Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Controversies, compromises and the common chemical language


The International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry — whose 100th anniversary fittingly falls during the International Year of the Periodic Table — is most recognized for its role in the naming of new elements. This is part of a wider effort to help create a common chemistry language for humans and machines alike.

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: List drawn up by F. A. Kekule of the diverse formulas for acetic acid that were used before 1861.
Fig. 2: Periodic tables published in 1919.
Fig. 3: The number of elements discovered since the 1600s has increased at a surprisingly regular pace.


  1. Meija, J. Chem. Int. 36, 18–20 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mönnich, M. W. Chem. Int. 32, 10–14 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Meyer, L. Abriss eines Lehrganges der Theoretischen Chemie vorgetragen an der K. Universität Genua vor Prof. S. Cannizzaro Herausgegeben von Lothar Meyer Ostwald’s Klassiker der Exalten Wissenschaften, nº 90 (Leipzig, Verlag Engelmann, 1891).

  4. Ihde, A. J. J. Chem. Educ. 38, 83–86 (1961).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Evieux, E. A. J. Chem. Educ. 31, 326–327 (1954).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Scerri, E. The Periodic Table: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford University Press, 2011).

  7. Hackh, I. W. D. Sci. Am. 38, 146–149 (1919).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Langmuir, I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 41, 868–934 (1919).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fontani, M., Costa, M. & Orna, M. V. The Lost Elements: The Periodic Table’s Shadow Side. (OUP, USA, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fennell, R. & Brown, S. S. History of IUPAC 1919–1999 (International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry, 2001).

  11. Hofmann, S. et al. Pure Appl. Chem. 90, 1773–1832 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Koppenol, W. H., Corish, J., García-Martínez, J., Meija, J. & Reedijk, J. Pure Appl. Chem. 88, 401–405 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ghiorso, A., Harvey, B., Chopin, G., Thompson, S. & Seaborg, T. G. Phys. Rev. 98, 1518–1519 (1955).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Choppin, G. R. Chem. Eng. News 81, 176–176 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kragh, H. From Transuranic to Superheavy Elements: A Story of Dispute and Creation (Springer Nature, 2018).

  16. Ghiorso, A., Hoffman, D. C. & Seaborg G. T. The Transuranium People: The Inside Story (World Scientific, 2000).

  17. Wapstra, A. H. Pure Appl. Chem. 63, 879–886 (1991).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wilkinson, D. H. et al. Pure Appl. Chem. 65, 1757–1814 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sargeson, A. M. et al. Pure Appl. Chem. 66, 2419–2421 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ghiorso, A. et al. Pure Appl. Chem. 65, 1815–1824 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sargeson, A. M. Pure Appl. Chem. 69, 2471–2474 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ball, P. Nature 565, 552–555 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhou, Q. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E6411–E6417 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Thornton, B. F. & Burdette, S. C. Nat. Chem. 5, 350–352 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lemonick, S. The periodic table is an icon. But chemists still can’t agree on how to arrange it. Chemical & Engineering News (2019).

  26. Extance, A. Nature 561, 273–274 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. De Luna, P., Wei, J., Bengio, Y., Aspuru-Guzik, A. & Sargent, E. Nature 552, 23–27 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Fleming, N. Nature 557, S55–S57 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Li, Z., Wang, S. & Xin, H. Nat. Catal. 1, 641–642 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Javier García-Martínez.

Additional information

Twitter: @javiergarciamar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

García-Martínez, J. Controversies, compromises and the common chemical language. Nat. Chem. 11, 853–856 (2019).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing