Abstract
The localized delivery of new long-lived species to Jupiter’s stratosphere by comet Shoemaker–Levy 9 in 1994 opened a window to constrain Jovian chemistry and dynamics by monitoring the evolution of their vertical and horizontal distributions. However, the spatial distributions of CO and HCN, two of these long-lived species, had never been jointly observed at high latitudinal resolution. Atacama large millimeter/submillimeter array observations of HCN and CO in March 2017 show that CO was meridionally uniform and restricted to pressures lower than 3 ± 1 mbar. HCN shared a similar vertical distribution in the low- to mid-latitudes, but was depleted at pressures between \({2}_{-1}^{+2}\) and \({0.04}_{-0.03}^{+0.07}\) mbar in the aurora and surrounding regions, resulting in a drop by one order of magnitude in column density. We propose that heterogeneous chemistry bonds HCN on large aurora-produced aerosols at these pressures in the Jovian auroral regions causing the observed depletion.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Observation data can be obtained from the ALMA archive. Temperature profiles, HCN and CO limb spectra and retrieved vertical profiles can be obtained from the following Zenodo repository: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7928701.
Code availability
Software used for the retrievals is available upon request by contacting the corresponding author.
Change history
02 August 2024
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-024-02348-y
References
Moses, J. I. et al. Photochemistry and diffusion in Jupiter’s stratosphere: constraints from ISO observations and comparisons with other planets. J. Geophys. Res. 110, E08001 (2005).
Feuchtgruber, H. et al. External supply of oxygen to the atmospheres of the giant planets. Nature 389, 159–162 (1997).
Hue, V., Hersant, F., Cavalié, T., Dobrijevic, M. & Sinclair, J. A. Photochemistry, mixing and transport in Jupiter’s stratosphere constrained by Cassini. Icarus 307, 106–123 (2018).
Harrington, J. et al. in Jupiter. The Planet, Satellites and Magnetosphere Vol. 1, 159–184 (eds Bagenal, F. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2004).
Orton, G. et al. Collision of comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 with Jupiter observed by the NASA Infrared Telescope Facility. Science 267, 1277–1282 (1995).
Moreno, R. et al. Jovian stratospheric temperature during the two months following the impacts of comet Shoemaker-Levy 9. Planet. Space Sci. 49, 473–486 (2001).
Sánchez-Lavega, A. et al. Motions of the SL9 impact clouds. Geophys. Res. Lett. 22, 1761–1764 (1995).
Hammel, H. B. et al. HST imaging of atmospheric phenomena created by the impact of comet Shoemaker-Levy9. Science 267, 1288–1296 (1995).
Lellouch, E. et al. Chemical response of Jupiter’s atmosphere following the impact of comet Shoemaker-Levy 9. Nature 373, 592–595 (1995).
Marten, A. et al. The collision of comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 with Jupiter: detection and evolution of HCN in the stratosphere of the planet. Geophys. Res. Lett. 22, 1589–1592 (1995).
Bjoraker, G. L., Stolovy, S. R., Herter, T. L., Gull, G. E. & Pirger, B. E. Detection of water after the collision of fragments G and K of comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 with Jupiter. Icarus 121, 411–421 (1996).
Zahnle, K. Dynamics and chemistry of SL9 plumes. In The Collision of Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 and Jupiter (eds Noll, K. S. et al.) 183–212 (Cambridge University Press, 1996).
Lellouch, E. et al. The origin of water vapor and carbon dioxide in Jupiter’s stratosphere. Icarus 159, 112–131 (2002).
Lellouch, E. et al. Carbon monoxide in Jupiter after the impact of comet Shoemaker-Levy 9. Planet. Space Sci. 45, 1203–1212 (1997).
Moreno, R., Marten, A., Matthews, H. E. & Biraud, Y. Long-term evolution of CO, CS and HCN in Jupiter after the impacts of comet Shoemaker-Levy 9. Planet. Space Sci. 51, 591–611 (2003).
Griffith, C. A. et al. Thermal infrared imaging spectroscopy of Shoemaker-Levy 9 impact sites: spatial and vertical distributions of NH3, C2H4, and 10-µm dust emission. Icarus 128, 275–293 (1997).
Griffith, C. A. et al. Meridional transport of HCN from SL9 impacts on Jupiter. Icarus 170, 58–69 (2004).
Lellouch, E. et al. On the HCN and CO2 abundance and distribution in Jupiter’s stratosphere. Icarus 184, 478–497 (2006).
Cavalié, T. et al. Observation of water vapor in the stratosphere of Jupiter with the Odin space telescope. Planet. Space Sci. 56, 1573–1584 (2008).
Benmahi, B. et al. Monitoring of the evolution of H2O vapor in the stratosphere of Jupiter over an 18-year period with the Odin space telescope. Astron. Astrophys. 641, A140 (2020).
Cavalié, T. et al. First direct measurement of auroral and equatorial jets in the stratosphere of Jupiter. Astron. Astrophys. 647, L8 (2021).
Cosentino, R. G. et al. New observations and modeling of Jupiter’s quasi-quadrennial oscillation. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 122, 2719–2744 (2017).
Sinclair, J. A. et al. A high spatial and spectral resolution study of Jupiter’s mid-infrared auroral emissions during a solar wind compression. Planet. Sci. J. 4, 76 (2023).
Clarke, J. T. et al. Response of Jupiter’s and Saturn’s auroral activity to the solar wind. J. Geophys. Res. 114, A05210 (2009).
Perry, J. J., Kim, Y. H., Fox, J. L. & Porter, H. S. Chemistry of the Jovian auroral ionosphere. J. Geophys. Res. 104, 16541–16565 (1999).
Gérard, J.-C. et al. Mapping the electorn energy in Jupiter’s aurora: Hubble spectral observations. J. Geophys. Res. 119, 9072–9088 (2014).
McKay, C. P. Elemental composition, solubility, and optical properties of Titan’s organic haze. Planet. Space Sci. 44, 741–747 (1996).
Lara, L.-M., Lellouch, E. & Shematovich, V. Titan’s atmospheric haze: the case for HCN incorporation. Astron. Astrophys. 341, 312–317 (1999).
Vinatier, S. et al. Vertical abundance profiles of hydrocarbons in Titan’s atmosphere at 15 °S and 80 °N retrieved from Cassini/CIRS spectra. Icarus 188, 120–138 (2007).
Perrin, Z. et al. An atmospheric origin for HCN-derived polymers on Titan. Processes 9, 965 (2021).
Sinclair, J. A. et al. Jupiter’s auroral-related stratospheric heating and chemistry II: analysis of IRTF-TEXES spectra measured in December 2004. Icarus 300, 305–326 (2018).
Wong, A.-S., Yung, Y. L. & Friedson, A. J. Benzene and haze formation in the polar atmosphere of Jupiter. Geophys. Res. Lett. 30, 1447 (2003).
Bézard, B., Drossart, P., Encrenaz, T. & Feuchtgruber, H. Benzene on the giant planets. Icarus 154, 492–500 (2001).
Wong, A.-S., Lee, A. Y. T., Yung, Y. L. & Ajello, J. M. Jupiter: aerosol chemistry in the polar atmosphere. Astrophys. J. 534, L215–L217 (2000).
Friedson, A. J., Wong, A.-S. & Yung, Y. L. Models for polar haze formation in Jupiter’s stratosphere. Icarus 158, 389–400 (2002).
Zhang, X., West, R. A., Banfield, D. & Yung, Y. L. Stratospheric aerosols on Jupiter from Cassini observations. Icarus 226, 159–171 (2013).
Sinclair, J. A. et al. Jupiter’s auroral-related stratospheric heating and chemistry I: analysis of Voyager-IRIS and Cassini-CIRS spectra. Icarus 292, 182–207 (2017).
Waite, J. H. et al. The process of tholin formation in Titan’s upper atmosphere. Science 316, 870–875 (2007).
Dobrijevic, M., Loison, J.-C., Hickson, K. M. & Gronoff, G. 1D-coupled photochemical model of neutrals, cations and anions in the atmosphere of Titan. Icarus 268, 313–339 (2016).
Cavalié, T., Lunine, J. I. & Mousis, O. A subsolar oxygen abundance or a radiative region deep in Jupiter revealed by thermochemical modeling. Nat. Astron. 7, 678–683 (2023).
Norwood, J. et al. Giant planet observations with the James Webb Space Telescope. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 128, 018005 (2016).
Cavalié, T. et al. Herschel map of Saturn’s stratospheric water, delivered by the plumes of Enceladus. Astron. Astrophys. 630, A87 (2019).
Rohart, F., Derozier, D. & Legrand, J. Foreign gas relaxation of the J = 0 → 1 transition of HC15N. A study of the temperature dependance by coherent transients. J. Chem. Phys. 87, 5794–5803 (1987).
Dick, M. J., Drouin, B. J., Crawford, T. J. & Pearson, J. C. Pressure broadening of the J = 5 ← 4 transition of carbon monoxide from 17 to 200 K: a new collisional cooling experiment. J. Quant. Spectr. Rad. Transf. 110, 619–638 (2009).
Borysow, J., Trafton, L., Frommhold, L. & Birnbaum, G. Modeling of pressure-induced far-infrared absorption spectra of molecular hydrogen pairs. Astrophys. J. 296, 644–654 (1985).
Borysow, A. & Frommhold, L. Theoretical collision-induced rototranslational absorption spectra for the outer planets: H2-CH4 pairs. Astrophys. J. 304, 849–865 (1986).
Borysow, J., Frommhold, L. & Birnbaum, G. Collision-induced rototranslational absorption spectra of H2-He pairs at temperatures from 40 to 3000 K. Astrophys. J. 326, 509–515 (1988).
Flasar, F. M. et al. An intense stratospheric jet on Jupiter. Nature 427, 132–135 (2004).
Giles, R. S., Greathouse, T. K., Cosentino, R. G., Orton, G. S. & Lacy, J. H. Vertically-resolved observations of Jupiter’s quasi-quadrennial oscillation from 2012 to 2019. Icarus 350, 113905 (2020).
Twomey, S. Introduction to the Mathematics of Inversion in Remote Sensing and Indirect Measurements 2nd edn (Dower Phoenix, 2002).
Acknowledgements
T.C. acknowledges funding from CNES and the Programme National de Planétologie of CNRS/INSU. This paper makes use of the following ALMA data: ADS/JAO.ALMA\#2016.1.01235.S. ALMA is a partnership of ESO (representing its member states), National Science Foundation (USA) and NINS (Japan), together with the National Research Council (Canada), MOST and ASIAA (Taiwan) and KASI (Republic of Korea), in cooperation with the Republic of Chile. The Joint ALMA Observatory is operated by ESO, AUI/NRAO and NAOJ.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
T.C. and L.R. performed the modelling and data analysis. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Astronomy thanks Imke de Pater, Conor Nixon and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data
Extended Data Fig. 1 Temperature fields used in the abundance retrievals.
The fields at 170 W (left) and 350 W (right) correspond to the eastern and western limbs, respectively, as reconstructed from the retrievals obtained from Gemini/TEXES observations on March 14–20, 2017.
Extended Data Fig. 2 HCN (left) and CO (right) VMR vertical profile retrieval examples.
The a priori and retrieved profiles are shown in black and blue, respectively. The shaded region encompasses the range of 1-σ uncertainties due to random measurement errors. The measurement spectra (black) and fitted spectra (magenta) along with the residuals are shown as well.
Extended Data Fig. 3 HCN (left) and CO (right) vertical profiles in Jupiter’s stratosphere, as retrieved from the ALMA observations of March 22nd, 2017.
They are grouped in latitude bins, similarly to Fig. 2.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Fig. 1.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Cavalié, T., Rezac, L., Moreno, R. et al. Evidence for auroral influence on Jupiter’s nitrogen and oxygen chemistry revealed by ALMA. Nat Astron 7, 1048–1055 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-023-02016-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-023-02016-7