Optimization of the facet structure of transition-metal catalysts applied to the oxygen reduction reaction


Predicting the optimal structure for a catalytic material has been a long-standing goal, but typically an arbitrary active site on a uniform surface is modelled. Identification of the most-active facet structure for structure-sensitive chemistries, such as the oxygen reduction reaction, is lacking. Here we develop an approach to predict the optimal structure of a catalytic material by identifying the active site and identifying the density and spatial arrangement of such sites while minimizing the surface energy. We find that the theoretical peak performance predicted by linear scaling relations is unattainable because of the lack of suitable active sites on low-index planes, as well as geometric and stability constraints. A random array of vacancies results in a modest performance enhancement compared to ideal facets, whereas defect sites with a maximum density in disordered structures significantly increase the catalyst performance. We applied this methodology to the oxygen reduction reaction on defected Pt(111), Pt(100), Au(111) and Au(100) surfaces.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Volcano map for ORR activities on Pt and Au.
Fig. 2: Current density and surface energy simulation results for numerous defected Pt(111)-based crystals that contain different active sites and/or density of active sites.
Fig. 3: Structures of defected crystals.
Fig. 4: Top-down views of the active sites for each surface.
Fig. 5: Pareto front of current density and surface energy.
Fig. 6: Activity of defected metastable structures compared to ideal crystals.

Data availability

All code and data that went into generating the results in this paper can be found at https://github.com/VlachosGroup/ORR-Optimization. The GitHub repository includes code for the following: structure generation, MKM, DFT data used in parameterizing the Hamiltonian used in the MKM and optimization algorithms.

Code availability

All code that went into generating the results in this paper can be found at https://github.com/VlachosGroup/ORR-Optimization. All the code is implemented in Python and requires the atomic simulation environment to represent molecular structures and for file input and output (IO). The directory structure is described in the readme.rst file.


  1. 1.

    Van Santen, R. A. Complementary structure sensitive and insensitive catalytic relationships. Acc. Chem. Res. 42, 57–66 (2009).

  2. 2.

    Koper, M. T. M. Structure sensitivity and nanoscale effects in electrocatalysis. Nanoscale 3, 2054–2073 (2011).

  3. 3.

    Carchini, G. et al. How theoretical simulations can address the structure and activity of nanoparticles. Top. Catal. 56, 1262–1272 (2013).

  4. 4.

    Roldan Cuenya, B. Metal nanoparticle catalysts beginning to shape-up. Acc. Chem. Res. 46, 1682–1691 (2012).

  5. 5.

    Somorjai, G. A. & Park, J. Y. Colloid science of metal nanoparticle catalysts in 2D and 3D structures. Challenges of nucleation, growth, composition, particle shape, size control and their influence on activity and selectivity. Top. Catal. 49, 126–135 (2008).

  6. 6.

    Xia, X. et al. Facile synthesis of palladium right bipyramids and their use as seeds for overgrowth and as catalysts for formic acid oxidation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 15706–15709 (2013).

  7. 7.

    Kim, S. K. et al. Performance of shape-controlled Pd nanoparticles in the selective hydrogenation of acetylene. J. Catal. 306, 146–154 (2013).

  8. 8.

    Renzas, J. R., Zhang, Y., Huang, W. & Somorjai, G. A. Rhodium nanoparticle shape dependence in the reduction of NO by CO. Catal. Lett. 132, 317–322 (2009).

  9. 9.

    Bratlie, K. M., Lee, H., Komvopoulos, K., Yang, P. & Somorjai, G. A. Platinum nanoparticle shape effects on benzene hydrogenation selectivity. Nano Lett. 7, 3097–3101 (2007).

  10. 10.

    Lee, I., Delbecq, F., Morales, R., Albiter, M. A. & Zaera, F. Tuning selectivity in catalysis by controlling particle shape. Nat. Mater. 8, 132–138 (2009).

  11. 11.

    Mostafa, S. et al. Shape-dependent catalytic properties of Pt nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 15714–15719 (2010).

  12. 12.

    Calle-Vallejo, F. et al. Finding optimal surface sites on heterogeneous catalysts by counting nearest neighbors. Science 350, 185–189 (2015).

  13. 13.

    Dubau, L. et al. Defects do dcatalysis: CO monolayer oxidation and oxygen reduction reaction on hollow PtNi/C nanoparticles. ACS Catal. 6, 4673–4684 (2016).

  14. 14.

    Guo, W. & Vlachos, D. G. Patched bimetallic surfaces are active catalysts for ammonia decomposition. Nat. Commun. 6, 8619–8625 (2015).

  15. 15.

    Calle-Vallejo, F. et al. Why conclusions from platinum model surfaces do not necessarily lead to enhanced nanoparticle catalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction. Chem. Sci. 8, 2283–2289 (2017).

  16. 16.

    Calle-Vallejo, F., Martínez, J. I., García-Lastra, J. M., Sautet, P. & Loffreda, D. Fast prediction of adsorption properties for platinum nanocatalysts with generalized coordination numbers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 8316–8319 (2014).

  17. 17.

    Calle-Vallejo, F., Loffreda, D., Koper, M. T. M. & Sautet, P. Introducing structural sensitivity into adsorption–energy scaling relations by means of coordination numbers. Nat. Chem. 7, 403–410 (2015).

  18. 18.

    Mpourmpakis, G., Andriotis, A. N. & Vlachos, D. G. Identification of descriptors for the CO interaction with metal nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 10, 1041–1045 (2010).

  19. 19.

    Hanselman, C. L. & Gounaris, C. E. A mathematical optimization framework for the design of nanopatterned surfaces. AIChE J. 62, 3250–3263 (2016).

  20. 20.

    Zhuang, H., Tkalych, A. J. & Carter, E. A. Surface energy as a descriptor of catalytic activity. J. Phys. Chem. C 120, 23698–23706 (2016).

  21. 21.

    Rong, X., Parolin, J. & Kolpak, A. M. A fundamental relationship between reaction mechanism and stability in metal oxide catalysts for oxygen evolution. ACS Catal. 6, 1153–1158 (2016).

  22. 22.

    Perez-Alonso, F. J. et al. The effect of size on the oxygen electroreduction activity of mass-selected platinum nanoparticles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 4641–4643 (2012).

  23. 23.

    Markovic, N., Gasteiger, H. & Ross, P. N. Kinetics of oxygen reduction on Pt(hkl) electrodes: implications for the crystallite size effect with supported Pt electrocatalysts. J. Electrochem. Soc. 144, 1591–1597 (1997).

  24. 24.

    Lee, S. W. et al. Role of surface steps of Pt nanoparticles on the electrochemical activity for oxygen reduction. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 1, 1316–1320 (2010).

  25. 25.

    Guerin, S., Hayden, B. E., Pletcher, D., Rendall, M. E. & Suchsland, J.-P. A combinatorial approach to the study of particle size effects on supported electrocatalysts: oxygen reduction on gold. J. Comb. Chem. 8, 679–686 (2006).

  26. 26.

    Gasteiger, H. A., Kocha, S. S., Sompalli, B. & Wagner, F. T. Activity benchmarks and requirements for Pt, Pt-alloy, and non-Pt oxygen reduction catalysts for PEMFCs. Appl. Catal. B 56, 9–35 (2005).

  27. 27.

    Wang, B. Recent development of non-platinum catalysts for oxygen reduction reaction. J. Power Sources 152, 1–15 (2005).

  28. 28.

    Jinnouchi, R., Suzuki, K. K. T. & Morimoto, Y. DFT calculations on electro-oxidations and dissolutions of Pt and Pt–Au nanoparticles. Catal. Today 262, 100–109 (2016).

  29. 29.

    Stephens, I. E. L., Bondarenko, A. S., Grønbjerg, U., Rossmeisl, J. & Chorkendorff, I. Understanding the electrocatalysis of oxygen reduction on platinum and its alloys. Energy Environ. Sci. 5, 6744–6762 (2012).

  30. 30.

    Yamamoto, K. et al. Size-specific catalytic activity of platinum clusters enhances oxygen reduction reactions. Nat. Chem. 1, 397–402 (2009).

  31. 31.

    Nørskov, J. K. et al. Universality in heterogeneous catalysis. J. Catal. 209, 275–278 (2002).

  32. 32.

    Nørskov, J. K. et al. Origin of the overpotential for oxygen reduction at a fuel-cell cathode. J. Phys. Chem. B 108, 17886–17892 (2004).

  33. 33.

    Norskov, J. K., Bligaard, T., Rossmeisl, J. & Christensen, C. H. Towards the computational design of solid catalysts. Nat. Chem. 1, 37–46 (2009).

  34. 34.

    Tripković, V., Cerri, I., Bligaard, T. & Rossmeisl, J. The influence of particle shape and size on the activity of platinum nanoparticles for oxygen reduction reaction: a density functional theory study. Catal. Lett. 144, 380–388 (2014).

  35. 35.

    Tritsaris, G. A., Greeley, J., Rossmeisl, J. & Nørskov, J. K. Atomic-scale modeling of particle size effects for the oxygen reduction reaction on Pt. Catal. Lett. 141, 909–913 (2011).

  36. 36.

    Li, H., Zhao, M. & Jiang, Q. Cohesive energy of clusters referenced by Wulff construction. J. Phys. Chem. C 113, 7594–7597 (2009).

  37. 37.

    Salciccioli, M., Stamatakis, M., Caratzoulas, S. & Vlachos, D. G. A review of multiscale modeling of metal-catalyzed reactions: mechanism development for complexity and emergent behavior. Chem. Eng. Sci. 66, 4319–4355 (2011).

  38. 38.

    Sutton, J. E., Guo, W., Katsoulakis, M. A. & Vlachos, D. G. Effects of correlated parameters and uncertainty in electronic-structure-based chemical kinetic modelling. Nat. Chem. 8, 331–337 (2016).

  39. 39.

    Ulissi, Z. W., Medford, A. J., Bligaard, T., Nørskov, J. K. & Nørskov, J. K. To address surface reaction network complexity using scaling relations machine learning and DFT calculations. Nat. Commun. 8, 14621 (2017).

  40. 40.

    Salciccioli, M. & Vlachos, D. G. Kinetic modeling of Pt catalyzed and computation-driven catalyst discovery for ethylene glycol decomposition. ACS Catal. 1, 1246–1256 (2011).

  41. 41.

    Hansgen, D. A., Vlachos, D. G. & Chen, J. G. Using first principles to predict bimetallic catalysts for the ammonia decomposition reaction. Nat. Chem. 2, 484–489 (2010).

  42. 42.

    Stephens, I. E. L. et al. Tuning the activity of Pt(111) for oxygen electroreduction by subsurface alloying. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 5485–5491 (2011).

  43. 43.

    Herron, J. A., Scaranto, J., Ferrin, P., Li, S. & Mavrikakis, M. Trends in formic acid decomposition on model transition metal surfaces: a density functional theory study. ACS Catal. 4, 4434–4445 (2014).

  44. 44.

    Ferrin, P. & Mavrikakis, M. Structure sensitivity of methanol electrooxidation on transition metals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 14381–14389 (2009).

  45. 45.

    Falsig, H. et al. Trends in the catalytic CO oxidation activity of nanoparticles. Angew. Chem. 120, 4913–4917 (2008).

  46. 46.

    Jiang, T. et al. Trends in CO oxidation rates for metal nanoparticles and close-packed, stepped, and kinked surfaces. J. Phys. Chem. C 113, 10548–10553 (2009).

  47. 47.

    Blaylock, D. W., Zhu, Y.-A. & Green, W. H. Computational investigation of the thermochemistry and kinetics of steam methane reforming over a multi-faceted nickel catalyst. Top. Catal. 54, 828–844 (2011).

  48. 48.

    Lin, S. et al. Influence of step defects on methanol decomposition: periodic density functional studies on Pd (211) and kinetic Monte Carlo simulations. Phys. Chem. C 117, 451–459 (2013).

  49. 49.

    Yang, L., Karim, A. & Muckerman, J. T. Density functional kinetic Monte Carlo simulation of water–gas shift reaction on Cu/ZnO. J. Phys. Chem. C 117, 3414–3425 (2013).

  50. 50.

    Stamatakis, M., Chen, Y. & Vlachos, D. G. First-principles-based kinetic Monte Carlo simulation of the structure sensitivity of the water gas shift reaction on platinum surfaces. J. Phys. Chem. C 115, 24750–24762 (2011).

  51. 51.

    Christopher, P. & Linic, S. Engineering selectivity in heterogeneous catalysis: Ag nanowires as selective ethylene epoxidation catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 11264–11265 (2008).

  52. 52.

    Shao, M., Peles, A. & Shoemaker, K. Electrocatalysis on platinum nanoparticles: particle size effect on oxygen reduction reaction activity. Nano Lett. 11, 3714–3719 (2011).

  53. 53.

    Wang, C., Daimon, H., Onodera, T., Koda, T. & Sun, S. A general approach to the size- and shape-controlled synthesis of platinum nanoparticles and their catalytic reduction of oxygen. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47, 3588–3591 (2008).

  54. 54.

    Stamenkovic, V., M. Markovic, N. & Ross, P. N. Structure-relationships in electrocatalysis: oxygen reduction and hydrogen oxidation reactions on Pt(111) and Pt(100) in solutions containing chloride ions. J. Electroanal. Chem. 500, 44–51 (2001).

  55. 55.

    Tománek, D. et al. Simple theory for the electronic and atomic structure of small clusters. Phys. Rev. B 28, 665–673 (1983).

  56. 56.

    Eichler, A. et al. Structural and electronic properties of rhodium surfaces: an ab initio approach. Surf. Sci. 346, 300–321 (1996).

  57. 57.

    Somorjai, G. A. & Van Hove, M. A. Adsorbate-induced restructuring of surfaces. Prog. Surf. Sci. 30, 201–231 (1989).

  58. 58.

    Martin, R., Gardner, P. & Bradshaw, A. M. The adsorbate-induced removal of the Pt{100} surface reconstruction Part II: CO. Surf. Sci. 342, 69–84 (1995).

  59. 59.

    Schwegmann, S., Tappe, W. & Korte, U. Quantitative structure analysis of a disordered system: RHEED study of the CO induced (1 × 2) → (1 × 1) structure transition of Pt(110). Surf. Sci. 334, 55–76 (1995).

  60. 60.

    Karakatsani, S., Ge, Q., Gladys, M. J., Held, G. & King, D. A. Coverage-dependent molecular tilt of carbon monoxide chemisorbed on Pt{110}: a combined LEED and DFT structural analysis. Surf. Sci. 606, 383–393 (2012).

  61. 61.

    Walker, A. V., Klötzer, B. & King, D. A. Dynamics and kinetics of oxygen dissociative adsorption on Pt{110}(1×2). J. Chem. Phys. 109, 6879–6888 (1998).

  62. 62.

    Tománek, D. Simple criterion for the reconstruction of clean and adsorbate-covered metal surfaces. Phys. Lett. A 113, 445–448 (1986).

  63. 63.

    Czyzżak, P. & Jaszkiewicz, A. Pareto simulated annealing—a metaheuristic technique for multiple‐objective combinatorial optimization. J. Multi‐Criteria Decis. Anal. 7, 34–47 (1998).

  64. 64.

    Marler, R. T. & Arora, J. S. Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 26, 369–395 (2004).

Download references


Material developed by Núñez and Vlachos is based on work supported by the US Department of Energy Office of Science, Office of Advanced Scientific Computing Research and Applied Mathematics programme under award no. DE-SC0010549. Funding for Lansford was provided by the Defense Advanced Research Project Agency under grant W911NF-15-2-0122. We thank F. Calle-Vallejo for providing the original data of his group’s work. We thank S. Giles for useful discussion on electrochemistry.

Author information




M.N. implemented the optimization methodology, performed the calculations and analysed the results. J.L.L. performed the DFT calculations and MKM. D.G.V. conceived the problem and provided supervision. All the authors contributed to writing the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. G. Vlachos.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Results, Supplementary Analysis, Supplementary Methods, Supplementary Figures 1–23, Supplementary Tables 1–8

Supplementary Dataset 1

Snapshot of GitHub repository that contains all code and data used in this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Núñez, M., Lansford, J.L. & Vlachos, D.G. Optimization of the facet structure of transition-metal catalysts applied to the oxygen reduction reaction. Nat. Chem. 11, 449–456 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-019-0247-4

Download citation

Further reading