Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

A dearth of small members in the Haumea family revealed by OSSOS


While collisional families are common in the asteroid belt, only one is known in the Kuiper belt, linked to the dwarf planet Haumea. The characterization of Haumea’s family helps to constrain its origin and, more generally, the collisional history of the Kuiper belt. However, the size distribution of the Haumea family is difficult to constrain from the known sample, which is affected by discovery biases. Here, we use the Outer Solar System Origins Survey (OSSOS) Ensemble to look for Haumea family members. In this OSSOS XVI study we report the detection of three candidates with small ejection velocities relative to the family formation centre. The largest discovery, 2013 UQ15, is conclusively a Haumea family member, with a low ejection velocity and neutral surface colours. Although the OSSOS Ensemble is sensitive to Haumea family members to a limiting absolute magnitude (Hr) of 9.5 (inferred diameter of ~90 km), the smallest candidate is significantly larger, Hr = 7.9. The Haumea family members larger than 20 km in diameter must be characterized by a shallow H-distribution slope in order to produce only these three large detections. This shallow size distribution suggests that the family formed in a graze-and-merge scenario, not a catastrophic collision.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it


Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Comparison of the isotropic and graze-and-merge models.
Fig. 2: Absolute magnitude distributions compared to OSSOS Ensemble detections.
Fig. 3: Absolute magnitude distributions compared to Pan-STARRS1 detections.

Data availability

The data that support the plots within this paper are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Code availability

The survey simulator is available publicly from the OSSOS webpages: A detailed description of usage is available29.


  1. Brown, M. E., Barkume, K. M., Ragozzine, D. & Schaller, E. L. A collisional family of icy objects in the Kuiper belt. Nature 446, 294–296 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ragozzine, D. & Brown, M. E. Candidate members and age estimate of the family of Kuiper belt object 2003 EL61. Astron. J. 134, 2160–2167 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rabinowitz, D. L., Schaefer, B. E., Schaefer, M. & Tourtellotte, S. W. The youthful appearance of the 2003 EL61 collisional family. Astron. J. 136, 1502–1509 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Carry, B., Snodgrass, C., Lacerda, P., Hainaut, O. & Dumas, C. Characterisation of candidate members of (136108) Haumea’s family. II. Follow-up observations. Astron. Astrophys. 544, A137 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Volk, K. & Malhotra, R. The effect of orbital evolution on the Haumea (2003 EL61) collisional family. Icarus 221, 106–115 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Parker, A. et al. The size distributions of asteroid families in the SDSS Moving Object Catalog 4. Icarus 198, 138–155 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Proudfoot, B. & Ragozzine, D. A. Modeling the formation of the collisional family of the dwarf planet Haumea. Astron. J. 157, 230 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Schlichting, H. E. & Sari, R. The creation of Haumea’s collisional family. Astrophys. J. 700, 1242–1246 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Leinhardt, Z. M., Marcus, R. A. & Stewart, S. T. The formation of the collisional family around the dwarf planet Haumea. Astrophys. J. 714, 1789–1799 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fraser, W. C. & Kavelaars, J. J. The size distribution of Kuiper belt objects for D ≥ 10 km. Astron. J. 137, 72–82 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dohnanyi, J. S. Collisional model of asteroids and their debris. J. Geophys. Res. 74, 2531–2554 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bannister, M. T. et al. OSSOS. VII. 800+ trans-Neptunian objects—the complete data release. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 236, 18 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Petit, J.-M. et al. The Canada-France Ecliptic Plane Survey—full data release: the orbital structure of the Kuiper belt. Astron. J. 142, 131 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Petit, J.-M. et al. The Canada-France Ecliptic Plane Survey (CFEPS)—high-latitude component. Astron. J. 153, 236 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Alexandersen, M. et al. A carefully characterized and tracked trans-Neptunian survey: the size distribution of the plutinos and the number of Neptunian trojans. Astron. J. 152, 111 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rein, H. & Liu, S.-F. REBOUND: an open-source multi-purpose N-body code for collisional dynamics. Astron. Astrophys. 537, A128 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Pike, R. E. et al. Col-OSSOS: z-Band photometry reveals three distinct TNO surface types. Astron. J. 154, 101 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Schwamb, M. E. et al. Col-OSSOS: the Colors of the Outer Solar System Origins Survey. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 243, 12 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Anderson, T. W. & Darling, D. A. A test of goodness of fit. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 49, 765–769 (1954).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lawler, S. M. et al. OSSOS. VIII. The transition between two size distribution slopes in the scattering disk. Astron. J. 155, 197 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Fraser, W. C., Brown, M. E., Morbidelli, A., Parker, A. & Batygin, K. The absolute magnitude distribution of Kuiper belt objects. Astrophys. J. 782, 100 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Vilenius, E. et al. TNOs are Cool: a survey of the trans-Neptunian region. XIV. Size/albedo characterization of the Haumea family observed with Herschel and Spitzer. Astron. Astrophys. 618, A136 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Petit, J.-M., Kavelaars, J. J., Gladman, B. & Loredo, T. in The Solar System Beyond Neptune (eds Barucci, M. A. et al.) 71–87 (University of Arizona Press, 2008).

  24. Lykawka, P. S., Horner, J., Mukai, T. & Nakamura, A. M. The dynamical evolution of dwarf planet (136108) Haumea’s collisional family: general properties and implications for the trans-Neptunian belt. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 421, 1331–1350 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ivezic, Z. et al. Large Synoptic Survey Telescope: from science drivers to reference design. Serb. Astron. J. 176, 1–13 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ortiz, J. L. et al. Rotational fission of trans-Neptunian objects: the case of Haumea. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 419, 2315–2324 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Campo Bagatin, A., Benavidez, P. G., Ortiz, J. L. & Gil-Hutton, R. On the genesis of the Haumea system. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 461, 2060–2067 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Leinhardt, Z. M. & Stewart, S. T. Collisions between gravity-dominated bodies. I. Outcome regimes and scaling laws. Astrophys. J. 745, 79 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lawler, S. M. et al. OSSOS: X. How to use a survey simulator: statistical testing of dynamical models against the real Kuiper belt. Front. Astron. Space Sci. 5, 14 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Shankman, C., Gladman, B. J., Kaib, N., Kavelaars, J. J. & Petit, J. M. A possible divot in the size distribution of the Kuiper belt’s scattering objects. Astro. J. Lett. 764, L2 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Vilenius, E. et al. ‘TNOs are Cool’: a survey of the trans-Neptunian region. X. Analysis of classical Kuiper belt objects from Herschel and Spitzer observations. Astron. Astrophys. 564, A35 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ortiz, J. L. et al. The size, shape, density and ring of the dwarf planet Haumea from a stellar occultation. Nature 550, 219–223 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. Müller, T. et al. Haumea’s thermal emission revisited in the light of the occultation results. Icarus (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Fornasier, S. et al. TNOs are Cool: A survey of the trans-Neptunian region. VIII. Combined Herschel PACS and Spire observations of nine bright targets at 70–500 μm. Astron. Astrophys. 555, A15 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Elliot, J. L. et al. Size and albedo of Kuiper belt object 55636 from a stellar occultation. Nature 465, 897–900 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. Lellouch, E. et al. ‘TNOs are Cool’: A survey of the trans-Neptunian region. IX. Thermal properties of Kuiper belt objects and centaurs from combined Herschel and Spitzer observations. Astron. Astrophys. 557, A60 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Holmberg, J., Flynn, C. & Portinari, L. The colours of the Sun. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 367, 449–453 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. Denneau, L. et al. The Pan-STARRS Moving Object Processing System. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 125, 357 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. Magnier, E. A. et al. The Pan-STARRS 1 photometric reference ladder, release 12.01. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 205, 20 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. Lin, H. W. et al. The Pan-STARRS 1 discoveries of five new Neptune trojans. Astron. J. 152, 147 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work is based on observations obtained with MegaPrime/MegaCam, a joint project of CFHT and CEA/DAPNIA, at the Canada–France–Hawaii Telescope (CFHT) that is operated by the National Research Council (NRC) of Canada, the Institut National des Sciences de l’Univers of the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique of France and the University of Hawaii. We recognize and acknowledge the very significant cultural role of the summit of Maunakea. We are most fortunate to have the opportunity to conduct observations from this mountain. B.C.N.P., D.R. and S.M. acknowledge support from a BYU Mentored Environment Grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



R.E.P. tested the models using the survey simulator, determined the mass and population estimate, and wrote most of the paper draft. B.C.N.P. generated the orbital distribution models used, and S.M., D.R. and B.C.N.P. classified the objects as Haumea family member candidates. M.A. assisted with the mass estimate and generating the approximate Pan-STARRS1 survey simulator blocks. M.A., M.T.B., Y.-T.C., B.J.G., J.J.K., S.G. and K.V. did the object detections and survey characterization for the OSSOS survey.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rosemary E. Pike.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pike, R.E., Proudfoot, B.C.N., Ragozzine, D. et al. A dearth of small members in the Haumea family revealed by OSSOS. Nat Astron 4, 89–96 (2020).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing