The Human Reference Atlas (HRA) aims to map all of the cells of the human body to advance biomedical research and clinical practice. This Perspective presents collaborative work by members of 16 international consortia on two essential and interlinked parts of the HRA: (1) three-dimensional representations of anatomy that are linked to (2) tables that name and interlink major anatomical structures, cell types, plus biomarkers (ASCT+B). We discuss four examples that demonstrate the practical utility of the HRA.
With developments in massively parallel sequencing in bulk and at the single-cell level, researchers can now detect genomic features and genome expression with great precision1. Profiling single cells within tissues and organs enables researchers to map the distribution of cells and their developmental trajectories across organs and gives indications as to their functions. In 2021, there are several ongoing, ambitious efforts to map all of the cells in the human body and to create a digital reference atlas of the human body. The final atlas will encompass the three-dimensional (3D) organization of whole organs and thousands of anatomical structures, the interdependencies between trillions of cells, and the biomarkers that characterize and distinguish cell types. It will make the human body computable, supporting spatial and semantic queries run over 3D structures linked to their scientific terminology and existing ontologies. It will establish a benchmark reference that helps us to understand how the healthy human body works and what changes during ageing or disease.
A network of 16 consortia is contributing to the construction of the HRA based on studies of 30 organs (Fig. 1a) with funding by the National Institutes of Health (NIH, blue) and strong support by the international Human Cell Atlas (HCA, red)2,3 as well as expert input by reviewers from many different countries. The 16 consortia include the Allen Brain Atlas4, the Brain Research through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies Initiative—Cell Census Network Initiative5, the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative Seed Networks for HCA2,3,6, HCA awards by the EU’s Horizon 2020 program, the Genotype-Tissue Expression project7, the GenitoUrinary Developmental Molecular Anatomy Project8, Helmsley Charitable Trust: Gut Cell Atlas2,3,6,9, the Human Tumor Atlas Network10, the Human Biomolecular Atlas Program (HuBMAP)11, the Kidney Precision Medicine Project (KPMP)12,13, LungMAP14, HCA grants from the United Kingdom Research and Innovation Medical Research Council (https://mrc.ukri.org), (Re)building the Kidney15, Stimulating Peripheral Activity to Relieve Conditions16, The Cancer Genome Atlas17,18,19 and Wellcome funding for HCA pilot projects2,3,6. In total, more than 2,000 experts from around the globe are working together to construct an open-source and free-to-use digital HRA using a wide variety of single or multimodal spatially resolved and bulk tissue assays. Imaging methods for anatomical structure segmentation include computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging or optical coherence tomography (OCT)20. Spatially resolved single-cell methods detect metabolites or lipids using high-resolution nanospray desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry imaging21, proteins using co-detection by indexing22 or tissue microarray-based immunohistochemistry23, simultaneous mRNA and chromatin accessibility using assay for transposase-accessible chromatin with high-throughput sequencing24, simultaneous protein and mRNA using cellular indexing of transcriptomes and epitopes by sequencing25, and mRNA using multiplexed error robust fluorescent hybridization (MERFISH)26,27, Slide-seq28,29, Nanostring’s GeoMX30 or 10x Genomics Visium31.
A major challenge in constructing the HRA is combining data generated by the different consortia without a common ‘language’ shared across them for describing and indexing the data in a spatially explicit and semantically consistent way. Rapid progress in single-cell technologies has led to an explosion of cell-type definitions. When researchers profile the expression of genes, proteins or other biomarkers, they can and do assign different cell types making it difficult, if not impossible, to compare results across studies—particularly across organ systems. Indeed, except for the brain32, no standards exist for the naming of anatomical structures, cell types and biomarkers. Furthermore, information on what cell types are commonly found in which anatomical structures and what biomarkers best characterize certain cell types is scattered across many ontologies (such as Uberon multi-species anatomy ontology33, the Foundational Model of Anatomy Ontology34,35, Cell Ontology (CL)36 or the Human Gene Ontology Nomenclature Committee (https://www.genenames.org/)) and hundreds of publications about cells identified during development, disease and across multiple species (for example, the atlas efforts for brain37, heart38, lungs14 and kidneys13). Some critically important details (such as the morphology and distribution of microanatomical structures or the spatial layout of functionally interdependent cell types) are captured through hand-drawn figures—not digitally—without a shared 3D spatial reference system. The lack of a central, unified benchmark reference framework and language impedes progress in biomedical science as it is challenging or impossible to manage, compare, harmonize or use published data.
Towards a unified reference framework for mapping the human body
To address these issues, an NIH–HCA-organized meeting in March 2020 brought together leading experts to agree on major ontologies and associated 3D anatomical reference objects and to expand them as needed to capture the healthy human adult body. On the basis of ensuing discussions, more than 50 experts—including physicians, surgeons, anatomists, pathologists, experimentalists and representatives from the various consortia—have agreed on a reference framework to digitally represent relevant knowledge. The framework includes data structures, standard operating procedures and visual user interfaces that can be used by anatomists, pathologists, surgeons and other domain experts to digitize, integrate and analyse massive amounts of heterogeneous data. Experts also agreed on the major ontologies that will be used to create a ‘Rosetta Stone’ across existing anatomy, cell and biomarker ontologies. As a proof of concept, experts compiled inventories for 11 major organs (Fig. 1a,b): bone marrow and blood plus pelvis reference organ39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52, brain4,32,37,53,54, heart55,56, large intestine57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68, kidneys13,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77, lungs (refs. 78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86 and Sun, X. & Morrisey, E., manuscript in preparation), lymph nodes87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97, skin98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110, spleen89,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122, thymus123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134 and vasculature78,135,136,137,138,139,140,141. For each organ, the experts listed known anatomical structures, the cell types located in these structures and the biomarkers that are commonly used to characterize each cell type (such as gene and protein markers). The results are captured in ASCT+B tables (Fig. 1c) that list and anatomical structures, cell types and biomarker entities, their relationships as well as references to supporting publications. As spatial position and context matter for cell function, the experts collaborated with medical designers to compile 3D, semantically annotated reference objects that cover the anatomically correct size and shape of major anatomical structures in a systematic and computable manner (see the final set for the initial 11 ASCT+B tables in Fig. 1b). Together, the ASCT+B tables and associated 3D reference objects constitute the HRA.
An initial set of the ASCT+B tables and reference objects have been published (Supplementary Information). They capture data and knowledge that are mandatory for compiling a comprehensive HRA, and they are critically important for facilitating data exchange and collaboration among the 16 consortia and other efforts. They demonstrate how existing knowledge can be captured digitally and reorganized in support of a HRA. The tables and associated 3D reference objects provide an agreed-on framework for experimental data annotation across organs and scales (that is, from whole body to organs, tissues, cell types and biomarkers); they make it possible to compare and integrate data from different assay types (such as single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq)142 and MERFISH143 data) for spatially equivalent tissue samples; they are a semantically and spatially explicit reference for healthy tissue and cell identity data that can then be compared against disease settings. Finally, the tables and associated reference organs can be used to evaluate progress on the semantic naming and definition of cell types and their anatomically accurate spatial characterization.
The ultimate goal is an HRA that correctly matches human diversity across populations. However, like the Human Genome Project144,145, the initial HRA covers a limited set of donors. For example, the Allen Human Reference Atlas—which is included in the HRA—was derived from one donor. It describes one half of a human brain that is intended to be mirrored to characterize a whole human brain. Most of the other reference organs in the current HRA are constructed from the Visible Human Project (VHP) male and female dataset made available by the National Library of Medicine146.
The presented ASCT+B tables and 3D reference objects are designed to be representative of organs and general enough to encompass all donors regardless of variation. All of the listed anatomical structures are expected to be present in a donor, except for sex-specific organs. There exists scientific evidence that the listed cell types are known to be located in the given anatomical structure, and that listed biomarkers are commonly used to identify a cell type. Future versions of the tables are in development and will make it possible to capture and compare data about variations in the size, location, shape and frequency of anatomical structures and cell types across donors. We next describe the data format, design and use of ASCT+B tables and the associated 3D reference objects. The initial HRA presents ten ASCT+B tables interlinked through a vasculature table together with a reference library of major anatomical structures. We discuss four examples that showcase the usage of the initial eleven-organ HRA for tissue registration and exploration, data integration, disease studies and measuring progress towards a more complete HRA. We conclude with a discussion of the next steps and an invitation to collaborate on the construction and usage of a reference atlas for healthy human adults.
In 2019, the KPMP project published a first version of the ASCT+B tables to serve as a guide to annotate structures and cell types across multiple technologies in the kidneys13. The table data format was expanded and the process for constructing, reviewing and approving the ASCT+B tables was formalized (the key steps are described in Box 1 and the terminology is explained in Tables 1 and 2). Note that the HRA framework is in line with reproducibility best-practices and principles that make data findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable147, which are essential for the development of disease atlases, biomedical discovery and, ultimately, health improvements.
In September 2021, there exist 11 ASCT+B tables, version 1.0. These master tables are available for free online148. They capture 1,424 anatomical structures, 591 cell types and 1,867 biomarkers. The anatomical structures are linked by 2,543 ‘part_of’ relationships, 4,611 ‘located_in’ relationships between cell types and anatomical structures and 3,708 ‘characterize’ links between biomarkers and cells, supported by 293 unique scholarly publications and 506 web links (Supplementary Information). Like the first maps of our world, the first ASCT+B tables are imperfect and incomplete (see the ‘Limitations’ section). However, they digitize and standardize existing data and knowledge by clinicians, pathologists, anatomists and surgeons at the gross anatomical level; biologists, computer scientists and others at the single-cell level; and chemists, engineers and others at the biomarker level.
Three-dimensional reference object library
The spatial location of cell types within anatomical structures matters, as do the number and types of cells within the same anatomical structure. A 3D reference object library was compiled (key steps are described in Box 2) to capture the size, shape, position and rotation of major anatomical structures in the organ-specific ASCT+B tables (Box 1, Tables 1 and 2, and Supplementary Information).
In September 2021, there exist 26 organ objects that complement the 11 ASCT+B tables discussed above. Male and female versions exist for all organs, and left and right versions exist for kidneys and lymph nodes. All organs are properly positioned in the male and female bodies and are freely available online149. The resulting 3D reference object library captures a total of 1,185 unique 3D structures (for example, the left female kidney has 11 renal papillae; see the complete listing in the HuBMAP Consortium 3D Reference Object Library149) with 557 unique Uberon terms, including the name of the organ. Files are provided in the GLB format150 and are used in several user interfaces (see the ‘Tissue registration and exploration’ section).
A ‘crosswalk’ mapping file links the anatomical structure names listed in the ASCT+B tables and the terminology used in the 3D reference object library GLB files (see the ‘CCF 3D reference object library & crosswalk’ section in the Supplementary Information). This interlinkage of ontology terms (for example, kidney or cortex of kidney; Fig. 1c), and the 3D references objects with well-defined polygon meshes (Table 1) that describe the size and shape of these anatomical structures in 3D (Fig. 1b) is critical for using 3D collision-detection algorithms for tissue registration and spatial search (see the ‘Tissue registration and exploration’ section).
How to use the HRA
The ASCT+B tables and associated 3D reference organ objects provide a starting point for the systematic construction of a HRA. They provide common nomenclature for major entities and relationships along with cross-references to existing ontologies and supporting literature. In the following sections, we provide four examples illustrating the value of the tables and associated 3D reference organs: (1) to support experimental tissue data registration and annotation across organs and scales (see the next section); (2) to compare and integrate data from different assay types (see the ‘Comparing cell states across different tissues and in disease’ section); (3) to compare healthy and disease data (see the ‘Understanding disease’ section); (4) and to evaluate progress toward the compilation of a comprehensive HRA (see the ‘Measuring progress’ section).
Tissue registration and exploration
Like any atlas, a HRA is a collection of maps that capture a multiscale 3D reality. Like other digital maps, it supports panning and zoom, from the whole body (macro scale; metres), to the organ level (meso scale; centimetres), to the level of functional tissue units (such as alveoli in the lungs, crypts in the colon and glomeruli in the kidneys; millimetres), down to the single-cell level (micro scale; micrometres). To be usable, the maps in an HRA must use the same index terms and a unifying topological coordinate system such that cells and anatomical structures in adjacent overlapping maps or at different zoom levels can be uniquely named and properly aligned.
The ASCT+B tables and 3D reference organs provide a framework for experimental data annotation and exploration across organs and scales—that is, from the entire body down to organs, tissues, cell types and biomarkers. For example, they are used to support the registration of new tissue data as well as spatial and semantic search, browsing and exploration of human tissue data. The HuBMAP CCF Registration User Interface151 (RUI; Fig. 2a) and CCF Exploration User Interface (EUI)152 (Fig. 2b) are available at the HuBMAP portal153. The code for both user interfaces is freely available at GitHub HuBMAP Consortium CCF User Interfaces154 (https://github.com/hubmapconsortium/ccf-ui). Several consortia and single investigators have used the stand-alone version of the CCF RUI151 to register human tissue samples. Resulting data have been added to the CCF EUI making it possible for data providers and others to explore these tissue datasets in the context of human anatomy, to search and filter for datasets that match certain criteria (such as a specific age, sex and assay type) and to access and download raw data.
To make it easy for anyone to explore or contribute HRA data, we developed diverse learning modules as part of the free Visible Human Massive Open Online Course (https://expand.iu.edu/browse/sice/cns/courses/hubmap-visible-human-mooc). This course describes the compilation and coverage of HRA data, demonstrates new single-cell analysis and mapping techniques, and introduces the diverse HRA user interfaces. Delivered entirely online, all coursework can be completed asynchronously to fit busy schedules.
Comparing cell states across different tissues and in disease
The ASCT+B framework provides a ‘look-up table’ from the 3D reference models to the unique ontology name and ID for anatomical structures and their cell-type composition across organs that are present in the ASCT+B tables. Researchers can use the tables to determine in what anatomical structure a cell type is commonly located. Specifically, the ASCT+B tables capture information on cells formed within and resident in a specific tissue (such as epithelia and stroma) as well as cells that migrate across tissues (such as immune cells)155. For example, immune cells originate primarily in the bone marrow in postnatal life. Adaptive lymphocytes subsequently differentiate and mature in lymphoid tissues such as the thymus and spleen before circulating to non-lymphoid tissues and lymph nodes (Fig. 3a). Thus, these cells recur across the ASCT+B tables in both the lymphoid (bone marrow, thymus, spleen, lymph node) and non-lymphoid (brain, heart, kidney, lung, skin) tissue tables. Existing data support a more nuanced and tissue-specific, ontology-based assignment of blood and immune cells. For example, scRNA-seq enables deep phenotyping of haematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) and haematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) and their differentiated progenies across various tissues. When comparing fetal liver versus thymic cell states (Fig. 3a (right)), a small region of the HSPCs highlighted as lymphoid progenitors is shared across the two organs, indicating cells that have migrated from the liver to the thymus52,125. Data integration defines molecules (such as chemokine receptors) that determine tissue residency versus migratory properties. These biomarkers in turn define tissue-resident versus migratory cell states, which can be added to the ASCT+B tables to refine cellular ontology.
A well-annotated healthy HRA can then be used to understand the molecular and cellular alterations in response to perturbations such as infection. For example, data from several single-cell multi-omics studies of patients’ blood can be combined to compute the cellular response during COVID-19 pathogenesis, including HSC progenitor states that emerge during disease156 (Fig. 3b).
As a reference for healthy tissue, the ASCT+B tables can be used to identify changes in molecular states in normal ageing or disease. For example, the kidney master table links relevant anatomical structures, cell types and biomarkers to disease and other ontologies for increasing our understanding of disease states. The top significant and specific biomarkers in each reference cell/state cluster might differ during disease or in a cell undergoing repair, regeneration, or in a state of failed or maladaptive repair. Loss of expression or alteration in the cellular distribution of a specific biomarker may provide clues to the underlying disease. The Kidney Precision Medicine Project is working towards ASCT+B tables that characterize disease. Researchers aim to include biomarkers with important physiological roles in maintaining the cellular architecture or function and biomarkers that reveal shifts in cell types that are associated with acute and chronic diseases157. Changes in biomarkers in healthy and injured cells provide information about the underlying biological pathways that drive these shifts and therefore provide critical insights into pathogenic mechanisms. For example, the gene NPHS1, which encodes nephrin, is one of the top markers of healthy podocytes and is essential for glomerular function. Mutations in NPHS1 may be found in patients with proteinuria158. The kidney ASCT+B table records that the gene biomarker NPHS1 (Fig. 1c (bottom right)) is expressed in the podocytes of the kidney. Ontology suggests injury to podocytes and glomerular function may cause proteinuria (Fig. 4). Ontology IDs provided for anatomical structures, cell types and biomarkers facilitate linkages to clinicopathological knowledge and help to provide broader insights into disease159. For example, the ASCT+B kidney master table and single-nucleus RNA-seq atlas data70 have been used to characterize diabetic nephropathy disease states by distinguishing the healthy interstitium from a diabetic one160. Note that some of the existing data are not at the single-cell level; in these cases, regional data (such as data bounded by tissue blocks registered within reference organs with known anatomical structures, cell types and biomarkers (see the RUI and EUI discussion above)) can be compared to the kidney master table. In summary, ASCT+B tables interlinked with existing ontologies provide a foundation for new data analysis and the functional study of diseases.
The ASCT+B tables provide objective measures for tracking progress towards an accurate and complete HRA. In particular, if a scholarly publication includes a new ASCT+B table, that table can be compared with existing master tables and the number and type of identical (confirmatory) and different (new) anatomical structures, cell types and biomarkers, as well as their relationships, can be determined. The value of a new data release for reference atlas design can be evaluated in terms of the number and type of new anatomical structures, cell types, biomarkers and their relationships that it contributes. The ASCT+B Reporter161 supports the visual exploration and comparison of ASCT+B tables. Table authors and reviewers can use this online tool to upload new tables, examine them visually and compare them with existing master tables. Power analysis methods can be run to assess the coverage and completeness of cell states and/or types and decide what tissues and cells should be sampled next139 in support of a data-driven experimental design.
As the number of published ASCT+B tables grows, estimates can be run to determine the likely accuracy of anatomical structures, cell types, biomarkers and relationships. Entities and relationships based on high-quality data or multiple types of scholarly evidence are more likely to be correct compared with those with limited or no evidence. Incomplete data can be easily identified and flagged (for example, anatomical structures with no linkages to cell types and cell types with no biomarkers indicate missing data). Given that the tables disclose who contributes the data and who authors relevant publications, experts on anatomical structures, cell types, biomarkers and their relationships can be identified and invited to further improve the tables.
The current format of the ASCT+B tables and 3D reference organs makes them easy to author, review, validate and use across organs and domains of expertise. The ASCT+B Reporter tool161 supports the authoring and review of ASCT+B tables but also the comparison of these data with new datasets. 3D reference objects can be freely explored in the Babylon.js sandbox in a web browser (https://sandbox.babylonjs.com/). However, the simplicity of the current tables and organs makes it impossible to fully capture the complexity of the human body. Thus, for each organ-specific table, experts recorded the process that they used to construct the table, which often included simplifying the anatomy to fit within a strict partonomy, making decisions about which cell types and biomarkers had sufficient evidence to be included in the table, or ignoring normal dynamic changes that occur in the organ over time. For several organs, such as the brain, the biomarkers are preliminary and are expected to improve in coverage and robustness in the future.
Biases in sampling with respect to donor demographics (for example, from convenience samples as opposed to using sampling strategies that reflect global demographics), organs (for example, as based on availability of funding) or cell types (for example, due to differential viability or capture efficiency) can be determined and need to be proactively addressed to arrive at an atlas that truly captures healthy human adults. The definition of ‘healthy’ is expected to evolve; HRA metadata for datasets that were used in the construction of the atlas include information on sex, age and ethnicity, but also comorbidities, making it possible to include or exclude datasets when inclusion criteria change and to recompute the HRA as needed.
Diversity, inclusion, and global scientific equity are major goals for all of the consortia involved in this effort162. Authors for the initial set of tables are from the United States and United Kingdom, but many have roots, training and collaborative connections in other parts of the world. Reviewers do not solely come from the United States and United Kingdom. Aiming to overcome the impact of COVID-19 related travel restrictions on collaboration across disciplinary, institutional and cultural boundaries, we organized the HRA panel at the virtual Spatial Biology Europe meeting in April 2021. The panel featured presentations by experts from Asia, Australia and North America. Slides and recordings are available online163. In the future, we hope to engage experts from many more countries as well as students from diverse backgrounds.
ASCT+B tables in combination with the 3D reference object library provide a rigorous cross-organ framework for experimental data annotation and exploration from the levels of organs and tissues to the levels of cell types and biomarkers. The construction and validation of the tables are iterative. Initially, ontology and publication data, along with knowledge from organ experts, are codified and unified. Later, experimental datasets are compared with existing master tables to confirm the tables or add to them as needed to capture healthy human tissue data. In the near future, the cell type typology will be expanded from one level to multiple levels, also using data from the evolving set of Azimuth references164,165 and in close collaboration with the Cell Ontology curation effort (see ref. 166 in this issue). This will make it possible to compare anatomical structure partonomy and cell-type typology datasets at different levels of resolution. New organs will be added to the 3D reference library and microanatomical structures, such as glomeruli in the kidneys, crypts in the large intestine and alveoli in the lungs will be included.
Efforts are underway to integrate cell-specific protein biomarkers in the ASCT+B tables with well-characterized antibodies for multiplexed antibody-based imaging; the ASCT+B reporter has already contributed to detect protein biomarkers in situ167,168. The goal of these efforts is to generate expertly curated, tissue-specific antibody panels that can be used across consortia in support of a HRA.
The number of anatomical structures, cell types and robust biomarkers will probably increase as new single-cell technologies and computational workflows are developed. Thus, the tables and associated reference objects are a living ‘snapshot’ of the status of the collective work towards an open, authoritative, computable HRA, against which experimentalists can calibrate their data and to which they can contribute. Future uses of the HRA might include cross-species comparisons or cross-species annotations, cross-tissue/organ comparisons, comparisons of healthy versus common or rare genetic variations, and usage in teaching—expanding widely used anatomy books78,135 to the single-cell level.
It will take extensive effort and expertise to arrive at a consensus HRA and to develop methods and user interfaces that use it to advance research and improve human health. Experts interested in contributing to this international and interdisciplinary effort are invited to register at https://iu.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_bpaBhIr8XfdiNRH to receive regular updates and invites to meetings that aim to advance the construction of the HRA.
Chen, G., Ning, B. & Shi, T. Single-cell RNA-seq technologies and related computational data analysis. Front. Genet. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.00317 (2019).
Rozenblatt-Rosen, O., Stubbington, M. J. T., Regev, A. & Teichmann, S. A. The human cell atlas: from vision to reality. Nature 574, 187–192 (2017).
Regev, A. et al. The Human Cell Atlas. eLife 6, e27041 (2017).
Ding, S. L. et al. Comprehensive cellular-resolution atlas of the adult human brain. J. Comp. Neurol. 524, 3127–3481 (2016).
Devor, A. et al. The challenge of connecting the dots in the B.R.A.I.N. Neuron 80, 270–274 (2013).
Moghe, I., Loupy, A. & Solez, K. The human cell atlas project by the numbers: relationship to the Banff classification. Am. J. Transpl. 18, 1830 (2018).
Lonsdale, J. et al. The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project. Nat. Genet. 45, 580–585 (2013).
McMahon, A. P. et al. GUDMAP: the genitourinary developmental molecular anatomy project. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 19, 667–671 (2008).
Elmentaite, R. et al. Cells of the human intestinal tract mapped across space and time. Nature 597, 250–255 (2021).
Srivastava, S. et al. The making of a PreCancer Atlas: promises, challenges, and opportunities. Trends Cancer 4, 523–536 (2018).
Snyder, M. P. et al. The human body at cellular resolution: the NIH Human Biomolecular Atlas Program. Nature 574, 187–192 (2019).
Himmelstein, D. S. et al. Systematic integration of biomedical knowledge prioritizes drugs for repurposing. eLife 6, e26726 (2017).
El-Achkar, T. M. et al. A multimodal and integrated approach to interrogate human kidney biopsies with rigor and reproducibility: guidelines from the Kidney Precision Medicine Project. Physiol. Genomics 53, 1–11 (2021).
Ardini-Poleske, M. E. et al. LungMAP: the molecular atlas of lung development program. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 313, L733–L740 (2013).
Oxburgh, L. et al. (Re)building a kidney. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 28, 1370–1378 (2017).
Stimulating Peripheral Activity to Relieve Conditions (SPARC) (NIH, 2020); https://commonfund.nih.gov/sparc
Heng, H. H. Q. Cancer genome sequencing the challenges ahead. Bioessays 29, 783–794 (2007).
TGCA Research Network Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways. Nature 455, 1061–1068 (2008).
Freire, P. et al. Exploratory analysis of the copy number alterations in glioblastoma multiforme. PLoS ONE 3, e4076 (2008).
Aumann, S., Donner, S., Fischer, J. & Muller, F. in High Resolution Imaging in Microscopy and Ophthalmology: New Frontiers in Biomedical Optics (ed. Bille, J. F.) 59–85. Springer (2019).
Yin, R., Burnum-Johnson, K. E., Sun, X., Dey, S. K. & Laskin, J. High spatial resolution imaging of biological tissues using nanospray desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Nat. Protoc. 14, 3445–3470 (2019).
Goltsev, Y. et al. Deep profiling of mouse splenic architecture with CODEX multiplexed imaging. Cell 174, 968–981 (2018).
Uhlén, M. et al. Tissue-based map of the human proteome. Science 347, 1260419 (2015).
Buenrostro, J. D. et al. Single-cell chromatin accessibility reveals principles of regulatory variation. Nature 523, 486–490 (2015).
Stoeckius, M. et al. Simultaneous epitope and transcriptome measurement in single cells. Nat. Methods 14, 865–868 (2017).
Chen, K. H., Boettiger, A. N., Moffitt, J. R., Wang, S. & Zhuang, X. Spatially resolved, highly multiplexed RNA profiling in single cells. Science 348, aaa6090 (2015).
Moffitt, J. R. et al. High-throughput single-cell gene-expression profiling with multiplexed error-robust fluorescence in situ hybridization. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 11046–11051 (2016).
Rodriques, S. G. et al. Slide-seq: a scalable technology for measuring genome-wide expression at high spatial resolution. Science 363, 1463–1467 (2019).
Asp, M., Bergenstrahle, J. & Lundeberg, J. Spatially resolved transcriptomes-next generation tools for tissue exploration. Bioessays 42, e1900221 (2020).
Zollinger, D. R., Lingle, S. E., Sorg, K., Beechem, J. M. & Merritt, C. R. GeoMx RNA Assay: high multiplex, digital, spatial analysis of RNA in FFPE tissue. Methods Mol. Biol. 2148, 331–345 (2020).
Visium Spatial Gene Expression (10x Genomics, 2021); https://www.10xgenomics.com/products/spatial-gene-expression
Miller, J. A. et al. Common cell type nomenclature for the mammalian brain. eLife 9, e59928 (2020).
Mungall, C. J., Torniai, C., Gkoutos, G. V., Lewis, S. E. & Haendel, M. A. Uberon, an integrative multi-species anatomy ontology. Genome Biol. 13, R5 (2012).
Golbreich, C., Grosjean, J. & Darmoni, S. J. The foundational model of anatomy in OWL 2 and its use. Artif. Intell. Med. 57, 119–132 (2013).
Rosse, C. & Mejino, J. L. V. A reference ontology for biomedical informatics: the Foundational Model of Anatomy. J. Biomed. Inform. 36, 478–500 (2003).
Meehan, T. F. et al. Logical development of the Cell Ontology. BMC Bioinform. 12, 6 (2011).
Ding, S. L. et al. Allen Human Reference Atlas—3D, 2020 (2021); http://download.alleninstitute.org/informatics-archive/allen_human_reference_atlas_3d_2020/version_2021
Fonseca, C. G. et al. The Cardiac Atlas Project: an imaging database for computational modeling and statistical atlases of the heart. Bioinformatics 27, 2288–2295 (2011).
Géron, A., Werner, J., Wattiez, R., Lebaron, P. & Mattallana-Surget, S. Deciphering the functioning of microbial communities: shedding light on the critical steps in metaproteomics. Front. Microbiol. 10, 2395 (2019).
Manz, M. G., Miyamoto, T., Akashi, K. & Weissman, I. L. Prospective isolation of human clonogenic common myeloid progenitors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 11872–11877 (2002).
Fajtova, M., Kovarikova, A., Svec, P., Kankuri, E. & Sedlak, J. Immunophenotypic profile of nucleated erythroid progenitors during maturation in regenerating bone marrow. Leuk. Lymphoma 54, 2523–2530 (2013).
Kawamura, S. et al. Identification of a human clonogenic progenitor with strict monocyte differentiation potential: a counterpart of mouse cMoPs. Immunity 54, 2523–2530 (2017).
Mousset, C. M. et al. Comprehensive phenotyping of T cells using flow cytometry. Cytom. A 95, 647–654 (2019).
Mello, F. V. et al. Maturation-associated gene expression profiles along normal human bone marrow monopoiesis. Br. J. Haematol. 176, 464–474 (2017).
Tomer, A. Human marrow megakaryocyte differentiation: multiparameter correlative analysis identifies von Willebrand factor as a sensitive and distinctive marker for early (2N and 4N) megakaryocytes. Blood 104, 2722–2727 (2004).
Doulatov, S. et al. Revised map of the human progenitor hierarchy shows the origin of macrophages and dendritic cells in early lymphoid development. Nat. Immunol. 11, 585–593 (2010).
Elghetany, M. T., Ge, Y., Patel, J., Martinez, J. & Uhrova, H. Flow cytometric study of neutrophilic granulopoiesis in normal bone marrow using an expanded panel of antibodies: correlation with morphologic assessments. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 18, 36–41 (2004).
Szabo, P. A. et al. Single-cell transcriptomics of human T cells reveals tissue and activation signatures in health and disease. Nat. Commun. 10, 4706 (2019).
Kaminski, D. A., Wei, C., Qian, Y., Rosenberg, A. F. & Sanz, I. Advances in human B cell phenotypic profiling. Front. Immunol. 3, 302 (2012).
Hay, S. B., Ferchen, K., Chetal, K., Grimes, H. L. & Salomonis, N. The Human Cell Atlas bone marrow single-cell interactive web portal. Exp. Hematol. 68, P51–P61 (2018).
Clavarino, G. et al. Novel strategy for phenotypic characterization of human B lymphocytes from precursors to effector cells by flow cytometry. PLoS ONE 11, e0162209 (2016).
Popescu, D. M. et al. Decoding human fetal liver haematopoiesis. Nature 574, 365–371 (2019).
Hodge, R. D. et al. Conserved cell types with divergent features in human versus mouse cortex. Nature 573, 61–68 (2019).
Hawrylycz, M. J. et al. An anatomically comprehensive atlas of the adult human brain transcriptome. Nature 489, 391–399 (2012).
Litviňuková, M. et al. Cells of the adult human heart. Nature 588, 466–472 (2020).
Tucker, N. R. et al. Transcriptional and cellular diversity of the human heart. Circulation 142, 466–482 (2020).
Giannasca, P. J., Giannasca, K. T., Leichtner, A. M. & Neutra, M. R. Human intestinal M cells display the sialyl Lewis A antigen. Infect. Immun. 67, 946–953 (1999).
Buettner, M. & Lochner, M. Development and function of secondary and tertiary lymphoid organs in the small intestine and the colon. Front. Immunol. 7, 342 (2016).
Hoyle, C. H. & Burnstock, G. Neuronal populations in the submucous plexus of the human colon. J. Anat. 166, 7–22 (1989).
Westerhoff, M. & Greeson, J. in Histology for Pathologists (ed. Mills, S.) Ch. 24, 640–663 (Wolters Kluwer, 2019).
Azzali, G. Structure, lymphatic vascularization and lymphocyte migration in mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue. Immunol. Rev. 195, 178–189 (2003).
Furness, J. B., Callaghan, B. P., Rivera, L. R. & Cho, H. J. The enteric nervous system and gastrointestinal innervation: integrated local and central control. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 817, 39–71 (2014).
Arai, T. & Kino, I. Morphometrical and cell kinetic studies of normal human colorectal mucosa. Comparison between the proximal and the distal large intestine. Acta Pathol. Jpn 39, 725–730 (1989).
Fenton, T. M. et al. Immune profiling of human gut-associated lymphoid tissue identifies a role for isolated lymphoid follicles in priming of region-specific immunity. Immunity 52, 557–570 (2020).
Habowski, A. N. et al. Transcriptomic and proteomic signatures of stemness and differentiation in the colon crypt. Commun. Biol. 3, 453 (2020).
Lundqvist, C., Baranov, V., Hammarström, S., Athlin, L. & Hammarström, M. L. Intra-epithelial lymphocytes. Evidence for regional specialization and extrathymic T cell maturation in the human gut epithelium. Int. Immunol. 7, 1473–1487 (1995).
Lockyer, M. G. & Petras, R. E. in Histology for Pathologists (ed. Mills, S.) Ch. 25, 664–676 (Wolters Kluwer, 2019).
Pittman, M. E. & Yantiss, R. K. in Histology for Pathologists (ed. Mills, S.) Ch. 26, 677–691 (Wolters Kluwer, 2019).
Kriz, W. & Bankir, L. A standard nomenclature for structures of the kidney. The Renal Commission of the International Union of Physiological Sciences (IUPS). Kidney Int. 33, 1–7 (1988).
Lake, B. B. et al. A single-nucleus RNA-sequencing pipeline to decipher the molecular anatomy and pathophysiology of human kidneys. Nat. Commun. 10, 2832 (2019).
Barry, D. M. et al. Molecular determinants of nephron vascular specialization in the kidney. Nat. Commun. 10, 5705 (2019).
Menon, R. et al. Single cell transcriptomics identifies focal segmental glomerulosclerosis remission endothelial biomarker. JCI Insight 5, e133267 (2020).
Ransick, A. et al. Single-cell profiling reveals sex, lineage, and regional diversity in the mouse kidney. Dev. Cell 51, 399–413 (2019).
Limbutara, K., Chou, C. L. & Knepper, M. A. Quantitative proteomics of all 14 renal tubule segments in rat. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 31, 1255–1266 (2020).
Kuppe, C. et al. Decoding myofibroblast origins in human kidney fibrosis. Nature 589, 281–286 (2021).
Stewart, B. J. et al. Spatiotemporal immune zonation of the human kidney. Science 365, 1461–1466 (2019).
Kirita, Y., Wu, H., Uchimura, K., Wilson, P. C. & Humphreys, B. D. Cell profiling of mouse acute kidney injury reveals conserved cellular responses to injury. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 15874–15883 (2020).
Standring, S. Gray’s Anatomy: The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice (Elsevier, 2016).
Haefeli-Bleuer, B. & Weibel, E. R. Morphometry of the human pulmonary acinus. Anat. Rec. 220, 401–414 (1988).
Whitsett, J. A., Kalin, T. V., Xu, Y. & Kalinichenko, V. V. Building and regenerating the lung cell by cell. Physiol. Rev. 99, 513–554 (2019).
Plasschaert, L. W. et al. A single-cell atlas of the airway epithelium reveals the CFTR-rich pulmonary ionocyte. Nature 560, 377–381 (2018).
Xu, Y. et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing identifies diverse roles of epithelial cells in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. JCI Insight 1, e90558 (2016).
Adams, T. S. et al. Single-cell RNA-seq reveals ectopic and aberrant lung-resident cell populations in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Sci. Adv. 6, eaba1983 (2020).
Wang, A. et al. Single-cell multiomic profiling of human lungs reveals cell-type-specific and age-dynamic control of SARS-CoV2 host genes. eLife 9, e62522 (2020).
Travaglini, K. J. et al. A molecular cell atlas of the human lung from single-cell RNA sequencing. Nature 587, 619–625 (2020).
Deprez, M. et al. A single-cell atlas of the human healthy airways. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 202, 1636–1645 (2019).
Medeiros, L. J. et al. in Tumors of the Lymph Node and Spleen Ch. 1 (American Registry of Pathology, 2017).
Medeiros, L. J. et al. Tumors of the Lymph Node and Spleen (American Registry of Pathology, 2017).
O’Malley, D. P., George, T. I., Orazi, A. & Abbondanzo, S. L. in Benign and Reactive Conditions of Lymph Node and Spleen Ch. 1 (American Registry of Pathology, 2009).
Angel, C. E. et al. Distinctive localization of antigen-presenting cells in human lymph nodes. Blood 113, 1257–1267 (2009).
James, K. R. et al. Distinct microbial and immune niches of the human colon. Nat. Immunol. 21, 343–353 (2020).
Link, A. et al. Association of T-zone reticular networks and conduits with ectopic lymphoid tissues in mice and humans. Am. J. Pathol. 178, 1662–1675 (2011).
Park, S. M. et al. Mapping the distinctive populations of lymphatic endothelial cells in different zones of human lymph nodes. PLoS ONE 9, e106814 (2014).
Xiang, M. et al. A single-cell transcriptional roadmap of the mouse and human lymph node lymphatic vasculature. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 7, 52 (2020).
Takeda, A. et al. Single-cell survey of human lymphatics unveils marked endothelial cell heterogeneity and mechanisms of homing for neutrophils. Immunity 51, 561–572 (2019).
Kunicki, M. A., Hernandez, L. C. A., Davis, K. L., Bacchetta, R. & Roncarolo, M. G. Identity and diversity of human peripheral Th and T regulatory cells defined by single-cell mass cytometry. J. Immunol. 200, 336–346 (2018).
Pusztaszeri, M. P., Seelentag, W. & Bosman, F. T. Immunohistochemical expression of endothelial markers CD31, CD34, von Willebrand factor, and Fli-1 in normal human tissues. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 54, 385–395 (2006).
Reynolds, G. et al. Developmental cell programs are co-opted in inflammatory skin disease. Science 371, eaba6500 (2021).
Dyring-Anderson, B. et al. Spatially and cell-type resolved quantitative proteomic atlas of healthy human skin. Nat. Commun. 11, 5587 (2020).
Fuchs, E. Keratins and the skin. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 11, 123–153 (1995).
Nestle, F. O., Meglio, P. D., Qin, J. Z. & Nickoloff, B. J. Skin immune sentinels in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 9, 679–691 (2009).
Laverdet, B. et al. Skin innervation: important roles during normal and pathological cutaneous repair. Histol. Histopathol. 30, 875–892 (2015).
Ryan, T. J. The blood vessels of the skin. J. Invest. Dermatol. 67, 110–118 (1976).
Popescu, D. M. A Single Cell Atlas of Adult Healthy, Psoriatic and Atopic Dermatitis Skin (2021); https://developmentcellatlas.ncl.ac.uk/datasets/hca_skin_portal
Bos, J. D. et al. The skin immune system (SIS): distribution and immunophenotype of lymphocyte subpopulations in normal human skin. J. Invest. Dermatol. 88, 569–573 (1987).
Schweizer, J. et al. New consensus nomenclature for mammalian keratins. J. Cell Biol. 174, 169–174 (2006).
Eberl, G., Colonna, M., Di Santo, J. P. & McKenzie, A. N. J. Innate lymphoid cells: a new paradigm in immunology. Science 348, aaa6566 (2015).
Ali, N. & Rosenblum, M. D. Regulatory T cells in skin. Immunology 152, 372–381 (2017).
Huber, W. E. et al. A tissue-restricted cAMP transcriptional response: SOX10 modulates alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone-triggered expression of microphthalmia-associated transcription factor in melanocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 45224–45230 (2003).
Haniffa, M., Gunawan, M. & Jardine, L. Human skin dendritic cells in health and disease. J. Dermatol. Sci. 77, 85–92 (2015).
Cesta, M. F. Normal structure, function, and histology of the spleen. Toxicol. Pathol. 34, 455–465 (2006).
Madissoon, E. et al. scRNA-seq assessment of the human lung, spleen, and esophagus tissue stability after cold preservation. Genome Biol. 21, 1 (2019).
Pack, M. et al. DEC-205/CD205+ dendritic cells are abundant in the white pulp of the human spleen, including the border region between the red and white pulp. Immunology 123, 438–446 (2008).
Steiniger, B. S. Human spleen microanatomy: why mice do not suffice. Immunology 145, 334–346 (2015).
Steiniger, B. S., Seiler, A., Lampp, K., Wilhelmi, V. & Stachniss, V. B lymphocyte compartments in the human splenic red pulp: capillary sheaths and periarteriolar regions. Histochem. Cell Biol. 141, 507–518 (2014).
Steiniger, B. S., Stachniss, V., Schwarzbach, H. & Barth, P. J. Phenotypic differences between red pulp capillary and sinusoidal endothelia help localizing the open splenic circulation in humans. Histochem. Cell Biol. 128, 391–398 (2007).
Qiu, J. et al. The characteristics of vessel lining cells in normal spleens and their role in the pathobiology of myelofibrosis. Blood Adv. 2, 1130–1145 (2018).
Lewis, S. M., Williams, A. & Eisenbarth, S. C. Structure and function of the immune system in the spleen. Sci. Immunol. 4, eaau6085 (2019).
Mittag, D. et al. Human dendritic cell subsets from spleen and blood are similar in phenotype and function but modified by donor health status. J. Immunol. 186, 6207–6217 (2011).
Cheng, H. W. et al. Origin and differentiation trajectories of fibroblastic reticular cells in the splenic white pulp. Nat. Commun. 10, 1739 (2019).
Van Krieken, J. H. J. M. & Te Velde, J. Immunohistology of the human spleen: an inventory of the localization of lymphocyte subpopulations. Histopathology 10, 285–294 (1986).
Van Krieken, J. H. J. M., Te Velde, J., Leenheers-Binnendijk, L. & Van de Velde, C. J. H. The human spleen; a histological study in splenectomy specimens embedded in methylmethacrylate. Histopathology 9, 571–585 (1985).
Bautista, J. L. et al. Single-cell transcriptional profiling of human thymic stroma uncovers novel cellular heterogeneity in the thymic medulla. Nat. Commun. 12, 1096 (2021).
Haynes, B. F. The human thymic microenvironment. Adv. Immunol. 36, 87–142 (1984).
Park, J. E. et al. A cell atlas of human thymic development defines T cell repertoire formation. Science 367, eaay3224 (2020).
Pearse, G. Normal structure, function and histology of the thymus. Toxicol. Pathol. 34, 504–514 (2006).
Suster, S. & Rosai, J. Histology of the normal thymus. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 14, 284–303 (1990).
Mignini, F. et al. Neuro-immune modulation of the thymus microenvironment (Review). Int. J. Mol. Med. 33, 1392–1400 (2014).
Stoeckle, C. et al. Isolation of myeloid dendritic cells and epithelial cells from human thymus. J. Vis. Exp. 79, e50951 (2013).
Marcovecchio, G. E. et al. Thymic epithelium abnormalities in DiGeorge and Down syndrome patients contribute to dysregulation in T cell development. Front. Immunol. 10, 447 (2019).
Wakimoto, T. et al. Identification and characterization of human thymic cortical dendritic macrophages that may act as professional scavengers of apoptotic thymocytes. Immunobiology 213, 837–847 (2008).
Lavaert, M. et al. Integrated scRNA-seq identifies human postnatal thymus seeding progenitors and regulatory dynamics of differentiating immature thymocytes. Immunity 52, 1088–1104 (2020).
Nuñez, S. et al. The human thymus perivascular space is a functional niche for viral-specific plasma cells. Sci. Immunol. 1, eaah4447 (2016).
Bendriss-Vermare, N. et al. Human thymus contains IFN-α-producing CD11c−, myeloid CD11c+, and mature interdigitating dendritic cells. J. Clin. Invest. 107, 835–844 (2001).
Netter, F. H. Atlas of Human Anatomy 7th edn (Elsevier, 2019).
Kandathil, A. & Chamarthy, M. Pulmonary vascular anatomy & anatomical variants. Cardiovasc. Diagn. Ther. 8, 201–207 (2018).
Perlmutter, D. & Rhoton, A. L. Jr Microsurgical anatomy of the distal anterior cerebral artery. J. Neurosurg. 49, 204–228 (1978).
Hacein-Bey, L. et al. The ascending pharyngeal artery: branches, anastomoses, and clinical significance. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 23, 1246–1256 (2002).
Vuong, S. M., Jeong, W. J., Morales, H. & Abruzzo, T. A. Vascular diseases of the spinal cord: infarction, hemorrhage, and venous congestive myelopathy. Semin. Ultrasound CT MR 37, 466–481 (2016).
Picel, A. C., Hsieh, T. C., Shapiro, R. M., Vezeridis, A. M. & Isaacson, A. J. Prostatic artery embolization for benign prostatic hyperplasia: patient evaluation, anatomy, and technique for successful treatment. Radiographics 39, 1526–1548 (2019).
Vummidi, D. et al. Pseudolesion in segment IV A of the liver from vein of Sappey secondary to SVC obstruction. Radiol. Case Rep. 5, 394 (2015).
Tang, F. et al. mRNA-Seq whole-transcriptome analysis of a single cell. Nat. Methods 6, 377–382 (2009).
Moffitt, J. R. et al. Molecular, spatial, and functional single-cell profiling of the hypothalamic preoptic region. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau5324 (2018).
International Human Genome Sequencing (IHGS) Consortium Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409, 860–921 (2001).
Venter, J. C. et al. The sequence of the human genome. Science 291, 1304–1351 (2001).
Visible Human Project (VHP) Data Sets (NLM, 2020); https://www.nlm.nih.gov/databases/download/vhp.html
Fair Principles (Go Fair, 2021); https://www.go-fair.org/fair-principles
CCF Anatomical Structures, Cell Types and Biomarkers (ASCT+B) Tables (HuBMAP Consortium, 2021); https://hubmapconsortium.github.io/ccf/pages/ccf-anatomical-structures.html
CCF 3D Reference Object Library (HuBMAP Consortium, 2021); https://hubmapconsortium.github.io/ccf/pages/ccf-3d-reference-library.html
Graphics Language Transmission Format (glTF) a File Format Specification for 3D Scenes and Models (Khronos Group, 2021); https://www.khronos.org
CCF Registration User Interface (HuBMAP Consortium, 2021); https://hubmapconsortium.github.io/ccf-ui/rui
CCF Exploration User Interface (HuBMAP Consortium, 2021); https://portal.hubmapconsortium.org/ccf-eui
Human Biomolecular Atlas Program (HuBMAP) Data Portal (NIH, 2020); https://portal.hubmapconsortium.org
CCF User Interfaces (RUI, EUI) (HuBMAP Consortium, 2021); https://github.com/hubmapconsortium/ccf-ui
Jardine, L. et al. Blood and immune development in human fetal bone marrow and Down syndrome. Nature 598, 327–331 (2021).
Stephenson, E. et al. Single-cell multi-omics analysis of the immune response in COVID-19. Nat. Med. 27, 904–916 (2021).
Lake, B. B. et al. An atlas of healthy and injured cell states and niches in the human kidney. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.28.454201 (2021).
Zhuo, L., Huang, L., Yang, Z., Li, G. & Wang, L. A comprehensive analysis of NPHS1 gene mutations in patients with sporadic focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. BMC Med. Genet. 20, 111 (2019).
Ong, E. et al. Modelling kidney disease using ontology: insights from the Kidney Precision Medicine Project. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 16, 686–696 (2020).
Barwinska, D. et al. Molecular characterization of the human kidney interstitium in health and disease. Sci. Adv. 7, eabd3359 (2021).
ASCT+B Reporter (HuBMAP Consortium, 2021); https://hubmapconsortium.github.io/ccf-asct-reporter
Majumder, P. P., Mhlanga, M. M. & Shalek, A. K. The Human Cell Atlas and equity: lessons learned. Nat. Med. 26, 1509–1511 (2020).
Spatial Biology Europe: Online (HuBMAP Consortium, 2021); https://cns-iu.github.io/workshops/2021-2004-2014_spatial_biology_europe_online
Azimuth App for reference-based single-cell analysis (Satija Lab, 2021); https://azimuth.hubmapconsortium.org/
Hao, Y. et al. Integrated analysis of multimodal single-cell data. Cell 184, 3573–3587 (2021).
Osumi-Sutherland, D. et al. Cell type ontologies of the Human Cell Atlas. Nat. Cell Biol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41556-021-00787-7 (2021).
Radtke, A. J. et al. IBEX: an open and extensible method for high content multiplex imaging of diverse tissues. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.11364 (2021).
Hickey, J. W. et al. Spatial mapping of protein composition and tissue organization: a primer for multiplexed antibody-based imaging. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.07953 (2021).
Manz, T. et al. Viv: multiscale visualization of high-resolution multiplexed bioimaging data on the web. Preprint at OSF https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/wd2gu (2020).
Balhoff, J. & Curtis, C. K. Ubergraph (2021); https://github.com/INCATools/ubergraph
Li, W., Germain, R. N. & Gerner, M. Y. Multiplex, quantitative cellular analysis in large tissue volumes with clearing-enhanced 3D microscopy (Ce3D). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E7321–E7330 (2017).
Fedorov, A. et al. 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn. Reson. Imaging 30, 1323–1341 (2012).
Slicer Community. 3D Slicer image computing platform (2021); https://www.slicer.org/
ZBrush, the all-in-one digital sculpting solution (Pixologic, 2021); https://pixologic.com/
Maya: 3D computer animation, modeling, simulation, and rendering software (Autodesk, 2021); https://www.autodesk.com/products/maya/overview
We thank B. B. Lake from University of California, San Diego, for assistance with annotations and analysing the single-nucleus RNA-seq HUBMAP data for several of the markers in the kidney ASCT+B tables; B. Steck and R. Dull from the University of Michigan for assistance with the nomenclature and curation of kidney partonomy; S. Winfree, IUPUI, for discussions regarding the kidney ASCT+B table; and staff at the KPMP, especially the Tissue Interrogation Sites and the Controlled Cell Vocabulary working group, for guidance and development of the initial sets of ASCT+B kidney tables. We acknowledge L. Yao for segmenting and optimizing the mouse popliteal lymph node model from high-resolution microscopy data. The work was funded, in part, by NIH Awards OT2OD026671, U54DK120058, 1UH3CA246594, 1U54AI142766, 1UG3CA256960, 1UG3HL145609, U54HL145608, U54HL145611, UH3DK114933, DK110814 and DK107350; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Department of Health and Human Services under BCBB Support Services Contract HHSN316201300006W/HHSN27200002; the Intramural Research Program of the NIH at NIAID; and Helmsley Charitable Trust 2018PG-T1D071.
In the past 3 years, S.A.T. has received remuneration for consulting and Scientific Advisory Board membership from Genentech, Roche, Biogen, GlaxoSmithKline, Foresite labs, Qiagen and Transition Bio and she is a co-founder and equity holder of Transition Bio. R.M. receives research funding from Bayer and Amgen and serves as a consultant for Myokardia/BMS and Third Pole; he is a co-founder of Patch Inc; he is a co-inventor for a patent no. PCT/US2O12/O22119 on pharmacologic BMP inhibitors (along with Mass General Brigham) for which he receives royalties from Keros Therapeutics, Inc.; he also receives royalties from UpToDate for scientific content authorship. The other authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Börner, K., Teichmann, S.A., Quardokus, E.M. et al. Anatomical structures, cell types and biomarkers of the Human Reference Atlas. Nat Cell Biol 23, 1117–1128 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41556-021-00788-6
This article is cited by
Human Genomics (2022)
IBEX: an iterative immunolabeling and chemical bleaching method for high-content imaging of diverse tissues
Nature Protocols (2022)
Nature Medicine (2022)