Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

CLN8 is an endoplasmic reticulum cargo receptor that regulates lysosome biogenesis


Organelle biogenesis requires proper transport of proteins from their site of synthesis to their target subcellular compartment1,2,3. Lysosomal enzymes are synthesized in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and traffic through the Golgi complex before being transferred to the endolysosomal system4,5,6, but how they are transferred from the ER to the Golgi is unknown. Here, we show that ER-to-Golgi transfer of lysosomal enzymes requires CLN8, an ER-associated membrane protein whose loss of function leads to the lysosomal storage disorder, neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis 8 (a type of Batten disease)7. ER-to-Golgi trafficking of CLN8 requires interaction with the COPII and COPI machineries via specific export and retrieval signals localized in the cytosolic carboxy terminus of CLN8. CLN8 deficiency leads to depletion of soluble enzymes in the lysosome, thus impairing lysosome biogenesis. Binding to lysosomal enzymes requires the second luminal loop of CLN8 and is abolished by some disease-causing mutations within this region. Our data establish an unanticipated example of an ER receptor serving the biogenesis of an organelle and indicate that impaired transport of lysosomal enzymes underlies Batten disease caused by mutations in CLN8.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: CLN8 interacts with lysosomal enzymes.
Fig. 2: CLN8 deficiency leads to depletion of lysosomal enzymes.
Fig. 3: Interaction with COPI and COPII complexes mediates CLN8 trafficking.
Fig. 4: Defective maturation of lysosomal enzymes upon CLN8 deficiency.
Fig. 5: CLN8 interaction with lysosomal enzymes requires the second luminal loop.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The authors declare that the main data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Information files. Source data for Figs. 1–5 and Supplementary Figs. 2–5 have been provided as Supplementary Table 1. All other data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request. Mass spectrometry data have been deposited in ProteomeXchange with the primary accession code PXD011066. The GEO accession numbers of the microarray data sets analysed for the co-expression analysis are the following: GDS1237, GDS1249, GDS1344, GDS1369, GDS1411, GDS1413, GDS1427, GDS1439, GDS1553, GDS1579, GDS1580, GDS1604, GDS1617, GDS1665, GDS1667, GDS1673, GDS1685, GDS1732, GDS1779, GDS1807, GDS1812, GDS1869, GDS1917, GDS1962, GDS1973, GDS1989, GDS2010, GDS2023, GDS2046, GDS2052, GDS2083, GDS2088, GDS2089, GDS2118, GDS2125, GDS2154, GDS2164, GDS2189, GDS2204, GDS2213, GDS2215, GDS2216, GDS2221, GDS2250, GDS2251, GDS2307, GDS2339, GDS2374, GDS2414, GDS2416, GDS2418, GDS2426, GDS2431, GDS2432, GDS2453, GDS2470, GDS2471, GDS2484, GDS2486, GDS2491, GDS2495, GDS2499, GDS2526, GDS2534, GDS2548, GDS2565, GDS2604, GDS2609, GDS2611, GDS2615, GDS2628, GDS2635, GDS2653, GDS2657, GDS2697, GDS2724, GDS2728, GDS2737, GDS2749, GDS2750, GDS2755, GDS2760, GDS2772, GDS2779, GDS2782, GDS2789, GDS2794, GDS2819, GDS2821, GDS2822, GDS2832, GDS2835, GDS2838, GDS2860, GDS2902, GDS2919, GDS2935, GDS2958, GDS2959, GDS3062, GDS3217, GDS3220, GDS3223 and GDS651.


  1. Purdue, P. E. & Lazarow, P. B. Peroxisome biogenesis. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 17, 701–752 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kornfeld, S. & Mellman, I. The biogenesis of lysosomes. Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 5, 483–525 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chacinska, A., Koehler, C. M., Milenkovic, D., Lithgow, T. & Pfanner, N. Importing mitochondrial proteins: machineries and mechanisms. Cell 138, 628–644 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Luzio, J. P., Pryor, P. R. & Bright, N. A. Lysosomes: fusion and function. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 622–632 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Braulke, T. & Bonifacino, J. S. Sorting of lysosomal proteins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1793, 605–614 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Saftig, P. & Klumperman, J. Lysosome biogenesis and lysosomal membrane proteins: trafficking meets function. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 623–635 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ranta, S. et al. The neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses in human EPMR and mnd mutant mice are associated with mutations in CLN8. Nat. Genet. 23, 233–236 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sardiello, M. et al. A gene network regulating lysosomal biogenesis and function. Science 325, 473–477 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Palmieri, M. et al. Characterization of the CLEAR network reveals an integrated control of cellular clearance pathways. Hum. Mol. Genet. 20, 3852–3866 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sardiello, M. Transcription factor EB: from master coordinator of lysosomal pathways to candidate therapeutic target in degenerative storage diseases. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1371, 3–14 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Geva, Y. & Schuldiner, M. The back and forth of cargo exit from the endoplasmic reticulum. Curr. Biol. 24, R130–R136 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kerppola, T. K. Design and implementation of bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) assays for the visualization of protein interactions in living cells. Nat. Protoc. 1, 1278–1286 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Passantino, R. et al. Identifying protein partners of CLN8, an ER-resident protein involved in neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1833, 529–540 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mole, S. E., Williams, R. E. & Goebel, H. H. Correlations between genotype, ultrastructural morphology and clinical phenotype in the neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses. Neurogenetics 6, 107–126 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bolivar, V. J., Scott Ganus, J. & Messer, A. The development of behavioral abnormalities in the motor neuron degeneration (mnd) mouse. Brain Res. 937, 74–82 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cannelli, N. et al. Novel mutations in CLN8 in Italian variant late infantile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis: another genetic hit in the Mediterranean. Neurogenetics 7, 111–117 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Letourneur, F. et al. Coatomer is essential for retrieval of dilysine-tagged proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum. Cell 79, 1199–1207 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bonifacino, J. S. & Lippincott-Schwartz, J. Coat proteins: shaping membrane transport. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 4, 409–414 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ma, W. & Goldberg, J. Rules for the recognition of dilysine retrieval motifs by coatomer. EMBO J. 32, 926–937 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Eugster, A. et al. Ent5p is required with Ent3p and Vps27p for ubiquitin-dependent protein sorting into the multivesicular body. Mol. Biol. Cell 15, 3031–3041 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Dominguez, M. et al. gp25L/emp24/p24 protein family members of the cis-Golgi network bind both COP I and II coatomer. J. Cell Biol. 140, 751–765 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Emery, G., Parton, R. G., Rojo, M. & Gruenberg, J. The trans-membrane protein p25 forms highly specialized domains that regulate membrane composition and dynamics. J. Cell Sci. 116, 4821–4832 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lonka, L., Kyttala, A., Ranta, S., Jalanko, A. & Lehesjoki, A. E. The neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis CLN8 membrane protein is a resident of the endoplasmic reticulum. Hum. Mol. Genet. 9, 1691–1697 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hu, T., Kao, C. Y., Hudson, R. T., Chen, A. & Draper, R. K. Inhibition of secretion by 1,3-cyclohexanebis(methylamine), a dibasic compound that interferes with coatomer function. Mol. Biol. Cell 10, 921–933 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kuehn, M. J., Herrmann, J. M. & Schekman, R. COPII–cargo interactions direct protein sorting into ER-derived transport vesicles. Nature 391, 187–190 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Otsu, W., Kurooka, T., Otsuka, Y., Sato, K. & Inaba, M. A new class of endoplasmic reticulum export signal ΦXΦXΦ for transmembrane proteins and its selective interaction with Sec24C. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 18521–18532 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kousi, M., Lehesjoki, A. E. & Mole, S. E. Update of the mutation spectrum and clinical correlations of over 360 mutations in eight genes that underlie the neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses. Hum. Mutat. 33, 42–63 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hamalisto, S. & Jaattela, M. Lysosomes in cancer-living on the edge (of the cell). Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 39, 69–76 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Perera, R. M. et al. Transcriptional control of autophagy–lysosome function drives pancreatic cancer metabolism. Nature 524, 361–365 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Seehafer, S. S. & Pearce, D. A. Spectral properties and mechanisms that underlie autofluorescent accumulations in Batten disease. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 382, 247–251 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Marwaha, R. & Sharma, M. DQ-Red BSA trafficking assay in cultured cells to assess cargo delivery to lysosomes. Bio. Protoc. 7, e2571 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ran, F. A. et al. Genome engineering using the CRISPR–Cas9 system. Nat. Protoc. 8, 2281–2308 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Wattiaux, R., Wattiaux-De Coninck, S., Ronveaux-dupal, M. F. & Dubois, F. Isolation of rat liver lysosomes by isopycnic centrifugation in a metrizamide gradient. J. Cell Biol. 78, 349–368 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Subramanian, A. et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 15545–15550 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Reimand, J., Kull, M., Peterson, H., Hansen, J. & Vilo, J. g:Profiler—a web-based toolset for functional profiling of gene lists from large-scale experiments. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, W193–W200 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Corpet, F. Multiple sequence alignment with hierarchical clustering. Nucleic Acids Res. 16, 10881–10890 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Simon, A. L., Stone, E. A. & Sidow, A. Inference of functional regions in proteins by quantification of evolutionary constraints. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 2912–2917 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Spatuzza, C. et al. Physical and functional characterization of the genetic locus of IBtk, an inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase: evidence for three protein isoforms of IBtk. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, 4402–4416 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank P. Lobel, D. Pearce, J. Cooper, T. Dierks, M. Damme, Z. Liu and S. Elsea for helpful discussion; A. Schiano and M. Rousseaux for technical assistance; H. Zoghbi, V. Brandt, A. Ballabio, H. Jafar-Nejad, K. Venkatachalam and M. Wang for critical reading of the manuscript; and B. Turk (J. Stefan Institute, Slovenia), K. Yamada (Institute for Developmental Research, Japan), B. Blazar (University of Minnesota, USA), D. Kohn (University of California, Los Angeles, USA), T. Beccari (Università degli Studi di Perugia, Italy) and M. Peterfy (University of California, Los Angeles, USA) for providing plasmids encoding lysosomal proteins or other tested proteins. This work was supported by the NIH grant NS079618 (to M.S.) and grants from the Beyond Batten Disease Foundation (to M.S.) and the NCL-Stiftung (to M.S.). This project was supported in part by the Hamill Foundation and by IDDRC grant number 1U54 HD083092 from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



M.S. conceived and supervised the study. A.d.R. and M.S. designed the experiments and analysed the data with the contribution of R.N.S., L.S., A.S. and F.M.S. A.d.R. performed the confocal analysis, flow cytometry, the cycloheximide assay, qPCR and enzyme assays. A.d.R. and L.B. performed subcellular fractionation. A.d.R. and J.S. performed the Co-IP experiments. A.d.R., L.B., J.S., D.S., P.L., C.J.A., J.C., M.P., A.A., L.P., K.T.C. and M.C.M. performed cloning, cell culture and transfection experiments. A.d.R. and P.L. performed immunohistochemistry. H.-C.E.L. performed LC–MS/MS. M.S. performed the co-expression and evolutionary analyses. A.d.R. and M.S. wrote the manuscript with help from H.-C.E.L., L.S., A.S. and F.M.S. All authors reviewed and edited the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Sardiello.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Integrated supplementary information

Supplementary Figure 1 Expression and interaction analyses of candidate cargo receptors.

(a), ER localization of YFP-tagged candidate cargo receptors. Confocal microscopy analysis of Y1- or Y2-tagged ER candidate proteins (green) shows co-localization of all of the constructs with the ER marker, KDEL (red), and no discernible alteration of ER morphology following protein overexpression. Scale bar: 20 μm. (b), Shown is a BiFC assay of candidate cargo receptors tagged with Y1 and five pools of Y2-tagged lysosomal enzymes, each pool containing 10 different enzymes. Control experiments (CTRL) were performed by co-transfecting Y1-tagged candidates with pools of Y1-tagged lysosomal enzymes. Scale bar: 200 μm. (c), Details of the BiFC-flow cytometry analysis. CLN8 proteins form homodimers and this property has been used to set up the BiFC-flow cytometry assay. Shown are examples of histogram representations of BiFC data for CLN8 Y1/Y1 and Y1/Y2 controls (left), CLN8/TPP1 interaction (center), and CLN8/PRCP lack of interaction (right). In all analyses, cells were co-transfected with a Ruby plasmid (red fluorescence), used to normalize BiFC readings for transfection efficiency. Images shown in (a), (b) and (c) are representative of n= 3 independent experiments

Supplementary Figure 2 Analysis of lysosome-enriched fractions from WT and CLN8-deficient mice.

(a), Lysosome-enriched fractions were harvested upon liver homogenization and ultra-centrifugation in a discontinuous Nycodenz gradient. (b), HEXA activity assay showed significant enrichment for lysosomes in the collected fractions and no obvious changes in activity in the comparison of WT and Cln8mnd mice. (c), LAMP1 immunoblot showing lysosomal enrichment in collected fractions and no obvious changes between WT and Cln8mnd samples. (d), Details of the plot of relative protein signals from LC-MS/MS analysis of lysosome-enriched liver fractions from WT and CLN8-deficient mice (KO). Each blue dot (representing soluble lysosomal enzymes) has been labeled with the corresponding protein symbol; red dots and grey dots represent lysosomal membrane proteins and other proteins detected by LC-MS/MS, respectively. Data are relative to n = 2 independent proteomic analyses conducted on pools of three livers each. (e), GSEA of lysosomal membrane proteins and mitochondrial matrix proteins in the comparison of lysosome-enriched fractions from the livers of WT and CLN8-deficient mice. Proteins detected by LC-MS/MS are ranked according to their enrichment in CLN8-deficient vs. WT mice (left: increased in CLN8-deficient mice, red; right: decreased in CLN8-deficient mice, blue). GSEA shows that the sets of proteins are not differentially distributed in CLN8-deficient vs. WT mice (Plysosomal membrane proteins = 0.31; Pmitochondrial matrix proteins = 0.32). (f), Enzymatic assay of GAA, GALNS, GBA, GLB1 and TPP1 in liver lysosome-enriched fractions from 2-month-old WT and Cln8mnd mice. Activity is expressed as percentage of the WT samples. All enzyme activities were conducted by using fluorophore analogs of enzymes substrates, as previously described: TPP11; GAA2; GBA3; GLB14; GALNS5. (g), Expression analysis of lysosomal genes in the liver of 2-month-old WT and Cln8mnd mice. Shown is the fold-change in expression of genes in the Cln8mnd relative to WT mice. Expression levels are normalized to the housekeeping gene Ppif (peptidylpropyl isomerase F or cyclophilin D). Images shown in (a) and (c) are representative of n = 3 independent experiments. In (b), (f) and (g), data are means ± SEM (n = 3 independent experiments, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, two-tailed Student’s t-test)

Supplementary Figure 3 Depletion of lysosomal enzymes in tissues from CLN8-deficient mice.

(a), Immunohistochemistry of lysosomal proteins in liver and brain from WT and CLN8-deficient mice. Liver and brains were collected from 2-month-old Cln8mnd and WT mice. CTSD and TPP1 protein levels are strongly reduced in CLN8-deficient mice, compared to WT, in all tested conditions. LAMP1 immunostaining is unchanged. Scale bar, 100 μm. (b), Confocal microscopy of lysosomal enzymes (red) and LAMP1 (green) on brain sections of WT and CLN8-deficient mice. Pearson correlation showed a significant reduction of the enzyme/LAMP1 signal overlap in CLN8-deficient mice compared to WT mice. Insets show four-fold magnification. Scale bar: 20 μm. Images in (a) are representative of n = 3 independent experiments. In (b), data are means ± SEM (n = 3 independent experiments, n = 10 independent images quantified, **P < 0.01, ****P < 0.0001, two-tailed Student’s t-test)

Supplementary Figure 4 Analysis of lysosomal protein localization and CLN8 interactions.

(a), Confocal microscopy of brain sections from WT and CLN8-deficient mice using antibodies against lysosomal enzymes (red) and the ER marker KDEL (green). Scale bar is 20 μm. (b), TPP1/LAMP1 overlap analysis of two CLN8 patients’ fibroblasts. Skin biopsied fibroblasts from two healthy subjects were used as controls. Data are means ± SEM (n = 3 independent experiments, n = 10 independent images quantified, ***P < 0.001, two-tailed Student’s t-test). (c), Immunoblot analysis of skin biopsied fibroblasts from two controls and from two CLN8 patients showed depletion for all the lysosomal protein tested. Signals are normalized to GAPDH staining. (d), Confocal microscopy showing colocalization of CLN8-myc (green) with the ER marker, KDEL (red). Scale bar is 20 μm. (e), Co-IP assay of γ-COP and CLN8 in the presence or absence of CBM. pcDNA is used as an empty vector control. Input represents 10% of the total cell extract. (f), Amino acid sequence of CLN8’s cytosolic C-terminus. Shown are the signals for COPI and COPII recognition and the changes in the CLN8dK and CLN8WdK constructs. TM, transmembrane domain. (g), BiFC analysis of CLN8dK and CLN8WdK constructs showing that CLN8 dimerization and CLN8 competency in the BiFC assay are not affected by mutagenesis of CLN8 ER retrieval and export signals. Scale bar is 200 μm. Images shown in (a), (c), (d), (e) and (g) are representative of n = 3 independent experiments

Supplementary Figure 5 Generation of CLN8-/- cells and their use in protein maturation experiments.

(a), Generation of CLN8-/- cells by CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing. The schematic shows the targeted region of CLN8 gene before and after the editing. (b), Real-time qPCR showing lack of expression of CLN8 in CLN8-/- cells. Fold changes are normalized to the housekeeping gene, GAPDH. (c), Metabolic radiolabeling in CLN8-/- cells and their parental HeLa cells, with or without CLN8 re-expression, showing rescue of the mature forms of CTSD and PPT1. CTSD and PPT1 were immunoprecipitated by using antibodies against the endogenous proteins. CLN8 was expressed by using a doxycycline-inducible vector used to transduce CLN8-/- and control cells. Arrows indicate the mature, lysosome-associated enzyme. IP = immature protein. ML = Mature light. (d), Immunoblot analysis of CTSD, GALNS, PPT1 and TPP1 in CLN8-/- cells and their parental HeLa cells treated with 1 µM MG132 and 1 µM Eeryastatin I (M + E) for 24 hours or left untreated. CTSD IP, immature precursor. CTSD ML, mature light form. GALNS I, immature form. GALNS M, mature form. An antibody against ubiquitin was used as a control for ERAD inhibition. (e), Metabolic radiolabeling of CTSD in CLN8-/- cells and their parental HeLa cells upon treatment with 10 µM MG132 and 6 µM Eeryastatin I (M + E), which were added at the beginning of the starvation step (1 hour) and kept in the pulse and chase media. The arrow indicates the mature, lysosome-associated enzyme. In (be), data are means ± SEM (n = 3 independent experiments, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, two-tailed Student’s t-test)

Supplementary Figure 6

Unprocessed images of all blots

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures 1–6 and Supplementary Table legends.

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Table 1

Statistics source data.

Supplementary Table 2

ER genes whose expression correlated with that of lysosomal genes.

Supplementary Table 3

GSEA of lysosomal soluble proteins.

Supplementary Table 4

GSEA of lysosomal membrane proteins.

Supplementary Table 5

GSEA of mitochondrial matrix proteins.

Supplementary Table 6

Oligonucleotide sequences.

Supplementary Table 7

List of primary and secondary antibodies.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

di Ronza, A., Bajaj, L., Sharma, J. et al. CLN8 is an endoplasmic reticulum cargo receptor that regulates lysosome biogenesis. Nat Cell Biol 20, 1370–1377 (2018).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing