Teaching the history of science along with the science itself can give students greater context about the topic they are learning and a wider perspective on how it has developed. Michelle Francl, who has wrestled with how much time to spend on teaching history in the chemistry classroom for years, considers how unconventional histories can shift the curriculum.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Science History Images / Alamy Stock Photo

References
Becker, M. L. & Nilsson, M. R. J. Chem. Educ. 98, 1146–1151 (2021).
Dessent, C. E. H. et al. J. Chem. Educ. 99, 5–9 (2022).
Schmidt, P. et al. Archaeol. Anthropol. Sci. 15, 84 (2023).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Francl, M. Decentring the central science. Nat. Chem. 15, 1319–1320 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-023-01336-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-023-01336-5