Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

A molecular multi-gene classifier for disease diagnostics

Nature Chemistry volume 10, pages 746–754 (2018)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Despite its early promise as a diagnostic and prognostic tool, gene expression profiling remains cost-prohibitive and challenging to implement in a clinical setting. Here, we introduce a molecular computation strategy for analysing the information contained in complex gene expression signatures without the need for costly instrumentation. Our workflow begins by training a computational classifier on labelled gene expression data. This in silico classifier is then realized at the molecular level to enable expression analysis and classification of previously uncharacterized samples. Classification occurs through a series of molecular interactions between RNA inputs and engineered DNA probes designed to differentially weigh each input according to its importance. We validate our technology with two applications: a classifier for early cancer diagnostics and a classifier for differentiating viral and bacterial respiratory infections based on host gene expression. Together, our results demonstrate a general and modular framework for low-cost gene expression analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Universal framework for rapid prototyping of molecular classifiers for gene expression diagnostics.
Fig. 2: Implementation of classifier weights by targeting of multiple adjacent regions in a transcript.
Fig. 3: Molecular implementation of a two-gene classifier for cancer diagnostics.
Fig. 4: In silico training of a minimal linear classifier to discriminate viral from bacterial infections based on host gene expression data.
Fig. 5: A molecular classifier of host gene expression for respiratory infections diagnostics.

References

  1. Vargas, J. D & Lima, J. A. C. A gene-expression score to predict obstructive CAD. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 10(5), 243–244 2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. van’t Veer, L. J. et al. Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer. Nature 415, 530–536 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Blank, P. R. et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of prognostic gene expression signature-based stratification of early breast cancer patients. Pharmacoeconomics 33, 179–190 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Myers, M. B. Targeted therapies with companion diagnostics in the management of breast cancer: current perspectives. Pharmgenomics Pers. Med. 9, 7–16 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Rotunno, M. et al. A gene expression signature from peripheral whole blood for stage I lung adenocarcinoma. Cancer Prev. Res 4, 1599–1608 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lunnon, K., Sattlecker, M. & Furney, S. J. A blood gene expression marker of early Alzheimer’s disease. J. Alzheimers Dis. 33, 737–753 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Koscielny, S. Why most gene expression signatures of tumors have not been useful in the clinic. Sci. Transl. Med. 2, 14ps2 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sotiriou, C. & Piccart, M. J. Taking gene-expression profiling to the clinic: when will molecular signatures become relevant to patient care? Nat. Rev. Cancer 7, 545–553 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cassarino, D. S., Lewine, N., Cole, D. & Wade, B. Budget impact analysis of a novel gene expression assay for the diagnosis of malignant melanoma. J. Med. Econ. 17, 782–791 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tsalik, E. L. et al. Host gene expression classifiers diagnose respiratory illness etiology. Sci. Transl. Med. 8, 322ra11 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Best, M. G. et al. RNA-seq of tumor-educated platelets enables blood-based pan-cancer, multiclass, and molecular pathway cancer diagnostics. Cancer Cell 28, 666–676 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Yuan, T. et al. Plasma extracellular RNA profiles in healthy and cancer patients. Sci. Rep. 6, 19413 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Dasí, F. et al. Real-time quantification in plasma of human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) mRNA: a simple blood test to monitor disease in cancer patients. Lab. Invest. 81, 767–769 (2001).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang, L. et al. Salivary transcriptomic biomarkers for detection of resectable pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterology 138, 949 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang, L. et al. Development of transcriptomic biomarker signature in human saliva to detect lung cancer. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 69, 3341–3350 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Kyo, S., Takakura, M., Fujiwara, T. & Inoue, M. Understanding and exploiting hTERT promoter regulation for diagnosis and treatment of human cancers. Cancer Sci. 99, 1528–1538 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lledo et al. Real time quantification in plasma of human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) mRNA in patients with colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. 6, 236–242 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. March-Villalba, J. A. et al. Cell-free circulating plasma hTERT mRNA is a useful marker for prostate cancer diagnosis and is associated with poor prognosis tumor characteristics. PLoS ONE 7, e43470 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Miura, N., Nakamura, H., Sato, R. & Tsukamoto, T. Clinical usefulness of serum telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) mRNA and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mRNA as a novel tumor marker. Cancer Sci. 97, 1366–1373 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Terrin, L. et al. Relationship between tumor and plasma levels of hTERT mRNA in patients with colorectal cancer: implications for monitoring of neoplastic disease. Clin. Cancer Res. 14, 7444–7451 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ramilo, O., Allman, W., Chung, W., Mejias, A. & Ardura, M. Gene expression patterns in blood leukocytes discriminate patients with acute infections. Blood 109, 2066–2077 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen, S. X. & Seelig, G. An engineered kinetic amplification mechanism for single nucleotide variant discrimination by DNA hybridization probes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 5076–5086 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pardee, K., Green, A. A., Ferrante, T. & Cameron, D. E. Paper-based synthetic gene networks. Cell 159, 940–954 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Pardee, K. et al. Rapid, low-cost detection of Zika virus using programmable biomolecular components. Cell 165, 1255–1266 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jung, C. & Ellington, A. D. Diagnostic applications of nucleic acid circuits. Acc. Chem. Res 47, 1825–1835 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Gootenberg, J. S. et al. Nucleic acid detection with CRISPR-Cas13a/C2c2. Science 356, 438–442 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Qian, L. & Winfree, E. Scaling up digital circuit computation with DNA strand displacement cascades. Science 332, 1196–1201 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Qian, L., Winfree, E. & Bruck, J. Neural network computation with DNA strand displacement cascades. Nature 475, 368–372 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Seelig, G., Soloveichik, D., Zhang, D. & Winfree, E. Enzyme-free nucleic acid logic circuits. Science 314, 1585–1588 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Chen, Y.-J. et al. Programmable chemical controllers made from DNA. Nat. Nanotech. 8, 755–762 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Genot, A. J., Fujii, T. & Rondelez, Y. Scaling down DNA circuits with competitive neural networks. J. R. Soc. Interface 10, 20130212 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Franco, E. et al. Timing molecular motion and production with a synthetic transcriptional clock. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, E784–E793 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Mills, A. P. Gene expression profiling diagnosis through DNA molecular computation. Trends Biotechnol. 20, 137–140 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Green, A. A. et al. Complex cellular logic computation using ribocomputing devices. Nature 548, 117–121 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Brown, M. P. S., Grundy, W. N. & Lin, D. Knowledge-based analysis of microarray gene expression data by using support vector machines. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 262–267 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Abusamra, H. A comparative study of feature selection and classification methods for gene expression data of glioma. Procedia Comput. Sci. 23, 5–14 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Liu, H., Li, J. & Wong, L. A comparative study on feature selection and classification methods using gene expression profiles and proteomic patterns. Genome Inform. 13, 51–60 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Shelton, V. M., Sosnick, T. R. & Pan, T. Applicability of urea in the thermodynamic analysis of secondary and tertiary RNA folding. Biochemistry 38, 16831–16839 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhang, D. Y. & Seelig, G. in DNA Computing and Molecular Programming (eds Sakakibara, Y. & Mi, Y.) Vol. 6518, 176–186 (Springer, Berlin, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Zhang, D. Cooperative hybridization of oligonucleotides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 1077–1086 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Dasí, F. et al. Real-time quantification of human telomerase reverse transcriptase mRNA in the plasma of patients with prostate cancer. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1075, 204–210 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Yang, Y. J., Chen, H., Huang, P., Li, C. H. & Dong, Z. Quantification of plasma hTERT DNA in hepatocellular carcinoma patients by quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction. Clin. Invest. 34, E238 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Lizardi, P. M., Huang, X., Zhu, Z. & Bray-Ward, P. Mutation detection and single-molecule counting using isothermal rolling-circle amplification. Nat. Genet 19, 225–232 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhao, W., Ali, M. M., Brook, M. A. & Li, Y. Rolling circle amplification: applications in nanotechnology and biodetection with functional nucleic acids. Angew. Chem. Int Ed. 47, 6330–6337 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Notomi, T., Okayama, H. & Masubuchi, H. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification of DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, e63 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Tomita, N., Mori, Y., Kanda, H. & Notomi, T. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) of gene sequences and simple visual detection of products. Nat. Protoc. 3, 877–882 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Y.-J. Chen, S. Chen, G. Chatterjee and D.Y. Zhang for their support and discussions. This work was supported by NSF grants CCF-171449 and CCF-1317653.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

    Randolph Lopez

  2. Molecular Engineering & Sciences Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

    Randolph Lopez & Georg Seelig

  3. Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

    Ruofan Wang

  4. Department of Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

    Ruofan Wang

  5. Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

    Georg Seelig

  6. Paul G. Allen School of Computer Science & Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

    Georg Seelig

Authors
  1. Randolph Lopez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ruofan Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Georg Seelig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

R.L.B. and G.S. designed the experiments and wrote the paper. R.L.B. and R.W. performed the experiments.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georg Seelig.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Text, Supplementary Figures, and Supplementary Tables

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lopez, R., Wang, R. & Seelig, G. A molecular multi-gene classifier for disease diagnostics. Nature Chem 10, 746–754 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-018-0056-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-018-0056-1

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing