Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

A more probable explanation for a continuum flash towards a redshift ≈ 11 galaxy

The Original Article was published on 14 December 2020

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Data availability

Data used in this work are available from the Keck Observatory Archive (https://www2.keck.hawaii.edu/koa/public/koa.php) with specific filenames given in Supplementary Table 1.

References

  1. 1.

    Jiang, L. et al. A possible bright ultraviolet flash from a galaxy at redshift z ≈ 11. Nat. Astron. 5, 262–267 (2021).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Oesch, P. A. et al. A remarkably luminous galaxy at z=11.1 measured with Hubble Space Telescope grism spectroscopy. Astrophys. J. 819, 129–139 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Jakobsson, P. J. et al. Swift identification of dark gamma-ray bursts. Astrophys. J. 617, L21–L24 (2004).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Japelj, J. S. et al. Spectrophotometric analysis of gamma-ray burst afterglow extinction curves with X-Shooter. Astron. Astrophys. 579, A74–A90 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Li, L. et al. A correlated study of optical and X-Ray afterglows of GRBs. Astrophys. J. 805, 13–44 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Mészáros, P. & Rees, M. J. GRB 990123: reverse and internal shock flashes and late afterglow behaviour. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 306, L39–L43 (1999).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Campana, S. V. et al. The association of GRB 060218 with a supernova and the evolution of the shock wave. Nature 442, 1008–1010 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Toma, K., Sakamoto, T. & Mészáros, P. Population III gamma-ray burst afterglows: constraints on stellar masses and external medium densities. Astrophys. J. 731, 127–142 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Uhm, Z. L. & Zhang, B. Fast-cooling synchrotron radiation in a decaying magnetic field and γ-ray burst emission mechanism. Nat. Phys. 10, 351–356 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Corbett, H. et al. Orbital foregrounds for ultra-short duration transients. Astrophys. J. 903, L27 (2020).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Blake, J. A. et al. DebrisWatch I: a survey of faint geosynchronous debris. Adv. Space Res. 67, 360–370 (2021).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Nir, G., Ofek, E. O. & Gal-Yam, A. The GN-z11-flash event can be a satellite glint. Res. Notes AAS 5, 27 (2021).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Michałowski, M. J., Kamiński, K., Kamińska, M. K. & Wnuk, E. GN-z11-flash from a man-made satellite not a gamma-ray burst at redshift 11. Nat. Astron. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-021-01472-3 (2021).

  14. 14.

    Borncamp, D. & Lim, P. L. in Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXVI (eds Molinaro, M. et al.) 491–494 (ASP, 2019).

  15. 15.

    Kann, D. A., Blazek, M., de Ugarte Postigo, A. & Thöne, C. C. GN-z11-flash in the context of gamma-ray burst afterglows. Res. Not. Am. Astron. Soc. 4, 247–249 (2020).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Jiang, L. et al. L. Jiang et al. reply. Nat Astron. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-021-01474-1 (2021).

  17. 17.

    Tukey, J. W. Comparing individual means in the analysis of variance. Biometrics 5, 99–114 (1949).

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Šidák, Z. Rectangular confidence regions for the means of multivariate normal distributions. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 62, 626–633 (1967).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Holm, S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand. J. Stat. 6, 65–70 (1979).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Kramer, C. Y. Extension of Multiple range tests to group means with unequal numbers of replications. Biometrics 12, 307–310 (1956).

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Meftah, M. et al. SOLAR-ISS: a new reference spectrum based on SOLAR/SOLSPEC observations. Astron. Astrophys. 611, A1–A14 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

C.L.S. is supported by ERC grant number 648179 ‘ConTExt’. The Cosmic Dawn Center (DAWN) is funded by the Danish National Research Foundation under grant no. 140. B.M.-J. is supported in part by Independent Research Fund Denmark grant number DFF-7014-00017. J.P.U.F. acknowledges support from the Carlsberg foundation. This research has made use of the Keck Observatory Archive (KOA), which is operated by the W. M. Keck Observatory and the NASA Exoplanet Science Institute (NExScI), under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The authors wish to recognize and acknowledge the very significant cultural role and reverence that the summit of Maunakea has always had within the indigenous Hawaiian community. We are most fortunate to have the opportunity to conduct observations from this mountain.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

C.L.S. took the lead in writing the manuscript. G.B.B. took the lead in the archival search presented in the Supplementary Information. All authors provided critical feedback and helped shape the research, analysis and manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles Louis Steinhardt.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Astronomy thanks Bahram Mobasher and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–4 and Table 1.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Steinhardt, C.L., Andersen, M.I., Brammer, G.B. et al. A more probable explanation for a continuum flash towards a redshift ≈ 11 galaxy. Nat Astron 5, 993–994 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-021-01473-2

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing