Article | Published:

Transient Scute activation via a self-stimulatory loop directs enteroendocrine cell pair specification from self-renewing intestinal stem cells

Nature Cell Biologyvolume 20pages152161 (2018) | Download Citation

Abstract

The process through which multiple types of cell-lineage-restricted progenitor cells are specified from multipotent stem cells is unclear. Here we show that, in intestinal stem cell lineages in adult Drosophila, in which the Delta-Notch-signalling-guided progenitor cell differentiation into enterocytes is the default mode, the specification of enteroendocrine cells (EEs) is initiated by transient Scute activation in a process driven by transcriptional self-stimulation combined with a negative feedback regulation between Scute and Notch targets. Scute activation induces asymmetric intestinal stem cell divisions that generate EE progenitor cells. The mitosis-inducing and fate-inducing activities of Scute guide each EE progenitor cell to divide exactly once prior to its terminal differentiation, yielding a pair of EEs. The transient expression of a fate inducer therefore specifies both type and numbers of committed progenitor cells originating from stem cells, which could represent a general mechanism used for diversifying committed progenitor cells from multipotent stem cells.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from $8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Change history

  • Correction 19 April 2018

    In the version of this Article originally published, the author had misnumbered the reference citations in the Methods, using numbers 1–14 instead of 46–59. These errors have now been corrected in all online versions of the Article.

References

  1. 1.

    Neumuller, R. A. & Knoblich, J. A. Dividing cellular asymmetry: asymmetric cell division and its implications for stem cells and cancer. Genes. Dev. 23, 2675–2699 (2009).

  2. 2.

    Morrison, S. J. & Spradling, A. C. Stem cells and niches: mechanisms that promote stem cell maintenance throughout life. Cell 132, 598–611 (2008).

  3. 3.

    Li, L. & Xie, T. Stem cell niche: structure and function. Annu. Rev. Cell. Dev. Biol. 21, 605–631 (2005).

  4. 4.

    Snippert, H. J. et al. Intestinal crypt homeostasis results from neutral competition between symmetrically dividing Lgr5 stem cells. Cell 143, 134–144 (2010).

  5. 5.

    Lopez-Garcia, C., Klein, A. M., Simons, B. D. & Winton, D. J. Intestinal stem cell replacement follows a pattern of neutral drift. Science 330, 822–825 (2010).

  6. 6.

    Ohlstein, B. & Spradling, A. Multipotent Drosophila intestinal stem cells specify daughter cell fates by differential notch signaling. Science 315, 988–992 (2007).

  7. 7.

    Ohlstein, B. & Spradling, A. The adult Drosophila posterior midgut is maintained by pluripotent stem cells. Nature 439, 470–474 (2006).

  8. 8.

    Micchelli, C. A. & Perrimon, N. Evidence that stem cells reside in the adult Drosophila midgut epithelium. Nature 439, 475–479 (2006).

  9. 9.

    Biteau, B. & Jasper, H. Slit/Robo signaling regulates cell fate decisions in the intestinal stem cell lineage of Drosophila. Cell. Rep. 7, 1867–1875 (2014).

  10. 10.

    Zeng, X. & Hou, S. X. Enteroendocrine cells are generated from stem cells through a distinct progenitor in the adult Drosophila posterior midgut. Development 142, 644–653 (2015).

  11. 11.

    Wang, C., Guo, X., Dou, K., Chen, H. & Xi, R. Ttk69 acts as a master repressor of enteroendocrine cell specification in Drosophila intestinal stem cell lineages. Development 142, 3321–3331 (2015).

  12. 12.

    Bardin, A. J., Perdigoto, C. N., Southall, T. D., Brand, A. H. & Schweisguth, F. Transcriptional control of stem cell maintenance in the Drosophila intestine. Development 137, 705–714 (2010).

  13. 13.

    Amcheslavsky, A. et al. Enteroendocrine cells support intestinal stem-cell-mediated homeostasis in Drosophila. Cell. Rep. 9, 32–39 (2014).

  14. 14.

    Beehler-Evans, R. & Micchelli, C. A. Generation of enteroendocrine cell diversity in midgut stem cell lineages. Development 142, 654–664 (2015).

  15. 15.

    Guo, Z. & Ohlstein, B. Stem cell regulation. Bidirectional Notch signaling regulates Drosophila intestinal stem cell multipotency. Science 350, aab0988 (2015).

  16. 16.

    Cubas, P., de Celis, J. F., Campuzano, S. & Modolell, J. Proneural clusters of achaete-scute expression and the generation of sensory organs in the Drosophila imaginal wing disc. Genes. Dev. 5, 996–1008 (1991).

  17. 17.

    Jenett, A. et al. A GAL4-driver line resource for Drosophila neurobiology. Cell. Rep. 2, 991–1001 (2012).

  18. 18.

    Struhl, G. & Basler, K. Organizing activity of wingless protein in Drosophila. Cell 72, 527–540 (1993).

  19. 19.

    Patel, P. H., Dutta, D. & Edgar, B. A. Niche appropriation by Drosophila intestinal stem cell tumours. Nat. Cell. Biol. 17, 1182–1192 (2015).

  20. 20.

    Lai, S. L. & Doe, C. Q. Transient nuclear Prospero induces neural progenitor quiescence. eLife 3, e03363 (2014).

  21. 21.

    Li, L. & Vaessin, H. Pan-neural Prospero terminates cell proliferation during Drosophila neurogenesis. Genes. Dev. 14, 147–151 (2000).

  22. 22.

    Zeng, X. et al. Genome-wide RNAi screen identifies networks involved in intestinal stem cell regulation in Drosophila. Cell. Rep. 10, 1226–1238 (2015).

  23. 23.

    Singson, A., Leviten, M. W., Bang, A. G., Hua, X. H. & Posakony, J. W. Direct downstream targets of proneural activators in the imaginal disc include genes involved in lateral inhibitory signaling. Genes. Dev. 8, 2058–2071 (1994).

  24. 24.

    Nellesen, D. T., Lai, E. C. & Posakony, J. W. Discrete enhancer elements mediate selective responsiveness of enhancer of split complex genes to common transcriptional activators. Dev. Biol. 213, 33–53 (1999).

  25. 25.

    Culi, J. & Modolell, J. Proneural gene self-stimulation in neural precursors: an essential mechanism for sense organ development that is regulated by Notch signaling. Genes. Dev. 12, 2036–2047 (1998).

  26. 26.

    Jimenez, G. & Ish-Horowicz, D. A chimeric enhancer-of-split transcriptional activator drives neural development and achaete–scute expression. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 4355–4362 (1997).

  27. 27.

    Dawson, S. R., Turner, D. L., Weintraub, H. & Parkhurst, S. M. Specificity for the hairy/enhancer of split basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) proteins maps outside the bHLH domain and suggests two separable modes of transcriptional repression. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 6923–6931 (1995).

  28. 28.

    Housden, B. E., Li, J. & Bray, S. J. Visualizing Notch signaling in vivo in Drosophila tissues. Methods Mol. Biol. 1187, 101–113 (2014).

  29. 29.

    Li, Y. et al. Transcription factor antagonism controls enteroendocrine cell specification from intestinal stem cells. Sci. Rep. 7, 988 (2017).

  30. 30.

    Schrons, H., Knust, E. & Campos-Ortega, J. A. The enhancer of split complex and adjacent genes in the 96F region of Drosophila melanogaster are required for segregation of neural and epidermal progenitor cells. Genetics 132, 481–503 (1992).

  31. 31.

    Martinez, C., Modolell, J. & Garrell, J. Regulation of the proneural gene achaete by helix-loop-helix proteins. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 3514–3521 (1993).

  32. 32.

    Jiang, H. & Edgar, B. A. EGFR signaling regulates the proliferation of Drosophila adult midgut progenitors. Development 136, 483–493 (2009).

  33. 33.

    Takashima, S. et al. Development of the Drosophila entero-endocrine lineage and its specification by the Notch signaling pathway. Dev. Biol. 353, 161–172 (2011).

  34. 34.

    Micchelli, C. A., Sudmeier, L., Perrimon, N., Tang, S. & Beehler-Evans, R. Identification of adult midgut precursors in Drosophila. Gene Expr. Patterns 11, 12–21 (2011).

  35. 35.

    Takashima, S., Aghajanian, P., Younossi-Hartenstein, A. & Hartenstein, V. Origin and dynamic lineage characteristics of the developing Drosophila midgut stem cells. Dev. Biol. 416, 347–360 (2016).

  36. 36.

    Knoblich, J. A., Jan, L. Y. & Jan, Y. N. Asymmetric segregation of Numb and Prospero during cell division. Nature 377, 624–627 (1995).

  37. 37.

    Spana, E. P. & Doe, C. Q. The prospero transcription factor is asymmetrically localized to the cell cortex during neuroblast mitosis in Drosophila. Development 121, 3187–3195 (1995).

  38. 38.

    Yin, C. & Xi, R. A phyllopod-mediated feedback loop promotes intestinal stem cell enteroendocrine commitment in Drosophila. Stem Cell Rep. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.11.014 (2017).

  39. 39.

    Novak, B. & Tyson, J. J. Design principles of biochemical oscillators. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 9, 981–991 (2008).

  40. 40.

    Clevers, H. The intestinal crypt, a prototype stem cell compartment. Cell 154, 274–284 (2013).

  41. 41.

    Homem, C. C. & Knoblich, J. A. Drosophila neuroblasts: a model for stem cell biology. Development 139, 4297–4310 (2012).

  42. 42.

    Choksi, S. P. et al. Prospero acts as a binary switch between self-renewal and differentiation in Drosophila neural stem cells. Dev. Cell. 11, 775–789 (2006).

  43. 43.

    Olsson, A. et al. Single-cell analysis of mixed-lineage states leading to a binary cell fate choice. Nature 537, 698–702 (2016).

  44. 44.

    Bechard, M. E. et al. Precommitment low-level Neurog3 expression defines a long-lived mitotic endocrine-biased progenitor pool that drives production of endocrine-committed cells. Genes. Dev. 30, 1852–1865 (2016).

  45. 45.

    Kim, T. H. et al. Single-cell transcript profiles reveal multilineage priming in early progenitors derived from Lgr5+ intestinal stem cells. Cell. Rep. 16, 2053–2060 (2016).

  46. 46.

    Ni, J. Q. et al. A genome-scale shRNA resource for transgenic RNAi in Drosophila. Nat. Methods 8, 405–407 (2011).

  47. 47.

    Zeng, X., Chauhan, C. & Hou, S. X. Characterization of midgut stem cell- and enteroblast-specific Gal4 lines in Drosophila. Genesis 48, 607–611 (2010).

  48. 48.

    Jenett, A. et al. A GAL4-driver line resource for Drosophila neurobiology. Cell. Rep. 2, 991–1001 (2012).

  49. 49.

    Bivik, C. et al. Control of neural daughter cell proliferation by multi-level Notch/Su(H)/E(spl)-HLH signaling. PLoS. Genet. 12, e1005984 (2016).

  50. 50.

    Schrons, H., Knust, E. & Campos-Ortega, J. A. The enhancer of split complex and adjacent genes in the 96F region of Drosophila melanogaster are required for segregation of neural and epidermal progenitor cells. Genetics 132, 481–503 (1992).

  51. 51.

    Yu, Z. et al. Highly efficient genome modifications mediated by CRISPR/Cas9 in Drosophila. Genetics 195, 289–291 (2013).

  52. 52.

    Lin, G., Xu, N. & Xi, R. Paracrine wingless signalling controls self-renewal of Drosophila intestinal stem cells. Nature 455, 1119–1123 (2008).

  53. 53.

    Brand, A. H. & Perrimon, N. Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. Development 118, 401–415 (1993).

  54. 54.

    McGuire, S. E., Mao, Z. & Davis, R. L. Spatiotemporal gene expression targeting with the TARGET and gene-switch systems in Drosophila. Sci. STKE 2004, pl6 (2004).

  55. 55.

    Lee, T. & Luo, L. Mosaic analysis with a repressible cell marker for studies of gene function in neuronal morphogenesis. Neuron 22, 451–461 (1999).

  56. 56.

    Dutta, D., Xiang, J. & Edgar, B. A. RNA expression profiling from FACS-isolated cells of the Drosophila intestine. Curr. Protoc. Stem Cell. Biol. 27, Unit 2F.2 (2013).

  57. 57.

    Chen, J., Xu, N., Huang, H., Cai, T. & Xi, R. A feedback amplification loop between stem cells and their progeny promotes tissue regeneration and tumorigenesis. eLife 5, e14330 (2016).

  58. 58.

    Chen, J., Li, J., Huang, H. & Xi, R. Gene expression analysis of sorted cells by RNA-seq in Drosophila intestine. Bio-Protoc. 6, e2079 (2016).

  59. 59.

    Gutierrez-Triana, J. A., Mateo, J. L., Ibberson, D., Ryu, S. & Wittbrodt, J. iDamIDseq and iDEAR: an improved method and computational pipeline to profile chromatin-binding proteins. Development 143, 4272–4278 (2016).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the members of the fly community, as identified in the Methods, for providing fly stocks and antibodies, the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center, the Tsinghua Fly Center and the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank (DSHB) for reagents, and A. Spradling, J. Rajagopal and members of the Xi laboratory for critical reading, and J. Snyder for proofreading the manuscript. This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFA0103602 to R.X), the National Basic Research Program of China (2014CB850002 and 2011CB812700 to R.X.) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31501105 to N.X.).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China

    • Jun Chen
    •  & Rongwen Xi
  2. National Institute of Biological Sciences, Beijing, China

    • Jun Chen
    • , Na Xu
    • , Chenhui Wang
    • , Pin Huang
    • , Huanwei Huang
    • , Zhen Jin
    • , Tao Cai
    •  & Rongwen Xi
  3. Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

    • Zhongsheng Yu
    •  & Renjie Jiao
  4. Sino-French Hoffmann Institute, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China

    • Renjie Jiao
  5. Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, China

    • Rongwen Xi

Authors

  1. Search for Jun Chen in:

  2. Search for Na Xu in:

  3. Search for Chenhui Wang in:

  4. Search for Pin Huang in:

  5. Search for Huanwei Huang in:

  6. Search for Zhen Jin in:

  7. Search for Zhongsheng Yu in:

  8. Search for Tao Cai in:

  9. Search for Renjie Jiao in:

  10. Search for Rongwen Xi in:

Contributions

Conceptualization was provided by J.C. and R.X. Methodology was designed by J.C., N.X., C.W., P.H., Z.J., H.H., Z.Y., T.C., R.J. and R.X. Investigations were carried out by J.C., N.X., C.W., P.H., H.H. and R.X. Formal analysis was performed by J.C., N.X., C.W., P.H., Z.J., H.H. and R.X. The manuscript was written by J.C., H.H. and R.X.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rongwen Xi.

Supplementary information

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41556-017-0020-0