Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Detectability of intermediate-mass black holes in multiband gravitational wave astronomy

Abstract

The direct measurement of gravitational waves is a powerful tool for surveying the population of black holes across the universe. While LIGO has detected black holes as heavy as ~50 M (ref. 1), there is not yet unambiguous evidence of black holes in the intermediate mass range of 102–5M. Recent electromagnetic observations have hinted towards the existence of intermediate-mass black holes (IMBHs)2,3,4; however, their masses remain poorly constrained. Here we argue that multiband observations by space- and ground-based gravitational wave detectors5,6 will be able to survey a broad population of IMBHs at cosmological distances. By utilizing general relativistic simulations of merging black holes7 and state-of-the-art gravitational waveform models8, we classify three distinct populations of binaries with IMBHs and discuss what can be observed about each. Multiband observations involving the upgraded LIGO detector9 and the proposed space-mission LISA10 would detect the inspiral, merger and ring-down of IMBH binaries out to redshift ≈ 2, pushing out to redshift ≈ 5 if next-generation ground-based detectors11,12 are operational at the same time. To facilitate studies of multiband IMBH sources, we provide analytic relations for the maximum redshift of multiband detectability, as a function of black hole mass, for various detector combinations. Our study paves the way for future work on what can be learned from IMBH observations in the era of multiband gravitational wave astronomy.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Examples of binaries with IMBHs in multiband gravitational wave spectrum.
Fig. 2: Cosmological reach to black hole binaries within the next 20 years of gravitational wave astronomy.
Fig. 3: Multiband detection radius for black hole binaries.
Fig. 4: Parameter space of multiband black hole binaries in the LISA + ET network.

Data availability

The data products that support the findings of this study are available via Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3364249.

Code availability

The scripts that support the findings of this study are available via Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3364249.

References

  1. 1.

    Abbott, B. P. et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration) GWTC-1: a gravitational-wave transient catalog of compact binary mergers observed by LIGO and virgo during the first and second observing runs. Phys. Rev. X 9, 031040 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Farrell, S. A., Webb, N. A., Barret, D., Godet, O. & Rodrigues, J. M. An intermediate-mass black hole of over 500 solar masses in the galaxy ESO243-49. Nature 460, 73–75 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Pasham, D. R., Strohmayer, T. E. & Mushotzky, R. F. A 400-solar-mass black hole in the galaxy M82. Nature 513, 74–76 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Kızıltan, B., Baumgardt, H. & Loeb, A. An intermediate-mass black hole in the centre of the globular cluster 47 Tucanae. Nature 542, 203–205 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Sesana, A. Prospects for multiband gravitational-wave astronomy after GW150914. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 231102 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Cutler, C. et al. What we can learn from multi-band observations of black hole binaries. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.04069 (2019).

  7. 7.

    Jani, K. et al. Georgia tech catalog of gravitational waveforms. Class. Quant. Grav. 33, 204001 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    London, L. et al. First higher-multipole model of gravitational waves from spinning and coalescing black-hole binaries. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 161102 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    LSC Instrument Science White Paper 2018 (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, 2018); https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-T1800133/public

  10. 10.

    Amaro-Seoane, P. et al. Laser interferometer space antenna. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.00786 (2017).

  11. 11.

    Punturo, M. et al. The Einstein telescope: a third-generation gravitational wave observatory. Class. Quant. Grav. 27, 194002 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Reitze, D. et al. Cosmic explorer: the U.S. Contribution to gravitational-wave astronomy beyond LIGO. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.04833 (2019).

  13. 13.

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, Salemi, F. & Papa, M. A. Search for intermediate mass black hole binaries in the first and second observing runs of the advanced LIGO and Virgo network. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.08000 (2019).

  14. 14.

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration & Virgo Collaboration. Prospects for observing and localizing gravitational-wave transients with advanced LIGO, advanced Virgo and KAGRA. Living Rev. Relativ. 21, 3 (2018).

  15. 15.

    Lacour, S. et al. Sage: finding IMBH in the black hole desert. Class. Quant. Grav. 36, 195005 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Cutler, C. & Flanagan, É. E. Gravitational waves from merging compact binaries: How accurately can one extract the binary’s parameters from the inspiral waveform/? Phys. Rev. D 49, 2658–2697 (1994).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Vitale, S. Multiband gravitational-wave astronomy: parameter estimation and tests of general relativity with space- and ground-based detectors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 051102 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Bellovary, J. et al. Where are the intermediate mass black holes? Preprint at https://arxiv.org.https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.08144

  19. 19.

    Randall, L. & Xianyu, Z.-Z. A direct probe of mass density near inspiraling binary black holes. Astrophys. J. 878, 75 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Del Pozzo, W., Sesana, A. & Klein, A. Stellar binary black holes in the LISA band: a new class of standard sirens. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 475, 3485–3492 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Madau, P. & Rees, M. J. Massive black holes as population III remnants. Astrophys. J. Lett. 551, L27–L30 (2001).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Calderón Bustillo, J., Salemi, F., Dal Canton, T. & Jani, K. P. Sensitivity of gravitational wave searches to the full signal of intermediate-mass black hole binaries during the first observing run of Advanced LIGO. Phys. Rev. D 97, 024016 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Tso, R., Gerosa, D. & Chen, Y. Optimizing LIGO with LISA forewarnings to improve black-hole spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. D 99, 124043 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Haster, C.-J., Antonini, F., Kalogera, V. & Mandel, I. N-body dynamics of intermediate mass-ratio inspirals in star clusters. Astrophys. J. 832, 192 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Portegies Zwart, S. F., Baumgardt, H., Hut, P., Makino, J. & McMillan, S. L. W. Formation of massive black holes through runaway collisions in dense young star clusters. Nature 428, 724–726 (2004).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Gerosa, D. & Berti, E. Escape speed of stellar clusters from multiple-generation black-hole mergers in the upper mass gap. Phys. Rev. D 100, 041301 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Wong, K. W. K., Kovetz, E. D., Cutler, C. & Berti, E. Expanding the LISA Horizon from the Ground. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 251102 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Planck Collaboration et al. Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters. Preprint at https://arxiv.abs.org/abs/1807.06209 (2018).

  29. 29.

    Robson, T., Cornish, N. J. & Liu, C. The construction and use of LISA sensitivity curves. Class. Quant. Grav. 36, 105011 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Moore, C. J., Cole, R. H. & Berry, C. P. L. Gravitational-wave sensitivity curves. Class. Quant. Grav. 32, 015014 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank L. Cadonati and C. Berry for useful discussions, and L. London and S. Khan for the links to generate their waveform model in the LIGO Analysis Library. K.J. and D.S. were funded by NASA grant no. 80NSSC19K0322 and NSF grant nos PHY 1806580 and 1809572. The work by C.C. was carried out at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract to NASA. C.C. also acknowledges support from NSF grant no. PHY-1708212.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed equally to the text and the primary results.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karan Jani.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2 and refs. 1–7.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jani, K., Shoemaker, D. & Cutler, C. Detectability of intermediate-mass black holes in multiband gravitational wave astronomy. Nat Astron 4, 260–265 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-019-0932-7

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing