Correction to: Nature Cell Biology https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1415, published online 14 May, 2006.

In the version of this Article originally published, there were several mistakes in Fig 4d. First, in the ‘none’ group, as shown by the raw data (UVP000641), lanes 9 and 10 were duplicated and used for both ‘anti-Flag’ and ‘anti-Tip60’, and lanes 11 and 12 are the correct data for ‘anti-Tip60’. In addition, lanes 2 and 3 were accidently used as ‘input’, and lanes 7 and 8 are the correct data. Second, in the ‘FLAG–SUMO–reptinK456R’ group, as shown by the raw data (UVP000691), lanes 8 and 9 were mistakenly used for both ‘anti-Ac-H3/4’ and ‘anti-pol II’, for which the correct data should be lanes 7–8 and 9–10, respectively. The experiment was repeated three times with similar results. The source data for Fig. 4d have been deposited to Figshare (https://figshare.com/s/1d713ae47261fed15c50). The errors have been corrected.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Original and corrected.

Full size image