Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Martian water loss to space enhanced by regional dust storms

Abstract

Mars has lost most of its initial water to space as atomic hydrogen and oxygen. Spacecraft measurements have determined that present-day hydrogen escape undergoes large variations with season that are inconsistent with long-standing explanations. The cause is incompletely understood, with likely contributions from seasonal changes in atmospheric circulation, dust activity and solar extreme ultraviolet input. Although some modelling and indirect observational evidence suggest that dust activity can explain the seasonal trend, no previous study has been able to unambiguously distinguish seasonal from dust-driven forcing. Here we present synoptic measurements of dust, temperature, ice, water and hydrogen on Mars during a regional dust event, demonstrating that individual dust events can boost planetary H loss by a factor of five to ten. This regional storm occurred in the declining phase of the known seasonal trend, establishing that dust forcing can override this trend to drive enhanced escape. Because similar regional storms occur in most Mars years, these storms may be responsible for a large fraction of Martian water loss and represent an important driver of Mars atmospheric evolution.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Atmospheric response to the Mars Year 34 C regional dust event.
Fig. 2: Paradigm for dust-driven and seasonal versus impulsive escape at Mars.

Data availability

MCS-derived and IUVS radiance data shown in Fig. 1 are available to the public on the Planetary Data System Planetary Atmospheres Node (MCS, https://atmos.nmsu.edu/data_and_services/atmospheres_data/MARS/mcs.html; IUVS, https://atmos.nmsu.edu/data_and_services/atmospheres_data/MAVEN/maven_iuvs.html). NOMAD and ACS data are available on the Planetary Science Archive of the European Space Agency at https://archives.esac.esa.int/psa. Complete datasets of retrieved water abundances from NOMAD are available on the BIRA-IASB data repository at http://repository.aeronomie.be/?doi=10.18758/71021054. ACS water data are available at http://exomars.cosmos.ru/ACS_Results_stormy_water_vREzUd4pxG.

Code availability

Figure 1 results from plotting the accessible datasets described previously. The data reduction procedures to produce these data for the MCS, IUVS, NOMAD and ACS datasets are described in the Methods and references therein.

References

  1. 1.

    Owen, T., Maillard, J. P., de Bergh, C. & Lutz, B. L. Deuterium on Mars: the abundance of HDO and the value of D/H. Science 240, 1767–1770 (1988).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Anderson, D. E. Jr. & Hord, C. W. Mariner 6 and 7 ultraviolet spectrometer experiment: analysis of hydrogen Lyman-alpha data. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 76, 6666–6673 (1971).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    McElroy, M. B. & Donahue, T. M. Stability of the Martian atmosphere. Science 177, 986–988 (1972).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Parkinson, T. D. & Hunten, D. M. Spectroscopy and aeronomy of O2 on Mars. J. Atmos. Sci. 29, 1380–1390 (1972).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Chaffin, M. S. et al. Unexpected variability of Martian hydrogen escape. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 314–320 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Clarke, J. T. et al. A rapid decrease of the hydrogen corona of Mars. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 8013–8020 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Bhattacharyya, D., Clarke, J. T., Bertaux, J.-L., Chaufray, J.-Y. & Mayyasi, M. A strong seasonal dependence in the Martian hydrogen exosphere. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 8678–8685 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Halekas, J. S. Seasonal variability of the hydrogen exosphere of Mars. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 122, 901–911 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Heavens, N. G. et al. Hydrogen escape from Mars enhanced by deep convection in dust storms. Nat. Astron. 2, 126–132 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Clarke, J. T. Dust-enhanced water escape. Nat. Astron. 2, 114–115 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Fedorova, A. et al. Water vapor in the middle atmosphere of Mars during the 2007 global dust storm. Icarus 300, 440–457 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Fedorova, A. A. et al. Stormy water on Mars: the distribution and saturation of atmospheric water during the dusty season. Science 367, 297–300 (2020).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Aoki, S. et al. Water vapor vertical profiles on Mars in dust storms observed by TGO/NOMAD. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 124, 3482–3497 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Wu, Z., Li, T., Zhang, X., Li, J. & Cui, J. Dust tides and rapid meridional motions in the Martian atmosphere during major dust storms. Nat. Commun. 11, 614 (2020).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Liuzzi, G. et al. Strong variability of Martian water ice clouds during dust storms revealed from ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter/NOMAD. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 125, e2019JE006250 (2020).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Connour, K. et al. Mars’s twilight cloud band: a new cloud feature seen during the Mars year 34 global dust storm. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e2019GL084997 (2020).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Stone, S. W. et al. Hydrogen escape from Mars is driven by seasonal and dust storm transport of water. Science 370, 824–831 (2020).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Chaffin, M. S., Deighan, J., Schneider, N. M. & Stewart, A. I. F. Elevated atmospheric escape of atomic hydrogen from Mars induced by high-altitude water. Nat. Geosci. 10, 174–178 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Maltagliati, L. et al. Evidence of water vapor in excess of saturation in the atmosphere of Mars. Science 333, 1868–1871 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Maltagliati, L. et al. Annual survey of water vapor vertical distribution and water–aerosol coupling in the Martian atmosphere observed by SPICAM/MEx solar occultations. Icarus 223, 942–962 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Shaposhnikov, D. S., Medvedev, A. S., Rodin, A. V. & Hartogh, P. Seasonal water ‘pump’ in the atmosphere of Mars: vertical transport to the thermosphere. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 4161–4169 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Neary, L. et al. Explanation for the increase in high-altitude water on Mars observed by NOMAD during the 2018 global dust storm. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e2019GL084354 (2020).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    McCleese, D. J. et al. Mars Climate Sounder: an investigation of thermal and water vapor structure, dust and condensate distributions in the atmosphere, and energy balance of the polar regions. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 112, E05S06 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Kleinböhl, A. et al. Mars Climate Sounder limb profile retrieval of atmospheric temperature, pressure, and dust and water ice opacity. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 114, E10006 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Kleinböhl, A., Friedson, A. J. & Schofield, J. T. Two-dimensional radiative transfer for the retrieval of limb emission measurements in the Martian atmosphere. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 187, 511–522 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Korablev, O. et al. The Atmospheric Chemistry Suite (ACS) of three spectrometers for the ExoMars 2016 Trace Gas Orbiter. Space Sci. Rev. 214, 7 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Vandaele, A. et al. Science objectives and performances of NOMAD, a spectrometer suite for the ExoMars TGO mission. Planet. Space Sci. 119, 233–249 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    McClintock, W. E. et al. The Imaging Ultraviolet Spectrograph (IUVS) for the MAVEN Mission. Space Sci. Rev. 195, 75–124 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Chaffin, M. S. et al. Three-dimensional structure in the Mars H corona revealed by IUVS on MAVEN. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 9001–9008 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Kass, D. M., Kleinböhl, A., McCleese, D. J., Schofield, J. T. & Smith, M. D. Interannual similarity in the Martian atmosphere during the dust storm season. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 6111–6118 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Kass, D. et al. Mars Climate Sounder observation of Mars’ 2018 global dust storm. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e83931 (2020).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Jain, S. K. et al. Martian thermospheric warming associated with the Planet Encircling Dust Event of 2018. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e85302 (2020).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Kockarts, G. & Nicolet, M. Le problème aéronomique de l’hélium et de l’hydrogène neutres. Ann. Geophys. 18, 269 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Mayyasi, M. et al. Significant space weather impact on the escape of hydrogen from Mars. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 8844–8852 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Bhattacharyya, D., Clarke, J., Bertaux, J.-L., Chaufray, J.-Y. & Mayyasi, M. Analysis and modeling of remote observations of the Martian hydrogen exosphere. Icarus 281, 264–280 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Chaffin, M. S. et al. Mars H escape rates derived from MAVEN/IUVS Lyman alpha brightness measurements and their dependence on model assumptions. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 123, 2192–2210 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Halekas, J. S. et al. Structure, dynamics, and seasonal variability of the Mars-solar wind interaction: MAVEN Solar Wind Ion Analyzer in-flight performance and science results. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 122, 547–578 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Hughes, A. et al. Proton aurora on Mars: a dayside phenomenon pervasive in southern summer. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 124, 10533–10548 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Montabone, L. et al. Martian year 34 column dust climatology from Mars Climate Sounder observations: reconstructed maps and model simulations. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 125, e2019JE006111 (2020).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Heavens, N. G., Kass, D. M. & Shirley, J. H. Dusty deep convection in the Mars Year 34 Planet-Encircling Dust Event. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 124, 2863–2892 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Kleinböhl, A. et al. Diurnal variations of dust during the 2018 global dust storm observed by the Mars Climate Sounder. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 125, e06115 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Elrod, M., Bougher, S., Roeten, K., Murphy, J. & Sharrar, R. Structural and compositional changes in the upper atmosphere related to the PEDE-2018a dust event on Mars as observed by MAVEN NGIMS. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e2019GL084378 (2020).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Jakosky, B. M. et al. Loss of the Martian atmosphere to space: present-day loss rates determined from MAVEN observations and integrated loss through time. Icarus 315, 146–157 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Deighan, J. et al. MAVEN IUVS observation of the hot oxygen corona at Mars. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 9009–9014 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Lillis, R. et al. Photochemical escape of oxygen from Mars: first results from MAVEN in situ data. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 122, 3815–3836 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Krasnopolsky, V. A. Photochemistry of water in the Martian thermosphere and its effect on hydrogen escape. Icarus 321, 62–70 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Fox, J. L. & Hać, A. B. Photochemical escape of oxygen from Mars: a comparison of the exobase approximation to a Monte Carlo method. Icarus 204, 527–544 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Laskar, J. et al. Long term evolution and chaotic diffusion of the insolation quantities of Mars. Icarus 170, 343–364 (2004).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Lindner, B. L. & Jakosky, B. M. Martian atmospheric photochemistry and composition during periods of low obliquity. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 90, 3435–3440 (1985).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Richardson, M. I. & Wilson, R. J. A topographically forced asymmetry in the Martian circulation and climate. Nature 416, 298–301 (2002).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Zurek, R. W. & Smrekar, S. E. An overview of the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) science mission. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 112, E05S01 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Kleinböhl, A., Schofield, J. T., Abdou, W. A., Irwin, P. G. J. & de Kok, R. J. A single-scattering approximation for infrared radiative transfer in limb geometry in the Martian atmosphere. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 112, 1568–1580 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Vandaele, A. C., Kruglanski, M. and de Mazière, M. Modeling and Retrieval of Atmospheric Spectra Using ASIMUT. In Proc. 1st Atmospheric Science Conference (ed. Lacoste, H) Vol. 628 (ESA, 2006).

  54. 54.

    Gordon, I. E. et al. The HITRAN2016 molecular spectroscopic database. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 203, 3–69 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Gamache, R. R., Farese, M. & Renaud, C. L. A spectral line list for water isotopologues in the 1100–4100 cm−1 region for application to CO2-rich planetary atmospheres. J. Mol. Spectrosc. 326, 144–150 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Neary, L. & Daerden, F. The GEM-Mars general circulation model for Mars: description and evaluation. Icarus 300, 458–476 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Rodgers, C. D. Inverse Methods for Atmospheric Sounding: Theory and Practice (World Scientific, 2000).

  58. 58.

    Ceccherini, S. Analytical determination of the regularization parameter in the retrieval of atmospheric vertical profiles. Opt. Lett. 30, 2554–2556 (2005).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Ceccherini, S., Belotti, C., Carli, B., Raspollini, P. & Ridolfi, M. Technical Note: Regularization performances with the error consistency method in the case of retrieved atmospheric profiles. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 7, 1435–1440 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Millour, E. et al. The Mars Climate Database (MCD version 5.2). In Proc. European Planetary Science Congress 2015 EPSC2015-438 (EPSC, 2015).

  61. 61.

    Eparvier, F. G., Chamberlin, P. C., Woods, T. N. & Thiemann, E. M. B. The Solar Extreme Ultraviolet monitor for MAVEN. Space Sci. Rev. 195, 293–301 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by NASA through the MAVEN and MRO projects. IUVS data products were produced using the RMACC Summit supercomputer, which is supported by the National Science Foundation (award nos. ACI-1532235 and ACI-1532236), by the University of Colorado Boulder and by Colorado State University. The Summit supercomputer is a joint effort of the University of Colorado Boulder and Colorado State University. M.M.J.C. is supported by the NASA Postdoctoral Program at the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, which is administered by the Universities Space Research Association under contract with NASA. A.K. acknowledges support from the NASA Mars Data Analysis Program (80NM0018F0719). Work at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, is performed under contract with NASA. ExoMars is a space mission of the European Space Agency and Roscosmos. The NOMAD experiment is led by the Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy (BIRA-IASB), assisted by co-principal investigator teams from Spain (IAA-CSIC), Italy (INAF-IAPS) and the United Kingdom (Open University). For this project we acknowledge funding by the Belgian Science Policy Office, with financial and contractual coordination by the European Space Agency Prodex Office (PEA 4000103401 and 4000121493); by the Spanish MICINN through its Plan Nacional; by European funds under grant nos. PGC2018-101836-B-I00 and ESP2017-87143-R (MINECO/FEDER); by the United Kingdom Space Agency through grant nos. ST/R005761/1, ST/P001262/1, ST/R001405/1 and ST/S00145X/1; and by the Italian Space Agency through grant no. 2018-2-HH.0. The IAA-CSIC team acknowledges financial support from the State Agency for Research of the Spanish MCIU through the ‘Center of Excellence Severo Ochoa’ award for the Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía (SEV-2017-0709). This work was supported by the Belgian Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique-FNRS under grant nos. 30442502 (ET_HOME) and T.0171.16 (CRAMIC) and by the Belgian Science Policy Office BrainBe SCOOP Project. S.A. is ‘Chargé de Recherches’ at the F.R.S.-FNRS. NOMAD’s United States investigators are supported by NASA. Science operations of ACS on TGO are funded by Roscosmos and the ESA. IKI affiliates acknowledge support from the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation. F.M. acknowledges funding from the CNES and ANR (PRCI, CE31 AAPG2019-MCUBE project).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.S.C. oversaw the study and cross-instrument comparison and performed MAVEN IUVS H data analysis. D.M.K., N.G.H. and A.K. performed MCS data analysis. S.A. analysed the NOMAD data. I.R.T. and J.T.E. calibrated the NOMAD data and planned NOMAD observations, assisted by B.R. F.D. helped assess the scientific relevance of NOMAD detections. A.C.V., M.R.P., G.B. and J.-J.L.-M. supervised the scientific observations of NOMAD. A.A.F. performed the TGO/ACS data analysis. J.D. identified the event in the IUVS data and suggested follow-up. K.C. provided IUVS apoapsis images of clouds. All authors made significant contributions to understanding or operating the instruments for which data are presented and participated in the preparation of the manuscript text.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. S. Chaffin.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Astronomy thanks Claire Newman and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Geometry of MAVEN apoapsis location throughout the MAVEN mission.

MAVEN orbit numbers and Earth Year/Month dates are shown on the bottom axis, with Mars Year and Ls on the top axis. The blue/brown and green curves show the location of MAVEN’s apoapsis in solar zenith angle (SZA) and local time, and in geographic latitude, respectively. The tan curve shows the latitude of the subsolar point. Intermittent spacecraft activities such as MAVEN Deep Dips (DD-X), Earth-Sun-Mars conjunctions, and the recent aerobraking campaigns are also indicated. IUVS Stellar occultation campaigns are indicated with the star icons. Time periods useful for IUVS H loss measurements occur when apoapsis SZA and latitude are both close to zero and occur relatively rarely in the dataset. Unfortunately these time periods are relatively rare in the dataset.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Geometry of TGO and IUVS observations shown in Fig. 1.

Points show the Mars surface geometry of the point along the observation line of sight with minimum ray height. For TGO, occultations are made in both hemispheres, but Fig. 1 shows only Southern Hemisphere data. MCS observations are made at 3 PM across all latitudes, and zonally averaged across longitudes, and so are not shown here. Both TGO and IUVS observing geometry evolved with time over the period of the study, with minimal impact on the conclusion that regional storms can make possible large amounts of high-altitude water that subsequently increases coronal H abundances and loss rates.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Comparison of middle atmosphere water retrievals.

From top to bottom, water retrieved in the Northern Hemisphere by ACS and NOMAD; MCS water retrievals using the methods of Heavens et al. 2018; and Southern Hemisphere water retrievals from ACS and NOMAD. Data presented in the text comes from the Southern Hemisphere, from ACS before Ls 330, and from NOMAD afterward. Color scales are unique to each instrument for clarity, but because these schemes are perceptual the perceived darkness in each panel is a trustworthy indicator of the water abundance retrieved. ACS retrieved abundances are higher than NOMAD abundances and display larger variations; MCS retrievals are higher than both and limited in altitude range.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chaffin, M.S., Kass, D.M., Aoki, S. et al. Martian water loss to space enhanced by regional dust storms. Nat Astron (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-021-01425-w

Download citation

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing