profiles for the as-synthesized and activated RP-H101 illustrated in Fig. 3d.

Source Data Fig. 4

The data include experimental and simulated N2 adsorption isotherms for RP-H100 and RP-H101 as depicted in Fig. 4a, pore-size distribution and pore volume data for RP-H101 presented in Fig. 4b, data demonstrating the trade-off between thermal stability and GSAs for all HOFs with GSAs higher than 1500 m2 g−1 shown in Fig. 4c, and data illustrating the trade-off between GSAs and VSAs for HOFs displayed in Fig. 4d.

Source Data Fig. 5

The data include experimental and simulated gravimetric total uptake of H2 in RP-H100 and RP-H101 as shown in Fig. 5a,b, volumetric total uptake of H2 in RP-H100 and RP-H101 depicted in Fig. 5c, and data illustrating the trade-off between gravimetric and volumetric deliverable capacities of H2 in RP-H100, RP-H101 and other MOFs presented in Fig. 5d.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, R., Daglar, H., Tang, C. et al. Balancing volumetric and gravimetric capacity for hydrogen in supramolecular crystals. Nat. Chem. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-024-01622-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-024-01622-w

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing