EPAC1 enhances brown fat growth and beige adipogenesis

Brown adipose tissue (BAT) is a central thermogenic organ that enhances energy expenditure and cardiometabolic health. However, regulators that specifically increase the number of thermogenic adipocytes are still an unmet need. Here, we show that the cAMP-binding protein EPAC1 is a central regulator of adaptive BAT growth. In vivo, selective pharmacological activation of EPAC1 increases BAT mass and browning of white fat, leading to higher energy expenditure and reduced diet-induced obesity. Mechanistically, EPAC1 coordinates a network of regulators for proliferation specifically in thermogenic adipocytes, but not in white adipocytes. We pinpoint the effects of EPAC1 to PDGFRα-positive preadipocytes, and the loss of EPAC1 in these cells impedes BAT growth and worsens diet-induced obesity. Importantly, EPAC1 activation enhances the proliferation and differentiation of human brown adipocytes and human brown fat organoids. Notably, a coding variant of RAPGEF3 (encoding EPAC1) that is positively correlated with body mass index abolishes noradrenaline-induced proliferation of brown adipocytes. Thus, EPAC1 might be an attractive target to enhance thermogenic adipocyte number and energy expenditure to combat metabolic diseases.

The proteomics datasets have been deposited in the ProteomeXchange database with accession number PXD046709.Source data have been provided in Source Data.All other data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request (email: Alexander.Pfeifer@unibonn.de).

Data
Policy information about availability of data All manuscripts must include a data availability statement.This statement should provide the following information, where applicable: -Accession codes, unique identifiers, or web links for publicly available datasets -A description of any restrictions on data availability -For clinical datasets or third party data, please ensure that the statement adheres to our policy

Human research participants
Policy information about studies involving human research participants and Sex and Gender in Research.
Reporting on sex and gender Population characteristics

Recruitment
Ethics oversight Note that full information on the approval of the study protocol must also be provided in the manuscript.

Field-specific reporting
Please select the one below that is the best fit for your research.If you are not sure, read the appropriate sections before making your selection.

Life sciences Behavioural & social sciences Ecological, evolutionary & environmental sciences
For a reference copy of the document with all sections, see nature.com/documents/nr-reporting-summary-flat.pdf

Life sciences study design
All studies must disclose on these points even when the disclosure is negative.

No data was excluded
All experiments were replicated (biologcal replicates) at least three times and all attempts of replication were successful.
Mice were allocated randomly into experimental groups.For diet-induced obesity studies mice were allocated into experimental groups according to their genotype.Due to the nature of the cell culture experiments (cell culture treatments -e.g.007, Norepinephrine, etc-), randomization of the samples was not possible.
Since most studies were performed by individual researchers knowing the design of the studies, blinding during data collection and analysis was not performed Briefly describe the study type including whether data are quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-methods (e.g.qualitative cross-sectional, quantitative experimental, mixed-methods case study).Describe the sampling procedure (e.g. random, snowball, stratified, convenience).Describe the statistical methods that were used to predetermine sample size OR if no sample-size calculation was performed, describe how sample sizes were chosen and provide a rationale for why these sample sizes are sufficient.For qualitative data, please indicate whether data saturation was considered, and what criteria were used to decide that no further sampling was needed.
Provide details about the data collection procedure, including the instruments or devices used to record the data (e.g.pen and paper, computer, eye tracker, video or audio equipment) whether anyone was present besides the participant(s) and the researcher, and whether the researcher was blind to experimental condition and/or the study hypothesis during data collection.
Indicate the start and stop dates of data collection.If there is a gap between collection periods, state the dates for each sample cohort.
If no data were excluded from the analyses, state so OR if data were excluded, provide the exact number of exclusions and the rationale behind them, indicating whether exclusion criteria were pre-established.Note the sampling procedure.Describe the statistical methods that were used to predetermine sample size OR if no sample-size calculation was performed, describe how sample sizes were chosen and provide a rationale for why these sample sizes are sufficient.
Describe the data collection procedure, including who recorded the data and how.
Indicate the start and stop dates of data collection, noting the frequency and periodicity of sampling and providing a rationale for these choices.If there is a gap between collection periods, state the dates for each sample cohort.Specify the spatial scale from which the data are taken If no data were excluded from the analyses, state so OR if data were excluded, describe the exclusions and the rationale behind them, indicating whether exclusion criteria were pre-established.
Describe the measures taken to verify the reproducibility of experimental findings.For each experiment, note whether any attempts to repeat the experiment failed OR state that all attempts to repeat the experiment were successful.
Describe how samples/organisms/participants were allocated into groups.If allocation was not random, describe how covariates were controlled.If this is not relevant to your study, explain why.

Describe the extent of blinding used during data acquisition and analysis. If blinding was not possible, describe why OR explain why blinding was not relevant to your study.
Describe the study conditions for field work, providing relevant parameters (e.g.temperature, rainfall).
State the location of the sampling or experiment, providing relevant parameters (e.g.latitude and longitude, elevation, water depth).
Describe the efforts you have made to access habitats and to collect and import/export your samples in a responsible manner and in nature portfolio | reporting summary We require information from authors about some types of materials, experimental systems and methods used in many studies.Here, indicate whether each material, system or method listed is relevant to your study.If you are not sure if a list item applies to your research, read the appropriate section before selecting a response.Provide provenance information for specimens and describe permits that were obtained for the work (including the name of the issuing authority, the date of issue, and any identifying information).Permits should encompass collection and, where applicable, export.

Antibodies
Indicate where the specimens have been deposited to permit free access by other researchers.
If new dates are provided, describe how they were obtained (e.g.collection, storage, sample pretreatment and measurement), where they were obtained (i.e.lab name), the calibration program and the protocol for quality assurance OR state that no new dates are provided.
Identify the organization(s) that approved or provided guidance on the study protocol, OR state that no ethical approval or guidance was required and explain why not.
sciences study designAll studies must disclose on these points even when the disclosure is negative.sizes were calculated using Software Power and Sample Size Calculation (G*Power Version 3.1.9.2).No sample size calculation was performed for in vitro analysis, sample sizes were determined based on our experience from previous studies (Niemann et al -PMID: 35790189; Klepac et al -PMID: 26955961; Gnad et al -PMID: 25317558).
State the research sample (e.g.Harvard university undergraduates, villagers in rural India) and provide relevant demographic & environmental sciences study designAll studies must disclose on these points even when the disclosure is negative..g. age, sex) and indicate whether the sample is representative.Provide a rationale for the study sample chosen.For studies involving existing datasets, please describe the dataset and source.
predictive analysis This checklist template is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/8 Report the measures of dependence used and the model details (e.g.Pearson correlation, partial correlation, mutual information).Report the dependent variable and connectivity measure, specifying weighted graph or binarized graph, subject-or group-level, and the global and/or node summaries used (e.g.clustering coefficient, efficiency, etc.).Specify independent variables, features extraction and dimension reduction, model, training and evaluation metrics.