Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are the most energetic electromagnetic sources in the Universe, releasing 1042–1047 J (refs. 1,2) in prompt gamma-ray radiation. Fifty years after their discovery, the physical origin of this emission is still unknown. Synchrotron emission has been an early contender3,4, but was criticized because spectral fits of empirical models suggest too hard a slope of the low-energy power law, violating the so-called synchrotron line-of-death5,6, and for its inefficient extraction of energy when the electrons are not fully cooled, reviving models of photospheric emission7,8,9. Fitting proper synchrotron spectra10 (rather than heuristic functions) and taking electron cooling into account was shown to work for several GRB spectra10,11,12,13,14. Here, we show that idealized synchrotron emission, when properly incorporating time-dependent cooling of the electrons, is capable of fitting ~95% of all time-resolved spectra of single-peaked GRBs observed by Fermi’s Gamma-ray Burst Monitor. Thus, the past exclusion of synchrotron radiation as an emission mechanism derived via the line-of-death was misleading. Our analysis probes the microphysical processes operating within these ultra-relativistic outflows and provides estimates of magnetic field strengths and Lorentz factors of the emitting region directly from spectral fits. The resulting parameter distributions are largely compatible with theoretical spectral15,16,17 and outflow predictions18. The emission energetics implied by the observed, uncooled electrons remain challenging for all theoretical models.
This is a preview of subscription content
Subscribe to Nature+
Get immediate online access to the entire Nature family of 50+ journals
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $8.25 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
The raw data are publicly available via the Fermi Science Support Center (https://fermi.gsfc.nasa.gov/ssc/). The processed data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
The spectral fitting software (3ML) used in this work is open source and freely available. Analysis scripts for reducing the data are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Cenko, S. B. et al. Afterglow observations of Fermi Large Area Telescope gamma-ray bursts and the emerging class of hyper-energetic events. Astrophys. J. 732, 29 (2011).
Atteia, J. L. et al. The maximum isotropic energy of gamma-ray bursts. Astrophys. J. 837, 119 (2017).
Mészàros, P. & Rees, M. Gamma-ray bursts: multiwaveband spectral predictions for blast wave models. Astrophys. J. Lett. 418, L59–L62 (1993).
Katz, J. I. Low-frequency spectra of gamma-ray bursts. Astrophys. J. 432, L107–L109 (1994).
Crider, A. et al. Evolution of the low-energy photon spectra in gamma-ray bursts. Astrophys. J. 479, L39–L42 (1994).
Preece, R. D. et al. The synchrotron shock model confronts a “line of death” in the BATSE gamma-ray burst data. Astrophys. J. 506, L23–L26 (1998).
Beloborodov, A. M. Radiative transfer in ultrarelativistic outflows. Astrophys. J. 737, 68 (2011).
Meszaros, P. & Rees, M. J. Steep slopes and preferred breaks in gamma-ray burst spectra: the role of photospheres and Comptonization. Astrophys. J. 530, 292–298 (2000).
Vianello, G. et al. The bright and the slow—GRBs 100724B and 160509A with high-energy cutoffs at ≲100 MeV. Astrophys. J. 864, 163 (2017).
Burgess, J. M. et al. Time-resolved analysis of Fermi gamma-ray bursts with fast- and slow-cooled synchrotron photon models. Astrophys. J. 784, 17 (2014).
Lloyd, N. M. & Petrosian, V. Synchrotron radiation as the source of gamma-ray burst spectra. Astrophys. J. 543, 722–732 (2000).
Burgess, J. M. et al. Constraints on the synchrotron shock model for the Fermi GRB 090820A observed by gamma-ray burst monitor. Astrophys. J. 741, 24 (2011).
Zhang, B.-B., Uhm, Z. L., Connaughton, V., Briggs, M. S. & Zhang, B. Synchrotron origin of the typical GRB band function—a case study of GRB 130606B. Astrophys. J. 816, 72 (2016).
Zhang, B. B. et al. Transition from fireball to Poynting-flux-dominated outflow in the three-episode GRB 160625B. Nat. Astron. 2, 69–75 (2018).
Uhm, Z. L. & Zhang, B. Fast-cooling synchrotron radiation in a decaying magnetic field and Γ-ray burst emission mechanism. Nat. Phys. 10, 351–356 (2014).
Beniamini, P. & Piran, T. Constraints on the synchrotron emission mechanism in gamma-ray bursts. Astrophys. J. 769, 69 (2013).
Beniamini, P., Barniol Duran, R. & Giannios, D. Marginally fast cooling synchrotron models for prompt GRBs. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 476, 1785–1795 (2018).
Zhang, B. & Yan, H. The Internal-Collision-Induced Magnetic Reconnection and Turbulence (ICMART) model of gamma-ray bursts. Astrophys. J. 726, 90 (2011).
Yu, H.-F. et al. The Fermi GBM gamma-ray burst time-resolved spectral catalog: brightest bursts in the first four years. Astron. Astrophys. 588, A135 (2016).
Band, D. et al. BATSE observations of gamma-ray burst spectra. I - Spectral diversity. Astrophys. J. 413, 281–292 (1993).
Sari, R., Piran, T. & Narayan, R. Spectra and light curves of gamma-ray burst afterglows. Astrophys. J. Lett. 497, L17–L20 (1998).
Ryde, F. et al. Identification and properties of the photospheric emission in GRB090902B. Astrophys. J. Lett. 709, L172–L177 (2010).
Sari, R., Narayan, R. & Piran, T. Cooling timescales and temporal structure of gamma-ray bursts. Astrophys. J. 473, 204 (1996).
Kirk, J. G., Guthmann, A. W., Gallant, Y. A. & Achterberg, A. Particle acceleration at ultrarelativistic shocks: an eigenfunction method. Astrophys. J. 542, 235–242 (2000).
Baring, M. G. Gamma-ray burst prompt emission: implications from shock acceleration theory. Adv. Space Res. 38, 1281–1286 (2006).
Eichler, D. & Levinson, A. A compact fireball model of gamma-ray bursts. Astrophys. J. 529, 146–150 (2000).
Baring, M. G. γ–γ Attenuation and relativistic beaming in gamma-ray bursts. Astrophys. J. 418, 391 (1993).
Zhang, B. & Pe’er, A. Evidence of an initially magnetically dominated outflow in GRB 080916C. Astrophys. J. Lett. 700, L65–L68 (2009).
Sironi, L. & Spitkovsky, A. Relativistic reconnection: an efficient source of non-thermal particles. Astrophys. J. Lett. 783, L21 (2014).
Xu, S., Yang, Y.-P. & Zhang, B. On the synchrotron spectrum of GRB prompt emission. Astrophys. J. 853, 43 (2018).
Scargle, J. D., Norris, J. P., Jackson, B. & Chiang, J. Studies in astronomical time series analysis. VI. Bayesian block representations. Astrophys. J. 764, 167 (2013).
Vianello, G. The significance of an excess in a counting experiment: assessing the impact of systematic uncertainties and the case with a Gaussian background. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 236, 17 (2018).
Feroz, F., Hobson, M. P. & Bridges, M. MULTINEST: an efficient and robust Bayesian inference tool for cosmology and particle physics. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 398, 1601–1614 (2009).
Bissaldi, E. et al. Ground-based calibration and characterization of the Fermi gamma-ray burst monitor detectors. Exp. Astron. 24, 47–88 (2009).
Vianello, G. et al. The Multi-Mission Maximum Likelihood framework (3 ML). Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1507.08343 (2015).
Vianello, G., Burgess, J. M., Henrike, F. & Lauer, R. J. giacomov/astromodels: Zenodo release version 0.5.1 (Zenodo, 25 June 2018).
Chang, J. S. & Cooper, G. A practical difference scheme for Fokker-Planck equations. J. Comput. Phys. 6, 1–16 (1970).
Gelman, A. A Bayesian formulation of exploratory data analysis and goodness‐of‐fit testing*. Int. Stat. Rev. 71, 369–382 (2007).
Wilk, M. B. & Gnanadesikan, R. Probability plotting methods for the analysis of data. Biometrika 55, 1–17 (1968).
Buchner, J. et al. X-ray spectral modelling of the AGN obscuring region in the CDFS: Bayesian model selection and catalogue. Astron. Astrophys. 564, A125 (2014).
Pe’er, A., Felix, R., Wijers, R. A. M. J., Meszaros, P. & Rees, M. J. A new method of determining the initial size and Lorentz factor of gamma-ray burst fireballs using a thermal emission component. Astrophys. J. 664, L1–L4 (2007).
Beloborodov, A. M. On the efficiency of internal shocks in gamma-ray bursts. Astrophys. J. 539, L25–L28 (2000).
Narayan, R. & Kumar, P. A turbulent model of gamma-ray burst variability. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. Lett. 394, L117–L120 (2009).
We thank J. Buchner, E. Cameron and R. Diehl for enlightening conversations. J.M.B. acknowledges support from the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation. J.M.B. and J.G. acknowledge support by the DFG cluster of excellence ‘Origin and Structure of the Universe’ (www.universe-cluster.de). D.B., F.B. and J.G. acknowledge support by the DFG through SFB 1258. A.B. acknowledges support by the University of Rijeka through the Erasmus+ programme.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Burgess, J.M., Bégué, D., Greiner, J. et al. Gamma-ray bursts as cool synchrotron sources. Nat Astron 4, 174–179 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-019-0911-z
Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy (2022)
Nature Communications (2021)
Nature Astronomy (2020)