Article | Published:

Cooperative communication within and between single nanocatalysts

Nature Chemistryvolume 10pages607614 (2018) | Download Citation


Enzymes often show catalytic allostery in which reactions occurring at different sites communicate cooperatively over distances of up to a few nanometres. Whether such effects can occur with non-biological nanocatalysts remains unclear, even though these nanocatalysts can undergo restructuring and molecules can diffuse over catalyst surfaces. Here we report that phenomenologically similar, but mechanistically distinct, cooperative effects indeed exist for nanocatalysts. Using spatiotemporally resolved single-molecule catalysis imaging, we find that catalytic reactions on a single Pd or Au nanocatalyst can communicate with each other, probably via hopping of positively charged holes on the catalyst surface, over ~102 nanometres and with a temporal memory of ~101 to 102 seconds, giving rise to positive cooperativity among its surface active sites. Similar communication is also observed between individual nanocatalysts, however it operates via a molecular diffusion mechanism involving negatively charged product molecules, and its communication distance is many micrometres. Generalization of these long-range intra- and interparticle catalytic communication mechanisms may introduce a novel conceptual framework for understanding nanoscale catalysis.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1.

    Fersht, A. Structure and Mechanism in Protein Science: A Guide to Enzyme Catalysis and Protein Folding (WH Freeman and Company, 1998).

  2. 2.

    Changeux, J.-P. Allostery and the monod-wyman-changeux model after 50 years. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 41, 103–133 (2012).

  3. 3.

    Cui, Q. & Karplus, M. Allostery and cooperativity revisited. Protein Sci. 17, 1295–1307 (2008).

  4. 4.

    Lu, H. P., Xun, L. & Xie, X. S. Single-molecule enzymatic dynamics. Science 282, 1877–1882 (1998).

  5. 5.

    De Cremer, G. et al. Dynamic disorder and stepwise deactivation in a chymotrypsin catalyzed hydrolysis reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 15458–15459 (2007).

  6. 6.

    Tao, F. et al. Reaction-driven restructuring of Rh–Pd and Pt–Pd core–shell nanoparticles. Science 322, 932–934 (2008).

  7. 7.

    Bell, A. T. The impact of nanoscience on heterogeneous catalysis. Science 299, 1688–1691 (2003).

  8. 8.

    Jaramillo, T. F. et al. Identification of active edge sites for electrochemical H2 evolution from MoS2 nanocrystals. Science 317, 100–102 (2007).

  9. 9.

    Hervés, P. et al. Catalysis by metallic nanoparticles in aqueous solution: model reactions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 5577–5587 (2012).

  10. 10.

    Buurmans, I. L. C. & Weckhuysen, B. M. Heterogeneities of individual catalyst particles in space and time as monitored by spectroscopy. Nat. Chem. 4, 873–886 (2012).

  11. 11.

    Xu, W., Kong, J. S., Yeh, Y.-T. E. & Chen, P. Single-molecule nanocatalysis reveals heterogeneous reaction pathways and catalytic dynamics. Nat. Mater. 7, 992–996 (2008).

  12. 12.

    Collins, S. S. E., Cittadini, M., Pecharromán, C., Martucci, A. & Mulvaney, P. Hydrogen spillover between single gold nanorods and metal oxide supports: a surface plasmon spectroscopy study. ACS Nano 9, 7846–7856 (2015).

  13. 13.

    Karim, W. et al. Catalyst support effects on hydrogen spillover. Nature 541, 68–71 (2017).

  14. 14.

    Tachikawa, T., Yonezawa, T. & Majima, T. Super-resolution mapping of reactive sites on titania-based nanoparticles with water-soluble fluorogenic probes. ACS Nano 7, 263–275 (2012).

  15. 15.

    Ristanović, Z., Kubarev, A. V., Hofkens, J., Roeffaers, M. B. J. & Weckhuysen, B. M. Single molecule nanospectroscopy visualizes proton-transfer processes within a zeolite crystal. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 13586–13596 (2016).

  16. 16.

    Sambur, J. B. et al. Sub-particle reaction and photocurrent mapping to optimize catalyst-modified photoanodes. Nature 530, 77–80 (2016).

  17. 17.

    Chen, T. et al. Optical super-resolution imaging of surface reactions. Chem. Rev. 117, 7510–7537 (2017).

  18. 18.

    Huang, X. & Zheng, N. One-pot, high-yield synthesis of 5-fold twinned Pd nanowires and nanorods. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 4602–4603 (2009).

  19. 19.

    Bueno, C. et al. The excited-state interaction of resazurin and resorufin with amines in aqueous solutions. Photophysics and photochemical reactions. Photochem. Photobiol. 76, 385–390 (2002).

  20. 20.

    Balcerzyk, A. & Baldacchino, G. Implementation of laser induced fluorescence in a pulse radiolysis experiment-a new way to analyze resazurin-like reduction mechanisms. Analyst 139, 1707–1712 (2014).

  21. 21.

    Chang, W. S. et al. Radiative and nonradiative properties of single plasmonic nanoparticles and their assemblies. Acc. Chem. Res. 45, 1936–1945 (2012).

  22. 22.

    Zaleski, S. et al. Investigating nanoscale electrochemistry with surface- and tip-enhanced raman spectroscopy. Acc. Chem. Res. 49, 2023–2030 (2016).

  23. 23.

    Kang, M. et al. Simultaneous topography and reaction flux mapping at and around electrocatalytic nanoparticles. ACS Nano 11, 9525–9535 (2017).

  24. 24.

    Smith, J. G., Chakraborty, I. & Jain, P. K. In situ single-nanoparticle spectroscopy study of bimetallic nanostructure formation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 9979–9983 (2016).

  25. 25.

    Xu, W. et al. Single-molecule electrocatalysis by single-walled carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett. 9, 3968–3973 (2009).

  26. 26.

    Yang, S. & Cao, J. Direct measurements of memory effects in single-molecule kinetics. J. Chem. Phys. 117, 10996–11009 (2002).

  27. 27.

    Zhou, X. et al. Quantitative super-resolution imaging uncovers reactivity patterns on single nanocatalysts. Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 237–241 (2012).

  28. 28.

    Andoy, N. M. et al. Single-molecule catalysis mapping quantifies site-specific activity and uncovers radial activity gradient on single 2D nanocrystals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 1845–1852 (2013).

  29. 29.

    Bian, Z., Tachikawa, T., Kim, W., Choi, W. & Majima, T. Superior electron transport and photocatalytic abilities of metal-nanoparticle-loaded TiO2 superstructures. J. Phys. Chem. C. 116, 25444–25453 (2012).

  30. 30.

    Chernyak, L., Osinsky, A., Fuflyigin, V. & Schubert, E. F. Electron beam-induced increase of electron diffusion length in p-type GaN and AlGaN/GaN superlattices. Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 875–877 (2000).

  31. 31.

    Gonzalez-Vazquez, J. P., Anta, J. A. & Bisquert, J. Determination of the electron diffusion length in dye-sensitized solar cells by random walk simulation: compensation effects and voltage dependence. J. Phys. Chem. C. 114, 8552–8558 (2010).

  32. 32.

    Utterback, J. K. et al. Observation of trapped-hole diffusion on the surfaces of CdS nanorods. Nat. Chem. 8, 1061–1066 (2016).

  33. 33.

    Jennings, J. R. & Peter, L. M. A reappraisal of the electron diffusion length in solid-state dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Phys. Chem. C. 111, 16100–16104 (2007).

  34. 34.

    Jana, N. R., Gearheart, L. & Murphy, C. J. Wet chemical synthesis of high aspect ratio cylindrical gold nanorods. J. Phys. Chem. B 105, 4065–4067 (2001).

  35. 35.

    Wang, Z. L., Mohamed, M. B., Link, S. & El-Sayed, M. A. Crystallographic facets and shapes of gold nanorods of different aspect ratios. Surf. Sci. 440, L809–L814 (1999).

  36. 36.

    Johnson, C. J. et al. Growth and form of gold nanorods prepared by seed-mediated, surfactant-directed synthesis. J. Mater. Chem. 12, 1765–1770 (2002).

  37. 37.

    Carbó-Argibay, E. et al. The crystalline structure of gold nanorods revisited: evidence for higher-index lateral facets. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49, 9397–9400 (2010).

  38. 38.

    Katz-Boon, H. et al. Three-dimensional morphology and crystallography of gold nanorods. Nano Lett. 11, 273–278 (2011).

  39. 39.

    Gai, P. L. & Harmer, M. A. Surface atomic defect structures and growth of gold nanorods. Nano Lett. 2, 771–774 (2002).

  40. 40.

    Shankar, S. S. et al. Biological synthesis of triangular gold nanoprisms. Nat. Mater. 3, 482–488 (2004).

  41. 41.

    Liz-Marzán, L. M., Giersig, M. & Mulvaney, P. Synthesis of nanosized goca core−shell particles. Langmuir 12, 4329–4335 (1996).

  42. 42.

    Botella, P., Corma, A. & Navarro, M. T. Single gold nanoparticles encapsulated in monodispersed regular spheres of mesostructured silica produced by pseudomorphic transformation. Chem. Mater. 19, 1979–1983 (2007).

  43. 43.

    Han, K. S., Liu, G., Zhou, X., Medina, R. E. & Chen, P. How does a single Pt nanocatalyst behave in two different reactions? A single-molecule study. Nano Lett. 12, 1253–1259 (2012).

  44. 44.

    Miranda, K. M., Espey, M. G. & Wink, D. A. A rapid, simple spectrophotometric method for simultaneous detection of nitrate and nitrite. Nitric Oxide 5, 62–71 (2001).

  45. 45.

    Zhang, Y. et al. Superresolution fluorescence mapping of single-nanoparticle catalysts reveals spatiotemporal variations in surface reactivity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 8959–8964 (2015).

  46. 46.

    Han, R. et al. Geometry-assisted three-dimensional superlocalization imaging of single-molecule catalysis on modular multilayer nanocatalysts. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 12865–12869 (2014).

  47. 47.

    Easter, Q. T. & Blum, S. A. Single turnover at molecular polymerization catalysts reveals spatiotemporally resolved reactions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 13772–13775 (2017).

  48. 48.

    Ng, J. D. et al. Single-molecule investigation of initiation dynamics of an organometallic catalyst. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 3876–3883 (2016).

  49. 49.

    Hodgson, G. K., Impellizzeri, S. & Scaiano, J. C. Dye synthesis in the pechmann reaction: catalytic behaviour of samarium oxide nanoparticles studied using single molecule fluorescence microscopy. Chem. Sci. 7, 1314–1321 (2016).

Download references


This research is supported mainly by the Army Research Office grants W911NF-17–1–0590 and W911NF-14–1–0377; and in part by the Army Research Office grant W911NF-14–1–0620; the Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences, Catalysis Science Program (grant DE-SC0004911); and National Science Foundation (grant CBET-1263736). Part of the work was carried out at the Cornell Center for Materials Research (grant DMR-1719875) and the Cornell NanoScale Facility (grant ECS-1542081). We thank J. B. Sambur and R. F. Loring for discussions.

Author information

Author notes

    • Xiaochun Zhou

    Present address: Suzhou Institute of Nano-Tech and Nano-Bionics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Suzhou, Jiangsu, PR China

    • Nesha May Andoy

    Present address: BioMed X Innovation Center, Heidelberg, Germany

    • Guokun Liu

    Present address: College of the Environment and Ecology, Xiamen University, Xiamen, PR China

  1. These authors contributed equally: Ningmu Zou, Xiaochun Zhou and Guanqun Chen.


  1. Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA

    • Ningmu Zou
    • , Xiaochun Zhou
    • , Guanqun Chen
    • , Nesha May Andoy
    • , Won Jung
    • , Guokun Liu
    •  & Peng Chen


  1. Search for Ningmu Zou in:

  2. Search for Xiaochun Zhou in:

  3. Search for Guanqun Chen in:

  4. Search for Nesha May Andoy in:

  5. Search for Won Jung in:

  6. Search for Guokun Liu in:

  7. Search for Peng Chen in:


N.Z. performed the experiments on Au nanorods catalysing the deacetylation and deoxygenation reactions, analysed the intra-particle and inter-particle catalytic communication behaviours, and performed simulations. X.Z. performed the early experiments, analyses, and simulations on the catalytic communications of Au nanorods catalysing the deacetylation reaction. G.C. performed experiments and analysis of Pd nanorods catalysing the disproportionation reaction. N.M.A. performed experiments and analysis of Au nanoplates catalysing the deoxygenation reaction. W.J. derived the diffusive model for analysing the intraparticle catalytic communication as a function of both distance and time separations. G.L. performed part of the electron microscopy measurements. P.C. conceived and directed the research. N.Z., X.Z., G.C. and P.C. discussed results and wrote the paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peng Chen.

Supplementary information

  1. Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Methods, Supplementary Data, Supplementary Analysis, Supplementary Discussion, Supplementary Figs. 1–29, and Supplementary Tables 1,2

About this article

Publication history





Further reading