Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Perturbing TET2 condensation promotes aberrant genome-wide DNA methylation and curtails leukaemia cell growth

Abstract

The ten-eleven translocation (TET) family of dioxygenases maintain stable local DNA demethylation during cell division and lineage specification. As the major catalytic product of TET enzymes, 5-hydroxymethylcytosine is selectively enriched at specific genomic regions, such as enhancers, in a tissue-dependent manner. However, the mechanisms underlying this selectivity remain unresolved. Here we unveil a low-complexity insert domain within TET2 that facilitates its biomolecular condensation with epigenetic modulators, such as UTX and MLL4. This co-condensation fosters a permissive chromatin environment for precise DNA demethylation. Disrupting low-complexity insert-mediated condensation alters the genomic binding of TET2 to cause promiscuous DNA demethylation and genome reorganization. These changes influence the expression of key genes implicated in leukaemogenesis to curtail leukaemia cell proliferation. Collectively, this study establishes the pivotal role of TET2 condensation in orchestrating precise DNA demethylation and gene transcription to support tumour cell growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: TET2 undergoes liquid-like condensation via its LCI domain.
Fig. 2: Molecular grammar of the TET2LCI for condensation.
Fig. 3: TET2 condensates coalesce with enhancer regulators via LCI.
Fig. 4: LCI condensation governs precise DNA demethylation mediated by TET2.
Fig. 5: Disrupting TET2 condensation suppresses leukaemia growth.
Fig. 6: Perturbing endogenous TET2 condensation curtails leukaemia cell growth.
Fig. 7: TET2 loss of condensation causes chromatin topological changes.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All of the sequencing data generated in this study, including CMS-IP-seq, WGBS and Micro-C data that support its findings, have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus under the accession code GSE183934. The human AML data were derived from the TCGA research network: http://cancergenome.nih.gov/. Source data are provided with this paper. All other data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

Code availability

The script code used to produce Fig. 7i and Extended Data Fig. 9 is available via GitHub at https://github.com/yangjunhuicq/prognostic_signature.

References

  1. Boija, A., Klein, I. A. & Young, R. A. Biomolecular condensates and cancer. Cancer Cell 39, 174–192 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Mehta, S. & Zhang, J. Liquid–liquid phase separation drives cellular function and dysfunction in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 22, 239–252 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Sabari, B. R. et al. Coactivator condensation at super-enhancers links phase separation and gene control. Science 361, eaar3958 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Li, W. et al. Biophysical properties of AKAP95 protein condensates regulate splicing and tumorigenesis. Nat. Cell Biol. 22, 960–972 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Shi, B. et al. UTX condensation underlies its tumour-suppressive activity. Nature 597, 726–731 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Ahn, J. H. et al. Phase separation drives aberrant chromatin looping and cancer development. Nature 595, 591–595 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Molliex, A. et al. Phase separation by low complexity domains promotes stress granule assembly and drives pathological fibrillization. Cell 163, 123–133 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Gopal, P. P., Nirschl, J. J., Klinman, E. & Holzbaur, E. L. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-linked mutations increase the viscosity of liquid-like TDP-43 RNP granules in neurons. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E2466–E2475 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Terlecki-Zaniewicz, S. et al. Biomolecular condensation of NUP98 fusion proteins drives leukemogenic gene expression. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 28, 190–201 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Tahiliani, M. et al. Conversion of 5-methylcytosine to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mammalian DNA by MLL partner TET1. Science 324, 930–935 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Ito, S. et al. Tet proteins can convert 5-methylcytosine to 5-formylcytosine and 5-carboxylcytosine. Science 333, 1300–1303 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. He, Y. F. et al. Tet-mediated formation of 5-carboxylcytosine and its excision by TDG in mammalian DNA. Science 333, 1303–1307 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Fang, S. et al. Tet inactivation disrupts YY1 binding and long-range chromatin interactions during embryonic heart development. Nat. Commun. 10, 4297 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Hon, G. C. et al. 5mC oxidation by Tet2 modulates enhancer activity and timing of transcriptome reprogramming during differentiation. Mol. Cell 56, 286–297 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Lio, C. W. et al. Tet2 and Tet3 cooperate with B-lineage transcription factors to regulate DNA modification and chromatin accessibility. eLife 5, e18290 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Cui, X. L. et al. A human tissue map of 5-hydroxymethylcytosines exhibits tissue specificity through gene and enhancer modulation. Nat. Commun. 11, 6161 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Huang, Y. & Rao, A. Connections between TET proteins and aberrant DNA modification in cancer. Trends Genet. 30, 464–474 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Ko, M. et al. Impaired hydroxylation of 5-methylcytosine in myeloid cancers with mutant TET2. Nature 468, 839–843 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Couronne, L., Bastard, C. & Bernard, O. A. TET2 and DNMT3A mutations in human T-cell lymphoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 366, 95–96 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Busque, L. et al. Recurrent somatic TET2 mutations in normal elderly individuals with clonal hematopoiesis. Nat. Genet. 44, 1179–1181 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Delhommeau, F. et al. Mutation in TET2 in myeloid cancers. N. Engl. J. Med. 360, 2289–2301 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Langemeijer, S. M. et al. Acquired mutations in TET2 are common in myelodysplastic syndromes. Nat. Genet. 41, 838–842 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cimmino, L. et al. Restoration of TET2 function blocks aberrant self-renewal and leukemia progression. Cell 170, 1079–1095.e20 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Agathocleous, M. et al. Ascorbate regulates haematopoietic stem cell function and leukaemogenesis. Nature 549, 476–481 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Steensma, D. P. et al. Multicenter study of decitabine administered daily for 5 days every 4 weeks to adults with myelodysplastic syndromes: the alternative dosing for outpatient treatment (ADOPT) trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 27, 3842–3848 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Dombret, H. et al. International phase 3 study of azacitidine vs conventional care regimens in older patients with newly diagnosed AML with >30% blasts. Blood 126, 291–299 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Xue, B., Dunbrack, R. L., Williams, R. W., Dunker, A. K. & Uversky, V. N. PONDR-FIT: a meta-predictor of intrinsically disordered amino acids. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1804, 996–1010 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Bugaj, L. J., Choksi, A. T., Mesuda, C. K., Kane, R. S. & Schaffer, D. V. Optogenetic protein clustering and signaling activation in mammalian cells. Nat. Methods 10, 249–252 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Martin, E. W. et al. Valence and patterning of aromatic residues determine the phase behavior of prion-like domains. Science 367, 694–699 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang, J. et al. A molecular grammar governing the driving forces for phase separation of prion-like RNA binding proteins. Cell 174, 688–699.e16 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Branon, T. C. et al. Efficient proximity labeling in living cells and organisms with TurboID. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 880–887 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Fasciani, A. et al. MLL4-associated condensates counterbalance Polycomb-mediated nuclear mechanical stress in Kabuki syndrome. Nat. Genet. 52, 1397–1411 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Van de Werken, H. J. et al. Robust 4C-seq data analysis to screen for regulatory DNA interactions. Nat. Methods 9, 969–972 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Aloia, L. et al. Epigenetic remodelling licences adult cholangiocytes for organoid formation and liver regeneration. Nat. Cell Biol. 21, 1321–1333 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Vogel, M. J., Peric-Hupkes, D. & van Steensel, B. Detection of in vivo protein–DNA interactions using DamID in mammalian cells. Nat. Protoc. 2, 1467–1478 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Rasmussen, K. D. et al. Loss of TET2 in hematopoietic cells leads to DNA hypermethylation of active enhancers and induction of leukemogenesis. Genes Dev. 29, 910–922 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Fang, S. et al. Ten-eleven translocation ablation impairs cardiac differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 40, 260–272 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Stomper, J., Rotondo, J. C., Greve, G. & Lubbert, M. Hypomethylating agents (HMA) for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes: mechanisms of resistance and novel HMA-based therapies. Leukemia 35, 1873–1889 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Chen, Q. et al. GSK-3484862 targets DNMT1 for degradation in cells. NAR Cancer 5, zcad022 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Pappalardi, M. B. et al. Discovery of a first-in-class reversible DNMT1-selective inhibitor with improved tolerability and efficacy in acute myeloid leukemia. Nat. Cancer 2, 1002–1017 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Hernandez-Candia, C. N., Pearce, S. & Tucker, C. L. A modular tool to query and inducibly disrupt biomolecular condensates. Nat. Commun. 12, 1809 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Moran-Crusio, K. et al. Tet2 loss leads to increased hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal and myeloid transformation. Cancer Cell 20, 11–24 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Ko, M. et al. Ten-eleven-translocation 2 (TET2) negatively regulates homeostasis and differentiation of hematopoietic stem cells in mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 14566–14571 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Li, Z. et al. Deletion of Tet2 in mice leads to dysregulated hematopoietic stem cells and subsequent development of myeloid malignancies. Blood 118, 4509–4518 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Pastor, W. A. et al. Genome-wide mapping of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in embryonic stem cells. Nature 473, 394–397 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Huang, Y., Pastor, W. A., Zepeda-Martinez, J. A. & Rao, A. The anti-CMS technique for genome-wide mapping of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine. Nat. Protoc. 7, 1897–1908 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Johnstone, S. E. et al. Large-scale topological changes restrain malignant progression in colorectal cancer. Cell 182, 1474–1489.e23 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Wang, R. et al. Single-cell dissection of intratumoral heterogeneity and lineage diversity in metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma. Nat. Med. 27, 141–151 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Lio, C. J. et al. TET enzymes augment activation-induced deaminase (AID) expression via 5-hydroxymethylcytosine modifications at the Aicda superenhancer. Sci. Immunol. 4, eaau7523 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Kallin, E. M. et al. Tet2 facilitates the derepression of myeloid target genes during CEBPα-induced transdifferentiation of pre-B cells. Mol. Cell 48, 266–276 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Hu, L. et al. Crystal structure of TET2–DNA complex: insight into TET-mediated 5mC oxidation. Cell 155, 1545–1555 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. McSwiggen, D. T. et al. Evidence for DNA-mediated nuclear compartmentalization distinct from phase separation. eLife 8, e47098 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Mitrea, D. M., Mittasch, M., Gomes, B. F., Klein, I. A. & Murcko, M. A. Modulating biomolecular condensates: a novel approach to drug discovery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 21, 841–862 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Holehouse, A. S. & Pappu, R. V. Functional implications of intracellular phase transitions. Biochemistry 57, 2415–2423 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Akalin, A. et al. Base-pair resolution DNA methylation sequencing reveals profoundly divergent epigenetic landscapes in acute myeloid leukemia. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002781 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Weber, M. et al. Chromosome-wide and promoter-specific analyses identify sites of differential DNA methylation in normal and transformed human cells. Nat. Genet. 37, 853–862 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Robertson, K. D. DNA methylation and human disease. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6, 597–610 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Lubbert, M. et al. Low-dose decitabine versus best supportive care in elderly patients with intermediate- or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) ineligible for intensive chemotherapy: final results of the randomized phase III study of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Leukemia Group and the German MDS Study Group. J. Clin. Oncol. 29, 1987–1996 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Sun, D. et al. MOABS: model based analysis of bisulfite sequencing data. Genome Biol. 15, R38 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Marshall, O. J., Southall, T. D., Cheetham, S. W. & Brand, A. H. Cell-type-specific profiling of protein–DNA interactions without cell isolation using targeted DamID with next-generation sequencing. Nat. Protoc. 11, 1586–1598 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Marshall, O. J. & Brand, A. H. damidseq_pipeline: an automated pipeline for processing DamID sequencing datasets. Bioinformatics 31, 3371–3373 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Robinson, J. T. et al. Juicebox.js provides a cloud-based visualization system for Hi-C data. Cell Syst. 6, 256–258.e1 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Peng, F. et al. Differential expression analysis at the individual level reveals a lncRNA prognostic signature for lung adenocarcinoma. Mol. Cancer 16, 98 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Lau, S. K. et al. Three-gene prognostic classifier for early-stage non small-cell lung cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 25, 5562–5569 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Shin, Y. et al. Spatiotemporal control of intracellular phase transitions using light-activated optoDroplets. Cell 168, 159–171.e14 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Duplaquet, L. et al. KDM6A epigenetically regulates subtype plasticity in small cell lung cancer. Nat. Cell Biol. 25, 1346–1358 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by The Welch Foundation (BE-1913-20220331 to Y.Z.), Leukemia & Lymphoma Society (to Y.Z.) and American Cancer Society (RSG-18-043-01-LIB to Y.H.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Y.H. and Y.Z. directed and oversaw the project. L.G. performed most of the droplet forming analysis, animal-related work and molecular characterization. Y.-T.L., X.H., G.P., S.K. and X.C. supported the droplet forming and biochemical analyses and functional characterization. L.G. and T.H. supported the sequencing library construction and analysis. J. Li, L.R., R.Z., J.Y. and L.H. performed the bioinformatics analysis on high-throughput sequencing data. Y.D. performed the cell sorting. R.W., J. Liang and Y.Y. supported animal colony maintenance, performed genotyping and histology analysis. W.L., B.D.S. and Y.Z. provided essential resources and key intellectual inputs to support this study. Y.H., Y.Z. and L.G. wrote the manuscript. All authors participated in the initial discussion, data interpretation and manuscript editing.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yubin Zhou, Jia Li or Yun Huang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Cell Biology thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 TET2 forms condensates via its LCI domain.

(a) Schematic for generating a mouse model with GFP knockin (KI) at the C-terminus of endogenous Tet2. 3XFLAG-tag was introduced at the C-terminus of Tet2-ΔLCI. (b-c) Sanger sequencing (B) and genotyping (C) results to confirm the knockin of GFP at the C-terminus of Tet2. n = 3 independent biological replicates. (d) Representative images of mCh-CRY2 fused to six TET2 IDRs predicted by PONDR as shown in Fig. 1e. HEK293T cells were stimulated by blue light at the indicated time points. Scale bar, 10 µm. (e) Quantification of droplet numbers per cell (n = 20 cells from 3 biological replicates, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test). Data were shown as mean ± S.D. (f) Reversible droplet formation for both human (top) and mouse (bottom) TET2 LCI domain when expressed in HEK293T cells upon repeated blue light stimulation. Scale bar, 5 µm. (g) Representative images (top) and FRAP recovery curves (bottom) of the TET2 LCI domain using purified recombinant protein fused with mCherry. n = 3 droplets. Scale bar, 5 µm. (h-i) Representative images (top) of droplet formation and quantification (bottom) of the puncta size of purified recombinant TET2 LCI fused with mCherry at the indicated protein (h) and NaCl (i) concentrations (n = 40 droplets). The data represent means ± SD (one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test). Scale bar, 10 µm. Related to Fig. 1.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 2 Molecular grammar of TET2 LCI.

(a) Schematic illustrating the amino acid composition and positions in the TET2 LCI domain. (b) Representative images (left) and quantification (right) of droplet numbers per cell in HEK293T cells expressing the indicated TET2 variants fused to mCh-CRY2. (n = 20 cells from 3 independent biological replicates, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test). Data were shown as mean ± SD. Scale bar, 10 µm. (c) Representative images (left) and quantification (right) of droplet numbers per cell in HEK293T cells expressing the indicated GFP fused TET2 variants. (n = 6 cells, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test). Data were shown as mean ± SD. Scale bar, 10 µm. Related to Fig. 2.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 3 TET2 co-condensates with enhancer regulators via LCI.

(a) Schematic depicting the experimental setup and analytical procedures of proximity labelling with TET2CD-TurboID and TET2CDΔLCI-TurboID. (b) Immunoblotting analysis to confirm the proximity labelling with TET2CD and TET2CDΔLCI fused to TurboID in HEK293T cells. n = 3 independent biological replicates. (c) Heatmap of ChIP-seq signals showing genomic co-localization of TET2, MLL4 and UTX at H3K27ac-enriched genomic regions in mESCs. TET2 ChIP-seq data were obtained from the GSE115972 dataset (collected from mESCs with 3XFlag knockin at the endogenous loci of Tet2). MLL4 and UTX ChIPseq data were obtained from GSE97703. (d-e) Representative images (d) and quantitative recruitment coefficient analysis (e) on HEK293T cells co-transfected with mCherry-CRY2 fused to the indicated TET2 LCI variants and MLL4-GFP before and after blue light stimulation (n = 6, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test). Data were shown as mean ± SD. Scale bar, 10 µm. Related to Fig. 3.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 4 LCI-mediated condensation determines precise DNA demethylation of TET2.

(a) Dotblot analysis (left) and statistical quantification (right) of 5hmC levels in HEK293T cells transduced with doxycycline (Dox) inducible TET2CD variants. Western blotting with antibody against FLAG was applied to verify protein expression levels of TET2CD variants. Methylene blue staining and GAPDH blotting were used as the total DNA or protein loading control, respectively. Data were shown as mean ± SD (n = 3 biological replicates). *** p < 0.001 (two-sided unpaired Student’s t-test). (b) Venn diagram showing overlapping status of Dam signals identified from mESCs expressing TET2CD-Dam and TET2CDΔLCI-Dam from two independent biological replicates. (c) Summary of Pearson correlation coefficients among TET2CD-Dam signals, H3K27ac ChIP-seq data (ENCFF163HEV), FLAG ChIP-seq data of FLAG-Tet2 (GSM3196082), and H3K9me3 signals (GSM3517479) in mESCs. (d) Scatter plot of the Dam signals in 5-kb bins identified from mESCs expressing TET2CD-Dam and TET2CDΔLCI-Dam. (e) Immunoblotting of FLAG-tagged TET2CD or TET2CDΔLCI transduced in Tet1/2/3 triple knockout (Tet-TKO) mESCs. GAPDH was used as the loading control. n = 3 independent biological replicates. (f) Scatter plot of the average DNA methylation levels for CpGs covered by at least 10 reads within mESCs expressing TET2CD and TET2CDΔLCI. (g) The average DNA methylation level of mESCs expressing TET2CD or TET2CDΔLCI. (h) Dotblot analysis (left) and quantification (right) of 5hmC levels using an in vitro on beads enzymatic assay. FLAG tagged TET2CD or TET2CDΔLCI were immobilized on anti-FLAG beads and incubated with a 5mC-modified DNA oligonucleotide in vitro. Western blotting (bottom) illustrated the amounts of proteins used for the on beads reaction using an antibody against FLAG. Data were shown as mean ± SD (n = 3 biological replicates; two-sided unpaired Student’s t-test). (i) Venn diagram showing overlapping hyperDMRs identified from Tet-TKO vs TET2CD groups (blue) and Tet-TKO vs TET2CDΔLCI groups (red). Numbers listed in the circle represent the DMR numbers in the corresponding category. Numbers listed below are the percentage of peaks in the corresponding category. Related to Fig. 4.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 5 Disrupting TET2 condensation suppresses leukemia growth.

(a) Immunoblot analysis on the expression of the indicated TET2 chimeras before and after doxycycline treatment (the same concentration as in Fig. 5a) for 24 hours in MOLM13 and THP-1 cells. n = 3 independent biological replicates. (b) Representative images (left) and statistical analysis (right) of colony formation of MOLM13 cells transduced with lentivirus encoding TET2CD or TET2CDΔLCI with or without doxycycline (Dox) treatment (1 µg/ml and 0.2 µg/ml for TET2CD and TET2CDΔLCI respectively). (n = 3 independent experiments, two-sided unpaired Student’s t-test). Data were shown as mean ± SD. Scale bar, 200 µm. (c) Growth curves of MOLM13 and THP-1 cell lines transduced with indicated TET2 chimeras without doxycycline (Dox) induction for 5 days. (d) Growth curves of MOLM13 and HEK293T cells transduced with WT TET2 and TET2-∆LCI. Data were shown as mean ± S.D. (n = 8 independent replicates; two-sided unpaired Student’s t-test). (e) Immunoblot analysis of the apoptosis-related marker, cleaved caspase 3 (C/Caspase3), in MOLM13 and HEK293T cells expressing TET2CDΔLCI from day 0 to day 5. GAPDH was used as the loading control. n = 3 independent biological replicates. (f) Representative images (left) and statistical analysis (right) of dot-blot assay results using an antibody against 5mC in MOLM13 and HEK293T transduced with TET2-∆LCI at the indicated days. Methylene blue (MEB) is used as loading control. Data were shown as mean ± SD. (n = 4 independent replicates; two-sided unpaired Student’s t-test). (g-h) Dotblot analysis (g) and ELISA assay (h) showing 5hmC levels in HEK293T cells transduced with doxycycline (Dox) inducible TET2 CD variants as indicated. Data were shown as mean ± S.D., n = 3 independent replicates. (one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test). (i) Dotblot analysis showing 5hmC levels in MOLM13 cells transduced with catalytically dead versions of the indicated TET2 CD variants. Cells transduced with WT TET2CD were used as positive control. (j) Growth curves of MOLM13 cell lines transduced with the indicated catalytically dead TET2 chimeras after doxycycline (Dox) induction for 5 days. (k) Western blot analysis of chromatin associated (left) and whole cell lysate (WCL) (right) TET2CD variants as indicated. Histone 3 (H3) was used as the loading control. n = 3 independent biological replicates. Related to Fig. 5.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 6 Chemically disrupting TET2 condensation inhibits leukemia growth.

(a) Immunoblot analysis of total lysates from MOLM13 cells transduced with the corresponding constructs with or without rapamycin (Rapa) treatment (2 µM). n = 3 independent biological replicates. (b) Dot-blot analysis of the total 5hmC levels in MOLM13 and THP-1 cells transduced with the indicated constructs with or without rapamycin (Rapa) treatment (2 µM) for 24 hrs. (c) Proliferation analysis of THP-1 cells transduced with the indicated constructs with or without rapamycin (Rapa) treatment (2 µM). Data were shown as mean ± SD. (n = 8 independent biological replicates; one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test). (d) Experimental procedures for monitoring tumor growth in vivo. (e) Representative images of spleens (left) and statistical analysis of spleen weights (right) collected from the recipient mice under the indicated conditions. Data are shown as mean ± SD. (n = 4 mice / group; one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test). Related to Fig. 5.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 7 Generation of a TET2 LCI domain deletion mouse model.

(a) Schematic showing the targeting strategy with CRISPR/Cas9 to generate Tet2 LCI domain (T1389-Y1760) deletion (Tet2-ΔLCI) mice. A FLAG tag was inserted into the C terminus of Tet2. (b) Genotyping primers and use of PCR to identify WT (+/+), Tet2-ΔLCI heterozygotes (+/Del) and homozygotes (Del/Del) mice. n = 3 independent biological replicates. (c) Real-time qPCR analysis of Tet2 mRNA expression with primers targeting LCI and non-LCI regions. Data were shown as mean ± SD; n = 3 independent replicates (two-sided unpaired Student’s t-test). (d) Lineage analysis on peripheral blood (PB) and bone marrow (BM) samples from WT and Tet2-ΔLCI mice at the indicated ages (Top: 6–8 weeks old; bottom: 10–12 months old). Data are shown as mean ± SD (n = 5–7 biologically independent mice; Two-tailed Student’s t-test). (e) Hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell analysis in bone marrow samples isolated from recipient mice transplanted with WT (CD45.1+) and the indicated HSPC groups (at a 1:1 ratio; black, WT; blue, Tet2-KO; red, Tet2-∆LCI). The percentage of CD45.2+ cells in each population was analyzed. MPP: Multipotent progenitors; LT-HSC: long-term hematopoietic stem cells; ST-HSC: short-term hematopoietic stem cells. Data are shown as mean ± SD. (n = 9-10 biologically independent mice; Two-tailed Student’s t-test). Related to Fig. 6.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 8 TET2 loss-of-condensation causes chromatin topological changes in leukemia cells.

(a) Heatmap representation of 5hmC enrichment around ± 2 kb of transcribed regions or H3K27ac (GSM2136938) enriched peak regions in MOLM13 cells (mock) and MOLM13 cells expressing TET2CD or TET2CDΔLCI for 24 or 48 h. n = 2 biological replicates. (b) Violin plot of overall DNA methylation levels in MOLM13 cells (MOCK) (grey) and MOLM13 cells expressing TET2CD (blue) or TET2CDΔLCI (red) for 24 or 48 hours. DNA methylation were determined by WGBS analysis. n = 2 biological replicates, two-sided Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests. (c) The average DNA methylation levels within the coding regions in MOLM13 cells expressing TET2CD (blue and green) or TET2CDΔLCI (red and orange) for 24 or 48 h. (d) The representative genome browser tracks of Micro-C data in MOLM-13 cells expressing TET2CD or TET2CDΔLCI. (e) Scatter plot of Eigenvector (PCA) in 50-kb in MOLM13 cells expressing TET2CD and TET2CDΔLCI for 48 h. (f) Scatter plot of Eigenvector (PCA) and DNA methylation difference at 50-kb between MOLM13 cells expressing TET2CD and TET2CDΔLCI for 48 h. (g) (Left) Representative genome browser views of Micro-C data using Juciebox60 at chromosome 7. (Right) The zoom-in snapshots of genomic regions in the highlighted boxes. The top tracks represent the difference of Eigenvector (PCA) or DNA methylation levels in MOLM13 cells expressing TET2CD and TET2CDΔLCI for 48 h. (h) Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) identified from MOLM13 cells expressing TET2CD and TET2CDΔLCI for 48 h. The DEGs were defined by |Log2fold change | ≥ 1, p-value < 0.05. Related to Fig. 7.

Extended Data Fig. 9 Chromatin topological changes induced by TET2 LCI loss of condensation are linked to tumor suppressive transcriptional program in AML.

(a) Flowchart showing the bioinformatic methods applied to identify 15-gene signatures that were associated with TET2 loss-of-condensation and AML patient outcomes (see details in the Methods). (b) Differential expression of the 15 signature genes between high-risk and low-risk AML cases (see details in the Methods). Two-sided Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests were applied for statistical analysis. Related to Fig. 7.

Supplementary information

Source data

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, L., Hong, T., Lee, YT. et al. Perturbing TET2 condensation promotes aberrant genome-wide DNA methylation and curtails leukaemia cell growth. Nat Cell Biol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41556-024-01496-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41556-024-01496-7

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing