Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

GRAVITATIONAL WAVES

Something for nothing

Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz3457 (2019)

Ever since 70 observatories around the world (and in space) detected electromagnetic waves following the merger of two neutron stars in the gravitational wave (GW) event GW170817, the astronomy community has been waiting for another merger event involving a neutron star. A coalescence of a binary neutron star (BNS) system or a neutron star and a black hole (NSBH) would produce a kilonova that emits at almost all observable wavelengths. But of the multiple GW detections since GW170817, no electromagnetic counterparts have been convincingly detected, despite prompt searches after each GW trigger. Michael Coughlin and co-workers analyse the data from the non-kilonova detections to establish constraints on the ejecta mass and properties of the source objects.

Specifically, Coughlin et al. apply three different kilonova models (two Gaussian process regressions and one semi-analytic model) to follow up on five events predicted to have a non-zero remnant mass. For each model they determine the ejecta mass constraints for various values of one key quantity: the lanthanide fraction (1), the temperature (2) and the opacities (3). These three parameters control the kilonova brightness and colour. The authors found the tightest constraints for S190425z, a BNS merger candidate, with a total mass of 2.5–2.9 M depending of the stiffness of the equation of state; for S190426c, a candidate NSBH merger, the non-detection of a kilonova rules out large aligned black hole spins with low-mass stars. Improvements to these constraints will require deeper observations, at the expense of sky coverage.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to May Chiao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chiao, M. Something for nothing. Nat Astron 4, 16 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-019-1003-9

Download citation

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing