Galaxy clusters are useful laboratories to investigate the evolution of the Universe, and accurate measurement of their total masses allows us to constrain important cosmological parameters. However, estimating mass from observations that use different methods and spectral bands introduces various systematic errors. Here we evaluate the use of a convolutional neural network (CNN) to reliably and accurately infer the masses of galaxy clusters from the Compton-y parameter maps provided by the Planck satellite. The CNN is trained with mock images generated from hydrodynamic simulations of galaxy clusters, with Planck’s observational limitations taken into account. We observe that the CNN approach is not subject to the usual observational assumptions, and therefore is not affected by the same biases. By applying the trained CNNs to the real Planck maps, we find cluster masses compatible with Planck measurements within a 15% bias. Finally, we show that this mass bias can be explained by the well-known hydrostatic equilibrium assumption in Planck masses, and the different parameters in the integrated Compton-y signal and the mass scaling laws. This work highlights that CNNs, supported by hydrodynamic simulations, are a promising and independent tool for estimating cluster masses with high accuracy, which can be extended to other surveys as well as to observations in other bands.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
The catalogue of CNN-estimated masses for Planck clusters can be downloaded from https://github.com/The300th/DeepPlanck. The mock y maps used to train the different CNN models can be accessed upon request to the corresponding authors.
CNN trained weights and data products are available at https://github.com/The300th/DeepPlanck.
Kravtsov, A. V. & Borgani, S. Formation of galaxy clusters. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 50, 353–409 (2012).
Planck Collaboration et al. Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters. Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020).
Biviano, A. et al. On the efficiency and reliability of cluster mass estimates based on member galaxies. Astron. Astrophys. 456, 23–36 (2006).
Becker, M. R. & Kravtsov, A. V. On the accuracy of weak-lensing cluster mass reconstructions. Astrophys. J. 740, 25 (2011).
Bryan, G. L. & Norman, M. L. Statistical properties of X-ray clusters: analytic and numerical comparisons. Astrophys. J. 495, 80–99 (1998).
Planck Collaboration Planck 2015 results. XXIV. Cosmology from Sunyaev–Zeldovich cluster counts. Astron. Astrophys. 594, A24 (2016).
Salvati, L., Douspis, M. & Aghanim, N. Constraints from thermal Sunyaev–Zel’dovich cluster counts and power spectrum combined with CMB. Astron. Astrophys. 614, A13 (2018).
Gianfagna, G. et al. Exploring the hydrostatic mass bias in MUSIC clusters: application to the NIKA2 mock sample. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 502, 5115–5133 (2021).
Bishop, C. M., Nasrabadi, N. M. (2006) Pattern recognition and machine learning. Springer, New York.
Baron, D. Machine learning in astronomy: a practical overview. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.07248 (2019).
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y. & Hinton, G. Deep learning. Nature 521, 436–444 (2015).
Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y. & Courville, A. Deep Learning (MIT Press, 2016); http://www.deeplearningbook.org
LeCun, Y. et al. Generalization and network design strategies. Connectionism Perspect. 19, 143–155 (1989).
Ntampaka, M. et al. A deep learning approach to galaxy cluster Xray masses. Astrophys. J. 876, 82 (2019).
Gupta, N. & Reichardt, C. L. Mass estimation of galaxy clusters with deep learning. I. Sunyaev–Zel’dovich effect. Astrophys. J. 900, 110 (2020).
Gupta, N. & Reichardt, C. L. Mass estimation of galaxy clusters with Deep Learning II. Cosmic microwave background cluster lensing. Astrophys. J. 923, 96 (2021).
Yan, Z., Mead, A., Van Waerbeke, L., Hinshaw, G. & McCarthy, I. Galaxy cluster mass estimation with deep learning and hydrodynamical simulations. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 499, 3445–3458 (2020).
Ho, M. et al. A robust and efficient deep learning method for dynamical mass measurements of galaxy clusters. Astrophys. J. 887, 25 (2019).
Kodi Ramanah, D., Wojtak, R. & Arendse, N. Simulation-based inference of dynamical galaxy cluster masses with 3D convolutional neural networks. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 501, 4080–4091 (2021).
Ho, M., Farahi, A., Rau, M. M. & Trac, H. Approximate Bayesian uncertainties on deep learning dynamical mass estimates of galaxy clusters. Astrophys. J. 908, 204 (2021).
Planck Collaboration Planck 2015 results. XXVII. The second Planck catalogue of Sunyaev–Zeldovich sources. Astron. Astrophys. 594, A27 (2016).
Cui, W. et al. The Three Hundred project: a large catalogue of theoretically modelled galaxy clusters for cosmological and astrophysical applications. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 480, 2898–2915 (2018).
Planck Collaboration Planck 2013 results. XX. Cosmology from Sunyaev–Zeldovich cluster counts. Astron. Astrophys. 571, A20 (2014).
Sunyaev, R. A. & Zeldovich, Y. B. The observations of relic radiation as a test of the nature of X-ray radiation from the clusters of galaxies. Comments Astrophys. Space Phys. 4, 173 (1972).
Kravtsov, A. V., Vikhlinin, A. & Nagai, D. A new robust low-scatter X-ray mass indicator for clusters of galaxies. Astrophys. J. 650, 128–136 (2006).
Knollmann, S. R. & Knebe, A. AHF: Amiga’s Halo Finder. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 182, 608–624 (2009).
Gianfagna, G., Rasia, E., Cui, W., De Petris, M. & Yepes, G. The hydrostatic mass bias in The Three Hundred clusters. EPJ Web Conf. 257, 00020 (2022).
Yang, T. et al. Understanding the relation between thermal Sunyaev-Zeldovich decrement and halo mass using the Simba and TNG simulations. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. (2022).
Ferragamo, A. et al. Comparison of hydrostatic and lensing cluster mass estimates: a pilot study in MACS J0647.7+7015. Astron. Astrophys. 661, A65 (2022).
Cui, W. et al. nIFTy galaxy cluster simulations—IV. Quantifying the influence of baryons on halo properties. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 458, 4052–4073 (2016).
Cui, W. et al. The Three Hundred project: the GIZMO-SIMBA run. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 514, 977–996 (2022).
Henden, N. A., Puchwein, E. & Sijacki, D. The redshift evolution of X-ray and Sunyaev–Zel’dovich scaling relations in the FABLE simulations. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 489, 2439–2470 (2019).
Le Brun, A. M. C., McCarthy, I. G. & Melin, J.-B. Testing Sunyaev–Zel’dovich measurements of the hot gas content of dark matter haloes using synthetic skies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 451, 3868–3881 (2015).
Le Brun, A. M. C., McCarthy, I. G., Schaye, J. & Ponman, T. J. The scatter and evolution of the global hot gas properties of simulated galaxy cluster populations. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 466, 4442–4469 (2017).
Barnes, D. J. et al. The redshift evolution of massive galaxy clusters in the MACSIS simulations. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 465, 213–233 (2017).
de Andres, D. et al. Machine learning methods to estimate observational properties of galaxy clusters in large volume cosmological N-body simulations. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.10751 (2022).
Villaescusa-Navarro, F. et al. Robust marginalization of baryonic effects for cosmological inference at the field level. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.10360 (2021).
Klypin, A., Yepes, G., Gottlöber, S., Prada, F. & Heß, S. MultiDark simulations: the story of dark matter halo concentrations and density profiles. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 457, 4340–4359 (2016).
Planck Collaboration Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters. Astron. Astrophys. 594, A13 (2016).
Sembolini, F. et al. The MUSIC of galaxy clusters—I. Baryon properties and scaling relations of the thermal Sunyaev–Zel’dovich effect. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 429, 323–343 (2013).
Murante, G., Monaco, P., Giovalli, M., Borgani, S. & Diaferio, A. A subresolution multiphase interstellar medium model of star formation and supernova energy feedback. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 405, 1491–1512 (2010).
Rasia, E. et al. Cool core clusters from cosmological simulations. Astrophys. J. Lett. 813, L17 (2015).
Davé, R. et al. SIMBA: cosmological simulations with black hole growth and feedback. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 486, 2827–2849 (2019).
Baldi, A. S. et al. Kinetic Sunyaev–Zel’dovich effect in rotating galaxy clusters from MUSIC simulations. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 479, 4028–4040 (2018).
Aguado-Barahona, A. et al. Optical validation and characterization of Planck PSZ2 sources at the Canary Islands observatories. II. Second year of LP15 observations. Astron. Astrophys. 631, A148 (2019).
Wen, Z. L. & Han, J. L. Clusters of galaxies up to z = 1.5 identified from photometric data of the Dark Energy Survey and unWISE. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 513, 3946–3959 (2022).
Ruppin, F. et al. Impact of ICM disturbances on the mean pressure profile of galaxy clusters: a prospective study of the NIKA2 SZ large program with MUSIC synthetic clusters. Astron. Astrophys. 631, A21 (2019).
Simonyan, K. & Zisserman, A. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1409.1556 (2014).
We acknowledge helpful discussions with A. Ferragamo, F. De Luca and F. Sembolini. D.d.A., W.C. and G.Y. thank financial support from Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (Spain) under project grant PID2021-122603NB-C21. W.C. is supported by the STFC AGP Grant ST/V000594/1 and by the Atracción de Talento Contract no. 2020-T1/TIC-19882 granted by the Comunidad de Madrid in Spain. W.C. further acknowledges the science research grants from the China Manned Space Project with no. CMS-CSST-2021-A01 and no. CMS-CSST-2021-B01. M.D.P. acknowledges support from Sapienza Università di Roma thanks to Progetti di Ricerca Medi 2019, RM11916B7540DD8D and Progetti di Ricerca Medi 2020, RM120172B32D5BE2.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information
Nature Astronomy and the authors thank Ziang Yan and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
de Andres, D., Cui, W., Ruppin, F. et al. A deep learning approach to infer galaxy cluster masses from Planck Compton-y parameter maps. Nat Astron 6, 1325–1331 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-022-01784-y
This article is cited by
Nature Astronomy (2022)