Article | Published:

U2AF1 mutations induce oncogenic IRAK4 isoforms and activate innate immune pathways in myeloid malignancies


Spliceosome mutations are common in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), but the oncogenic changes due to these mutations have not been identified. Here a global analysis of exon usage in AML samples revealed distinct molecular subsets containing alternative spliced isoforms of inflammatory and immune genes. Interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 4 (IRAK4) was the dominant alternatively spliced isoform in MDS and AML and is characterized by a longer isoform that retains exon 4, which encodes IRAK4-long (IRAK4-L), a protein that assembles with the myddosome, results in maximal activation of nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of B cells (NF-κB) and is essential for leukaemic cell function. Expression of IRAK4-L is mediated by mutant U2 small nuclear RNA auxiliary factor 1 (U2AF1) and is associated with oncogenic signalling in MDS and AML. Inhibition of IRAK4-L abrogates leukaemic growth, particularly in AML cells with higher expression of the IRAK4-L isoform. Collectively, mutations in U2AF1 induce expression of therapeutically targetable ‘active’ IRAK4 isoforms and provide a genetic link to activation of chronic innate immune signalling in MDS and AML.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Data availability

RNA-sequencing data that support the findings of this study have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus under accession codes GSE114922 (corresponding to data in Fig. 4b), GSE58831 (corresponding to data in Supplementary Fig. 4), dbGaP: phs000159.v8 (SRX1608652, SRX1608653, SRX1608605, SRX1608609, SRX1608616 and SRX1608620) (corresponding to data in Fig. 5a), and E-MTAB-1733 (corresponding to data in Fig. 1g). The human AML data were derived from the TCGA Research Network: Protein isoform-isoform interaction network was generated using human protein sequences (GRCh37/hg19) from the UCSC Genome Browser’s Table Browser (, accessed February 2009); protein-domain models from PFAM v28 (, CCD v3.16 (, and InterPro v50 (; protein–protein interactions from HPRD v9 (; and domain–domain interactions from DOMINE v2.0 ( = download) (corresponding to data in Fig. 2i). Source data for Figs. 26 and Supplementary Figs. 3, 4 and 6 have been provided as Supplementary Table 5. All other data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1.

    Vitting-Seerup, K. & Sandelin, A. The landscape of isoform switches in human cancers. Mol. Cancer Res. 15, 1206–1220 (2017).

  2. 2.

    Inoue, D., Bradley, R. K. & Abdel-Wahab, O. Spliceosomal gene mutations in myelodysplasia: molecular links to clonal abnormalities of hematopoiesis. Genes Dev. 30, 989–1001 (2016).

  3. 3.

    Kim, E. et al. SRSF2 mutations contribute to myelodysplasia by mutant-specific effects on exon recognition. Cancer Cell 27, 617–630 (2015).

  4. 4.

    Zhang, J. et al. Disease-associated mutation in SRSF2 misregulates splicing by altering RNA-binding affinities. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E4726–E4734 (2015).

  5. 5.

    Saez, B., Walter, M. J. & Graubert, T. A. Splicing factor gene mutations in hematologic malignancies. Blood 129, 1260–1269 (2017).

  6. 6.

    Graubert, T. A. et al. Recurrent mutations in the U2AF1 splicing factor in myelodysplastic syndromes. Nat. Genet. 44, 53–57 (2011).

  7. 7.

    Hirsch, C. M. et al. Molecular features of early onset adult myelodysplastic syndrome. Haematologica 102, 1028–1034 (2017).

  8. 8.

    Papaemmanuil, E. et al. Somatic SF3B1 mutation in myelodysplasia with ring sideroblasts. N. Engl. J. Med. 365, 1384–1395 (2011).

  9. 9.

    Pellagatti, A. & Boultwood, J. Splicing factor gene mutations in the myelodysplastic syndromes: impact on disease phenotype and therapeutic applications. Adv. Biol. Regul. 63, 59–70 (2017).

  10. 10.

    Papaemmanuil, E. et al. Clinical and biological implications of driver mutations in myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood 122, 3616–3627 (2013).

  11. 11.

    Haferlach, T. et al. Landscape of genetic lesions in 944 patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Leukemia 28, 241–247 (2014).

  12. 12.

    Lindsley, R. C. et al. Acute myeloid leukemia ontogeny is defined by distinct somatic mutations. Blood 125, 1367–1376 (2015).

  13. 13.

    Ley, T. J. et al. DNMT3A mutations in acute myeloid leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 363, 2424–2433 (2010).

  14. 14.

    Barreyro, L., Chlon, T. M. & Starczynowski, D. T. Chronic immune response dysregulation in MDS pathogenesis. Blood 132, 1553–1560 (2018).

  15. 15.

    Patra, M. C. & Choi, S. Recent progress in the molecular recognition and therapeutic importance of interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 4. Molecules 21, 1529 (2016).

  16. 16.

    Yang, X. et al. Widespread expansion of protein interaction capabilities by alternative splicing. Cell 164, 805–817 (2016).

  17. 17.

    Dossang, A. C. et al. The N-terminal loop of IRAK-4 death domain regulates ordered assembly of the Myddosome signalling scaffold. Sci. Rep. 6, 37267 (2016).

  18. 18.

    Ferrao, R. et al. IRAK4 dimerization and trans-autophosphorylation are induced by Myddosome assembly. Mol. Cell 55, 891–903 (2014).

  19. 19.

    Booher R. N., S.M., Xu G., Cheng H., Tuck D. P. Efficacy of the IRAK4 inhibitor CA-4948 in patient-derived xenograft models of diffuse large B cell lymphoma. In Proc. American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017 (AACR, 2017).

  20. 20.

    Gerstung, M. et al. Combining gene mutation with gene expression data improves outcome prediction in myelodysplastic syndromes. Nat. Commun. 6, 5901 (2015).

  21. 21.

    Ilagan, J. O. et al. U2AF1 mutations alter splice site recognition in hematological malignancies. Genome Res. 25, 14–26 (2015).

  22. 22.

    Brooks, A. N. et al. A pan-cancer analysis of transcriptome changes associated with somatic mutations in U2AF1 reveals commonly altered splicing events. PLoS One 9, e87361 (2014).

  23. 23.

    Fei, D. L. et al. Wild-Type U2AF1 antagonizes the splicing program characteristic of u2af1-mutant tumors and is required for cell survival. PLoS Genet. 12, e1006384 (2016).

  24. 24.

    Yip, B. H. et al. The U2AF1 S34F mutation induces lineage-specific splicing alterations in myelodysplastic syndromes. J. Clin. Invest. 127, 2206–2221 (2017).

  25. 25.

    Okeyo-Owuor, T. et al. U2AF1 mutations alter sequence specificity of pre-mRNA binding and splicing. Leukemia 29, 909–917 (2015).

  26. 26.

    Shirai, C. L. et al. Mutant U2AF1-expressing cells are sensitive to pharmacological modulation of the spliceosome. Nat. Commun. 8, 14060 (2017).

  27. 27.

    Powers, J. P. et al. Discovery and initial SAR of inhibitors of interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase-4. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 16, 2842–2845 (2006).

  28. 28.

    Maimon, A. et al. Mnk2 alternative splicing modulates the p38-MAPK pathway and impacts Ras-induced transformation. Cell Rep. 7, 501–513 (2014).

  29. 29.

    Hofmann, W. K. et al. Characterization of gene expression of CD34+cells from normal and myelodysplastic bone marrow. Blood 100, 3553–3560 (2002).

  30. 30.

    Pellagatti, A. et al. Deregulated gene expression pathways in myelodysplastic syndrome hematopoietic stem cells. Leukemia 24, 756–764 (2010).

  31. 31.

    Kristinsson, S. Y. et al. Chronic immune stimulation might act as a trigger for the development of acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndromes. J. Clin. Oncol. 29, 2897–2903 (2011).

  32. 32.

    Starczynowski, D. T. et al. Identification of miR-145 and miR-146a as mediators of the 5q– syndrome phenotype. Nat. Med. 16, 49–58 (2010).

  33. 33.

    Varney, M. E. et al. Epistasis between TIFAB and miR-146a: neighboring genes in del(5q) myelodysplastic syndrome. Leukemia 31, 491–495 (2017).

  34. 34.

    Varney, M. E. et al. Loss of Tifab, a del(5q) MDS gene, alters hematopoiesis through derepression of Toll-like receptor–TRAF6 signaling. J. Exp. Med. 212, 1967–1985 (2015).

  35. 35.

    Rhyasen, G. W. et al. Targeting IRAK1 as a therapeutic approach for myelodysplastic syndrome. Cancer Cell 24, 90–104 (2013).

  36. 36.

    Beverly, L. J. & Starczynowski, D. T. IRAK1: oncotarget in MDS and AML. Oncotarget 5, 1699–1700 (2014).

  37. 37.

    Dussiau, C. et al. Targeting IRAK1 in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Oncotarget 6, 18956–18965 (2015).

  38. 38.

    Li, Z. et al. Inhibition of IRAK1/4 sensitizes T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia to chemotherapies. J. Clin. Invest. 125, 1081–1097 (2015).

  39. 39.

    Goh, J. Y. et al. Chromosome 1q21.3 amplification is a trackable biomarker and actionable target for breast cancer recurrence. Nat. Med. 23, 1319–1330 (2017).

  40. 40.

    Adams, A. K. et al. IRAK1 is a novel DEK transcriptional target and is essential for head and neck cancer cell survival. Oncotarget 6, 43395–43407 (2015).

  41. 41.

    Wee, Z. N. et al. IRAK1 is a therapeutic target that drives breast cancer metastasis and resistance to paclitaxel. Nat. Commun. 6, 8746 (2015).

  42. 42.

    Lee, S. C. et al. Synthetic lethal and convergent biological effects of cancer-associated spliceosomal gene mutations. Cancer Cell 34, 225–241 (2018).

  43. 43.

    Yoshida, K. et al. Frequent pathway mutations of splicing machinery in myelodysplasia. Nature 478, 64–69 (2011).

  44. 44.

    Makishima, H. et al. Mutations in the spliceosome machinery, a novel and ubiquitous pathway in leukemogenesis. Blood 119, 3203–3210 (2012).

  45. 45.

    Ogawa, S. Splicing factor mutations in AML. Blood 123, 3216–3217 (2014).

  46. 46.

    Kon, A. et al. Physiological Srsf2 P95H expression causes impaired hematopoietic stem cell functions and aberrant RNA splicing in mice. Blood 131, 621–635 (2018).

  47. 47.

    Komeno, Y. et al. SRSF2 Is essential for hematopoiesis, and its myelodysplastic syndrome-related mutations dysregulate alternative pre-mRNA splicing. Mol. Cell Biol. 35, 3071–3082 (2015).

  48. 48.

    Obeng, E. A. et al. Physiologic expression of Sf3b1 K700E causes impaired erythropoiesis, aberrant splicing, and sensitivity to therapeutic spliceosome modulation. Cancer Cell 30, 404–417 (2016).

  49. 49.

    Mupo, A. et al. Hemopoietic-specific Sf3b1-K700E knock-in mice display the splicing defect seen in human MDS but develop anemia without ring sideroblasts. Leukemia 31, 720–727 (2017).

  50. 50.

    Shirai, C. L. et al. Mutant U2AF1 expression alters hematopoiesis and pre-mRNA splicing in vivo. Cancer Cell 27, 631–643 (2015).

  51. 51.

    Komurov, K., Dursun, S., Erdin, S. & Ram, P. T. NetWalker: a contextual network analysis tool for functional genomics. BMC Genomics 13, 282 (2012).

  52. 52.

    Matsuoka, A. et al. Lenalidomide induces cell death in an MDS-derived cell line with deletion of chromosome 5q by inhibition of cytokinesis. Leukemia 24, 748–755 (2010).

  53. 53.

    Rhyasen, G. W. et al. An MDS xenograft model utilizing a patient-derived cell line. Leukemia 28, 1142–1145 (2014).

  54. 54.

    Sun, J. et al. Comprehensive RNAi-based screening of human and mouse TLR pathways identifies species-specific preferences in signaling protein use. Sci. Signal. 9, aab2191 (2016).

  55. 55.

    Komurov, K., White, M. A. & Ram, P. T. Use of data-biased random walks on graphs for the retrieval of context-specific networks from genomic data. PLoS Comput. Biol. 6, 1000889 (2010).

  56. 56.

    Stoilov, P., Lin, C. H., Damoiseaux, R., Nikolic, J. & Black, D. L. A high-throughput screening strategy identifies cardiotonic steroids as alternative splicing modulators. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 11218–11223 (2008).

  57. 57.

    Fang, J. et al. Ubiquitination of the spliceosome auxiliary factor hnRNPA1 by TRAF6 links chronic innate immune signaling with hematopoietic defects and myelodysplasia. Nat. Immunol. 18, 236–245 (2017).

Download references


This work was supported by Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Research Foundation, Leukemia Lymphoma Society, National Institutes of Health (R35HL135787, RO1DK102759, RO1DK113639), and Edward P. Evans Foundation grants to D.T.S. A.V. is supported by National Institutes of Health (R01HL139487 and R01DK103961), Leukemia and Lymphoma Society, and EvansMDS grants. A.P. and J.B. are supported by Bloodwise (UK, grant 13042). M.A.S. is supported by a National Institutes of Health Research Training and Career Development Grant (F31HL132420). I.D.C.F. is supported by the Intramural Research Program of NIAID. We also thank R. Booher (Curis) for suggestions. We thank M. Scott and Y.-C. Hu from the Gene Editing Core at CCHMC for their assistance.

Author information

M.A.S., G.S.C. and A.P. performed most of the experiments with assistance from L.C.B. A.P., J.B., N.S., K.K., K.C. V.S., and A.K. performed the splicing and isoform analysis. M.W., S.K., and I.D.C.F. provided essential reagents. T.D.B., S.G.-M., D.V.A., K.P., U.S. and A.V. provided patient samples and insight. M.A.S., K.K., J.B., A.V. and D.T.S. conceived the project, designed experiments, interpreted results and wrote the manuscript.

Competing interests

A.V. has received research funding from GlaxoSmithKline, Incyte, MedPacto, Novartis, Curis and Eli Lilly and Company, has received compensation as a scientific advisor to Novartis, Stelexis Therapeutics, Acceleron Pharma and Celgene, and has equity ownership in Stelexis Therapeutics.

Correspondence to Jacqueline Boultwood or Amit Verma or Daniel T. Starczynowski.

Integrated supplementary information

Supplementary Fig. 1 Molecularly and clinically distinct subtypes of AML based on global and IRAK4 RNA isoform expression.

(a) Overview of RNA isoform switching analysis in AML with the corresponding figures and panels shown in parentheses. (b) Schematic representation of expression-level regulation versus isoform-level regulation of RNA isoforms in hypothetical samples. (c) Overall survival analysis of the 3 major groupings of AML (Group 1, blue; Group 2, red; Group 3, green) characterized by distinct patterns of differential isoform usage identified in Fig. 1b. Likelihood ratio test, Multivariate P = 0.06. (d) Exon usage of innate immune genes undergoing isoform switching in AML (Group 2) was correlated to overall survival of AML. Shown is the z-score correlation of IRAK4 exon usage to overall survival of AML patients. In red, exon 4 significantly correlates with worse overall survival of AML patients. (e) Relative expression of IRAK4-L to IRAK4-S in normal tissue (blue) relative to cancer tissue (red) for the indicated cancers analyzed in TCGA. Breast cancer (n = 1093); normal tissue (n = 112). Colon cancer (n = 285); normal tissue (n = 41). Lung cancer (n = 515); normal tissue (n = 59). The P value is indicated for each pair of samples and was determined by Welch’s t-test. (f) Sequence analysis of the IRAK4 exon 4 cassette using primers flanking exon junctions 3-4, 4-5, and 3–5 isolated from THP1 cells.

Supplementary Fig. 2 IRAK4-L and IRAK4-S activation of NF-κB and MAPK pathways.

(a) Pathway analysis of enriched genes in AML patients preferentially expressing IRAK4-L (left) or IRAK4-S (right). Shown are the significant signalling networks and relevant genes associated with IRAK4-L or IRAK4-S expression in AML. Data is adapted from Fig. 2a. (b, c) HEK293 cells transfected with empty vector (pcDNA3.1), pcDNA3.1-IRAK4-L, or pcDNA3.1-IRAK4-S and then immunoblotted for NF-κB (p-IRAK1, p-p65) and MAPK (p-JNK, p-ERK, p-p38) signalling. (Three independent experiments). (d) HL60 cells, which express primarily IRAK4-S, were transduced with empty vector (pMSCV-pGK-GFP) or IRAK4-L and then immunoblotted for the indicated proteins. (Two independent experiments). (e) TF1 and HL60 cells were immunoblotted for IRAK4 with C-terminal antibody that detects IRAK4-L and IRAK4-S after immunoprecipitation of MyD88.

Supplementary Fig. 3 Generation and characterization of THP1 cells deficient for IRAK4 isoforms.

(a) Schematic showing the exons targeted for CRISPR-Cas9 mediated editing of the human IRAK4 gene locus in THP1 cells from 2 independent clones. (b) Immunoblotting for IRAK4 (N-terminal antibody) in matched parental (THP1) and IRAK4-edited (THP1 IRAK4 KO) THP1 cells. (c) Parental and IRAK4 KO THP1 cells expressing were examined for leukaemic progenitor function in methylcellulose using independent clones. Representative images are shown on the left. Scale bar, 700 microns. Data is summarized from 3 biological replicates. Error bars represent mean +/- SD. Two-sided t-tests were used for statistical analyses. (d) Total cell counts were performed for THP1 and THP1-IRAK4 KO (clone 14) cells in liquid culture for the indicated days. (e) Viable cell counts (Trypan blue exclusion) were performed for THP1 and THP1-IRAK4 KO (clone 14) cells in liquid culture for the indicated days. (f) THP1 cells transduced with shRNAs targeting IRAK4-L (shIRAK4-L), IRAK4-L and shIRAK4-S (shIRAK4-L/S), or empty control were monitored in liquid culture by GFP expression. (g) Flow cytometric analysis of THP1 and THP1-IRAK4 KO (clone 14) cells stained with CD14-PE or CD34-APC. Dark grey histogram represents no antibody control. Representative FACS histogram from 2 independent biological replicates. Data represent the mean ± s.e.m.

Supplementary Fig. 4 IRAK4-L is required for leukaemic cell function in vitro and correlates with worse overall survival in MDS.

(a) THP1 cells were transduced with mCherry-expressing shRNAs targeting both IRAK4-L and IRAK4-S (shIRAK4-L/S), or control shRNA, sorted for mCherry expression. Isolated cells (mCherry positive) were then transduced with cDNAs expressing IRAK4-L (pMSCV-pGK-GFP), IRAK4-S, or empty vector and sorted for mCherry/GFP expression. Double positive cells were then immunoblotted with the N-terminal IRAK4 antibody (left panel) and C-terminal IRAK4 antibody (right panel). (b-c) The indicated cells from panel (A) were examined for leukaemic progenitor function in methylcellulose. Representative images are shown in (B). Data in (C) is from 3 biological replicates. Scale bar, 700 microns. Error bars represent mean +/- SEM. Two-sided t-tests were used for statistical analyses. (d) Kaplan-meier survival analysis of MDS patients stratified based on expression of high or low IRAK4-L expression. Data is adapted from Gerstung et al. (Nature Communications, 2015). Data represent the mean ± s.e.m.

Supplementary Fig. 5 Inhibition of IRAK4-L reduces signalling and results in apoptosis in U2AF1-mutant AML cells.

(a–c) K562-U2AF1-S34F cells were treated with 10 μM IRAK1/4-Inh for 1 or 2 hours and immunoblotted for NF-κB (p-IRAK1, p-IKK) and MAPK (p-ERK, p-p38, p-JNK) activation (three biological replicates).

Supplementary Fig. 6 Genetic or pharmacologic inhibition of IRAK4 results in differentiation of U2AF1-mutant MDS, but does not affect normal haematopoiesis.

(a) Immunoblot analysis of THP1 cells using the N-terminal IRAK4 antibody following transfection with a control siRNA (siCTL) or siIRAK4 after 24 hours. (b) BM cells from MDS1 following transfection with a control siRNA (siCTL) or siIRAK4 were plated in methylcellulose (for 14 days) and analyzed by flow cytometry for myeloid differentiation. (c, d) BM cells from MDS3 (C) or normal CD34+ (D) cells were treated with 10 μM CA-4948 in methylcellulose (14 days) and then analyzed by flow cytometry for erythroid differentiation. (e) NSG mice received 12.5 mg/kg of CA-4948 (n = 9 mice) or vehicle (PBS; n = 7 mice) for 5 days per week for 12 weeks. Complete blood counts were determined at the end of the study. Two-sided t-tests were used for statistical analyses. Data represent the mean ± s.e.m.

Supplementary Fig. 7

Unprocessed images of all gels and blots.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures 1–7, Supplementary Table titles and legends

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Table 1

Genes that undergo RNA isoform switching in AML.

Supplementary Table 2

Genes undergoing mRNA isoform switching with at least one differential exon inclusion/exclusion event that correlates with AML survival.

Supplementary Table 3

Isoforms that correlate with worst prognosis in AML.

Supplementary Table 4

Description of antibodies.

Supplementary Table 5

Statistics source data.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Further reading

Fig. 1: Differential RNA isoform usage correlates with AML prognosis and oncogenic IRAK4 isoforms.
Fig. 2: IRAK4-L expression results in myddosome assembly and maximal activation of innate immune signalling.
Fig. 3: IRAK4-L is required for leukaemic cell function.
Fig. 4: IRAK4-L expression is associated with U2AF1 mutations in MDS and AML.
Fig. 5: U2AF1(S34F) induces expression of IRAK4-L and increased innate immune pathway activation.
Fig. 6: U2AF1(S34F) AML cells are sensitive to IRAK4 inhibitors.
Supplementary Fig. 1: Molecularly and clinically distinct subtypes of AML based on global and IRAK4 RNA isoform expression.
Supplementary Fig. 2: IRAK4-L and IRAK4-S activation of NF-κB and MAPK pathways.
Supplementary Fig. 3: Generation and characterization of THP1 cells deficient for IRAK4 isoforms.
Supplementary Fig. 4: IRAK4-L is required for leukaemic cell function in vitro and correlates with worse overall survival in MDS.
Supplementary Fig. 5: Inhibition of IRAK4-L reduces signalling and results in apoptosis in U2AF1-mutant AML cells.
Supplementary Fig. 6: Genetic or pharmacologic inhibition of IRAK4 results in differentiation of U2AF1-mutant MDS, but does not affect normal haematopoiesis.
Supplementary Fig. 7