Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Bioresorbable pressure sensors protected with thermally grown silicon dioxide for the monitoring of chronic diseases and healing processes

Abstract

Pressures in the intracranial, intraocular and intravascular spaces are clinically useful for the diagnosis and management of traumatic brain injury, glaucoma and hypertension, respectively. Conventional devices for measuring these pressures require surgical extraction after a relevant operational time frame. Bioresorbable sensors, by contrast, eliminate this requirement, thereby minimizing the risk of infection, decreasing the costs of care and reducing distress and pain for the patient. However, the operational lifetimes of bioresorbable pressure sensors available at present fall short of many clinical needs. Here, we present materials, device structures and fabrication procedures for bioresorbable pressure sensors with lifetimes exceeding those of previous reports by at least tenfold. We demonstrate measurement accuracies that compare favourably to those of the most sophisticated clinical standards for non-resorbable devices by monitoring intracranial pressures in rats for 25 days. Assessments of the biodistribution of the constituent materials, complete blood counts, blood chemistry and magnetic resonance imaging compatibility confirm the biodegradability and clinical utility of the device. Our findings establish routes for the design and fabrication of bioresorbable pressure monitors that meet requirements for clinical use.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Materials and designs for long-lived, inorganic bioresorbable pressure sensors.
Fig. 2: Kinetics of dissolution of a bioresorbable pressure sensor.
Fig. 3: In vivo measurements of the elemental biodistribution and biocompatibility of bioresorbable devices throughout their functional lifetimes and beyond.
Fig. 4: Acute and chronic monitoring of intracranial temperature and pressure in rats using bioresorbable sensors.
Fig. 5: MRI compatibility of bioresorbable sensors.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The authors declare that all data supporting the findings of this study are available in the paper and its Supplementary Information.

References

  1. Jiang, G. Design challenges of implantable pressure monitoring system. Front. Neurosci. 4, 29 (2010).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yu, L., Kim, B. & Meng, E. Chronically implanted pressure sensors: challenges and state of the field. Sensors 14, 20620–20644 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sit, A. J. Continuous monitoring of intraocular pressure: rationale and progress toward a clinical device. J. Glaucoma 18, 272–279 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Boutry, C. M. et al. Towards biodegradable wireless implants. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 370, 2418–2432 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chamis, A. L. et al. Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in patients with permanent pacemakers or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Circulation 104, 1029–1033 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hall-Stoodley, L., Costerton, J. W. & Stoodley, P. Bacterial biofilms: from the natural environment to infectious diseases. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2, 95–108 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Polikov, V. S., Tresco, P. A. & Reichert, W. M. Response of brain tissue to chronically implanted neural electrodes. J. Neurosci. Methods 148, 1–18 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kang, S.-K. et al. Bioresorbable silicon electronic sensors for the brain. Nature 530, 71–76 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Luo, M., Martinez, A. W., Song, C., Herrault, F. & Allen, M. G. A microfabricated wireless RF pressure sensor made completely of biodegradable materials. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 23, 4–13 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hwang, S.-W. et al. Biodegradable elastomers and silicon nanomembranes/nanoribbons for stretchable, transient electronics, and biosensors. Nano Lett. 15, 2801–2808 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Yu, K. J. et al. Bioresorbable silicon electronics for transient spatiotemporal mapping of electrical activity from the cerebral cortex. Nat. Mater. 15, 782–791 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee, Y. K. et al. Dissolution of monocrystalline silicon nanomembranes and their use as encapsulation layers and electrical interfaces in water-soluble electronics. ACS Nano 11, 12562–12572 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee, G. et al. Fully biodegradable microsupercapacitor for power storage in transient electronics. Adv. Energy Mater. 7, 1700157 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee, C. H. et al. Wireless microfluidic systems for programmed, functional transformation of transient electronic devices. Adv. Funct. Mater. 25, 5100–5106 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tao, H. et al. Silk-based resorbable electronic devices for remotely controlled therapy and in vivo infection abatement. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 17385–17389 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hwang, S.-W. et al. A physically transient form of silicon electronics. Science 337, 1640–1644 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hwang, S.-W. et al. High-performance biodegradable/transient electronics on biodegradable polymers. Adv. Mater. 26, 3905–3911 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kang, S.-K. et al. Dissolution behaviors and applications of silicon oxides and nitrides in transient electronics. Adv. Funct. Mater. 24, 4427–4434 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kang, S.-K. et al. Biodegradable thin metal foils and spin-on glass materials for transient electronics. Adv. Funct. Mater. 25, 1789–1797 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Fang, H. et al. Ultrathin, transferred layers of thermally grown silicon dioxide as biofluid barriers for biointegrated flexible electronic systems. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 11682–11687 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee, Y. K. et al. Kinetics and chemistry of hydrolysis of ultrathin, thermally grown layers of silicon oxide as biofluid barriers in flexible electronic systems. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 42633–42638 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Haddad, S. H. & Arabi, Y. M. Critical care management of severe traumatic brain injury in adults. Scand. J. Trauma Resusc. Emerg. Med. 20, 12 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang, Q., Ding, J. & Wang, W. Fabrication and temperature coefficient compensation technology of low cost high temperature pressure sensor. Sens. Actuat. A 120, 468–473 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Camino, G., Lomakin, S. M. & Lazzari, M. Polydimethylsiloxane thermal degradation Part 1. Kinetic aspects. Polymer 42, 2395–2402 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kanda, Y. A graphical representation of the piezoresistance coefficients in silicon. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 29, 64–70 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lund, E. & Finstad, T. G. Temperature and doping dependency of piezoresistivity in p-type silicon. MRS Proc. 657, EE5.13 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Norton, P. & Brandt, J. Temperature coefficient of resistance for p- and n-type silicon. Solid-State Electron. 21, 969–974 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Bratton, S. L. Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. VI. Indications for intracranial pressure monitoring. J. Neurotrauma 24, S37–S44 (2007).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Post Craniotomy Subdural Pressure Monitoring Kit. Model 110-4G (Integra NeuroSciences, 2010).

  30. Johanson, C. E. et al. Multiplicity of cerebrospinal fluid functions: new challenges in health and disease. Cerebrospinal Fluid. Res. 5, 10 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Moghimi, S. M. & Patel, H. M. Serum-mediated recognition of liposomes by phagocytic cells of the reticuloendothelial system – the concept of tissue specificity. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 32, 45–60 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Gelabert-González, M. et al. The Camino® intracranial pressure device in clinical practice. Assessment in a 1000 cases. Acta Neurochir. 148, 435–441 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Martínez-Mañas, R. M., Santamarta, D., de Campos, J. M. & Ferrer, E. Camino intracranial pressure monitor: prospective study of accuracy and complications. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat. 69, 82–86 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zacchetti, L., Magnoni, S., Di Corte, F., Zanier, E. R. & Stocchetti, N. Accuracy of intracranial pressure monitoring: systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit. Care 19, 420 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Dunn, J. F. et al. Functional mapping at 9.4T using a new MRI compatible electrode chronically implanted in rats. Magn. Reson. Med. 61, 222–228 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sawyer-Glover, A. M. & Shellock, F. G. Pre-MRI procedure screening: recommendations and safety considerations for biomedical implants and devices. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 12, 92–106 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. National Research Council Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals 8th edn (The National Academies Press, 2011).

Download references

Acknowledgements

J.S. thanks G. Mensing and J. Maduzia at the Micro-Nano-Mechanical Systems Cleanroom (University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign) for assistance with process development. J.S. acknowledges support from True Phantom Solutions Inc. with the preparation of brain phantoms for MRI compatibility tests. Y.X. acknowledges support from the Ryan Fellowship and the Northwestern University International Institute for Nanotechnology. L.T. acknowledges support from a Beckman Institute Postdoctoral Fellowship at UIUC. I.K. acknowledges support from Cancer Center Support grant no. P30 CA060553 (National Cancer Institute) awarded to the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center. K.J.Y. acknowledges support from the National Research Foundation of Korea (grant nos. NRF-2017M1A2A2048880 and NRF-2018M3A7B4071109) and Yonsei University Future-leading Research Initiative of 2017 (grant no. RMS2 2018-22-0028). Y.H. acknowledges support from the NSF (grant nos. 1400169, 1534120 and 1635443).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J.S., W.B., Y.L., M.C., J.K., H.R., J.-K.C., S.-K.K., S.M.W., K.J.Y. and J.A.R. designed and fabricated the sensors. J.S., Y.L., M.C., H.R., J.Z. and Y.K.L. conceived and performed the dissolution studies. J.S., W.B., I.K. and M.P. performed the biodistribution, toxicity and histology studies. Y.Y., P.G., M.R.M. and W.Z.R. performed the in vivo ICP measurements and analysed data. Y.X. and Y.H. performed mechanical simulations. J.S., Y.Y., L.T., C.R.H., W.S. and S.-K.S. performed the CT and MRI studies. J.S., Y.Y., W.B., Y.X., W.Z.R. and J.A.R. wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Wilson Z. Ray or John A. Rogers.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary notes, references and figures.

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shin, J., Yan, Y., Bai, W. et al. Bioresorbable pressure sensors protected with thermally grown silicon dioxide for the monitoring of chronic diseases and healing processes. Nat Biomed Eng 3, 37–46 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-018-0300-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-018-0300-4

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research