Massive black holes (BHs) at the centres of massive galaxies are ubiquitous. The population of BHs within dwarf galaxies, on the other hand, is not yet known. Dwarf galaxies are thought to harbour BHs with proportionally small masses, including intermediate-mass BHs, with masses 102 < MBH < 106 solar masses (M⊙). Identification of these systems has historically relied on the detection of light emitted from accreting gaseous disks close to the BHs. Without this light, they are difficult to detect. Tidal disruption events, the luminous flares produced when a star strays close to a BH and is shredded, are a direct way to probe massive BHs. The rise times of these flares theoretically correlate with the BH mass. Here we present AT 2020neh, a fast-rising tidal disruption event candidate, hosted by a dwarf galaxy. AT 2020neh can be described by the tidal disruption of a main sequence star by a 104.7–105.9 M⊙ BH. We find the observable rate of fast-rising nuclear transients like AT 2020neh to be low, at ≲2 × 10−8 events Mpc−3 yr−1. Finding non-accreting BHs in dwarf galaxies is important to determine how prevalent BHs are within these galaxies, and to constrain models of BH formation. AT 2020neh-like events may provide a galaxy-independent method of measuring the masses of intermediate-mass BHs.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Subscribe to Nature+
Get immediate online access to Nature and 55 other Nature journal
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $9.92 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Code used for LRIS and Kast spectra can be accessed here https://github.com/msiebert1/UCSC_spectral_pipeline. Codes used for the reduction of ALFOSC data and spectral calibration routines, alongside those used for the interpolation and fitting of the photometric data canbe accessed here https://github.com/crangus/.
Masci, F. J. et al. The Zwicky Transient Facility: data processing, products, and archive. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 131, 018003 (2019).
Jones, D. O. et al. The Young Supernova Experiment: survey goals, overview, and operations. Astrophys. J. 908, 143 (2021).
Blagorodnova, N. et al. The broad absorption line tidal disruption event iPTF15af: optical and ultraviolet evolution. Astrophys. J. 873, 92 (2019).
Leloudas, G. et al. The spectral evolution of AT 2018dyb and the presence of metal lines in tidal disruption events. Astrophys. J. 887, 218 (2019).
Holoien, T. W. S. et al. The rise and fall of ASASSN-18pg: following a TDE from early to late times. Astrophys. J. 898, 161 (2020).
van Velzen, S. et al. Seventeen tidal disruption events from the first half of ZTF survey observations: entering a new era of population studies. Astrophys. J. 908, 4 (2021).
Charalampopoulos, P. et al. A detailed spectroscopic study of tidal disruption events. Astron. Astrophys. 659, A34 (2022).
Bowen, I. S. The excitation of the permitted O III nebular lines. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 46, 146 (1934).
Roth, N. & Kasen, D. What sets the line profiles in tidal disruption events? Astrophys. J. 855, 54 (2018).
Blanchard, P. K. et al. PS16dtm: a tidal disruption event in a narrow-line Seyfert 1 galaxy. Astrophys. J. 843, 106 (2017).
Hung, T. et al. Discovery of highly blueshifted broad Balmer and metastable helium absorption lines in a tidal disruption event. Astrophys. J. 879, 119 (2019).
Nicholl, M. et al. An outflow powers the optical rise of the nearby, fast-evolving tidal disruption event AT2019qiz. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 499, 482–504 (2020).
Jerkstrand, A. in The Handbook of Supernovae (eds Alsabti, A. W. & Murdin P.) 795 (Springer, 2017).
Gezari, S. Tidal disruption events. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 59, 21–58 (2021).
Vinkó, J. et al. A luminous, fast rising UV-transient discovered by ROTSE: a tidal disruption event? Astrophys. J. 798, 12 (2015).
Prentice, S. J. et al. The Cow: discovery of a luminous, hot, and rapidly evolving transient. Astrophys. J. Lett. 865, L3 (2018).
Pursiainen, M. et al. Rapidly evolving transients in the Dark Energy Survey. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 481, 894–917 (2018).
Rees, M. J. Tidal disruption of stars by black holes of 106–108 solar masses in nearby galaxies. Nature 333, 523–528 (1988).
Law-Smith, J., Ramirez-Ruiz, E., Ellison, S. L. & Foley, R. J. Tidal disruption event host galaxies in the context of the local galaxy population. Astrophys. J. 850, 22 (2017).
Graur, O. et al. A dependence of the tidal disruption event rate on global stellar surface mass density and stellar velocity dispersion. Astrophys. J. 853, 39 (2018).
French, K. D., Wevers, T., Law-Smith, J., Graur, O. & Zabludoff, A. I. The host galaxies of tidal disruption events. Space Sci. Rev. 216, 32 (2020).
Reines, A. E. & Volonteri, M. Relations between central black hole mass and total galaxy stellar mass in the local Universe. Astrophys. J. 813, 82 (2015).
Reines, A. E. & Comastri, A. Observational signatures of high-redshift quasars and local relics of black hole seeds. Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust. 33, e054 (2016).
Miller, B. P. et al. X-ray constraints on the local supermassive black hole occupation fraction. Astrophys. J. 799, 98 (2015).
van Velzen, S., Holoien, T. W. S., Onori, F., Hung, T. & Arcavi, I. Optical-ultraviolet tidal disruption events. Space Sci. Rev. 216, 124 (2020).
Guillochon, J., Manukian, H. & Ramirez-Ruiz, E. PS1-10jh: the disruption of a main-sequence star of near-solar composition. Astrophys. J. 783, 23 (2014).
Guillochon, J. & Ramirez-Ruiz, E. A dark year for tidal disruption events. Astrophys. J. 809, 166 (2015).
Dai, L., McKinney, J. C., Roth, N., Ramirez-Ruiz, E. & Miller, M. C. A unified model for tidal disruption events. Astrophys. J. Lett. 859, L20 (2018).
Mockler, B., Guillochon, J. & Ramirez-Ruiz, E. Weighing black holes using tidal disruption events. Astrophys. J. 872, 151 (2019).
Merritt, D. & Ferrarese, L. Black hole demographics from the Mffl-σ relation. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 320, L30–L34 (2001).
Greene, J. E., Strader, J. & Ho, L. C. Intermediate-mass black holes. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 58, 257–312 (2020).
Magorrian, J. et al. The demography of massive dark objects in galaxy centers. Astron. J. 115, 2285–2305 (1998).
Giersz, M., Leigh, N., Hypki, A., Lützgendorf, N. & Askar, A. MOCCA code for star cluster simulations - IV. A new scenario for intermediate mass black hole formation in globular clusters. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 454, 3150–3165 (2015).
Schneider, R., Ferrara, A., Natarajan, P. & Omukai, K. First stars, very massive black holes, and metals. Astrophys. J. 571, 30–39 (2002).
Loeb, A. & Rasio, F. A. Collapse of primordial gas clouds and the formation of quasar black holes. Astrophys. J. 432, 52 (1994).
Baldassare, V. F., Reines, A. E., Gallo, E. & Greene, J. E. X-ray and ultraviolet properties of agns in nearby dwarf galaxies. Astrophys. J. 836, 20 (2017).
Baldassare, V. F., Geha, M. & Greene, J. Identifying AGNs in low-mass galaxies via long-term optical variability. Astrophys. J. 868, 152 (2018).
Reines, A. E., Condon, J. J., Darling, J. & Greene, J. E. A new sample of (wandering) massive black holes in dwarf galaxies from high-resolution radio observations. Astrophys. J. 888, 36 (2020).
Kunth, D., Sargent, W. L. W. & Bothun, G. D. A dwarf galaxy with Seyfert characteristics. Astron. J. 93, 29 (1987).
Filippenko, A. V. & Sargent, W. L. W. Discovery of an extremely low luminosity Seyfert 1 nucleus in the dwarf galaxy NGC 4395. Astrophys. J. Lett. 342, L11 (1989).
Baldassare, V. F., Reines, A. E., Gallo, E. & Greene, J. E. A ~50,000 M⊙ solar mass black hole in the nucleus of RGG 118. Astrophys. J. Lett. 809, L14 (2015).
Baldassare, V. F., Dickey, C., Geha, M. & Reines, A. E. Populating the low-mass end of the MBH-σ* relation. Astrophys. J. Lett. 898, L3 (2020).
Donato, D. et al. A tidal disruption event in a nearby galaxy hosting an intermediate mass black hole. Astrophys. J. 781, 59 (2014).
Lin, D. et al. A luminous X-ray outburst from an intermediate-mass black hole in an off-centre star cluster. Nat. Astron. 2, 656–661 (2018).
He, J. S. et al. Long-term X-ray evolution of SDSS J134244.4+053056.1. A more than 18 year-old, long-lived IMBH-TDE candidate. Astron. Astrophys. 652, A15 (2021).
Kaiser, N. et al. Pan-STARRS: A Large Synoptic Survey Telescope Array. In Survey and Other Telescope Technologies and Discoveries SPIE Conference Series Vol. 4836 (eds Tyson, J. A. & Wolff, S.) 154–164 (SPIE, 2002).
Magnier, E. A. et al. The Pan-STARRS data-processing system. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 251, 3 (2020).
Smith, K. W. et al. Design and operation of the ATLAS transient science server. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 132, 085002 (2020).
Rest, A. et al. Testing LMC microlensing scenarios: the discrimination power of the SuperMACHO microlensing survey. Astrophys. J. 634, 1103–1115 (2005).
Bellm, E. C. et al. The Zwicky Transient Facility: system overview, performance, and first results. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 131, 018002 (2019).
Graham, M. J. et al. The Zwicky Transient Facility: science objectives. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 131, 078001 (2019).
Prochaska, J. et al. PypeIt: the Python spectroscopic data reduction pipeline. J. Open Source Softw. 5, 2308 (2020).
Schlafly, E. F. & Finkbeiner, D. P. Measuring reddening with Sloan Digital Sky Survey stellar spectra and recalibrating SFD. Astrophys. J. 737, 103 (2011).
Aihara, H. et al. The eighth data release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: first data from SDSS-III. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 193, 29 (2011).
Hsiao, E. Y. et al. K-corrections and spectral templates of type Ia supernovae. Astrophys. J. 663, 1187–1200 (2007).
HI4PI Collaborationet al. HI4PI: A full-sky H I survey based on EBHIS and GASS. Astron. Astrophys. 594, A116 (2016).
Auchettl, K., Guillochon, J. & Ramirez-Ruiz, E. New physical insights about tidal disruption events from a comprehensive observational inventory at X-ray wavelengths. Astrophys. J. 838, 149 (2017).
Alexander, K. D., van Velzen, S., Horesh, A. & Zauderer, B. A. Radio properties of tidal disruption events. Space Sci. Rev. 216, 81 (2020).
Bertin, E. & Arnouts, S. SExtractor: software for source extraction. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 117, 393–404 (1996).
Dressel, L. WFC3 Instrument Handbook for Cycle 29. Baltimore: STScI. 13, 343 (2021).
Khazov, D. et al. Flash spectroscopy: emission lines from the ionized circumstellar material around <10-day-old type II supernovae. Astrophys. J. 818, 3 (2016).
Gutiérrez, C. P. et al. Hα spectral diversity of type II supernovae: correlations with photometric properties. Astrophys. J. Lett. 786, L15 (2014).
Gutiérrez, C. P. et al. Type II supernova spectral diversity. I. Observations, sample characterization, and spectral line evolution. Astrophys. J. 850, 89 (2017).
Anderson, J. P. et al. Analysis of blueshifted emission peaks in type II supernovae. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 441, 671–680 (2014).
Drout, M. R. et al. Rapidly evolving and luminous transients from Pan-STARRS1. Astrophys. J. 794, 23 (2014).
Perley, D. A. et al. The fast, luminous ultraviolet transient AT2018cow: extreme supernova, or disruption of a star by an intermediate-mass black hole? Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 484, 1031–1049 (2019).
Hammerstein, E. et al. The final season reimagined: 30 tidal disruption events from the ZTF-I Survey. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.01461 (2022).
Parkinson, E. J. et al. Optical line spectra of tidal disruption events from reprocessing in optically thick outflows. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 510, 5426–5443 (2022).
Gonzalez-Gaitan, S. et al. The rise-time of type II supernovae. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 451, 2212–2229 (2015).
Patat, F., Barbon, R., Cappellaro, E. & Turatto, M. Light curves of type II supernovae. II. The analysis. Astron. Astrophys. 282, 731–741 (1994).
Ambikasaran, S., Foreman-Mackey, D., Greengard, L., Hogg, D. W. & O’Neil, M. Fast direct methods for Gaussian processes. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 38, 252 (2015).
Ho, A. Y. Q. et al. The Koala: a fast blue optical transient with luminous radio emission from a starburst dwarf galaxy at z = 0.27. Astrophys. J. 895, 49 (2020).
Hinkle, J. T. et al. The curious case of ASASSN-20hx: a slowly-evolving, UV and X-ray luminous, ambiguous nuclear transient. Astrophys. J. 930, 12 (2022).
Wiseman, P. et al. The host galaxies of 106 rapidly evolving transients discovered by the Dark Energy Survey. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 498, 2575–2593 (2020).
Baldwin, J. A., Phillips, M. M. & Terlevich, R. Classification parameters for the emission-line spectra of extragalactic objects. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 93, 5–19 (1981).
Kewley, L. J., Groves, B., Kauffmann, G. & Heckman, T. The host galaxies and classification of active galactic nuclei. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 372, 961–976 (2006).
Butler, N. R. & Bloom, J. S. Optimal time-series selection of quasars. Astron. J. 141, 93 (2011).
Skrutskie, M. F. et al. The Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS). Astron. J. 131, 1163–1183 (2006).
Wright, E. L. et al. The Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE): mission description and initial on-orbit performance. Astron. J. 140, 1868–1881 (2010).
Martin, D. C. et al. The Galaxy Evolution Explorer: a space ultraviolet survey mission. Astrophys. J. Lett. 619, L1–L6 (2005).
Leja, J., Johnson, B. D., Conroy, C., van Dokkum, P. G. & Byler, N. Deriving physical properties from broadband photometry with Prospector: description of the model and a demonstration of its accuracy using 129 galaxies in the local universe. Astrophys. J. 837, 170 (2017).
Speagle, J. S. DYNESTY: a dynamic nested sampling package for estimating Bayesian posteriors and evidences. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 493, 3132–3158 (2020).
Lower, S. et al. How well can we measure the stellar mass of a galaxy: the impact of the assumed star formation history model in SED fitting. Astrophys. J. 904, 33 (2020).
Cappellari, M. & Emsellem, E. Parametric recovery of line-of-sight velocity distributions from absorption-line spectra of galaxies via penalized likelihood. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 116, 138–147 (2004).
Cappellari, M. Improving the full spectrum fitting method: accurate convolution with Gauss-Hermite functions. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 466, 798–811 (2017).
Gonneau, A. et al. The X-shooter Spectral Library (XSL): data release 2. Astron. Astrophys. 634, A133 (2020).
Geha, M. et al. The least-luminous galaxy: spectroscopy of the Milky Way satellite Segue 1. Astrophys. J. 692, 1464–1475 (2009).
Hammerstein, E. et al. Tidal disruption event hosts are green and centrally concentrated: signatures of a post-merger system. Astrophys. J. Lett. 908, L20 (2021).
Lodato, G. & Natarajan, P. The mass function of high-redshift seed black holes. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 377, L64–L68 (2007).
Guillochon, J. et al. MOSFiT: modular open source fitter for transients. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 236, 6 (2018).
Guillochon, J. & Ramirez-Ruiz, E. Hydrodynamical simulations to determine the feeding rate of black holes by the tidal disruption of stars: the importance of the impact parameter and stellar structure. Astrophys. J. 767, 25 (2013).
Mockler, B. et al. Constraints on the preferential disruption of moderately massive stars by supermassive black holes. Astrophys. J. 924, 70 (2022).
Nicholl, M. Systematic light curve modelling of TDEs: statistical differences between the spectroscopic classes. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 515, 5604–5616 (2022).
Ramsden, P., Lanning, D., Nicholl, M. & McGee, S. L. The bulge masses of TDE host galaxies and their scaling with black hole mass. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 515, 1146–1157 (2022).
McLeod, D. J. et al. The evolution of the galaxy stellar-mass function over the last 12 billion years from a combination of ground-based and HST surveys. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 503, 4413–4435 (2021).
Yaron, O. & Gal-Yam, A. WISeREP—an interactive supernova data repository. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 124, 668 (2012).
Kormendy, J. & Ho, L. C. Coevolution (or not) of supermassive black holes and host galaxies. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 51, 511–653 (2013).
Xiao, T. et al. Exploring the low-mass end of the MBH-σ* relation with active galaxies. Astrophys. J. 739, 28 (2011).
We thank M. Pursiainen for insightful discussions regarding the spectroscopic evolution of this event, and M. Briday for useful instructions regarding the use of PROSPECTOR. C.R.A., J.H., K.A., L.I., C.C., N.K. and R.W. were supported by VILLUM FONDEN Investigator grant (project number 16599). C.R.A., C.G. and L.I. were supported by a VILLUM FONDEN Young Investigator Grant (project number 25501). B.M. acknowledges support from the AAUW Dissertation Fellowship under Swift grant number 80NSSC21K1409. R.J.F., T.H., M.R.S., K.T., S.T. and C.R.-B. were supported in part by NASA grant number 80NSSC20K0953, NSF grant number AST–1815935, the Gordon & Betty Moore Foundation, the Heising-Simons Foundation, and by a fellowship from the David and Lucile Packard Foundation to R.J.F. E.R.-R. acknowledges support from the Heising-Simons Foundation, Nasa Swift and NICER and NSF (grant numbers AST-1911206 and AST-1852393). S.I.R. has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement number 891744. Parts of this research were supported by the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for All Sky Astrophysics in 3 Dimensions (ASTRO 3D), through project number CE170100013 and the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Gravitational Wave Discovery (OzGrav) through project number CE170100004. H.P. acknowledges support from the Danish National Research Foundation (grant number DNRF132) and the Hong Kong government (GRF grant numbers HKU27305119 and HKU17304821). M.R.D acknowledges support from the NSERC through grant number RGPIN-2019-06186, the Canada Research Chairs Program, the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CIFAR) and the Dunlap Institute at the University of Toronto. D.O.J. is supported by NASA through the NASA Hubble Fellowship grant number HF2-51462.001 awarded by the Space Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., for NASA, under contract number NAS 5-26555. M.R.S. is supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program under grant number. 1842400. D.A.C. acknowledges support from the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship under grant number DGE1339067. A.G. is supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program under grant number DGE-1746047. A.G. also acknowledges funding from the Center for Astrophysical Surveys Fellowship at UIUC/NCSA and the Illinois Distinguished Fellowship. Some of the data presented herein were obtained at the W. M. Keck Observatory, which is operated as a scientific partnership among the California Institute of Technology, the University of California and NASA. The Observatory was made possible by the generous financial support of the W. M. Keck Foundation. We wish to recognize and acknowledge the very important cultural role and reverence that the summit of Maunakea has always had within the indigenous Hawaiian community. We are most fortunate to have the opportunity to conduct observations from this mountain. Based on observations made with the Nordic Optical Telescope, owned in collaboration by the University of Turku and Aarhus University, and operated jointly by Aarhus University, the University of Turku and the University of Oslo, representing Denmark, Finland and Norway, the University of Iceland and Stockholm University at the Observatorio del Roque de los Muchachos, La Palma, Spain, of the Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias. Observations were carried out under programme P61-022. A major upgrade of the Kast spectrograph on the Shane 3 m telescope at Lick Observatory was made possible through generous gifts from the Heising-Simons Foundation as well as W. Kast and M. Kast. Research at Lick Observatory is partially supported by a generous gift from Google. This research is based on observations made with the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope obtained from the Space Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under NASA contract number NAS 5–26555. These observations are associated with programme SNAP-16239. We acknowledge the use of public data from the Swift data archive. Based on observations obtained at the international Gemini Observatory (programme numberGN-2020A-DD-111), a programme of NSF’s NOIRLab, which is managed by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy (AURA) under a cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation on behalf of the Gemini Observatory partnership: the National Science Foundation (United States), the National Research Council (Canada), the Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo (Chile), the Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (Argentina), the Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovações e Comunicações (Brazil) and the Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute (Republic of Korea). We thank the Director for supporting this programme. Based in part on observations obtained with the Samuel Oschin 48-inch Telescope at the Palomar Observatory as part of the Zwicky Transient Facility project. ZTF is supported by the NSF under grant number AST-1440341 and a collaboration including Caltech, IPAC, the Weizmann Institute for Science, the Oskar Klein Center at Stockholm University, the University of Maryland, the University of Washington, Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron and Humboldt University, Los Alamos National Laboratories, the TANGO Consortium of Taiwan, the University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee and the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Operations are conducted by the Caltech Optical Observatories (COO), the Infrared Processing and Analysis Center (IPAC) and the University of Washington (UW). The Pan-STARRS1 Surveys (PS1) and the PS1 public science archive have been made possible through contributions by the Institute for Astronomy, the University of Hawaii, the Pan-STARRS Project Office, the Max Planck Society and its participating institutes, the Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, Heidelberg, and the Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Garching, The Johns Hopkins University, Durham University, the University of Edinburgh, the Queen’s University Belfast, the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, the Las Cumbres Observatory Global Telescope Network Incorporated, the National Central University of Taiwan, STScI, NASA under grant number NNX08AR22G issued through the Planetary Science Division of the NASA Science Mission Directorate, NSF grant number AST-1238877, the University of Maryland, Eotvos Lorand University (ELTE), the Los Alamos National Laboratory and the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information
Nature Astronomy thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The UV-optical light curve of AT 2020neh throughout its observable lifetime. Grey dashed lines mark spectroscopic epochs, the dashed black line marks the peak of optical emission. Limits represent 3 σ upper limits to the flux for each telescope during periods of non-detection. There is an apparent gap in optical data between 40-60 days due to poor weather. AT 2020neh is first detected within YSE (PS1) imaging in the i-band, confirmed by with a g-band detection from ZTF <24 hours later. Pre-explosion monitoring allows for strong constraints to be placed upon the explosion epoch of the transient.
Top: The Prospector SED fit to the host galaxy photometry. All host photometry meaurements are shown with + / − 1 σ standard deviation uncertainties. Bottom left: Star formation rates vs. stellar masses for field galaxies (shown here is the SDSS spectroscopic sample as grey contours). The hosts of optical TDEs are shown in red (taken from 21). AT 2020neh sits comfortably within the parameter space occupied by other TDEs. Bottom right: A BPT diagram showing the regions where emission line ratios are indicative of ionisation from either an AGN, star formation or a composite of the two (78) The location of AT 2020neh is shown, alongside other optical TDE hosts with host SDSS spectra (21). The position of AT 2020neh inside of the star forming region of the diagram confirms the lack of an AGN component within the host.
Photometry of AT 2020neh in UV-optical bands (offset for clarity) alongside all possible TDE light curves each constructed from the posterior parameter distribution. All photometric measurements are presented with + / − 1 σ standard deviation uncertainties.
About this article
Cite this article
Angus, C.R., Baldassare, V.F., Mockler, B. et al. A fast-rising tidal disruption event from a candidate intermediate-mass black hole. Nat Astron 6, 1452–1463 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-022-01811-y
This article is cited by
Nature Astronomy (2022)