Abstract
Epithelial folding is typically driven by localized actomyosin contractility. However, it remains unclear how epithelia deform when myosin levels are low and uniform. In the Drosophila gastrula, dorsal fold formation occurs despite a lack of localized myosin changes, while the fold-initiating cells reduce cell height following basal shifts of polarity via an unknown mechanism. We show that cell shortening depends on an apical microtubule network organized by the CAMSAP protein Patronin. Prior to gastrulation, microtubule forces generated by the minus-end motor dynein scaffold the apical cell cortex into a dome-like shape, while the severing enzyme Katanin facilitates network remodelling to ensure tissue-wide cell size homeostasis. During fold initiation, Patronin redistributes following basal polarity shifts in the initiating cells, apparently weakening the scaffolding forces to allow dome descent. The homeostatic network that ensures size/shape homogeneity is thus repurposed for cell shortening, linking epithelial polarity to folding via a microtubule-based mechanical mechanism.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Microtubule disassembly by caspases is an important rate-limiting step of cell extrusion
Nature Communications Open Access 25 June 2022
-
A release-and-capture mechanism generates an essential non-centrosomal microtubule array during tube budding
Nature Communications Open Access 02 July 2021
-
FACEts of mechanical regulation in the morphogenesis of craniofacial structures
International Journal of Oral Science Open Access 05 February 2021
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout








References
Pearl, E. J., Li, J. & Green, J. B. A. Cellular systems for epithelial invagination. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 372, 20150526 (2017).
Kondo, T. & Hayashi, S. Mechanisms of cell height changes that mediate epithelial invagination. Dev. Growth Diff. 57, 313–323 (2015).
Martin, A. C. & Goldstein, B. Apical constriction: themes and variations on a cellular mechanism driving morphogenesis. Development 141, 1987–1998 (2014).
Murrell, M., Oakes, P. W., Lenz, M. & Gardel, M. L. Forcing cells into shape: the mechanics of actomyosin contractility. Nat.Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 16, 486–498 (2015).
Wang, Y.-C., Khan, Z., Kaschube, M. & Wieschaus, E. F. Differential positioning of adherens junctions is associated with initiation of epithelial folding. Nature 484, 390–393 (2012).
Rauzi, M. et al. Embryo-scale tissue mechanics during Drosophila gastrulation movements. Nat. Commun. 6, 8677 (2015).
Nashchekin, D., Fernandes, A. R. & Johnston, D. S. Patronin/shot cortical foci assemble the noncentrosomal microtubule array that specifies the Drosophila anterior-posterior axis. Dev. Cell 38, 61–72 (2016).
Ni, J.-Q. et al. A genome-scale shRNA resource for transgenic RNAi in Drosophila. Nat. Methods 8, 405–407 (2011).
Warn, R. M. & Warn, A. Microtubule arrays present during the syncytial and cellular blastoderm stages of the early Drosophila embryo. Exp. Cell Res. 163, 201–210 (1986).
Royou, A., Field, C., Sisson, J. C., Sullivan, W. & Karess, R. Reassessing the role and dynamics of nonmuscle myosin II during furrow formation in early Drosophila embryos. Mol. Biol. Cell 15, 838–850 (2004).
Harris, T. J. C. Adherens junction assembly and function in the Drosophila embryo. Int. Rev. Cell Mol. Biol. 293, 45–83 (2012).
Harris, T. J. C. & Peifer, M. The positioning and segregation of apical cues during epithelial polarity establishment in Drosophila. J. Cell Biol. 170, 813–823 (2005).
Hampoelz, B. et al. Microtubule-induced nuclear envelope fluctuations control chromatin dynamics in Drosophila embryos. Development 138, 3377–3386 (2011).
Brandt, A. et al. Developmental control of nuclear size and shape by Kugelkern and Kurzkern. Curr. Biol. 16, 543–552 (2006).
Pilot, F., Philippe, J.-M., Lemmers, C., Chauvin, J.-P. & Lecuit, T. Developmental control of nuclear morphogenesis and anchoring by charleston, identified in a functional genomic screen of Drosophila cellularisation. Development 133, 711–723 (2006).
Khanal, I., Elbediwy, A., Diaz de la Loza, M. D. C., Fletcher, G. C. & Thompson, B. J. Shot and Patronin polarise microtubules to direct membrane traffic and biogenesis of microvilli in epithelia. J. Cell Sci. 129, 2651–2659 (2016).
Toya, M. et al. CAMSAP3 orients the apical-to-basal polarity of microtubule arrays in epithelial cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 332–337 (2016).
Figard, L., Xu, H., Garcia, H. G., Golding, I. & Sokac, A. M. The plasma membrane flattens out to fuel cell-surface growth during Drosophila cellularization. Dev. Cell 27, 648–655 (2013).
Fabrowski, P. et al. Tubular endocytosis drives remodelling of the apical surface during epithelial morphogenesis in Drosophila. Nat. Commun. 4, 2244 (2013).
Legland, D., Arganda-Carreras, I. & Andrey, P. MorphoLibJ: integrated library and plugins for mathematical morphology with Image. J. Bioinformatics 32, 3532–3534 (2016).
Morais-de-Sa, E., Mirouse, V. & St Johnston, D. aPKC phosphorylation of Bazookadefines the apical/lateral border in Drosophila epithelial cells. Cell 141, 509–523 (2010).
Walther, R. F. & Pichaud, F. Crumbs/DaPKC-dependent apical exclusion of Bazooka promotes photoreceptor polarity remodeling. Curr. Biol. 20, 1065–1074 (2010).
Jiang, K. et al. Microtubule minus-end stabilization by polymerization-driven CAMSAP deposition. Dev. Cell 28, 295–309 (2014).
Chuang, M. et al. DAPK interacts with Patronin and the microtubule cytoskeleton in epidermal development and wound repair. eLife 5, e15833 (2016).
Wang, H., Brust-Mascher, I., Civelekoglu-Scholey, G. & Scholey, J. M. Patronin mediates a switch from kinesin-13-dependent poleward flux to anaphase B spindle elongation. J. Cell Biol. 203, 35–46 (2013).
Derivery, E. et al. Polarized endosome dynamics by spindle asymmetry during asymmetric cell division. Nature 528, 280–285 (2015).
Goodwin, S. S. & Vale, R. D. Patronin regulates the microtubule network by protecting microtubule minus ends. Cell 143, 263–274 (2010).
Caussinus, E., Kanca, O. & Affolter, M. Fluorescent fusion protein knockout mediated by anti-GFP nanobody. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 19, 117–121 (2012).
Tanenbaum, M. E., Vale, R. D. & McKenney, R. J. Cytoplasmic dynein crosslinks and slides anti-parallel microtubules using its two motor domains. eLife 2, e00943 (2013).
Foster, P. J., Furthauer, S., Shelley, M. J., Needleman, D. J. & Akhmanova, A. Active contraction of microtubule networks. eLife 4, e10837 (2015).
Gittes, F., Mickey, B., Nettleton, J. & Howard, J. Flexural rigidity of microtubules and actin filaments measured from thermal fluctuations in shape. J. Cell Biol. 120, 923–934 (1993).
Uyttewaal, M. et al. Mechanical stress acts via Katanin to amplify differences in growth rate between adjacent cells in Arabidopsis. Cell 149, 439–451 (2012).
Picone, R. et al. A polarised population of dynamic microtubules mediates homeostatic length control in animal cells. PLoS Biol. 8, e1000542 (2010).
Dmitrieff, S., Alsina, A., Mathur, A. & Nedelec, F. J. Balance of microtubule stiffness and cortical tension determines the size of blood cells with marginal band across species. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 22, 201618041 (2017).
Baines, A. J. et al. The CKK domain (DUF1781) binds microtubules and defines the CAMSAP/ssp4 family of animal proteins. Mol. Biol. Evol. 26, 2005–2014 (2009).
Noordstra, I. et al. Control of apico-basal epithelial polarity by the microtubule minus-end-binding protein CAMSAP3 and spectraplakin ACF7. J. Cell Sci. 129, 4278–4288 (2016).
Akhmanova, A. & Hoogenraad, C. C. Microtubule minus-end-targeting proteins. Curr. Biol. 25, R162–R171 (2015).
Yano, T., Matsui, T., Tamura, A., Uji, M. & Tsukita, S. The association of microtubules with tight junctions is promoted by cingulin phosphorylation by AMPK. J. Cell Biol. 203, 605–614 (2013).
Gomez, J. M., Chumakova, L., Bulgakova, N. A. & Brown, N. H. Microtubule organization is determined by the shape of epithelial cells. Nat. Commun. 7, 1–13 (2016).
Booth, A. J. R., Blanchard, G. B., Adams, R. J. & Roper, K. A dynamic microtubule cytoskeleton directs medial actomyosin function duringtube formation. Dev. Cell 29, 562–576 (2014).
Bosveld, F. et al. Mechanical control of morphogenesis by fat/dachsous/four-jointed planar cell polaritypathway. Science 336, 724–727 (2012).
Basto, R. et al. Centrosome amplification can initiate tumorigenesis in flies. Cell 133, 1032–1042 (2008).
Venken, K. J. T. et al. Versatile P[acman] BAC libraries for transgenesis studies in Drosophila melanogaster. Nat. Methods 6, 431–434 (2009).
Venken, K. J. T., He, Y., Hoskins, R. A. & Bellen, H. J. P[acman]: a BAC transgenic platform for targeted insertion of large DNA fragments in D. melanogaster. Science 314, 1747–1751 (2006).
Shulman, J. M., Benton, R. & St Johnston, D. The Drosophilahomologof C. elegans PAR-1 organizes the oocyte cytoskeleton and directs oskar mRNA localization to the posterior pole. Cell 101, 377–388 (2000).
Ferguson, S. B., Blundon, M. A., Klovstad, M. S. & Schupbach, T. Modulation of gurken translation by insulin and TOR signaling in Drosophila. J. Cell Sci. 125, 1407–1419 (2012).
Mao, C.-X. et al. Microtubule-severing protein Katanin regulates neuromuscular junction development and dendritic elaboration in Drosophila. Development 141, 1064–1074 (2014).
Hu, Y. et al. FlyPrimerBank: an online database for Drosophila melanogaster gene expression analysis and knockdown evaluation of RNAi reagents. G3 (Bethesda) 3, 1607–1616 (2013).
Acknowledgements
We thank the BACPAC Resources Center at the Children’s Hospital Oakland Research Institute, the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, the Bloomington and Kyoto Drosophila Stock Centers, Y. Bellaiche, J. Grofihans, M. Krahn, J. Raff, D. St Johnston, R. Vale, E. Wieschaus and J. Zallen for sharing reagents; S. Kondo for generation and sharing of the patronin-null alleles as gifts; S. Blythe for assistance with the BAC engineering protocols; A. Momen-Roknabadi for engineering the pBabr plasmid from pTiger; T. Nishimura for assistance with qRT-PCR experiments; A. B. Albero and P. Shankar for advice on data analysis; G. Deshpande, S. Hayashi, S. Lemke, T. Shibata, M. Takeichi and S. K. Yoo for comments on the manuscript; members of the Hayashi, Nishimura, Kuranaga and Yoo laboratories for discussions.
The preparation of some of the reagents used in this work was performed in the laboratory of E. Wieschaus. This work was supported by the core funding at RIKEN Center for Developmental Biology and the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (Kakenhi) grant (15H04373) to Y.-C.W.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Y.-C.W. conceived the project, M.T. and Y.-C.W. performed experiments and analysed the data, M.M.S. developed software tools for image processing and analysis, Y.-C.W. wrote the manuscript and all authors approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Figures 1–7 and Supplementary Table and Video Legends.
Supplementary Table
Supplementary Table 1
Supplementary Video
Supplementary Video 1
Supplementary Video
Supplementary Video 2
Supplementary Video
Supplementary Video 3
Supplementary Video
Supplementary Video 4
Supplementary Video
Supplementary Video 5
Supplementary Video
Supplementary Video 6
Supplementary Video
Supplementary Video 7
Supplementary Video
Supplementary Video 8
Supplementary Video
Supplementary Video 9
Supplementary Video
Supplementary Video 10
Supplementary Video
Supplementary Video 11
Supplementary Video
Supplementary Video 12
Supplementary Video
Supplementary Video 13
Supplementary Video
Supplementary Video 14
Supplementary Video
Supplementary Video 15
Supplementary Video
Supplementary Video 16
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Takeda, M., Sami, M.M. & Wang, YC. A homeostatic apical microtubule network shortens cells for epithelial folding via a basal polarity shift. Nat Cell Biol 20, 36–45 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41556-017-0001-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41556-017-0001-3
This article is cited by
-
Computational study of biomechanical drivers of renal cystogenesis
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology (2023)
-
Microtubule disassembly by caspases is an important rate-limiting step of cell extrusion
Nature Communications (2022)
-
FACEts of mechanical regulation in the morphogenesis of craniofacial structures
International Journal of Oral Science (2021)
-
A release-and-capture mechanism generates an essential non-centrosomal microtubule array during tube budding
Nature Communications (2021)
-
The mechanobiology of tight junctions
Biophysical Reviews (2019)