Abstract
The outer disk of the Milky Way Galaxy is warped and flared. Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain these phenomena, but none have quantitatively reproduced both features. Recent work has demonstrated that the Galactic stellar halo is tilted with respect to the disk plane, suggesting that at least some component of the dark matter halo may also be tilted. Here we show that a dark halo tilted in the same direction as the stellar halo can induce a warp and flare in the Galactic disk at the same amplitude and orientation as the data. In our model, the warp is visible in both the gas and stars of all ages, which is consistent with the breadth of observational tracers of the warp. These results, in combination with data in the stellar halo, provide compelling evidence that our Galaxy is embedded in a tilted dark matter halo. This misalignment of the dark halo and the disk holds clues to the formation history of the Galaxy and represents the next step in the dynamical modelling of the Galactic potential.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The present-day star and gas particle data are provided under stars.npy and gas.npy in https://github.com/jiwonjessehan/MilkyWayWarp.
Code availability
All of the code and data files used to produce the results are shared in https://github.com/jiwonjessehan/MilkyWayWarp.
References
Chen, X. et al. An intuitive 3D map of the Galactic warp’s precession traced by classical Cepheids. Nat. Astron. 3, 320–325 (2019).
Wang, H. F. et al. Mapping the Galactic disk with the LAMOST and Gaia red clump sample. VI. Evidence for the long-lived nonsteady warp of nongravitational scenarios. Astrophys. J. 897, 119 (2020).
Levine, E. S., Blitz, L. & Heiles, C. The vertical structure of the outer Milky Way H I disk. Astrophys. J. 643, 881–896 (2006).
Kalberla, P. M. W., Dedes, L., Kerp, J. & Haud, U. Dark matter in the Milky Way. II. The HI gas distribution as a tracer of the gravitational potential. Astron. Astrophys. 469, 511–527 (2007).
Dame, T. M. & Thaddeus, P. A molecular spiral arm in the far outer galaxy. Astrophys. J. Lett. 734, L24 (2011).
Wouterloot, J. G. A., Brand, J., Burton, W. B. & Kwee, K. K. IRAS sources beyond the solar circle. II. Distribution in the galactic warp. Astron. Astrophys. 230, 21–36 (1990).
Drimmel, R. & Spergel, D. N. Three-dimensional structure of the Milky Way disk: the distribution of stars and dust beyond 0.35 R☉. Astrophys. J. 556, 181–202 (2001).
Djorgovski, S. & Sosin, C. The warp of the Galactic stellar disk detected in IRAS source counts. Astrophys. J. Lett. 341, L13 (1989).
Yusifov, I. in The Magnetized Interstellar Medium (eds Uyaniker, B. et al.) 165–169 (Copernicus GmbH, 2004).
Momany, Y. et al. Outer structure of the Galactic warp and flare: explaining the Canis Major over-density. Astron. Astrophys. 451, 515–538 (2006).
Cantat-Gaudin, T. et al. Painting a portrait of the Galactic disc with its stellar clusters. Astron. Astrophys. 640, A1 (2020).
Newberg, H. J. et al. The ghost of Sagittarius and lumps in the halo of the Milky Way. Astrophys. J. 569, 245–274 (2002).
Martin, N. F. et al. A dwarf galaxy remnant in Canis Major: the fossil of an in-plane accretion on to the Milky Way. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 348, 12–23 (2004).
Naidu, R. P. et al. Evidence from the H3 survey that the stellar halo is entirely comprised of substructure. Astrophys. J. 901, 48 (2020).
Han, J. J. et al. The stellar halo of the Galaxy is tilted and doubly broken. Astron. J. 164, 249 (2022).
Heyer, M. & Dame, T. M. Molecular clouds in the Milky Way. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 53, 583–629 (2015).
Burke, B. F. Systematic distortion of the outer regions of the galaxy. Astron. J. 62, 90 (1957).
Kerr, F. J., Hindman, J. V. & Carpenter, M. S. The large-scale structure of the Galaxy. Nature 180, 677–679 (1957).
Hunter, C. & Toomre, A. Dynamics of the bending of the Galaxy. Astrophys. J. 155, 747 (1969).
Toomre, A. in Internal Kinematics and Dynamics of Galaxies. International Astronomical Union, Vol. 100 (ed. Athanassoula, E.) 177–185 (Springer, 1983).
Olling, R. P. & Merrifield, M. R. The shape of the Milky Way’s dark halo. In Proc. Galactic Halos: A UC Santa Cruz Workshop. Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 136 (ed. Zaritsky, D.) 219–226 (ASP, 1998).
Olling, R. P. & Merrifield, M. R. Two measures of the shape of the dark halo of the Milky Way. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 311, 361–369 (2000).
Sparke, L. S. & Casertano, S. A model for persistent galactic warps. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 234, 873–898 (1988).
Debattista, V. P. & Sellwood, J. A. Warped galaxies from misaligned angular momenta. Astrophys. J. Lett. 513, L107–L110 (1999).
Jiang, I.-G. & Binney, J. WARPS and cosmic infall. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 303, L7–L10 (1999).
Poggio, E. et al. Measuring the vertical response of the Galactic disc to an infalling satellite. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 508, 541–559 (2021).
Ostriker, E. C. & Binney, J. J. Warped and tilted galactic discs. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 237, 785–798 (1989).
Dubinski, J. & Chakrabarty, D. Warps and bars from the external tidal torques of tumbling dark halos. Astrophys. J. 703, 2068–2081 (2009).
Laporte, C. F. P., Gómez, F. A., Besla, G., Johnston, K. V. & Garavito-Camargo, N. Response of the Milky Way’s disc to the Large Magellanic Cloud in a first infall scenario. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 473, 1218–1230 (2018).
Erkal, D. et al. The total mass of the Large Magellanic Cloud from its perturbation on the Orphan stream. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 487, 2685–2700 (2019).
Prada, J., Forero-Romero, J. E., Grand, R. J. J., Pakmor, R. & Springel, V. Dark matter halo shapes in the Auriga simulations. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 490, 4877–4888 (2019).
Emami, R. et al. Morphological types of DM halos in Milky Way-like galaxies in the TNG50 simulation: simple, twisted, or stretched. Astrophys. J. 913, 36 (2021).
Debattista, V. P. et al. What’s up in the Milky Way? The orientation of the disc relative to the triaxial halo. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 434, 2971–2981 (2013).
Shao, S., Cautun, M., Deason, A. & Frenk, C. S. The twisted dark matter halo of the Milky Way. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 504, 6033–6048 (2021).
Han, J. J. et al. A tilt in the dark matter halo of the Galaxy. Astrophys. J. 934, 14 (2022).
Pillepich, A. et al. First results from the TNG50 simulation: the evolution of stellar and gaseous discs across cosmic time. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 490, 3196–3233 (2019).
Nelson, D. et al. The IllustrisTNG simulations: public data release. Comput. Astrophys. Cosmol. 6, 2 (2019).
Belokurov, V., Erkal, D., Evans, N. W., Koposov, S. E. & Deason, A. J. Co-formation of the disc and the stellar halo. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 478, 611–619 (2018).
Helmi, A. et al. The merger that led to the formation of the Milky Way’s inner stellar halo and thick disk. Nature 563, 85–88 (2018).
Gallart, C. et al. Uncovering the birth of the Milky Way through accurate stellar ages with Gaia. Nat. Astron. 3, 932–939 (2019).
Bonaca, A. et al. Timing the early assembly of the Milky Way with the H3 survey. Astrophys. J. Lett. 897, L18 (2020).
Naidu, R. P. et al. Reconstructing the last major merger of the Milky Way with the H3 survey. Astrophys. J. 923, 92 (2021).
Lilleengen, S. et al. The effect of the deforming dark matter haloes of the Milky Way and the Large Magellanic Cloud on the Orphan-Chenab stream. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 518, 774–790 (2023).
Peter, A. H. G., Rocha, M., Bullock, J. S. & Kaplinghat, M. Cosmological simulations with self-interacting dark matter II: halo shapes versus observations. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 430, 105–120 (2013).
Evans, N. W., O’Hare, C. A. J. & McCabe, C. Refinement of the standard halo model for dark matter searches in light of the Gaia Sausage. Phys. Rev. D. 99, 023012 (2019).
Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S. & White, S. D. M. A universal density profile from hierarchical clustering. Astrophys. J. 490, 493–508 (1997).
Bland-Hawthorn, J. & Gerhard, O. The Galaxy in context: structural, kinematic, and integrated properties. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 54, 529–596 (2016).
Miyamoto, M. & Nagai, R. Three-dimensional models for the distribution of mass in galaxies. Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn 27, 533–543 (1975).
Hernquist, L. An analytical model for spherical galaxies and bulges. Astrophys. J. 356, 359 (1990).
Price-Whelan, A. M. Gala: a Python package for galactic dynamics. J. Open Source Softw. 2, 388 (2017).
Negroponte, J. & White, S. D. M. Simulations of mergers between disc-halo galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 205, 1009–1029 (1983).
Carlberg, R. G. & Freedman, W. L. Dissipative models of spiral galaxies. Astrophys. J. 298, 486–492 (1985).
Frankel, N., Rix, H.-W., Ting, Y.-S., Ness, M. & Hogg, D. W. Measuring radial orbit migration in the Galactic disk. Astrophys. J. 865, 96 (2018).
Sellwood, J. A. & Binney, J. J. Radial mixing in galactic discs. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 336, 785–796 (2002).
Frankel, N., Sanders, J., Rix, H.-W., Ting, Y.-S. & Ness, M. The inside-out growth of the Galactic disk. Astrophys. J. 884, 99 (2019).
Acknowledgements
L.H. acknowledges support from the Simons Collaboration on ‘Learning the Universe’.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
J.J.H. conceived of and led the project. C.C. contributed to the warp analysis and writing of the paper. L.H. contributed to the sticky particle simulation and the writing of the paper. All authors reviewed and commented on the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Astronomy thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Figs. 1–4: Supplementary Fig. 1: Present-day distribution of star particles in the simulation in Galactocentric cylindrical coordinates. Negative R indicates azimuthal angles that are within 90∘ of the northern warp, and positive R indicates azimuthal angles that are within 90∘ of the southern warp. The top panels show the warp, and the bottom panels show the vertical deviation from the average warp. The vertical deviation systematically increases towards the outer Galaxy, demonstrating the flare of the disk. Points that are in the outer Galaxy are plotted with larger circles. Particles coloured based on birth radius reveal that the magnitude of the warp correlates strongly with the birth radius. Supplementary Fig. 2: Time evolution of the warp amplitude at fixed radius R = 16 kpc. At t = 0, the disk is initialized to have no warp. Error bars indicate 1σ statistical uncertainty in the warp fit. Within a few hundred Myr, the warp reaches maximum amplitude. After a transient oscillatory phase from t = 500–1500 Myr, the warp reaches a steady-state amplitude. This plot demonstrates that the warp onsets quickly, within one rotation period of the disk (400 Myr for a star at 16 kpc). Supplementary Fig. 3: Variation of (1) the scale length of the tilted component of the dark halo and (2) the present-day scale length of the tracer particles. Apart from the two parameters being modulated, all other parameters are fixed to the simulation presented in Fig. 1. In each panel, we show the fraction of stars that are off the Z = 0 plane by more than 0.25 kpc, Nwarp/Nplane. If this fraction is greater than 0.5%, we fit a warp model (dotted lines) and show the warp amplitude at 20 kpc as Z20. The warp amplitude correlates positively with the scale length of the disk and anti-correlates with the scale length of the tilted dark halo. Supplementary Fig. 4: Variation of (1) the tilt angle of the dark halo (2) the mass fraction of the tilted component of the dark halo. Apart from the two parameters being modulated, all other parameters are fixed to the simulation presented in Fig. 1. Similar to Supplementary Fig. 3, we show the fraction of stars that are off the Z = 0 plane by more than 0.25 kpc, Nwarp/Nplane. If this fraction is greater than 0.5%, we fit a warp model (dotted lines) and show the warp amplitude at 20 kpc as Z20. The warp amplitude correlates positively with both the tilt angle and the mass fraction of the tilted halo.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Han, J.J., Conroy, C. & Hernquist, L. A tilted dark halo origin of the Galactic disk warp and flare. Nat Astron 7, 1481–1485 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-023-02076-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-023-02076-9
This article is cited by
-
A slightly oblate dark matter halo revealed by a retrograde precessing Galactic disk warp
Nature Astronomy (2024)