Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

State-of-the-art energetic and morphological modelling of the launching site of the M87 jet


M87 has been the target of numerous astronomical observations across the electromagnetic spectrum, and very long baseline interferometry has resolved an edge-brightened jet1,2,3,4. However, the origin and formation of its jets remain unclear. In our current understanding, black holes (BH) are the driving engine of jet formation5, and indeed the recent Event Horizon Telescope observations revealed a ring-like structure in agreement with theoretical models of accretion onto a rotating Kerr BH6. In addition to the spin of the BH being a potential source of energy for the launching mechanism, magnetic fields are believed to play a key role in the formation of relativistic jets7,8. A priori, the spin, a, of the BH in M87 is unknown; however, when accounting for the estimates of the X-ray luminosity and jet power, values of \(\left|{a}_{\star }\right|\gtrsim 0.5\) appear favoured6. Besides the properties of the accretion flow and the BH spin, the radiation microphysics including the particle distribution (thermal6 and non-thermal9,10) as well as the particle acceleration mechanism11 play a crucial role. We show that general relativistic magnetohydrodynamic simulations and general relativistic radiative transfer calculations can reproduce the broadband spectrum from the radio to the near-infrared regime and simultaneously match the observed collimation profile of M87, thus allowing us to set rough constraints on the dimensionless spin of M87* to be 0.5 a 1.0, with higher spins being possibly favoured.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type



Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Large-scale 3D morphology of the jet and disk from a 3D GRMHD MAD simulation for a BH with a = 0.9375.
Fig. 2: Broadband spectrum of the flux density of M87.
Fig. 3: Morphological comparison between observations and theoretical models.
Fig. 4: Jet diameter comparison between observations and theoretical models.

Data availability

The data that support the plots within this paper and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

Code availability

The publicly released version of the GRMHD code BHAC can be found at The eht-imaging software to convolve the images is available at repository


  1. Kovalev, Y. Y., Lister, M. L., Homan, D. C. & Kellermann, K. I. The inner jet of the radio galaxy M87. Astrophys. J. Lett. 668, L27–L30 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Asada, K. & Nakamura, M. The structure of the M87 jet: a transition from parabolic to conical streamlines. Astrophys. J. Lett. 745, L28 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Walker, R. C., Hardee, P. E., Davies, F. B., Ly, C. & Junor, W. The structure and dynamics of the subparsec jet in M87 based on 50 VLBA observations over 17 years at 43 GHz. Astrophys. J. 855, 128 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim, J.-Y. et al. The limb-brightened jet of M87 down to the 7 Schwarzschild radii scale. Astron. Astrophys. 616, A188 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Blandford, R. D. & Znajek, R. L. Electromagnetic extraction of energy from Kerr black holes. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 179, 433–456 (1977).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration et al. First M87 Event Horizon Telescope results. V. Physical origin of the asymmetric ring. Astrophys. J. Lett. 875, L5 (2019).

  7. Narayan, R., Igumenshchev, I. V. & Abramowicz, M. A. Magnetically arrested disk: an energetically efficient accretion flow. Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn 55, L69–L72 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Narayan, R., Sa̧dowski, A., Penna, R. F. & Kulkarni, A. K. GRMHD simulations of magnetized advection-dominated accretion on a non-spinning black hole: role of outflows. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 426, 3241–3259 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim, J.-Y. et al. Long-term millimeter VLBI monitoring of M 87 with KVN at milliarcsecond resolution: nuclear spectrum. Astron. Astrophys. 610, L5 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Junor, W. & Biretta, J. A. The radio jet in 3C274 at 0.01 pc resolution. Astron. J. 109, 500–506 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ball, D., Sironi, L. & Özel, F. Electron and proton acceleration in trans-relativistic magnetic reconnection: dependence on plasma beta and magnetization. Astrophys. J. 862, 80 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Xiao, F. Modelling energetic particles by a relativistic kappa-loss-cone distribution function in plasmas. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 48, 203–213 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Davelaar, J. et al. Modeling non-thermal emission from the jet-launching region of M 87 with adaptive mesh refinement. Astron. Astrophys. 632, A2 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mizuno, Y. et al. Comparison of the ion-to-electron temperature ratio prescription: GRMHD simulations with electron thermodynamics. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 506, 741–758 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Younsi, Z., Porth, O., Mizuno, Y., Fromm, C. M. & Olivares, H. Modelling the polarised emission from black holes on event horizon-scales. In Proc. International Astronomical Union, Symposium S342, Perseus in Sicily: From Black Hole to Cluster Outskirts Vol. 14 (eds Asada, K. et al.) 9–12 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2020).

  16. Mościbrodzka, M., Falcke, H., Shiokawa, H. & Gammie, C. F. Observational appearance of inefficient accretion flows and jets in 3D GRMHD simulations: application to Sagittarius A*. Astron. Astrophys. 570, A7 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Doeleman, S. S. et al. Jet-launching structure resolved near the supermassive black hole in M87. Science 338, 355–358 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Perlman, E. S. et al. Deep 10 micron imaging of M87. Astrophys. J. 561, L51–L54 (2001).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lonsdale, C. J., Doeleman, S. S. & Phillips, R. B. A 3 millimeter VLBI continuum source survey. Astron. J. 116, 8–12 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Whysong, D. & Antonucci, R. Thermal emission as a test for hidden nuclei in nearby radio galaxies. Astrophys. J. 602, 116–122 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Akiyama, K. et al. 230 GHz VLBI observations of M87: event-horizon-scale structure during an enhanced very-high-energy γ-ray state in 2012. Astrophys. J. 807, 150 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Prieto, M. A., Fernández-Ontiveros, J. A., Markoff, S., Espada, D. & González-Martín, O. The central parsecs of M87: jet emission and an elusive accretion disc. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 457, 3801–3816 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hada, K. et al. Pilot KaVA monitoring on the M 87 jet: confirming the inner jet structure and superluminal motions at sub-pc scales. Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn 69, 71 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. An, T., Sohn, B. W. & Imai, H. Capabilities and prospects of the East Asia Very Long Baseline Interferometry Network. Nat. Astron. 2, 118–125 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lister, M. L. et al. MOJAVE. XV. VLBA 15 GHz total intensity and polarization maps of 437 parsec-scale AGN jets from 1996 to 2017. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 234, 12 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Nakamura, M. et al. Parabolic jets from the spinning black hole in M87. Astrophys. J. 868, 146 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Mizuno, Y. et al. The current ability to test theories of gravity with black hole shadows. Nat. Astron. 2, 585–590 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Porth, O. et al. The black hole accretion code. Comput. Astrophys. Cosmol. 4, 1 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Rezzolla, L & Zanotti, O. Relativistic Hydrodynamics (Oxford Univ. Press, 2013).

  30. Olivares, H. et al. Constrained transport and adaptive mesh refinement in the Black Hole Accretion Code. Astron. Astrophys. 629, A61 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Font, J. A. & Daigne, F. On the stability of thick accretion disks around black holes. Astrophys. J. 581, L23–L26 (2002).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Shiokawa, H., Dolence, J. C., Gammie, C. F. & Noble, S. C. Global general relativistic magnetohydrodynamic simulations of black hole accretion flows: a convergence study. Astrophys. J. 744, 187 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. Gold, R. et al. Verification of radiative transfer schemes for the EHT. Astrophys. J. 897, 148 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. Younsi, Z., Wu, K. & Fuerst, S. V. General relativistic radiative transfer: formulation and emission from structured tori around black holes. Astron. Astrophys. 545, A13 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. Event Horizon Telescope Collaborationet al. First M87 Event Horizon Telescope results. I. The shadow of the supermassive black hole. Astrophys. J. Lett. 875, L1 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. Mościbrodzka, M., Gammie, C. F., Dolence, J. C., Shiokawa, H. & Leung, P. K. Radiative models of SGR A* from GRMHD simulations. Astrophys. J. 706, 497–507 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. Chael, A., Narayan, R. & Johnson, M. D. Two-temperature, Magnetically Arrested Disc simulations of the jet from the supermassive black hole in M87. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 486, 2873–2895 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. Nemmen, R. The spin of M87*. Astrophys. J. Lett. 880, L26 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. Feng, J. & Wu, Q. Constraint on the black hole spin of M87 from the accretion-jet model. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 470, 612–616 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. Event Horizon Telescope Collaborationet al. First M87 Event Horizon Telescope results. VII. Polarization of the ring. Astrophys. J. Lett. 910, L12 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. Event Horizon Telescope Collaborationet al. First M87 Event Horizon Telescope results. VIII. Magnetic field structure near the event horizon. Astrophys. J. Lett. 910, L13 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. Mertens, F., Lobanov, A. P., Walker, R. C. & Hardee, P. E. Kinematics of the jet in M 87 on scales of 100–1000 Schwarzschild radii. Astron. Astrophys. 595, A54 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references


This research is supported by the ERC synergy grant ‘BlackHoleCam: Imaging the Event Horizon of Black Holes’ (grant no. 610058). C.M.F. is supported by the Black Hole Initiative at Harvard University, which is supported by a grant from the John Templeton Foundation. A.N. was supported by the Hellenic Foundation for Research and Innovation (H.F.R.I.) under the ‘2nd Call for H.F.R.I. Research Projects to support Post-Doctoral Researchers’ (project no. 00634). Z.Y. is supported by a UK Research and Innovation Stephen Hawking Fellowship and acknowledges support from a Leverhulme Trust Early Career Fellowship. J.D. is supported by NASA grant no. NNX17AL82 and a Joint Columbia/Flatiron Postdoctoral Fellowship. Research at the Flatiron Institute is supported by the Simons Foundation. The simulations were performed on Goethe-HLR at the Center for Scientific Computing in Frankfurt, on Iboga at the Institut für Theoretische Physik in Frankfurt, and on Pi2.0 at Shanghai Jiao Tong University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



A.C.-O. and C.M.F. performed and analysed the GRRT calculations and wrote the manuscript. Y.M. performed the GRMHD simulations and wrote the manuscript. A.N. wrote the manuscript. Z.Y. authored the GRRT code BHOSS. O.P. authored the GRMHD code BHAC. J.D. helped in the GRRT calculations. H.F. and M.K. wrote the manuscript. L.R. wrote the manuscript and coordinated the various aspects of the research. All authors discussed the results and commented on all versions of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Alejandro Cruz-Osorio, Christian M. Fromm or Yosuke Mizuno.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Astronomy thanks Bidisha Bandyopadhyay and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Large-scale morphology of the jet from GRMHD simulations of a Kerr BH with spin a = 0.9375 (the BH spin is aligned with the z axis).

a) Shown the magnetisation parameters σ, b) the dimensionless electron temperature Θe, c) the distribution of the power-law index κ, and d) the weighted temperature w. All quantities are averaged in space (over the azimuthal direction) and in time (over a time interval of 2,000 M with a cadence of 10 M). The white dashed line marks the boundary between bounded and unbounded (Be > 1.02) material, while the black lines show the most important contours of the logarithm of the magnetisation, \({{{\mathrm{log}}}\,}_{10}\sigma =-1.0,\,0.0\), and 0.5. Moving out from the polar axis, we report the contours for the ‘jet spine’, the ‘jet sheath’, and the ‘external wall’.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Small-scale morphology of the jet from GRMHD simulations.

Same as in Extended Data Fig. 1, Kerr BH with spin a = 0.9375 but on smaller lengthscales.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Same as in Fig. 2, but considering five different values of the black hole spin.

Solid and dotted lines represent nonthermal and thermal emission models, respectively. While gray vertical lines show the most representative frequencies. For each observational data, the uncertainties indicate the variability during the observations.

Extended Data Fig. 4 GRRT and convolved images.

The top panels shown the GRRT, while bottom shown convolved images for thermal and nonthermal emission models for two BHs with spins a= 0.50 and a= 0.9375. The images refer to a representative time (t = 13, 820 M) and we show as an ellipse in the lower-left corner the convolving beam with axes 116 × 307 μas, as in the observational data. The contours in the flux density correspond to \({S}_{i}={S}_{{{{\rm{m}}}}in}+0.43\ {{{\rm{m}}}}Jy\times {\sqrt{2}}^{i}\), where i = 0, 1, …, n, such that Sn < Smax.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Same as in Extended Data Figure 4, but showing the time average computed between 13,000 M and 15,000 M.

Note that all of the features discussed in Fig. Extended Data Figure 4 are present also when averaging in time.

Extended Data Fig. 6 χ2 for the jet width.

χ2 between the observational data and the jet width measured from the numerical simulations (see Fig. 4).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cruz-Osorio, A., Fromm, C.M., Mizuno, Y. et al. State-of-the-art energetic and morphological modelling of the launching site of the M87 jet. Nat Astron 6, 103–108 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing