Decoupling the production of solar hydrogen from the diurnal cycle is a key challenge in solar energy conversion, the success of which could lead to sustainable energy schemes capable of delivering H2 independent of the time of day. Here, we report a fully integrated photochemical molecular dyad composed of a ruthenium-complex photosensitizer covalently linked to a Dawson polyoxometalate that acts as an electron-storage site and hydrogen-evolving catalyst. Visible-light irradiation of the system in solution leads to charge separation and electron storage on the polyoxometalate, effectively resulting in a liquid fuel. In contrast to related, earlier dyads, this system enables the harvesting, storage and delayed release of solar energy. On-demand hydrogen release is possible by adding a proton donor to the dyad solution. The system is a minimal molecular model for artificial photosynthesis and enables the spatial and temporal separation of light absorption, fuel storage and hydrogen release.
This is a preview of subscription content
Subscribe to Nature+
Get immediate online access to the entire Nature family of 50+ journals
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $9.92 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
All the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the main text of the paper and the Supplementary Information and have been deposited on Zenodo.org under https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5533869.
Crystallographic data for the structure reported in this Article has been deposited at the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, under deposition number CCDC no. 2045447. Copies of the data can be obtained free of charge via https://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/structures/.
Roger, I., Shipman, M. A. & Symes, M. D. Earth-abundant catalysts for electrochemical and photoelectrochemical water splitting. Nat. Rev. Chem. 1, 0003 (2017).
Chen, S., Takata, T. & Domen, K. Particulate photocatalysts for overall water splitting. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2, 17050 (2017).
Listorti, A., Durrant, J. & Barber, J. Artificial photosynthesis: solar to fuel. Nat. Mater. 8, 929–930 (2009).
Cook, T. R. et al. Solar energy supply and storage for the legacy and nonlegacy worlds. Chem. Rev. 110, 6474–6502 (2010).
Rausch, B., Symes, M. D., Chisholm, G. & Cronin, L. Decoupled catalytic hydrogen evolution from a molecular metal oxide redox mediator in water splitting. Science 345, 1326–1330 (2014).
Symes, M. D. & Cronin, L. Decoupling hydrogen and oxygen evolution during electrolytic water splitting using an electron-coupled-proton buffer. Nat. Chem. 5, 403–409 (2013).
Borgschulte, A. The hydrogen grand challenge. Front. Energy Res. 4, 11 (2016).
McHugh, P. J., Stergiou, A. D. & Symes, M. D. Decoupled electrochemical water splitting: from fundamentals to applications. Adv. Energy Mater. 10, 2002453 (2020).
Huang, J. & Wang, Y. Efficient renewable-to-hydrogen conversion via decoupled electrochemical water splitting. Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. 1, 100138 (2020).
Ifkovits, Z. P., Evans, J. M., Meier, M. C., Papadantonakis, K. M. & Lewis, N. S. Decoupled electrochemical water-splitting systems: a review and perspective. Energy Environ. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1EE01226F (2021).
Yan, Z., Hitt, J. L., Turner, J. A. & Mallouk, T. E. Renewable electricity storage using electrolysis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 12558–12563 (2020).
Pellow, M. A., Emmott, C. J. M., Barnhart, C. J. & Benson, S. M. Hydrogen or batteries for grid storage? A net energy analysis. Energy Environ. Sci. 8, 1938–1952 (2015).
Rothschild, A. & Dotan, H. Beating the efficiency of photovoltaics-powered electrolysis with tandem cell photoelectrolysis. ACS Energy Lett. 2, 45–51 (2017).
Sakar, M., Nguyen, C.-C., Vu, M.-H. & Do, T.-O. Materials and mechanisms of photo-assisted chemical reactions under light and dark conditions: can day–night photocatalysis be achieved? ChemSusChem 11, 809–820 (2018).
Bloor, L. G. et al. Solar-driven water oxidation and decoupled hydrogen production mediated by an electron-coupled-proton buffer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 6707–6710 (2016).
Lau, V. W. et al. Dark photocatalysis: storage of solar energy in carbon nitride for time-delayed hydrogen generation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 129, 525–529 (2017).
Konduri, R. et al. Ruthenium photocatalysis capable of reversibility storing up to four electrons in a single acceptor ligand: a step closer to artificial photosynthesis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 41, 3185–3187 (2002).
Schulz, M. et al. Photoinduced charge accumulation and prolonged multielectron storage for the separation of light and dark reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 15722–15728 (2020).
Proust, A. et al. Functionalization and post-functionalization: a step towards polyoxometalate-based materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 7605–7622 (2012).
Anyushin, A. V., Kondinski, A. & Parac-Vogt, T. N. Hybrid polyoxometalates as post-functionalization platforms: from fundamentals to emerging applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 49, 382–432 (2020).
Matt, B. et al. Elegant approach to the synthesis of a unique heteroleptic cyclometalated iridium(III)-polyoxometalate conjugate. Organometallics 31, 35–38 (2012).
Matt, B. et al. Long lived charge separation in iridium(iii)-photosensitized polyoxometalates: synthesis, photophysical and computational studies of organometallic–redox tunable oxide assemblies. Chem. Sci. 4, 1737–1745 (2013).
Parrot, A. et al. Photochromism and dual-color fluorescence in a polyoxometalate-benzospiropyran molecular switch. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 4872–4876 (2017).
Matt, B. et al. Charge photo-accumulation and photocatalytic hydrogen evolution under visible light at an iridium(iii)-photosensitized polyoxotungstate. Energy Environ. Sci. 6, 1504–1508 (2013).
Schönweiz, S. et al. Experimental and theoretical investigation of the light-driven hydrogen evolution by polyoxometalate–photosensitizer dyads. Chem. Eur. J. 23, 15370–15376 (2017).
Luo, Y. et al. Yield—not only lifetime—of the photoinduced charge‐separated state in iridium complex–polyoxometalate dyads impact their hydrogen evolution reactivity. Chem. Eur. J. 26, 8045–8052 (2020).
Luo, Y. et al. Is electron ping-pong limiting the catalytic hydrogen evolution activity in covalent photosensitizer–polyoxometalate dyads? Chem. Commun. 56, 10485–10488 (2020).
Schaming, D. et al. Synthesis and photocatalytic properties of mixed polyoxometalate–porphyrin copolymers obtained from Anderson-type polyoxomolybdates. Langmuir 26, 5101–5109 (2010).
Schönweiz, S. et al. Covalent photosensitizer-–polyoxometalate-catalyst dyads for visible-light-driven hydrogen evolution. Chem. Eur. J. 22, 12002–12005 (2016).
Azcarate, I. et al. Generation of photocurrent by visible-light irradiation of conjugated Dawson polyoxophosphovanadotungstate–porphyrin copolymers. Chem. Eur. J. 21, 8271–8280 (2015).
Black, F. A. et al. Rapid photoinduced charge injection into covalent polyoxometalate–bodipy conjugates. Chem. Sci. 9, 5578–5584 (2018).
Odobel, F. et al. Coupled sensitizer–catalyst dyads: electron-transfer reactions in a perylene–polyoxometalate conjugate. Chem. Eur. J. 15, 3130–3138 (2009).
Toupalas, G. et al. Tuning photoinduced electron transfer in POM-bodipy hybrids by controlling the environment: experiment and theory. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 6518–6525 (2021).
Kirchhoff, B., Rau, S. & Streb, C. Detecting and preventing the formation of photosensitizer-catalyst colloids in homogeneous light-driven water oxidation. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2016, 1425–1429 (2016).
Heussner, K., Peuntinger, K., Rockstroh, N., Rau, S. & Streb, C. Cluster-controlled dimerisation in supramolecular ruthenium photosensitizer–polyoxometalate systems. Dalton Trans. 44, 330–337 (2015).
Heussner, K. et al. Solution and solid-state interactions in a supramolecular ruthenium photosensitizer–polyoxometalate aggregate. Chem. Commun. 47, 6852–6854 (2011).
Amthor, S. et al. Tailored protective groups for surface immobilization of ruthenium dyes. Dalton Trans. 49, 3735–3742 (2020).
Streb, C. New trends in polyoxometalate photoredox chemistry: from photosensitisation to water oxidation catalysis. Dalton Trans. 41, 1651–1659 (2012).
Prenzler, P. D., Boskovic, C., Bond, A. M. & Wedd, A. G. Coupled electron- and proton-transfer processes in the reduction of α-[P2W18O62]6– and α-[H2W12O40]6– as revealed by simulation of cyclic voltammograms. Anal. Chem. 71, 3650–3656 (1999).
Pegis, M. L. et al. Standard reduction potentials for oxygen and carbon dioxide couples in acetonitrile and N,N-dimethylformamide. Inorg. Chem. 54, 11883–11888 (2015).
Soupart, A., Alary, F., Heully, J. L., Elliott, P. I. P. & Dixon, I. M. Recent progress in ligand photorelease reaction mechanisms: theoretical insights focusing on Ru(II) 3MC states. Coord. Chem. Rev. 408, 213184 (2020).
Siebert, R. et al. Spectroscopic investigation of the ultrafast photoinduced dynamics in π-conjugated terpyridines. ChemPhysChem 10, 910–919 (2009).
Damrauer, N. H. Femtosecond dynamics of excited-state evolution in [Ru(bpy)3]2+. Science 275, 54–57 (1997).
Tarnovsky, A. N., Gawelda, W., Johnson, M., Bressler, C. & Chergui, M. Photexcitation of aqueous ruthenium(II)-tris-(2,2′-bipyridine) with high-intensity femtosecond laser pulses. J. Phys. Chem. B 110, 26497–26505 (2006).
Müller, P. & Brettel, K. [Ru(bpy)3]2+ as a reference in transient absorption spectroscopy: differential absorption coefficients for formation of the long-lived 3MLCT excited state. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 11, 632–636 (2012).
Kemmegne-Mbouguen, J. C. et al. Electrochemical properties of the [SiW10O36(M2O2E2)]6− polyoxometalate series (M = Mo(V) or W(V); E = S or O). New J. Chem. 43, 1146–1155 (2019).
Dobryakov, A. L., Kovalenko, S. A. & Ernsting, N. P. Coherent and sequential contributions to femtosecond transient absorption spectra of a rhodamine dye in solution. J. Chem. Phys. 123, 044502 (2005).
We gratefully acknowledge the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG for financial support through the TRR234 ‘CataLight’ (project no. 364549901, projects A1, A4, B2, B6 and Z2; U.S.S., S.R., B.D. and C.S.). Funding by the Federal State of Baden-Württemberg and Ulm University for a PhD fellowship (LGFG; S.K.) and a Margarete von Wrangell fellowship (M.A.) is gratefully acknowledged. We thank T. Meyer-Zedler for assistance with the time-resolved emission measurements.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information
Nature Chemistry thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Figs. 1–27; Tables 1–3; Discussion; instrumentation, synthesis and characterization details; and spectroscopic, electrochemical, spectro-electrochemical, mass-spectrometric and single-crystal X-ray diffraction data.
Crystallographic data for (mPO3Et2)bpy; CCDC no. 2045447.
About this article
Cite this article
Amthor, S., Knoll, S., Heiland, M. et al. A photosensitizer–polyoxometalate dyad that enables the decoupling of light and dark reactions for delayed on-demand solar hydrogen production. Nat. Chem. 14, 321–327 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-021-00850-8