There are many open questions regarding the hydration of solvent-exposed non-polar tracts and pockets in proteins. Although water is predicted to de-wet purely repulsive surfaces and evacuate crevices, the extent of de-wetting is unclear when ubiquitous van der Waals interactions are in play. The structural simplicity of synthetic supramolecular hosts imbues them with considerable potential to address this issue. To this end, here we detail a combination of densimetry and molecular dynamics simulations of three cavitands, coupled with calorimetric studies of their complexes with short-chain carboxylates. Our results reveal the range of wettability possible within the ostensibly identical cavitand pockets—which differ only in the presence and/or position of the methyl groups that encircle the portal to their non-polar pockets. The results demonstrate the ability of macrocycles to template water cavitation within their binding sites and show how the orientation of methyl groups can trigger the drying of non-polar pockets in liquid water, which suggests new avenues to control guest complexation.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $9.92 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
The results that appear in Figs. 2–4 are provided in Source Data Microsoft Excel spreadsheets linked in the HTML version of the article. Data for Supplementary Figs. 16, 18 and 19 are provided in a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet in the Supplementary Data. In addition, we provide GROMACS topology and Gromos87 files for hosts 1–3 in a .zip file in the Supplementary Data. Additional information supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Stillinger, F. H. Structure in aqueous solutions of nonpolar solutes from the standpoint of scaled-particle theory. J. Soln Chem. 2, 141–158 (1973).
Chandler, D. Interfaces and the driving force of hydrophobic assembly. Nature 437, 640–647 (2005).
Ashbaugh, H. S. & Pratt, L. R. Colloquium: scaled particle theory and the length scales of hydrophobicity. Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 159–178 (2006).
Rasaiah, J. C., Garde, S. & Hummer, G. Water in nonpolar confinement: from nanotubes to proteins and beyond. Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. 59, 713–740 (2008).
Collins, M. D., Hummer, G., Quillin, M. L., Matthews, B. W. & Gruner, S. M. Cooperative water filling of a nonpolar protein cavity observed by high-pressure crystallography and simulation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 16668–16671 (2005).
Qvist, J., Davidovic, M., Hamelberg, D. & Halle, B. A dry ligand-binding cavity in a solvated protein. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 6296–6301 (2008).
Hummer, G., Rasaiah, J. C. & Noworyta, J. P. Water conduction through the hydrophobic channel of a carbon nanotube. Nature 414, 188–190 (2001).
Huang, D. M. & Chandler, D. The hydrophobic effect and the influence of solute–solvent attractions. J. Phys. Chem. B 106, 2047–2053 (2002).
Ben-Amotz, D. Water-mediated hydrophobic interactions. Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. 67, 617–638 (2016).
Li, I. T. S. & Walker, G. C. Signature of hydrophobic hydration in a single polymer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 16527–16532 (2011).
Davis, J. G., Gierszal, K. P., Wang, P. & Ben-Amotz, D. Water structural transformation at molecular hydrophobic interfaces. Nature 491, 582–585 (2012).
Wu, X. G., Lu, W. J., Streacker, L. M., Ashbaugh, H. S. & Ben-Amotz, D. Temperature-dependent hydrophobic crossover length scale and water tetrahedral order. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 9, 1012–1017 (2018).
Collins, M. D., Quillin, M. L., Hummer, G., Matthews, B. W. & Gruner, S. M. Structural rigidity of a large cavity-containing protein revealed by high-pressure crystallography. J. Mol. Biol. 367, 752–763 (2007).
Yin, H., Feng, G. G., Clore, G. M., Hummer, G. & Rasaiah, J. C. Water in the polar and nonpolar cavities of the protein interleukin-1β. J. Phys. Chem. B 114, 16290–16297 (2010).
Patel, A. J. et al. Sitting at the edge: how biomolecules use hydrophobicity to tune their interactions and function. J. Phys. Chem. B 116, 2498–2503 (2012).
Ernst, J. A., Clubb, R. T., Zhou, H. X., Gronenborn, A. M. & Clore, G. M. Demonstration of positionally disordered water within a protein hydrophobic cavity by NMR. Science 267, 1813–1817 (1995).
Finzel, B. C. et al. Crystal-structure of recombinant human interleukin-1-beta at 2.0-Å resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 209, 779–791 (1989).
Snyder, P. W. et al. Mechanism of the hydrophobic effect in the biomolecular recognition of arylsulfonamides by carbonic anhydrase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 17889–17894 (2011).
Myslinski, J. M., DeLorbe, J. E., Clements, J. H. & Martin, S. F. Protein–ligand interactions: thermodynamic effects associated with increasing nonpolar surface area. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 18518–18521 (2011).
Setny, P., Baron, R. & McCammon, J. A. How can hydrophobic association be enthalpy driven? J. Chem. Theory Comput. 6, 2866–2871 (2010).
Biedermann, F., Vendruscolo, M., Scherman, O. A., De Simone, A. & Nau, W. M. Cucurbituril and blue-box: high-energy water release overwhelms electrostatic interactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 14879–14888 (2013).
Biedermann, F., Nau, W. M. & Schneider, H. J. The hydrophobic effect revisited—studies with supramolecular complexes imply high-energy water as a noncovalent driving force. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 11158–11171 (2014).
Hummer, G. Molecular binding: under water’s influence. Nat. Chem. 2, 906–907 (2010).
Giri, N. et al. Liquids with permanent porosity. Nature 527, 216–220 (2015).
Sullivan, M. R., Sokkalingam, P., Nguyen, T., Donahue, J. P. & Gibb, B. C. Binding of carboxylate and trimethylammonium salts to octa-acid and TEMOA deep-cavity cavitands. J. Comp. Aided Mol. Des. 31, 21–28 (2017).
Gibb, C. L. D. & Gibb, B. C. Well-defined, organic nanoenvironments in water: the hydrophobic effect drives a capsular assembly. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 11408–11409 (2004).
Liu, S. M., Whisenhunt-Ioup, S. E., Gibb, C. L. D. & Gibb, B. C. An improved synthesis of ‘octa-acid’ deep-cavity cavitand. Supramol. Chem. 23, 480–485 (2011).
Gan, H. Y., Benjamin, C. J. & Gibb, B. C. Nonmonotonic assembly of a deep-cavity cavitand. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 4770–4773 (2011).
Gan, H. Y. & Gibb, B. C. Guest-mediated switching of the assembly state of a water-soluble deep-cavity cavitand. Chem. Commun. 49, 1395–1397 (2013).
Jordan, J. H. & Gibb, B. C. Molecular containers assembled through the hydrophobic effect. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 547–585 (2015).
Gibb, C. L. D. & Gibb, B. C. Binding of cyclic carboxylates to octa-acid deep-cavity cavitand. J. Comp. Aided Mol. Des. 28, 319–325 (2014).
Gibb, C. L. D. & Gibb, B. C. Anion binding to hydrophobic concavity is central to the salting-in effects of Hofmeister chaotropes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 7344–7347 (2011).
Carnegie, R. S., Gibb, C. L. D. & Gibb, B. C. Anion complexation and the Hofmeister effect. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 11498–11500 (2014).
Sokkalingam, P., Shraberg, J., Rick, S. W. & Gibb, B. C. Binding hydrated anions with hydrophobic pockets. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 48–51 (2016).
Sullivan, M. R., Yao, W., Tang, D., Ashbaugh, H. S. & Gibb, B. C. The thermodynamics of anion complexation to nonpolar pockets. J. Phys. Chem. B 122, 1702–1713 (2018).
Hedwig, G. R. & Hinz, H. J. Group additivity schemes for the calculation of the partial molar heat capacities and volumes of unfolded proteins in aqueous solution. Biophys. Chem. 100, 239–260 (2003).
Ashbaugh, H. S. Solvent cavitation under solvophobic confinement. J. Chem. Phys. 139, 064702 (2013).
Cremer, P. S., Flood, A. H., Gibb, B. C. & Mobley, D. L. Collaborative routes to clarifying the murky waters of aqueous supramolecular chemistry. Nat. Chem. 10, 8–16 (2018).
Cao, L. P. et al. Cucurbituril⋅guest pair with an attomolar dissociation constant. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 988–993 (2014).
Assaf, K. I. & Nau, W. M. Cucurbiturils: from synthesis to high-affinity binding and catalysis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 394–418 (2015).
Hillyer, M. B. & Gibb, B. C. Molecular shape and hydrophobic effect. Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. 67, 307–329 (2016).
Abraham, M. J. et al. GROMACS: high performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers. SoftwareX 1–2, 19–25 (2015).
Horn, H. W. et al. Development of an improved four-site water model for biomolecular simulations: TIP4P-Ew. J. Chem. Phys. 120, 9665–9678 (2004).
Wang, J. M., Wolf, R. M., Caldwell, J. W., Kollman, P. A. & Case, D. A. Development and testing of a general amber force field. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1157–1174 (2004).
Jakalian, A., Bush, B. L., Jack, D. B. & Bayly, C. I. Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC model: I. Method. J. Comput. Chem. 21, 132–146 (2000).
Ewell, J., Gibb, B. C. & Rick, S. W. Water inside a hydrophobic cavitand molecule. J. Phys. Chem. B 112, 10272–10279 (2008).
Darden, T., York, D. & Pedersen, L. Particle mesh Ewald—An N·log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J. Chem. Phys. 98, 10089–10092 (1993).
Nosé, S. A unified formulation of the constant temperature molecular-dynamics methods. J. Chem. Phys. 81, 511–519 (1984).
Hoover, W. G. Canonical dynamics: equilibrium phase-space distributions. Phys. Rev. A 31, 1695–1697 (1985).
Parrinello, M. & Rahman, A. Polymorphic transitions in single-crystals—a new molecular-dynamics method. J. Appl. Phys. 52, 7182–7190 (1981).
Hess, B., Bekker, H., Berendsen, H. J. C. & Fraaije, J. LINCS: a linear constraint solver for molecular simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 18, 1463–1472 (1997).
Miyamoto, S. & Kollman, P. A. SETTLE—an analytical version of the shake and rattle algorithm for rigid water models. J. Comput. Chem. 13, 952–962 (1992).
M.R.S., T.N. and B.C.G. acknowledge the National Institutes of Health (GM125690) and the National Science Foundation (CHE–1807101) for financial support. B.C.G. and H.S.A. gratefully acknowledge the support of the National Science Foundation (CBET–1403167 and CBET–1805167). J.A.L. and D.B.-A. gratefully acknowledge support from the National Science Foundation (CHE–1763581). J.W.B. gratefully acknowledges financial support from the Louisiana Board of Regents. J.W.B., D.T. and H.S.A. thank the Louisiana Optical Network Initiative who provided computational support.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Figs. 1–33, Tables 1–8 and discussion.
Data appearing in Supplementary Figs. 16, 18, 19, 21, 22 and 23.
Zip file of GROMACS topology (.top) and Gromos87 (.gro) files for simulating hosts 1, 2 and 3 in water. GROMACS is a widely used and distributed research software
Experimental densimetry results for cavitand hosts in aqueous solution.
Simulation results characterizing the distribution of host occupation probabilities and partial molar volumes as a function of the host pocket occupancy.
Free energies of drying host pockets as a function of temperature determined from molecular simulation.
About this article
Cite this article
Barnett, J.W., Sullivan, M.R., Long, J.A. et al. Spontaneous drying of non-polar deep-cavity cavitand pockets in aqueous solution. Nat. Chem. 12, 589–594 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-020-0458-8
Nature Communications (2021)
SAMPL7 Host–Guest Challenge Overview: assessing the reliability of polarizable and non-polarizable methods for binding free energy calculations
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design (2021)
Nature Chemistry (2020)