Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Molecular clouds in the Cosmic Snake normal star-forming galaxy 8 billion years ago

Abstract

The cold molecular gas in contemporary galaxies is structured in discrete cloud complexes. These giant molecular clouds (GMCs), with 104–107 solar masses (M) and radii of 5–100 parsecs, are the seeds of star formation1. Highlighting the molecular gas structure at such small scales in distant galaxies is observationally challenging. Only a handful of molecular clouds were reported in two extreme submillimetre galaxies at high redshift2,3,4. Here we search for GMCs in a typical Milky Way progenitor at z = 1.036. Using the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA), we mapped the CO(4–3) emission of this gravitationally lensed galaxy at high resolution, reading down to 30 parsecs, which is comparable to the resolution of CO observations of nearby galaxies5. We identify 17 molecular clouds, characterized by masses, surface densities and supersonic turbulence all of which are 10–100 times higher than present-day analogues. These properties question the universality of GMCs6 and suggest that GMCs inherit their properties from ambient interstellar medium. The measured cloud gas masses are similar to the masses of stellar clumps seen in the galaxy in comparable numbers7. This corroborates the formation of molecular clouds by fragmentation of distant turbulent galactic gas disks8,9, which then turn into stellar clumps ubiquitously observed in galaxies at ‘cosmic noon’ (ref. 10).

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Molecular gas distribution in the strongly lensed Cosmic Snake galaxy.
Fig. 2: Normalized distributions of molecular gas mass for different GMC populations.
Fig. 3: Larson scaling relations.
Fig. 4: Pressure confinement versus self-gravitating confinement of the Cosmic Snake GMCs.

Data availability

The ALMA raw data of the Cosmic Snake arc are available through the ALMA archive under the project identification 2013.1.01330.S. The HST images of MACS J1206.2–0847 are part of the CLASH, available at https://archive.stsci.edu/prepds/clash/. The data that support the plots within this paper and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Code availability

The reduction of the ALMA data was performed with the CASA pipeline version 4.2.2, available at https://almascience.eso.org/processing/science-pipeline. The PdBI data were reduced using GILDAS software, available at http://www.iram.fr/IRAMFR/GILDAS. The lens model was obtained using Lenstool, publicly available at https://projets.lam.fr/projects/lenstool/wiki. The spectral energy distribution fitting was performed with a modified version of the Hyperz code, available in its original form at https://ascl.net/1108.010.

References

  1. 1.

    Bolatto, A. D., Leroy, A. K., Rosolowsky, E., Walter, F. & Blitz, L. The resolved properties of extragalactic giant molecular clouds. Astrophys. J. 686, 948–965 (2008).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Swinbank, A. M. et al. ALMA resolves the properties of star-forming regions in a dense gas disk at z ~ 3. Astrophys. J. 806, L17–L22 (2015).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Sharda, P., Federrath, C., da Cunha, E., Swinbank, A. M. & Dye, S. Testing star formation laws in a starburst galaxy at redshift 3 resolved with ALMA. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 477, 4380–4390 (2018).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Tadaki, K. et al. The gravitationally unstable gas disk of a starburst galaxy 12 billion years ago. Nature 560, 613–616 (2018).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Sun, J. et al. Cloud-scale molecular gas properties in 15 nearby galaxies. Astrophys. J. 860, 172–211 (2018).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Hughes, A. et al. A comparative study of giant molecular clouds in M51, M33, and the Large Magellanic Cloud. Astrophys. J. 779, 46–66 (2013).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Cava, A. et al. The nature of giant clumps in distant galaxies probed by the anatomy of the Cosmic Snake. Nat. Astron. 2, 76–82 (2018).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Tamburello, V., Mayer, L., Shen, S. & Wadsley, J. A lower fragmentation mass scale in high-redshift galaxies and its implications on giant clumps: a systematic numerical study. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 453, 2490–2514 (2015).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Mandelker, N. et al. Giant clumps in simulated high-z galaxies: properties, evolution and dependence on feedback. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 464, 635–665 (2017).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Guo, Y. et al. Clumpy galaxies in CANDELS. I. The definition of UV clumps and the fraction of clumpy galaxies at 0.5 < z < 3. Astrophys. J. 800, 39–60 (2015).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Behroozi, P. S., Wechsler, R. H. & Conroy, C. The average star formation histories of galaxies in dark matter halos from z = 0–8. Astrophys. J. 770, 57–93 (2013).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Rodighiero, G. et al. The lesser role of starbursts in star formation at z = 2. Astrophys. J. 739, L40–L46 (2011).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Patrício, V. et al. Kinematics, turbulence, and star formation of z ~ 1 strongly lensed galaxies seen with MUSE. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 477, 18–44 (2018).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Wisnioski, E. et al. The KMOS3D survey: design, first results, and the evolution of galaxy kinematics from 0.7 ≤ z ≤ 2.7. Astrophys. J. 799, 209–236 (2015).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Dekel, A. et al. Cold streams in early massive hot haloes as the main mode of galaxy formation. Nature 457, 451–454 (2009).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Ebeling, H. et al. A spectacular giant arc in the massive cluster lens MACS J1206.2-0847. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 395, 1213–1224 (2009).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Heyer, M., Krawczyk, C., Duval, J. & Jackson, J. M. Re-examining Larson’s scaling relationships in galactic molecular clouds. Astrophys. J. 699, 1092–1103 (2009).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Donovan Meyer, J. et al. Resolved giant molecular clouds in nearby spiral galaxies: insights from the CANON CO(1–0) survey. Astrophys. J. 772, 107–123 (2013).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Colombo, D. et al. The PdBI Arcsecond Whirlpool Survey (PAWS): environmental dependence of giant molecular cloud properties in M51. Astrophys. J. 784, 3–35 (2014).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Corbelli, E. et al. From molecules to young stellar clusters: the star formation cycle across the disk of M33. Astron. Astrophys. 601, 146–164 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Larson, R. B. Turbulence and star formation in molecular clouds. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 194, 809–826 (1981).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Wei, L. H., Keto, E. & Ho, L. C. Two populations of molecular clouds in the Antennae galaxies. Astrophys. J. 750, 136–154 (2012).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Leroy, A. K. et al. ALMA reveals the molecular medium fueling the nearest nuclear starburst. Astrophys. J. 801, 25–53 (2015).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Bolatto, A. D., Wolfire, M. & Leroy, A. K. The CO-to-H2 conversion factor. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 51, 207–268 (2013).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    McKee, C. F. & Ostriker, E. C. Theory of star formation. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 45, 565–687 (2007).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Brunt, C. M., Heyer, M. H. & Mac Low, M.-M. Turbulent driving scales in molecular clouds. Astron. Astrophys. 504, 883–890 (2009).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Evans, N. J. II et al. The Spitzer c2d legacy results: star-formation rates and efficiencies; evolution and lifetimes. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 181, 321–350 (2009).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Grudić, M. Y. et al. When feedback fails: the scaling and saturation of star formation efficiency. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 475, 3511–3528 (2018).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Kruijssen, J. M. D. et al. What controls star formation in the central 500 pc of the Galaxy? Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 440, 3370–3391 (2014).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Renaud, F., Boily, C. M., Fleck, J.-J., Naab, T. & Theis, Ch Star cluster survival and compressive tides in Antennae-like mergers. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 391, L98–L102 (2008).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Jullo, E. et al. A Bayesian approach to strong lensing modelling of galaxy clusters. New J. Phys. 9, 447 (2007).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    McMullin, J. P., Waters, B., Schiebel, D., Young, W. & Golap, K. in Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVI, Vol. 376 (eds. Shaw, R. A. et al.) 127 (Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 2007).

  33. 33.

    Daddi, E. et al. CO excitation of normal star-forming galaxies out to z = 1.5 as regulated by the properties of their interstellar medium. Astron. Astrophys. 577, A46–A65 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Walter, F. et al. ALMA Spectroscopic Survey in the Hubble Ultra Deep Field: survey description. Astrophys. J. 833, 67–82 (2016).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Hodge, J. A. et al. Kiloparsec-scale dust disks in high-redshift luminous submillimeter galaxies. Astrophys. J. 833, 103–118 (2016).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Solomon, P. M., Downes, D., Radford, S. J. E. & Barrett, J. W. The molecular interstellar medium in ultraluminous infrared galaxies. Astrophys. J. 478, 144–161 (1997).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Solomon, P. M., Rivolo, A. R., Barrett, J. & Yahil, A. Mass, luminosity, and line width relations of Galactic molecular clouds. Astrophys. J. 319, 730–741 (1987).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Postman, M. et al. The cluster lensing and supernova survey with Hubble: an overview. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 199, 25–47 (2012).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Schaerer, D. & de Barros, S. On the physical properties of z ~ 6–8 galaxies. Astron. Astrophys. 515, A73–A88 (2010).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Schaerer, D., de Barros, S. & Sklias, P. Properties of z ~ 3–6 Lyman break galaxies. I. Testing star formation histories and the SFR–mass relation with ALMA and near-IR spectroscopy. Astron. Astrophys. 549, A4–A24 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Sklias, P. et al. Star formation histories, extinction, and dust properties of strongly lensed z ~ 1.5–3 star-forming galaxies from the Herschel Lensing Survey. Astron. Astrophys. 561, A149–A176 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Bruzual, G. & Charlot, S. Stellar population synthesis at the resolution of 2003. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 344, 1000–1028 (2003).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Salpeter, E. E. The luminosity function and stellar evolution. Astrophys. J. 121, 161–167 (1955).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Elmegreen, B. G. Theory of starbursts in nuclear rings. Rev. Mex. Astron. Astrofis. Conf. Ser. 6, 165 (1997).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Elmegreen, B. G. Molecular cloud formation by gravitational instabilities in a clumpy interstellar medium. Astrophys. J. 344, 306–310 (1989).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work of M.D.-Z., D.S., L.M. and A.C. was supported by the STARFORM Sinergia Project funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation. J.R. acknowledges support from the European Research Council starting grant 336736-CALENDS. W.R. is supported by the Thailand Research Fund/Office of the Higher Education Commission grant no. MRG6280259 and Chulalongkorn University’s CUniverse. P.G.P.-G. acknowledges support from the Spanish Government grant AYA2015-63650-P. This paper makes use of the following ALMA data: ADS/JAO.ALMA#2013.1.01330.S. ALMA is a partnership of ESO (representing its member states), NSF (USA) and NINS (Japan), together with NRC (Canada), MOST and ASIAA (Taiwan), and KASI (Republic of Korea), in cooperation with the Republic of Chile. The Joint ALMA Observatory is operated by ESO, AUI/NRAO and NAOJ. We also used PdBI observations. PdBI is run by the Institut de Radioastronomie Millimétrique (IRAM, France), a partnership of the French CNRS, the German MPG and the Spanish IGN. Part of the analysis presented herein is also based on observations made with the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope, and obtained from the Hubble Legacy Archive, which is a collaboration between the Space Telescope Science Institute (STScI/NASA), the Space Telescope European Coordinating Facility (ST-ECF/ESA) and the Canadian Astronomy Data Centre (CADC/NRC/CSA). We thank E. Chapillon from the ALMA Regional Center node of IRAM for her help and training on the reduction of the ALMA data, V. Patricio for sharing the kinematic analysis of the [O ii] emission of the Cosmic Snake galaxy and C. Georgy for the presentation of the VisIt 3D visualization tool.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The data reduction was performed by M.D.-Z. W.R. contributed to the production of the final CO(4–3) data cube. J.R. and A.C. were responsible for the lens model. M.D.-Z. carried out all the data analysis, following advice from J.R., A.C., F.C., W.R. and F.B. F.C. computed the radial dynamical properties and associated figures. Data interpretation was led by M.D.-Z., with feedback from F.C., D.S., L.M., D.P. and R.T. The main text and Methods, with related figures and table, were written by M.D.-Z. All authors commented on the paper, with particular involvement of D.S., L.M., F.C. and T.D.R.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miroslava Dessauges-Zavadsky.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–8, Table 1.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dessauges-Zavadsky, M., Richard, J., Combes, F. et al. Molecular clouds in the Cosmic Snake normal star-forming galaxy 8 billion years ago. Nat Astron 3, 1115–1121 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-019-0874-0

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing