Inhibiting PD-L1 palmitoylation enhances T-cell immune responses against tumours

An Author Correction to this article was published on 11 April 2019

This article has been updated


Checkpoint blockade therapy targeting the programmed-death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and its receptor programmed cell death 1 promotes T-cell-mediated immunosurveillance against tumours, and has been associated with marked clinical benefit in cancer patients. Antibodies against PD-L1 function by blocking PD-L1 on the cell surface, but intracellular storage of PD-L1 and its active redistribution to the cell membrane can minimize the therapeutic benefits, which highlights the importance of targeting PD-L1 throughout the whole cell. Here, we show that PD-L1 is palmitoylated in its cytoplasmic domain, and that this lipid modification stabilizes PD-L1 by blocking its ubiquitination, consequently suppressing PD-L1 degradation by lysosomes. We identified palmitoyltransferase ZDHHC3 (DHHC3) as the main acyltransferase required for the palmitoylation of PD-L1, and show that the inhibition of PD-L1 palmitoylation via 2-bromopalmitate, or the silencing of DHHC3, activates antitumour immunity in vitro and in mice bearing MC38 tumour cells. We also designed a competitive inhibitor of PD-L1 palmitoylation that decreases PD-L1 expression in tumour cells to enhance T-cell immunity against the tumours. These findings suggest new strategies for overcoming PD-L1-mediated immune evasion in cancer.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Targeting palmitoylation-depleted PD-L1 in tumour cells.
Fig. 2: Identification of the palmitoylation site on PD-L1.
Fig. 3: An intrinsic lysosomal sorting signal in PD-L1 is masked by palmitoylation.
Fig. 4: PD-L1 is palmitoylated by DHHC3 acyltransferase.
Fig. 5: Palmitoylation blocks PD-L1 ubiquitination and ESCRT-mediated trafficking to the MVB.
Fig. 6: Targeting PD-L1 palmitoylation-activated anti-cancer immunity.
Fig. 7: Targeting PD-L1 palmitoylation with a peptidic inhibitor.
Fig. 8: Palmitoylation stabilizes PD-L1 by blocking its ubiquitination and lysosomal degradation.

Data availability

The authors declare that all data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its Supplementary Information files.

Change history

  • 11 April 2019

    In the version of this Article originally published, ‘palmitoyltransferase ZDHHC3 (DHHC3)’ was incorrectly referred to as an ‘acetyltransferase’ rather than an as an ‘acyltransferase’; this has now been corrected in five instances. In Fig. 3a, the label for the bottom row of the blots was mistakenly written as ‘GAPHD’; it should have read ‘GAPDH’. In the two right-most panels of Fig. 4j, the antibody labels ‘α-PD-L1’ for the reciprocal co-immunoprecipitation of DHHC3 were incorrect; they should have been ‘α-DHHC3’. These errors have been corrected in all versions of the Article.


  1. 1.

    Brahmer, J. R. et al. Safety and activity of anti-PD-L1 antibody in patients with advanced cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 366, 2455–2465 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Sonpavde, G. PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors as salvage therapy for urothelial carcinoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 376, 1073–1074 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Yao, H., Wang, H., Li, C., Fang, J. Y. & Xu, J. Cancer cell-intrinsic PD-1 and implications in combinatorial immunotherapy. Front. Immunol. 9, 1774 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Rodell, C. B. et al. TLR7/8-agonist-loaded nanoparticles promote the polarization of tumour-associated macrophages to enhance cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2, 578–588 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Sharpe, A. H. & Pauken, K. E. The diverse functions of the PD1 inhibitory pathway. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 18, 153–167 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Burr, M. L. et al. CMTM6 maintains the expression of PD-L1 and regulates anti-tumour immunity. Nature 549, 101–105 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Zerdes, I., Matikas, A., Bergh, J., Rassidakis, G. Z. & Foukakis, T. Genetic, transcriptional and post-translational regulation of the programmed death protein ligand 1 in cancer: biology and clinical correlations. Oncogene 37, 4639–4661 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Maj, T. et al. Oxidative stress controls regulatory T cell apoptosis and suppressor activity and PD-L1-blockade resistance in tumor. Nat. Immunol. 18, 1332–1341 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Snyder, A. et al. Contribution of systemic and somatic factors to clinical response and resistance to PD-L1 blockade in urothelial cancer: an exploratory multi-omic analysis. PLoS Med. 14, e1002309 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Takeda, Y. et al. A TLR3-specific adjuvant relieves innate resistance to PD-L1 blockade without cytokine toxicity in tumor vaccine immunotherapy. Cell Rep. 19, 1874–1887 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Tang, H. et al. Facilitating T cell infiltration in tumor microenvironment overcomes resistance to PD-L1 blockade. Cancer Cell 29, 285–296 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Bellucci, R. et al. Interferon-gamma-induced activation of JAK1 and JAK2 suppresses tumor cell susceptibility to NK cells through upregulation of PD-L1 expression. OncoImmunology 4, e1008824 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Wolfle, S. J. et al. PD-L1 expression on tolerogenic APCs is controlled by STAT-3. Eur. J. Immunol. 41, 413–424 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Casey, S. C. et al. MYC regulates the antitumor immune response through CD47 and PD-L1. Science 352, 227–231 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Bi, X. W. et al. PD-L1 is upregulated by EBV-driven LMP1 through NF-κB pathway and correlates with poor prognosis in natural killer/T-cell lymphoma. J. Hematol. Oncol. 9, 109 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Lim, S. O. et al. Deubiquitination and stabilization of PD-L1 by CSN5. Cancer Cell 30, 925–939 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Mognol, G. P. et al. Exhaustion-associated regulatory regions in CD8+ tumor-infiltrating T cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E2776–E2785 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Wang, Y. et al. Regulation of PD-L1: emerging routes for targeting tumor immune evasion. Front. Pharmacol. 9, 536 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Zhang, J. et al. Cyclin D-CDK4 kinase destabilizes PD-L1 via cullin 3-SPOP to control cancer immune surveillance. Nature 553, 91–95 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Li, C. W. et al. Glycosylation and stabilization of programmed death ligand-1 suppresses T-cell activity. Nat. Commun. 7, 12632 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Wang, H. et al. PD-L2 expression in colorectal cancer: independent prognostic effect and targetability by deglycosylation. OncoImmunology 6, e1327494 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Li, C. W. et al. Eradication of triple-negative breast cancer cells by targeting glycosylated PD-L1. Cancer Cell 33, 187–201.e10 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Chen, G. et al. Exosomal PD-L1 contributes to immunosuppression and is associated with anti-PD-1 response. Nature 560, 382–386 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Wang, H. et al. HIP1R targets PD-L1 to lysosomal degradation to alter T cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Nat. Chem. Biol. 15, 42–50 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Chen, M. et al. Development and validation of a novel clinical fluorescence in situ hybridization assay to detect JAK2 and PD-L1 amplification: a fluorescence in situ hybridization assay for JAK2 and PD-L1 amplification. Mod. Pathol. 30, 1516–1526 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Taguchi, T. & Misaki, R. Palmitoylation pilots Ras to recycling endosomes. Small GTPases 2, 82–84 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Runkle, K. B. et al. Inhibition of DHHC20-mediated EGFR palmitoylation creates a dependence on EGFR signaling. Mol. Cell 62, 385–396 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Gao, X. & Hannoush, R. N. Single-cell imaging of Wnt palmitoylation by the acyltransferase porcupine. Nat. Chem. Biol. 10, 61–68 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Tukachinsky, H., Petrov, K., Watanabe, M. & Salic, A. Mechanism of inhibition of the tumor suppressor Patched by Sonic Hedgehog. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, E5866–E5875 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Ren, J. et al. CSS-Palm 2.0: an updated software for palmitoylation sites prediction. Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 21, 639–644 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Weng, S. L., Kao, H. J., Huang, C. H. & Lee, T. Y. MDD-Palm: identification of protein S-palmitoylation sites with substrate motifs based on maximal dependence decomposition. PLoS ONE 12, e0179529 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Thul, P. J. & Lindskog, C. The human protein atlas: a spatial map of the human proteome. Protein Sci. 27, 233–244 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Garcia-Diaz, A. et al. Interferon receptor signaling pathways regulating PD-L1 and PD-L2 expression. Cell Rep. 19, 1189–1201 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Riaz, N. et al. Tumor and microenvironment evolution during immunotherapy with nivolumab. Cell 171, 934–949 e915 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Linder, M. E. & Deschenes, R. J. Palmitoylation: policing protein stability and traffic. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 74–84 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Horita, H., Law, A., Hong, S. & Middleton, K. Identifying regulatory posttranslational modifications of PD-L1: a focus on monoubiquitinaton. Neoplasia 19, 346–353 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Stringer, D. K. & Piper, R. C. A single ubiquitin is sufficient for cargo protein entry into MVBs in the absence of ESCRT ubiquitination. J. Cell Biol. 192, 229–242 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Takahashi, H., Mayers, J. R., Wang, L., Edwardson, J. M. & Audhya, A. Hrs and STAM function synergistically to bind ubiquitin-modified cargoes in vitro. Biophys. J. 108, 76–84 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Wang, H. et al. HIP1R targets PD-L1 to lysosomal degradation to alter T cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Nat. Chem. Biol. 15, 42–50 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Bolhassani, A., Jafarzade, B. S. & Mardani, G. In vitro and in vivo delivery of therapeutic proteins using cell penetrating peptides. Peptides 87, 50–63 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Soragni, A. et al. A designed inhibitor of p53 aggregation rescues p53 tumor suppression in ovarian carcinomas. Cancer Cell 29, 90–103 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Liang, L. et al. A designed peptide targets two types of modifications of p53 with anti-cancer activity. Cell Chem. Biol. 25, 761–774.e5 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Tian, X. et al. Organ-specific metastases obtained by culturing colorectal cancer cells on tissue-specific decellularized scaffolds. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2, 443–452 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Fang, C. et al. Identification of palmitoylated transitional endoplasmic reticulum ATPase by proteomic technique and pan antipalmitoylation antibody. J. Proteome Res. 15, 956–962 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Yousefi-Salakdeh, E., Johansson, J. & Stromberg, R. A method for S- and O-palmitoylation of peptides: synthesis of pulmonary surfactant protein-C models. Biochem. J. 343, 557–562 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This project was supported by grants from the National Key Research and Development Plan (2016YFC0906000, 2016YFC0906003, 2016YFC0906002 and 2017YFC0906600), National Natural Science Foundation of China (81572326, 81322036, 81421001, 81773752, 81702969, 81874050, 21335002 and 31671360), Key Program of the Science and Technology Bureau of Sichuan (number 2017SZ00005), Top-Notch Young Talents Program of China (ZTZ2015-48), ‘Tang Scholar’ programme (JX-2017), Shanghai Municipal Education Commission-Gaofeng Clinical Medicine Grant Support (20152514), ‘ShuGuang’ project supported by the Shanghai Municipal Education Commission and Shanghai Education Development Foundation (15SG16), National Key Technology Support Program (2015BAI13B07 to J.X.), and Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (18ZR1402800 to C.F.). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information




H.Y. performed the in vitro and in vivo experiments, analysed the data and wrote the manuscript. J.L. performed the in vivo experiments and analysed the data. C.L. performed the in vitro experiments. H.S. designed the in vivo experiments and analysed the data. J.-P.B. contributed to the experimental design, analysed the data and wrote the manuscript. H.W. performed the in vitro experiments. H.L. and C.F. contributed the anti-palmitoylation antibody and analysed the relevant data. Y.Z., L.L., X.Z. and C.W. analysed the peptide toxicity data in different organs/samples, as well as the tissue microarray data. Y.X. contributed analysis tools and designed the mutagenesis experiment. Y.C. analysed the peptide toxicity data. J.X. supervised the project, conceived and designed the experiments and peptides, analysed the data and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jie Xu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary methods, figures and tables

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yao, H., Lan, J., Li, C. et al. Inhibiting PD-L1 palmitoylation enhances T-cell immune responses against tumours. Nat Biomed Eng 3, 306–317 (2019).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing