Behavioural responses to a photovoltaic subretinal prosthesis implanted in non-human primates


Retinal dystrophies and age-related macular degeneration related to photoreceptor degeneration can cause blindness. In blind patients, although the electrical activation of the residual retinal circuit can provide useful artificial visual perception, the resolutions of current retinal prostheses have been limited either by large electrodes or small numbers of pixels. Here we report the evaluation, in three awake non-human primates, of a previously reported near-infrared-light-sensitive photovoltaic subretinal prosthesis. We show that multipixel stimulation of the prosthesis within radiation safety limits enabled eye tracking in the animals, that they responded to stimulations directed at the implant with repeated saccades and that the implant-induced responses were present two years after device implantation. Our findings pave the way for the clinical evaluation of the prosthesis in patients affected by dry atrophic age-related macular degeneration.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Retinal prosthesis design and RGC responses on an in vitro NHP retina preparation.
Fig. 2: RGC responses to single pixel activations on an in vitro blind NHP retina.
Fig. 3: In vitro experiment on a human retina after full-field stimulation.
Fig. 4: Ophthalmological characterization and natural vision of implanted NHPs.
Fig. 5: Implant activation in behaving NHPs.
Fig. 6: Optimal parameters for NIR stimulations.
Fig. 7: Electro-optical characterization of the implant.

Data availability

All data supporting the results in this study are available in the Article and Supplementary Information. The raw and analysed datasets generated during the study are available for research purposes from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Code availability

The custom codes used in this study are available from the corresponding author on request.


  1. 1.

    Brandli, A., Luu, C. D., Guymer, R. H. & Ayton, L. N. Progress in the clinical development and utilization of vision prostheses: an update. Eye Brain 8, 15–25 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Cha, K., Horch, K. & Normann, R. A. Simulation of a phosphene-based visual field: visual acuity in a pixelized vision system. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 20, 439–449 (1992).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Cha, K., Horch, K. W., Normann, R. A. & Boman, D. K. Reading speed with a pixelized vision system. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 9, 673–677 (1992).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Fornos, A. P., Sommerhalder, J., Pittard, A., Safran, A. B. & Pelizzone, M. Simulation of artificial vision: IV. Visual information required to achieve simple pointing and manipulation tasks. Vis. Res. 48, 1705–1718 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Sommerhalder, J. et al. Simulation of artificial vision: I. Eccentric reading of isolated words, and perceptual learning. Vis. Res. 43, 269–283 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Sommerhalder, J. et al. Simulation of artificial vision: II. Eccentric reading of full-page text and the learning of this task. Vis. Res. 44, 1693–1706 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Jung, J.-H., Aloni, D., Yitzhaky, Y. & Peli, E. Active confocal imaging for visual prostheses. Vis. Res. 111, 182–196 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Stingl, K. et al. Interim results of a multicenter trial with the new electronic subretinal implant Alpha AMS in 15 patients blind from inherited retinal degenerations. Front. Neurosci. 11, 445 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Da Cruz, L. et al. The Argus II epiretinal prosthesis system allows letter and word reading and long-term function in patients with profound vision loss. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 97, 632–636 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Joucla, S. & Yvert, B. Improved focalization of electrical microstimulation using microelectrode arrays: a modeling study. PLoS ONE 4, e4828 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Bendali, A. et al. Synthetic 3D diamond-based electrodes for flexible retinal neuroprostheses: model, production and in vivo biocompatibility. Biomaterials 67, 73–83 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Lorach, H. et al. Photovoltaic restoration of sight with high visual acuity. Nat. Med. 21, 476–482 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Picaud, S. et al. GABAA and GABAC receptors in adult porcine cones: evidence from a photoreceptor‐glia co‐culture model. J. Physiol. 513, 33–42 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Jones, B. W. et al. Retinal remodeling and metabolic alterations in human AMD. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 10, 103 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Jensen, R. J., Ziv, O. R. & Rizzo, J. F. Thresholds for activation of rabbit retinal ganglion cells with relatively large, extracellular microelectrodes. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 46, 1486–1496 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Fried, S. I., Hsueh, H.-A. & Werblin, F. S. A method for generating precise temporal patterns of retinal spiking using prosthetic stimulation. J. Neurophysiol. 95, 970–978 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Freeman, D. K., Rizzo, J. F. III & Fried, S. I. Encoding visual information in retinal ganglion cells with prosthetic stimulation. J. Neural Eng. 8, 035005 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Boinagrov, D., Pangratz-Fuehrer, S., Goetz, G. & Palanker, D. Selectivity of direct and network-mediated stimulation of the retinal ganglion cells with epi-, sub- and intraretinal electrodes. J. Neural Eng. 11, 026008 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Mathieson, K. et al. Photovoltaic retinal prosthesis with high pixel density. Nat. Photonics 6, 391–397 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Lorach, H. et al. Retinal safety of near infrared radiation in photovoltaic restoration of sight. Biomed. Opt. Express 7, 13–21 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Li, P. H. et al. Anatomical identification of extracellularly recorded cells in large-scale multielectrode recordings. J. Neurosci. 35, 4663–4675 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Schiller, P. H. & Lee, K. The effects of lateral geniculate nucleus, area V4, and middle temporal (MT) lesions on visually guided eye movements. Vis. Neurosci. 11, 229–241 (1994).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Smith, R., Smith, G. & Wong, D. Refractive changes in silicone filled eyes. Eye 4, 230–234 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Lapuerta, P. & Schein, S. J. A four-surface schematic eye of macaque monkey obtained by an optical method. Vis. Res. 35, 2245–2254 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Silverman, M. & Hughes, S. Transplantation of photoreceptors to light-damaged retina. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 30, 1684–1690 (1989).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by BPIfrance (grant no. 2014-PRSP-15), the Foundation Fighting Blindness, the Fédération des Aveugles de France and LabEx LIFESENSES (grant no. ANR-10-LABX-65) and was managed by the French Agence National pour la Recherche as part of the first Investissements d’Avenir programme (grant no. ANR-11-IDEX-0004-02). This project also received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme for the European Graphene Flagship under grant agreement no. 785219. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the views of the funders. The authors had the final say over the data collection and analysis, decision to publish and preparation of the manuscript.

Author information




P.-H.P., P.D., G.C., P.P., R.B. and S.P. planned the studies. M.L., M.V., K.B. and F.A. conducted the NHP behavioural experiments assisted by N.W. and M.W.; S.D. and V.F. conducted the in vitro experiments. E.D. and S.D. performed the histological analyses. K.G., H.A. and M.A.K. analysed the data. K.B. and O.O. coded the stimulations. P.L., E.E. and H.L. built the apparatus. Y.L., E.Bo., M.D. and R.H. designed the surgery procedure. E.Br., C.N.-J., P.H., J.D., C.-M.F. and Y.L. conducted the prostheses surgeries. E.Bo., M.D., R.H. and G.B. characterized and provided the implants. P.-H.P., S.P., P.P. and F.A. wrote the Article. J.-A.S. and S.P. obtained the funding. All authors reviewed, edited and approved the Article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Serge Picaud.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

J.-A.S., R.B. and S.P. were consultants and founders of Pixium Vision. Y.L. is a consultant for Pixium Vision. E.Bo., M.D., R.H. and G.B. are employees at Pixium Vision.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prévot, PH., Gehere, K., Arcizet, F. et al. Behavioural responses to a photovoltaic subretinal prosthesis implanted in non-human primates. Nat Biomed Eng 4, 172–180 (2020).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing