Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

A two-directional vibrational probe reveals different electric field orientations in solution and an enzyme active site


The catalytic power of an electric field depends on its magnitude and orientation with respect to the reactive chemical species. Understanding and designing new catalysts for electrostatic catalysis thus requires methods to measure the electric field orientation and magnitude at the molecular scale. We demonstrate that electric field orientations can be extracted using a two-directional vibrational probe by exploiting the vibrational Stark effect of both the C=O and C–D stretches of a deuterated aldehyde. Combining spectroscopy with molecular dynamics and electronic structure partitioning methods, we demonstrate that, despite distinct polarities, solvents act similarly in their preference for electrostatically stabilizing large bond dipoles at the expense of destabilizing small ones. In contrast, we find that for an active-site aldehyde inhibitor of liver alcohol dehydrogenase, the electric field orientation deviates markedly from that found in solvents, which provides direct evidence for the fundamental difference between the electrostatic environment of solvents and that of a preorganized enzyme active site.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Electrostatic catalysis and the two-directional vibrational probe used in this work.
Fig. 2: Infrared absorption and Stark spectra of CXF-D at 77 K demonstrating the VSEs of the C–D (left) and C=O (right) bonds.
Fig. 3: Normalized infrared spectra of CXF-D in a series of solvents with various polarities.
Fig. 4: Construction of the field-frequency maps for C–D and C=O in the CXF-D probe using experimentally measured frequency shifts and computed electric field projections along these bonds.
Fig. 5: Comparison of the electric field orientations in solvents and at the LADH active site revealed by two-directional electric field measurements.

Data availability

The gene sequence for the wild-type enzyme in this study has been deposited in GenBank (accession code OM863576). The X-ray coordinates and structural factors have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank as entry 7RM6 for the wild-type enzyme in complex with NADH and CXF. The electronic structure partitioning methods for DFT calculations of solvent electric fields at atomic positions were implemented in the Q-Chem software package36, which is available in the 5.4.2 and later releases. Source data are provided with this paper. All the data that support the finding of this study are available within this article and its Supplementary Information and available on Figshare (

Code availability

The code used for processing MD trajectories and calculating electric field projections along bond directions is available at and Zenodo (


  1. Warshel, A. et al. Electrostatic basis for enzyme catalysis. Chem. Rev. 106, 3210–3235 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fried, S. D. & Boxer, S. G. Electric fields and enzyme catalysis. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 86, 387–415 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Schneider, S. H. & Boxer, S. G. Vibrational Stark effects of carbonyl probes applied to reinterpret IR and Raman data for enzyme inhibitors in terms of electric fields at the active site. J. Phys. Chem. B 120, 9672–9684 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Carey, P. R. Spectroscopic characterization of distortion in enzyme complexes. Chem. Rev. 106, 3043–3054 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dong, J. et al. The strength of dehalogenase–substrate hydrogen bonding correlates with the rate of Meisenheimer intermediate formation. Biochemistry 42, 9482–9490 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tonge, P. J. & Carey, P. R. Length of the acyl carbonyl bond in acyl-serine proteases correlates with reactivity. Biochemistry 29, 10723–10727 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Deng, H. et al. Source of catalysis in the lactate dehydrogenase system. Ground-state interactions in the enzyme-substrate complex. Biochemistry 33, 2297–2305 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fried, S. D., Bagchi, S. & Boxer, S. G. Extreme electric fields power catalysis in the active site of ketosteroid isomerase. Science 346, 1510–1514 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wu, Y. & Boxer, S. G. A critical test of the electrostatic contribution to catalysis with noncanonical amino acids in ketosteroid isomerase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 11890–11895 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fried, S. D. & Boxer, S. G. Measuring electric fields and noncovalent interactions using the vibrational stark effect. Acc. Chem. Res. 48, 998–1006 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fried, S. D., Bagchi, S. & Boxer, S. G. Measuring electrostatic fields in both hydrogen-bonding and non-hydrogen-bonding environments using carbonyl vibrational probes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 11181–11192 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wu, Y., Fried, S. D. & Boxer, S. G. A preorganized electric field leads to minimal geometrical reorientation in the catalytic reaction of ketosteroid isomerase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 9993–9998 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Welborn, V. V. & Head-Gordon, T. Computational design of synthetic enzymes. Chem. Rev. 119, 6613–6630 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Welborn, V. V., Pestana, L. R. & Head-Gordon, T. Computational optimization of electric fields for better catalysis design. Nat. Catal. 1, 649–655 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fuxreiter, M. & Mones, L. The role of reorganization energy in rational enzyme design. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 21, 34–41 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kamerlin, S. C., Sharma, P. K., Chu, Z. T. & Warshel, A. Ketosteroid isomerase provides further support for the idea that enzymes work by electrostatic preorganization. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 4075–4080 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bím, D. & Alexandrova, A. N. Electrostatic regulation of blue copper sites. Chem. Sci. 12, 11406–11413 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shaik, S., Mandal, D. & Ramanan, R. Oriented electric fields as future smart reagents in chemistry. Nat. Chem. 8, 1091–1098 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Xu, L., Izgorodina, E. I. & Coote, M. L. Ordered solvents and ionic liquids can be harnessed for electrostatic catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 12826–12833 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Deng, H., Schindler, J. F., Berst, K. B., Plapp, B. V. & Callender, R. A Raman spectroscopic characterization of bonding in the complex of horse liver alcohol dehydrogenase with NADH and N-cyclohexylformamide. Biochemistry 37, 14267–14278 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ramaswamy, S., Scholze, M. & Plapp, B. V. Binding of formamides to liver alcohol dehydrogenase. Biochemistry 36, 3522–3527 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Claudino, D. & Mayhall, N. J. Automatic partition of orbital spaces based on singular value decomposition in the context of embedding theories. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 15, 1053–1064 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Khaliullin, R. Z., Head-Gordon, M. & Bell, A. T. An efficient self-consistent field method for large systems of weakly interacting components. J. Chem. Phys. 124, 204105 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Adhikary, R., Zimmermann, J. & Romesberg, F. E. Transparent window vibrational probes for the characterization of proteins with high structural and temporal resolution. Chem. Rev. 117, 1927–1969 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Bublitz, G. U. & Boxer, S. G. Stark spectroscopy: applications in chemistry, biology, and materials science. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 48, 213–242 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Boxer, S. G. Stark realities. J. Phys. Chem. B 113, 2972–2983 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Baiz, C. R. et al. Vibrational spectroscopic map, vibrational spectroscopy, and intermolecular interaction. Chem. Rev. 120, 7152–7218 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kozuch, J. et al. Testing the limitations of MD-based local electric fields using the vibrational Stark effect in solution: penicillin G as a test case. J. Phys. Chem. B 125, 4415–4427 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Fried, S. D., Wang, L. P., Boxer, S. G., Ren, P. & Pande, V. S. Calculations of the electric fields in liquid solutions. J. Phys. Chem. B 117, 16236–16248 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Eggers, D. F. & Lingren, W. E. C–H vibrations in aldehydes. Anal. Chem. 28, 1328–1329 (1956).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Onsager, L. Electric moments of molecules in liquids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 58, 1486–1493 (1936).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Levinson, N. M., Fried, S. D. & Boxer, S. G. Solvent-induced infrared frequency shifts in aromatic nitriles are quantitatively described by the vibrational Stark effect. J. Phys. Chem. B 116, 10470–10476 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Tomasi, J., Mennucci, B. & Cammi, R. Quantum mechanical continuum solvation models. Chem. Rev. 105, 2999–3093 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Sekhar, V. C. & Plapp, B. V. Rate constants for a mechanism including intermediates in the interconversion of ternary complexes by horse liver alcohol dehydrogenase. Biochemistry 29, 4289–4295 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Reichardt, C. & Welton, T. Solvents and Solvent Effects in Organic Chemistry (John Wiley & Sons, 2011).

  36. Epifanovsky, E. et al. Software for the frontiers of quantum chemistry: an overview of developments in the Q-Chem 5 package. J. Chem. Phys. 155, 084801 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Johnson, R. D. III NIST Computational Chemistry Comparison and Benchmark Database. NIST Standard Reference Database Number 101, Release 21 August 2020 (NIST, accessed 2 January 2021).

Download references


We express our gratitude to B. V. Plapp at the University of Iowa for providing detailed guidance on the expression and purification of LADH and much other valuable advice. We thank C.-Y. Lin for his help with X-ray crystallography, S. Schneider, J. Weaver, J. Kirsh and S. D. E. Fried for helpful discussions, T. Carver at the Stanford Nano Shared Facilities for nickel coating the Stark windows, T. McLaughlin from Stanford University Mass Spectrometry (SUMS) for technical support with the mass spectrometry. C.Z. is grateful for the Stanford Center for Molecular Analysis and Design (CMAD) Fellowship. J.K. acknowledges support from the German Research Foundation DFG-Project-ID221545957-SFB1078/B9. This work was supported in part by NIH Grant GM118044 (to S.G.B.) and the National Science Foundation grant no. CHE-1652960 (to T.E.M.). T.E.M. also acknowledges support from the Camille Dreyfus Teacher-Scholar Awards Program. Use of the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, is supported by the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences under contract no. DE-AC02-76SF00515. The SSRL Structural Molecular Biology Program is supported by the DOE Office of Biological and Environmental Research, and by the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P30GM133894). The contents of this publication are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of NIGMS or NIH. This research also used resources of the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC), a US Department of Energy Office of Science User Facility operated under contract no. DE-AC02-05CH11231, and the Sherlock cluster operated by the Stanford Research Computing Center.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



C.Z. and S.G.B. designed the research. C.Z. performed the experiments and fixed-charge MD simulations. Y.M. developed the computational protocol that combined MD simulations and QM calculations to quantify the solvent electric field contributions, implemented the electronic structure partitioning schemes in the Q-Chem software package and performed the QM calculations. J.K. performed the AMOEBA polarizable MD simulations. A.O.A. analysed the data from the MD simulations and wrote the codes to extract the truncated solute–solvent structures for the QM calculations. Z.J. synthesized N-[formyl-2H]cyclohexylformamide. C.Z., Y.M., T.E.M. and S.G.B. discussed the results and wrote the manuscript. All the authors contributed to improving the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Thomas E. Markland or Steven G. Boxer.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Chemistry thanks Steven Corcelli, Jahan Dawlaty, Feng Gai, Valerie Welborn for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Materials and Methods, Supplementary Texts, Figures 1–17 and Tables 1–31.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 2

Numerical data for optical spectra.

Source Data Fig. 3

Numerical data for optical spectra.

Source Data Fig. 4

Numerical data for scatter plots.

Source Data Fig. 5

Numerical data for optical spectra and scatter plots.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zheng, C., Mao, Y., Kozuch, J. et al. A two-directional vibrational probe reveals different electric field orientations in solution and an enzyme active site. Nat. Chem. 14, 891–897 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing