Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Snapshot of a magnetohydrodynamic disk wind traced by water maser observations

Nature Astronomy volume 6, pages 1068–1076 (2022)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

The formation of astrophysical objects of different nature, from black holes to gaseous giant planets, involves a disk–jet system, where the disk drives the mass accretion onto a central compact object and the jet is a fast collimated ejection along the disk rotation axis. Magnetohydrodynamic disk winds can provide the link between mass accretion and ejection, which is essential to ensure that the excess angular momentum is removed and accretion can proceed. However, until now, we have been lacking direct observational proof of disk winds. Here we present a direct view of the velocity field of a disk wind around a forming massive star. Achieving a very high spatial resolution of about 0.05 au, our water maser observations trace the velocities of individual streamlines emerging from the disk orbiting the forming star. We find that, at low elevation above the disk midplane, the flow co-rotates with its launch point in the disk, in agreement with magneto-centrifugal acceleration. Beyond the co-rotation point, the flow rises spiralling around the disk rotation axis along a helical magnetic field. We have performed (resistive-radiative-gravito-)magnetohydrodynamic simulations of the formation of a massive star and record the development of a magneto-centrifugally launched jet presenting many properties in agreement with our observations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Previous NOEMA, JVLA and VLBA observations towards IRAS 21078+5211.
Fig. 2: Global VLBI observations of the 22 GHz water masers and 3D view of the proposed kinematical interpretation.
Fig. 3: The geometry of the spiral motion.
Fig. 4: The southwest spiral motion.
Fig. 5: The northeast spiral motions.
Fig. 6: The co-rotating north stream.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

This article makes use of the following EVN data: GM077 (EVN project code). The calibrated datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Code availability

The custom parts of the code for producing the simulations and subsequent data analysis are not ready for public use, but they can be provided upon reasonable request. For the magnetohydrodynamics part of the software, we make use of the open-source code Pluto35,41. The implementation method of the employed radiation transport module (‘Makemake’) is publicly accessible38.

References

  1. Pudritz, R. E. & Norman, C. A. Centrifugally driven winds from contracting molecular disks. Astrophys. J. 274, 677–697 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Blandford, R. D. & Payne, D. G. Hydromagnetic flows from accretion disks and the production of radio jets. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 199, 883–903 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ouyed, R. & Pudritz, R. E. Numerical simulations of astrophysical jets from Keplerian Disks. I. Stationary models. Astrophys. J. 482, 712–732 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Krasnopolsky, R., Li, Z.-Y. & Blandford, R. Magnetocentrifugal launching of jets from accretion disks. I. Cold axisymmetric flows. Astrophys. J. 526, 631–642 (1999).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bacciotti, F., Ray, T. P., Mundt, R., Eislöffel, J. & Solf, J. Hubble Space Telescope/STIS spectroscopy of the optical outflow from DG Tauri: indications for rotation in the initial jet channel. Astrophys. J. 576, 222–231 (2002).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hirota, T. et al. Disk-driven rotating bipolar outflow in Orion Source I. Nat. Astron. 1, 0146 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee, C.-F. et al. A rotating protostellar jet launched from the innermost disk of HH 212. Nat. Astron. 1, 0152 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Aalto, S. et al. ALMA resolves the remarkable molecular jet and rotating wind in the extremely radio-quiet galaxy NGC 1377. Astron. Astrophys. 640, A104 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tabone, B. et al. Constraining MHD disk winds with ALMA. Apparent rotation signatures and application to HH212. Astron. Astrophys. 640, A82 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Matthews, L. D. et al. A feature movie of SiO emission 20–100 au from the massive young stellar object Orion Source I. Astrophys. J. 708, 80–92 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Moscadelli, L. & Goddi, C. A multiple system of high-mass YSOs surrounded by disks in NGC 7538 IRS1. Gas dynamics on scales of 10–700 au from CH3OH maser and NH3 thermal lines. Astron. Astrophys. 566, A150 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sanna, A. et al. Velocity and magnetic fields within 1000 au of a massive YSO. Astron. Astrophys. 583, L3 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Moscadelli, L., Cesaroni, R., Rioja, M. J., Dodson, R. & Reid, M. J. Methanol and water masers in IRAS 20126+4104: the distance, the disk, and the jet. Astron. Astrophys. 526, A66 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Burns, R. A. et al. A ‘water spout’ maser jet in S235AB-MIR. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 453, 3163–3173 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Moscadelli, L. et al. Outflow structure within 1000 au of high-mass YSOs. I. First results from a combined study of maser and radio continuum emission. Astron. Astrophys. 585, A71 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Xu, Y. et al. On the nature of the local spiral arm of the Milky Way. Astrophys. J. 769, 15 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Moscadelli, L. et al. Multi-scale view of star formation in IRAS 21078+5211: from clump fragmentation to disk wind. Astron. Astrophys. 647, A114 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pudritz, R. E., Ouyed, R., Fendt, C. & Brandenburg, A. in Disk Winds, Jets, and Outflows: Theoretical and Computational Foundations. Protostars and Planets V (eds Reipurth, B. et al.) 277-294 (2007), University of Arizona Press, Tucson.

  19. Pudritz, R. E. & Ray, T. P. The role of magnetic fields in protostellar outflows and star formation. Front. Astron. Space Sci. 6, 54 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Elitzur, M., Hollenbach, D. J. & McKee, C. F. Planar H2O masers in star-forming regions. Astrophys. J. 394, 221–227 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hollenbach, D., Elitzur, M. & McKee, C. F. Interstellar H2O masers from J shocks. Astrophys. J. 773, 70 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kaufman, M. J. & Neufeld, D. A. Water maser emission from magnetohydrodynamic shock waves. Astrophys. J. 456, 250–+ (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pesenti, N. et al. Predicted rotation signatures in MHD disc winds and comparison to DG Tau observations. Astron. Astrophys. 416, L9–L12 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sanna, A. et al. VLBI study of maser kinematics in high-mass star-forming regions. I. G16.59−0.05. Astron. Astrophys. 517, A71 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Reid, M. J. et al. The distance to the center of the galaxy—H2O maser proper motions in Sagittarius B2(N). Astrophys. J. 330, 809–816 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang, Q., Claus, B., Watson, L. & Moran, J. Angular momentum in disk wind revealed in the young star MWC 349A. Astrophys. J. 837, 53 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Pelletier, G. & Pudritz, R. E. Hydromagnetic disk winds in young stellar objects and active galactic nuclei. Astrophys. J. 394, 117 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Staff, J., Koning, N., Ouyed, R. & Pudritz, R. Three-dimensional simulations of MHD disk winds to hundred AU scale from the protostar. Eur. Phys. J. Web Conf 64, 05006 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Caratti o Garatti, A. et al. Disk-mediated accretion burst in a high-mass young stellar object. Nat. Phys. 13, 276–279 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hunter, T. R. et al. An extraordinary outburst in the massive protostellar system NGC 6334I−MM1: quadrupling of the millimeter continuum. Astrophys. J. Lett. 837, L29 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Oliva, G. A. & Kuiper, R. Modeling disk fragmentation and multiplicity in massive star formation. Astron. Astrophys. 644, A41 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Anglada, G., Rodríguez, L. F. & Carrasco-González, C. Radio jets from young stellar objects. Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 26, 3 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. Elitzur, M., Hollenbach, D. J. & McKee, C. F. H2O masers in star-forming regions. Astrophys. J. 346, 983–990 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. Moscadelli, L. et al. Protostellar Outflows at the Earliest Stages (POETS). IV. Statistical properties of the 22 GHz H2O masers. Astron. Astrophys. 635, A118 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Mignone, A. et al. PLUTO: a numerical code for computational astrophysics. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 170, 228–242 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. Machida, M. N., Inutsuka, S.-i & Matsumoto, T. Magnetic fields and rotations of protostars. Astrophys. J. 670, 1198–1213 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. Kuiper, R., Klahr, H., Beuther, H. & Henning, T. Circumventing the radiation pressure barrier in the formation of massive stars via disk accretion. Astrophys. J. 722, 1556–1576 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. Kuiper, R., Yorke, H. W. & Mignone, A. Makemake + Sedna: a continuum radiation transport and photoionization framework for astrophysical newtonian fluid dynamics. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 250, 13 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. Mouschovias, T. C. & Spitzer, J. L. Note on the collapse of magnetic interstellar clouds. Astrophys. J. 210, 326 (1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. Kölligan, A. & Kuiper, R. Jets and outflows of massive protostars. From cloud collapse to jet launching and cloud dispersal. Astron. Astrophys. 620, A182 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. Mignone, A. et al. PLUTO: a code for flows in multiple spatial dimensions. Astrophysics Source Code Library ascl:1010.045 (2010).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank C. Fendt and D. Galli for useful discussion. A.O. acknowledges financial support from the Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst (DAAD), under the programme Research Grants - Doctoral Projects in Germany, and complementary financial support for the completion of the doctoral degree by the University of Costa Rica, as part of their scholarship programme for postgraduate studies in foreign institutions. H.B. acknowledges support from the European Research Council under the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme via the ERC Consolidator Grant CSF-648505. H.B. also acknowledges support from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft in the Collaborative Research Center (SFB 881) ‘The Milky Way System’ (subproject B1). R.K. acknowledges financial support via the Emmy Noether and Heisenberg Research Grants funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) under grant numbers KU 2849/3 and 2849/9. The European VLBI Network is a joint facility of independent European, African, Asian and North American radio astronomy institutes. Scientific results from data presented in this publication are derived from the following EVN project code: GM077.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri, Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica, Firenze, Italy

    Luca Moscadelli

  2. Osservatorio Astronomico di Cagliari, Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica, Selargius, Italy

    Alberto Sanna

  3. Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastronomie, Max Planck Gesellschaft, Bonn, Germany

    Alberto Sanna

  4. Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, Max Planck Gesellschaft, Heidelberg, Germany

    Henrik Beuther

  5. Institut für Astronomie und Astrophysik, Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany

    André Oliva

  6. Space Research Center (CINESPA), School of Physics, University of Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica

    André Oliva

  7. Faculty of Physics, University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany

    Rolf Kuiper

Authors
  1. Luca Moscadelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alberto Sanna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Henrik Beuther
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. André Oliva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Rolf Kuiper
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

L.M. led the project, analysis, discussion and drafted the manuscript. A.S., H.B. and R.K. commented on the manuscript and participated in the discussion. A.O. and R.K. performed the numerical jet simulations described in ‘Simulation snapshot of a forming massive star’ in Methods. A.O. performed the dynamical analysis of the simulations, compared the simulation results to the observations, and produced the illustrations of the magnetic-field lines and streamlines.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luca Moscadelli.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Astronomy thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–7 and Discussion (with 3 distinct headings).

Supplementary Table 1

Table (in text format) listing the properties (label, Intensity, VLSR, right ascension and declination positional offsets) of the observed water masers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moscadelli, L., Sanna, A., Beuther, H. et al. Snapshot of a magnetohydrodynamic disk wind traced by water maser observations. Nat Astron 6, 1068–1076 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-022-01754-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-022-01754-4

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing