Australian astronomy is undergoing a great change in culture, diversity and inclusion through major nationwide and university-scale initiatives. These initiatives include prestigious women-only faculty hires, broad diversity targets, concrete activities to overcome implicit bias, and innovative initiatives to change the academic culture and environment. Many of these activities were precipitated by the Pleiades Awards programme run by the Astronomical Society of Australia and by initiatives developed within the Australia-wide Centres of Excellence in astrophysics. I provide an overview of the nationwide programmes that are making an important impact on diversity, culture and climate, and describe the most promising and innovative initiatives in Australian universities and institutions. The striking changes seen in Australian astronomy can be triggered in other countries by similar awards programmes initiated by national astronomical societies or Academies of Science.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $8.25 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Figure 1 was created with publicly available data from the Higher Education Staff Database: https://www.education.gov.au/staff-data. Figures 2 and 4 were created with publicly available data from the ASA: http://asa.astronomy.org.au/awards.html and https://mailman.sydney.edu.au/pipermail/asa/Week-of-Mon-20190114/005234.html. Information on diversity initiatives at astronomer departments and organizations in Australia (including Fig. 3) was provided solely for the purpose of this publication by the heads of department, directors and diversity committee chairs from the ARC ASTRO 3D and OzGrav, ANU, CASS, Curtin University, Macquarie University, Monash University, Swinburne University of Technology, University of Adelaide, University of Melbourne, University of New South Wales, University of Queensland, University of Southern Queensland, University of Sydney, University of Tasmania, University of Western Australia and Western Sydney University. The survey data and derived statistics can be provided by the author upon reasonable request, if agreement from the individual institution heads of department, directors and diversity chairs is obtained.
Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J. & Handelsman, J. Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 16474–16479 (2012).
Helmer, M., Schottdorf, M., Neef, A. & Battaglia, A. Gender bias in scholarly peer review. eLife 6, e21718 (2017).
Caplar, N., Tacchella, S. & Birrer, S. Quantitative evaluation of gender bias in astronomical publications from citation counts. Nat. Astron. 1, 0141 (2017).
Viner, N., Powell, P. & Green, R. Institutionalized biases in the award of research grants: a preliminary analysis revisiting the principle of accumulative advantage. Res. Policy 33, 443–454 (2004).
Reid, N. I. Gender-correlated systematics in HST proposal selection. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 126, 923–934 (2014).
Patat, F. Gender systematics in telescope time allocation at ESO. Messenger 165, 2–9 (2016).
Whitelegg, E., Hodgson, B. K., Scanlon, E. & Donovan, C. Young women’s perceptions and experiences of becoming a research physicist. Proc. 12th Int. Conf. Women Engineers and Scientists Paper no. 167 (Open Research Online, 2002).
Nittrouera, C. L. et al. Gender disparities in colloquium speakers at top universities. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 104–108 (2018).
Jones, E. G., Horner, J., Cairns, A. & Short, W. Gender balance and inclusion within the Australian space community: an overview of delegates at the 2018 Australian Space Research Conference. Proc. 18th Australian Space Research Conf. https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.12358 (2019).
Lunnemann, P., Jensen, M. H. & Jauffred, L. Gender bias in Nobel prizes. Palgrave Commun. 5, 46 (2019).
Yifang, M., Oliveira, D. F. M., Woodruff, T. K. & Uzzi, B. Women who win prizes get less money and prestige. Nature 565, 287–288 (2019).
Winchester, H., Shard, L., Browning, L. & Chesterman, C. Academic women’s promotions in Australian universities. Empl. Relat. 28, 505–522 (2006).
Winchester, H. & Browning, L. Gender equality in academia: a critical reflection. J. High. Educ. Policy Manag. 37, 269–281 (2015).
Challice, G., Compton, S., Phillips, B. & Vickers, N. 2018 Graduate Outcomes Survey—Longitudinal (GOS-L). https://www.qilt.edu.au/about-this-site/graduate-employment (2018).
Ivie, R., White, S. & Chu, R. Y. Women’s and men’s career choices in astronomy and astrophysics. Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 12, 020109 (2016).
Aloisi, A. & Reid, N. (Un)conscious bias in the astronomical profession: universal recommendations to improve fairness, inclusiveness, and representation. State of the Profession White Paper, Astro 2020 Decadal Survey (2019); https://arxiv.org/pdf/1907.05261.pdf
Martell, R. F., Lane, D. M. & Emrich, C. Male–female differences: a computer simulation. Am. Psychol. 51, 157–158 (1996).
Bezrukova, K., Spell, C. S., Perry, J. L. & Jehn, K. A. A meta-analytical integration of over 40 years of research on diversity training evaluation. Psychol. Bull. 142, 1227–1274 (2016).
Clancy, K. B. H., Lee, K. M. N., Rodgers, E. M. & Richey, C. Double jeopardy in astronomy and planetary science: women of color face greater risks of gendered and racial harassment. JGR Planets 122, 1610–1623 (2017).
Brannon, T. N. & Walton, G. M. Enacting cultural interests: how intergroup contact reduces prejudice by sparking interest in an out-group’s culture. Psychol. Sci. 10, 1947–1957 (2013).
Shih, M., Wang, E., Trahan Bucher, A. & Stotzer, R. Perspective taking: reducing prejudice towards general outgroups and specific individuals. Group Process. Intergr. Relat. 12, 565–577 (2009).
Shih, M. J., Stotzer, R. & Gutiérrez, A. S. Perspective-taking and empathy: generalizing the reduction of group bias towards Asian Americans to general outgroups. Asian Am. J. Psychol. 4, 79–83 (2013).
Mekawi, Y., Bresin, K. & Hunter, C. D. White fear, dehumanization, and low empathy: lethal combinations for shooting biases. Cultur. Divers. Ethn. Minor. Psychol. 22, 322–332 (2016).
Teding van Berkhout, E. & Malouff, J. M. The efficacy of empathy training: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J. Couns. Psychol. 63, 32–41 (2016).
Hall, N. R., Crisp, R. J. & Suen, M.-W. Reducing implicit prejudice by blurring intergroup boundaries. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 31, 244–254 (2009).
Candey, R. M. et al. xSonify: sonification software. Astrophysics Source Code Library Record ascl:1207.008 (2012).
Garcia, B., Diaz-Merced, W., Casado, J. & Cancio, A. Evolving from xSonify: a new digital platform for sonorization. EPJ Web Conf. 200, 01013 (2019).
Delivering Through Diversity (McKinsey & Company, 2018); go.nature.com/32XV1VR
L.J.K. is supported by the Australian Research Council ASTRO 3D through project no. CE170100013. I thank the ASA president, astronomer department and organization chairs and directors, and their diversity committee chairs for information on programmes operating at each institution and organization.
The author declares no competing interests.
Peer review information Nature Astronomy thanks Alessandra Aloisi and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Kewley, L.J. Diversity and inclusion in Australian astronomy. Nat Astron 3, 1067–1074 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-019-0954-1
Nature Astronomy (2020)