Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Formation of carbon–nitrogen bonds in carbon monoxide electrolysis

Nature Chemistry volume 11, pages 846–851 (2019)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

The electroreduction of CO2 is a promising technology for carbon utilization. Although electrolysis of CO2 or CO2-derived CO can generate important industrial multicarbon feedstocks such as ethylene, ethanol, n-propanol and acetate, most efforts have been devoted to promoting C–C bond formation. Here, we demonstrate that C–N bonds can be formed through co-electrolysis of CO and NH3 with acetamide selectivity of nearly 40% at industrially relevant reaction rates. Full-solvent quantum mechanical calculations show that acetamide forms through nucleophilic addition of NH3 to a surface-bound ketene intermediate, a step that is in competition with OH– addition, which leads to acetate. The C–N formation mechanism was successfully extended to a series of amide products through amine nucleophilic attack on the ketene intermediate. This strategy enables us to form carbon–heteroatom bonds through the electroreduction of CO, expanding the scope of products available from CO2 reduction.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Acetamide production from CO electrolysis with NH3.
Fig. 2: The mechanism for CO reduction on Cu that shows how it splits at [*(HO)C=COH] into two pathways.
Fig. 3: Electrochemical production of longer amides from CO electrolysis in 5 M amine solutions.

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Code availability

The computational codes used in the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Otto, A., Grube, T., Schiebahn, S. & Stolten, D. Closing the loop: captured CO2 as a feedstock in the chemical industry. Energy Environ. Sci. 8, 3283–3297 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Schiffer, Z. J. & Manthiram, K. Electrification and decarbonization of the chemical industry. Joule 1, 10–14 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Katelhon, A., Meys, R., Deutz, S., Suh, S. & Bardow A. Climate change mitigation potential of carbon capture and utilization in the chemical industry. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 11187–11194 (2019).

  4. Montoya, J. H. et al. Materials for solar fuels and chemicals. Nat. Mater. 16, 70–81 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Haegel, N. M. et al. Terawatt-scale photovoltaics: transform global energy. Science 364, 836–838 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. De Luna, P. et al. What would it take for renewably powered electrosynthesis to displace petrochemical processes? Science 364, eaav3506 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Verma, S., Lu, S. & Kenis, P. J. A. Co-electrolysis of CO2 and glycerol as a pathway to carbon chemicals with improved technoeconomics due to low electricity consumption. Nature Energy 4, 466–474 (2019).

  8. Nitopi, S. et al. Progress and perspectives of electrochemical CO2 reduction on copper in aqueous electrolyte. Chem. Rev. 119, 7610–7672 (2019).

  9. Jouny, M., Luc, W. & Jiao, F. General techno-economic analysis of CO2 electrolysis systems. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 57, 2165–2177 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gao, D., Arán-Ais, R. M., Jeon, H. S. & Roldan Cuenya, B. Rational catalyst and electrolyte design for CO2 electroreduction towards multicarbon products. Nat. Catal. 2, 198–210 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dinh, C.-T. et al. CO2 electroreduction to ethylene via hydroxide-mediated copper catalysis at an abrupt interface. Science 360, 783 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Verma, S. et al. Insights into the low overpotential electroreduction of CO2 to CO on a supported gold catalyst in an alkaline flow electrolyzer. ACS Energy Lett. 3, 193–198 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Li, C. W., Ciston, J. & Kanan, M. W. Electroreduction of carbon monoxide to liquid fuel on oxide-derived nanocrystalline copper. Nature 508, 504–507 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Verdaguer-Casadevall, A. et al. Probing the active surface sites for CO reduction on oxide-derived copper electrocatalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 9808–9811 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bertheussen, E. et al. Acetaldehyde as an intermediate in the electroreduction of carbon monoxide to ethanol on oxide-derived copper. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 1450–1454 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Garza, A. J., Bell, A. T. & Head-Gordon, M. Mechanism of CO2 reduction at copper surfaces: pathways to C2 products. ACS Catal. 8, 1490–1499 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Pang, Y. et al. Efficient electrocatalytic conversion of carbon monoxide to propanol using fragmented copper. Nat. Catal. 2, 251–258 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhuang, T.-T. et al. Copper nanocavities confine intermediates for efficient electrosynthesis of C3 alcohol fuels from carbon monoxide. Nat. Catal. 1, 946–951 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang, H., Li, J., Cheng, M.-J. & Lu, Q. CO electroreduction: current development and understanding of Cu-based catalysts. ACS Catal. 9, 49–65 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pattabiraman, V. R. & Bode, J. W. Rethinking amide bond synthesis. Nature 480, 471–479 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Nagib, D. Nitrogen gets radical. Nat. Chem. 11, 396–398 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Jouny, M., Luc, W. & Jiao, F. High-rate electroreduction of carbon monoxide to multi-carbon products. Nat. Catal. 1, 748–755 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Cheng, T., Xiao, H. & Goddard, W. A. Reaction mechanisms for the electrochemical reduction of CO2 to CO and formate on the Cu(100) surface at 298 K from quantum mechanics free energy calculations with explicit water. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 13802–13805 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Cheng, T., Xiao, H. & Goddard, W. A. Full atomistic reaction mechanism with kinetics for CO reduction on Cu(100) from ab initio molecular dynamics free-energy calculations at 298 K. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 1795–1800 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim, B., Ma, S., Molly Jhong, H.-R. & Kenis, P. J. A. Influence of dilute feed and pH on electrochemical reduction of CO2 to CO on Ag in a continuous flow electrolyzer. Electrochim. Acta 166, 271–276 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang, L. et al. Electrochemical carbon monoxide reduction on polycrystalline copper: effects of potential, pressure, and pH on selectivity toward multicarbon and oxygenated products. ACS Catal. 8, 7445–7454 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lum, Y. W. & Ager, J. W. Stability of residual oxides in oxide-derived copper catalysts for electrochemical CO2 reduction investigated with 18O labeling. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 551–554 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Scott, S. B. et al. Absence of oxidized phases in Cu under CO reduction conditions. ACS Energy Lett. 4, 803–804 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Luc W. et al. Two-dimensional copper nanosheets for electrochemical reduction of carbon monoxide to acetate. Nat Catal. 2, 423–430 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lum, Y. W., Cheng, T., Goddard, W. A. & Ager, J. W. Electrochemical CO reduction builds solvent water into oxygenate products. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 9337–9340 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Cheng, T., Xiao, H. & Goddard, W. A. Free-energy barriers and reaction mechanisms for the electrochemical reduction of CO on the Cu(100) surface, including multiple layers of explicit solvent at pH 0. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6, 4767–4773 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Bagger, A., Arnarson, L., Hansen, M. H., Spohr, E. & Rossmeisl, J. Electrochemical CO reduction: a property of the electrochemical interface. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 1506–1514 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Calle-Vallejo, F. & Koper, M. T. M. Theoretical considerations on the electroreduction of CO to C2 species on Cu(100) electrodes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 7282–7285 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Feng, X. F., Jiang, K. L., Fan, S. S. & Kanan, M. W. A direct grain-boundary-activity correlation for CO electroreduction on Cu nanoparticles. ACS Cent. Sci. 2, 169–174 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Dean J. A., Lange N. A. Lange’s Handbook of Chemistry (McGraw-Hill, 1999).

  36. Lundberg, H., Tinnis, F., Selander, N. & Adolfsson, H. Catalytic amide formation from non-activated carboxylic acids and amines. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 2714–2742 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Watts, J. C. & Larson, P. A. “Dimethylacetamide” in Kirk–Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology Online (John C. Wiley & Sons, 2002). https://doi.org/10.1002/0471238961.0409130523012020.a01.pub2

  38. McEnaney, J. M. et al. Ammonia synthesis from N2 and H2O using a lithium cycling electrification strategy at atmospheric pressure. Energy Environ. Sci. 10, 1621–1630 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Jiao, F. & Xu, B. J. Electrochemical ammonia synthesis and ammonia fuel cells. Adv. Mater. 31, 1805173 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Chen, J. G. et al. Beyond fossil fuel-driven nitrogen transformations. Science 360, eaar6611 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Liu, K., Smith, W. A. & Burdyny, T. Introductory guide to assembling and operating gas diffusion electrodes for electrochemical CO reduction. ACS Energy Lett. 4, 639–643 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Lu, X. & Zhao, C. Electrodeposition of hierarchically structured three-dimensional nickel–iron electrodes for efficient oxygen evolution at high current densities. Nat. Commun. 6, 6616 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Luc, W., Jiang, Z., Chen, J. G. G. & Jiao, F. Role of surface oxophilicity in copper-catalyzed water dissociation. ACS Catal. 8, 9327–9333 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

F.J. would like to thank W. Luc for illustration assistance and E. Jeng for help with preparation of the anode. M.J. and J.-J.L. also thank B. Murphy and Z. J. Wang for help with GC–MS. The experimental work was financially supported by the US Department of Energy under award no. DE-FE0029868. F.J. also thanks the National Science Foundation Faculty Early Career Development program (award no. CBET-1350911). J.-J.L. acknowledges financial support from Chinese Scholarship Council. T.C. and W.A.G. were supported by the Joint Center for Artificial Photosynthesis, a DOE Energy Innovation Hub, supported through the Office of Science of the US Department of Energy under award no. DE-SC0004993. This work used the Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment, which is supported by National Science Foundation grant no. ACI-1053575. This research used resources at the 8-ID Beamline of the National Synchrotron Light Source II, a US Department of Energy Office of Science User Facility operated by Brookhaven National Laboratory under contract no. DE-SC0012704. The authors acknowledge E. Stavitski (8-ID Beamline, NSLS-II, Brookhaven National Laboratory) for assistance in X-ray absorption spectroscopy measurements.

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally: Matthew Jouny, Jing-Jing Lv, Tao Cheng.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Catalytic Science and Technology, Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA

    Matthew Jouny, Jing-Jing Lv, Byung Hee Ko & Feng Jiao

  2. State Key Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry for Life Science, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China

    Jing-Jing Lv & Jun-Jie Zhu

  3. Joint Center for Artificial Photosynthesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA

    Tao Cheng & William A. Goddard III

  4. Materials and Process Simulation Center, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA

    Tao Cheng & William A. Goddard III

  5. Institute of Functional Nano & Soft Materials, Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Carbon-based Functional Materials & Devices, Joint International Research Laboratory of Carbon-based Functional Materials and Devices, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China

    Tao Cheng

Authors
  1. Matthew Jouny
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jing-Jing Lv
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tao Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Byung Hee Ko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jun-Jie Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. William A. Goddard III
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Feng Jiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

F.J. conceived the idea and supervised the project. M.J. and J.J.-L. performed the electrolysis experiments, analysed the data and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. B.H.K. performed the SEM characterization. T.C. and W.A.G. performed the computational modelling studies. All the authors contributed to the discussion of the results and preparation of the manuscript. M.J., J.J.L. and T.C. have the right to list themselves first in the bibliographic documents.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to William A. Goddard III or Feng Jiao.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

M.J., J.-J.L. and F.J. have filed a patent application (international patent application number: PCT/US 19/27012) that is based on the discovery presented in this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information

Supplementary Figs. 1–15, Tables 1–5 and Methods

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jouny, M., Lv, JJ., Cheng, T. et al. Formation of carbon–nitrogen bonds in carbon monoxide electrolysis. Nat. Chem. 11, 846–851 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-019-0312-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-019-0312-z

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing