Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Strong gravitational lensing by AGNs as a probe of the quasar–host relations in the distant Universe

Nature Astronomy volume 7, pages 959–966 (2023)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

The tight correlations found between the mass of supermassive black holes and the luminosities, stellar masses and velocity dispersions of their host galaxies are often interpreted as a sign of their co-evolution. Studying these correlations across redshift provides a powerful insight into the evolutionary path followed by the quasar and its host galaxy. While the mass of the black hole is accessible from single-epoch spectra, measuring the mass of its host galaxy is challenging as the active nucleus largely overshines its host. Here we present a technique to probe quasar–host relations beyond the local Universe with strong gravitational lensing, hence overcoming the use of stellar population models or velocity dispersion measurements, both prone to degeneracies. We study in detail one of the three known cases of strong lensing by a quasar to accurately measure the mass of its host and to infer a total lensing mass within the Einstein radius. The lensing measurement is more precise than any other alternative technique and compatible with the local scaling relation between the mass of the black hole and the stellar mass. The sample of such quasar–galaxy or quasar–quasar lensing systems should reach a few hundred with Euclid and the Rubin-Large Synoptic Survey Telescope, thus enabling the application of such a method with statistically significant sample sizes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: The SDSS J0919 + 2720 strongly lensed system.
Fig. 2: Value of ΔBIC for different masses of the quasar host galaxy, with a clear minimum for host total mass of \({\log }_{10}({M}_{{{{\rm{Tot}}}},{{{\rm{h}}}}}/{M}_{\odot })=10.27\,\).
Fig. 3: MBH−M⋆,h relation for local (z ≲ 0.08) AGNs taken from refs. 48,49 (grey points).

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The HST images supporting this work are publicly available on the Hubble Legacy Archive (https://hla.stsci.edu/). Our reduced Keck and SDSS spectra are available on Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7806468).

Code availability

The lens modelling code Lenstronomy and the source reconstruction software SLITronomy are freely accessible at https://github.com/sibirrer/lenstronomyand https://github.com/aymgal/SLITronomy. Stellar masses were estimated by using the public python package GSF (https://github.com/mtakahiro/gsf). The HST PSF was reconstructed using AstroObjectAnalyser, which is publicly available at https://github.com/sibirrer/AstroObjectAnalyser. Spectra have been fitted using pyQSOfit, which is also publicly available at https://github.com/legolason/PyQSOFit.

References

  1. Courbin, F. et al. Three quasi-stellar objects acting as strong gravitational lenses. Astron. Astrophys. 540, A36 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ferrarese, L. & Merritt, D. A fundamental relation between supermassive black holes and their host galaxies. Astrophys. J. 539, L9–L12 (2000).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gebhardt, K. et al. A relationship between nuclear black hole mass and galaxy velocity dispersion. Astrophys. J. 539, L13–L16 (2000).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Springel, V. et al. Simulations of the formation, evolution and clustering of galaxies and quasars. Nature 435, 629–636 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Di Matteo, T., Colberg, J., Springel, V., Hernquist, L. & Sijacki, D. Direct cosmological simulations of the growth of black holes and galaxies. Astrophys. J. 676, 33–53 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Peng, C. Y. How mergers may affect the mass scaling relation between gravitationally bound systems. Astrophys. J. 671, 1098–1107 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kormendy, J. & Ho, L. C. Coevolution (or not) of supermassive black holes and host galaxies. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 51, 511–653 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sexton, R. O. et al. Stronger constraints on the evolution of the MBH–σ⋆ relation up to z ~ 0.6. Astrophys. J. 878, 101 (2019).

  9. Ding, X. et al. The mass relations between supermassive black holes and their host galaxies at 1 < z < 2 HST-WFC3. Astrophys. J. 888, 37 (2020).

  10. Ding, X. et al. Testing the evolution of correlations between supermassive black holes and their host galaxies using eight strongly lensed quasars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 501, 269–280 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jahnke, K. et al. Massive galaxies in COSMOS: evolution of black hole versus bulge mass but not versus total stellar mass over the last 9 Gyr? Astrophys. J. 706, L215–L220 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Schramm, M. & Silverman, J. D. The black hole-bulge mass relation of active galactic nuclei in the Extended Chandra Deep Field-South Survey. Astrophys. J. 767, 13 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Schulze, A. & Wisotzki, L. Accounting for selection effects in the BH–bulge relations: no evidence for cosmological evolution. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 438, 3422–3433 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Woo, J. H. in Panoramic Views of Galaxy Formation and Evolution, vol. 399 (eds Kodama, T., Yamada, T. & Aoki, K.) (Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 2008).

  15. Treu, T., Woo, J.-H., Malkan, M. A. & Blandford, R. D. Cosmic evolution of black holes and spheroids. II. Scaling relations at z = 0.36. Astrophys. J. 667, 117–130 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cen, R. Coevolution between supermassive black holes and bulges is not via internal feedback regulation but by rationed gas supply due to angular momentum distribution. Astrophys. J. Lett. 805, L9 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lauer, T. R., Tremaine, S., Richstone, D. & Faber, S. M. Selection bias in observing the cosmological evolution of the Mffl–σ and Mffl–L relationships. Astrophys. J. 670, 249–260 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Claeskens, J. F., Lee, D. W., Remy, M., Sluse, D. & Surdej, J. QSO mass constraints from gravitational lensing studies of quasar pairs. The cases of Q1548+114 A & B and Q1148+0055 A & B. Astron. Astrophys. 356, 840–848 (2000).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Meyer, R. A., Delubac, T., Kneib, J.-P. & Courbin, F. Quasi-stellar objects acting as potential strong gravitational lenses in the SDSS-III BOSS survey. Astron. Astrophys. 625, A56 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Taak, Y. C. & Im, M. High-z Universe probed via lensing by QSOs (HULQ). I. Number estimates of QSO–QSO and QSO–galaxy lenses. Astrophys. J. 897, 163 (2020).

  21. Galan, A., Peel, A., Joseph, R., Courbin, F. & Starck, J. L. SLITRONOMY: towards a fully wavelet-based strong lensing inversion technique. Astron. Astrophys. 647, A176 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Suyu, S. H. et al. Dissecting the gravitational lens B1608+656. II. Precision measurements of the Hubble constant, spatial curvature, and the dark energy equation of state. Astrophys. J. 711, 201–221 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Despali, G. et al. Detecting low-mass haloes with strong gravitational lensing I: the effect of data quality and lensing configuration. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 510, 2480–2494 (2022).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Grier, C. J. et al. Stellar velocity dispersion measurements in high-luminosity quasar hosts and implications for the AGN black hole mass scale. Astrophys. J. 773, 90 (2013).

  25. Letawe, G. et al. On-axis spectroscopy of the host galaxies of 20 optically luminous quasars at z ~0.3. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 378, 83–108 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Millon, M. et al. TDCOSMO. I. An exploration of systematic uncertainties in the inference of H0 from time-delay cosmography. Astron. Astrophys. 639, A101 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Park, D. et al. Extending the calibration of C IV-based single-epoch black hole mass estimators for active galactic nuclei. Astrophys. J. 839, 93 (2017).

  28. Bahk, H., Woo, J.-H. & Park, D. Calibrating Mg II-based black hole mass estimators with Hβ reverberation measurements. Astrophys. J. 875, 50 (2019).

  29. Bertin, E. & Arnouts, S. SExtractor: software for source extraction. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 117, 393–404 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Birrer, S. et al. lenstronomy II: A gravitational lensing software ecosystem. J. Open Source Softw. 6, 3283 (2021).

  31. Bolton, A. S., Burles, S., Koopmans, L. V. E., Treu, T. & Moustakas, L. A. The Sloan Lens ACS Survey. I. A large spectroscopically selected sample of massive early-type lens galaxies. Astrophys. J. 638, 703–724 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Shajib, A. J., Treu, T., Birrer, S. & Sonnenfeld, A. Dark matter haloes of massive elliptical galaxies at z ~ 0.2 are well described by the Navarro–Frenk–White profile. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 503, 2380–2405 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. Refregier, A. Shapelets - I. A method for image analysis. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 338, 35–47 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. Birrer, S., Amara, A. & Refregier, A. Gravitational lens modeling with basis sets. Astrophys. J. 813, 102 (2015).

  35. Joseph, R., Courbin, F., Starck, J. L. & Birrer, S. Sparse lens inversion technique (SLIT): lens and source separability from linear inversion of the source reconstruction problem. Astron. Astrophys. 623, A14 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Starck, J.-L., Fadili, J. & Murtagh, F. The undecimated wavelet decomposition and its reconstruction. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 16, 297–309 (2007).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. Abazajian, K. N. et al. The seventh data release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 182, 543–558 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. Guo, H., Shen, Y. & Wang, S. PyQSOFit: Python code to fit the spectrum of quasars (Astrophysics Source Code Library, 2018); http://ascl.net/1809.008

  39. Yip, C. W. et al. Spectral classification of quasars in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: eigenspectra, redshift, and luminosity effects. Astron. J. 128, 2603–2630 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P. & Davis, M. Maps of dust infrared emission for use in estimation of reddening and cosmic microwave background radiation foregrounds. Astrophys. J. 500, 525–553 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. Mejía-Restrepo, J. E., Trakhtenbrot, B., Lira, P., Netzer, H. & Capellupo, D. M. Active galactic nuclei at z ~ 1.5 – II. Black hole mass estimation by means of broad emission lines. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 460, 187–211 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. Liu, H.-Y. et al. A comprehensive and uniform sample of broad-line active galactic nuclei from the SDSS DR7. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 243, 21 (2019).

  43. Ho, L. C. & Kim, M. A revised calibration of the virial mass estimator for black holes in active galaxies based on single-epoch Hβ spectra. Astrophys. J. 809, 123 (2015).

  44. Morishita, T. et al. Massive dead galaxies at z ~ 2 with HST Grism spectroscopy. I. Star formation histories and metallicity enrichment. Astrophys. J. 877, 141 (2019).

  45. Park, D. et al. Cosmic evolution of black holes and spheroids. V. The relation between black hole mass and host galaxy luminosity for a sample of 79 active galaxies. Astrophys. J. 799, 164 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. Bell, E. F. & de Jong, R. S. Stellar mass-to-light ratios and the Tully–Fisher relation. Astrophys. J. 550, 212–229 (2001).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. Binney, J. & Tremaine, S. Galactic Dynamics (Princeton University Press, 1987).

  48. Häring, N. & Rix, H.-W. On the black hole mass–bulge mass relation. Astrophys. J. 604, L89–L92 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. Bennert, V. N., Auger, M. W., Treu, T., Woo, J.-H. & Malkan, M. A. A local baseline of the black hole mass scaling relations for active galaxies. I. Methodology and results of pilot study. Astrophys. J. 726, 59 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

M.M. acknowledges the support of the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) under grant P500PT_203114. M.M., F.C. and A.G. are supported by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (COSMICLENS: grant agreement no. 787886) and the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) under grant 200020_200463. X.D. is supported by JSPS KAKENHI grant no. JP22K14071.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Physics, Laboratory of Astrophysics, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Versoix, Switzerland

    Martin Millon, Frédéric Courbin & Aymeric Galan

  2. Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology and Department of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

    Martin Millon

  3. Department of Physics, TUM School of Natural Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany

    Aymeric Galan

  4. STAR Institute, Liège, Belgium

    Dominique Sluse

  5. Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe, University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Japan

    Xuheng Ding

  6. Argelander-Institut für Astronomie, Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany

    Malte Tewes

  7. California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA

    S. G. Djorgovski

Authors
  1. Martin Millon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Frédéric Courbin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Aymeric Galan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dominique Sluse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xuheng Ding
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Malte Tewes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. S. G. Djorgovski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

M.M. conducted the analysis. A.G. developed the source reconstruction algorithm SLITronomy. M.M. and F.C wrote the manuscript. X.D. did the stellar population analysis. D.S. measured the black hole mass. All other co-authors actively participated in the discussions, in the HST data acquisition and in the discovery process of SDSS J0919 + 2720.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Millon.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interest.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Astronomy thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–3 and Table 1.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Millon, M., Courbin, F., Galan, A. et al. Strong gravitational lensing by AGNs as a probe of the quasar–host relations in the distant Universe. Nat Astron 7, 959–966 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-023-01982-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-023-01982-2

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing