Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Magnetic field strengths of hot Jupiters from signals of star–planet interactions

Nature Astronomy volume 3, pages 1128–1134 (2019)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Evidence of star–planet interactions in the form of planet-modulated chromospheric emission has been noted for a number of hot Jupiters. Magnetic star–planet interactions involve the release of energy stored in the stellar and planetary magnetic fields. These signals thus offer indirect detections of exoplanetary magnetic fields. Here, we report the derivation of the magnetic field strengths of four hot Jupiter systems, using the power observed in calcium ii K emission modulated by magnetic star–planet interactions. By approximating the fractional energy released in the calcium ii K line, we find that the surface magnetic field values for the hot Jupiters in our sample range from 20 G to 120 G, around 10–100 times larger than the values predicted by dynamo scaling laws for planets with rotation periods of around 2–4 days. However, these values are in agreement with scaling laws relating the magnetic field strength to the internal heat flux in giant planets. Large planetary magnetic field strengths may produce observable electron cyclotron maser radio emission by preventing the maser from being quenched by the planet’s ionosphere. Intensive radio monitoring of hot Jupiter systems will help to confirm these field values and inform the generation mechanism of magnetic fields in this important class of exoplanets.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Ca ii K residual spectra, and summed residual power as a function of time, stellar rotational phase and planetary orbital phase.
Fig. 2: Observed powers in the Ca ii K line residuals as a function of relevant magnetic SPI parameters.
Fig. 3: Magnetic field strengths.

Data availability

This work made use of archived data from the PolarBase archive (http://polarbase.irap.omp.eu/) and the Canada–France–Hawaii Telescope data archive (http://www.cadc-ccda.hia-iha.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/en/cfht/). The data that support the plots within this paper and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The reduced spectra used here are also publicly available via the PolarBase archive and the Canada–France–Hawaii Telescope data archive.

References

  1. Wood, B. E., Müller, H. R., Zank, G. P., Linsky, J. L. & Redfield, S. New mass-loss measurements from astrospheric Lyα absorption. Astrophys. J. 628, L143–L146 (2005).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cuntz, M., Saar, S. & Zdzislaw, E. On stellar activity enhancement due to interactions with extrasolar giant planets. Astrophys. J. 533, L151–L154 (2000).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Stevens, I. R. Magnetospheric radio emission from extrasolar giant planets: the role of the host stars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 356, 1053–1063 (2005).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Vidotto, A. A., Jardine, M. & Helling, Ch. Transit variability in bow shock-hosting planets. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 414, 1573–1582 (2011).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Strugarek, A. Assessing magnetic torques and energy fluxes in close-in star–planet systems. Astrophys. J. 833, 140–152 (2016).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rogers, T. M. & McElwaine, J. N. The hottest hot Jupiters may host atmospheric dynamos. Astrophys. J. Lett. 841, L26–L32 (2017).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cohen, O. et al. The interaction of Venus-like, M-dwarf planets with the stellar wind of their host star. Astrophys. J. 806, 41–51 (2015).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jakosky, B. M. et al. Mars’ atmospheric history derived from upper-atmosphere measurements of 38Ar/36Ar. Science 355, 1408–1410 (2017).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Blackman, E. G. & Tarduno, J. A. Mass, energy, and momentum capture from stellar winds by magnetized and unmagnetized planets: implications for atmospheric erosion and habitability. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 481, 5146–5155 (2018).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lazio, T. J. W. et al. Planetary Magnetic Fields: Planetary Interiors and Habitability (Keck Institute for Space Studies, 2016).

  11. Shkolnik, E. L. & Llama, J. in Handbook of Exoplanets (eds Deeg, H. J. & Belmonte, J. A.) 1737–1753 (Springer, 2017).

  12. Shkolnik, E., Walker, G. A. H. & Bohlender, D. A. Evidence for planet-induced chromospheric activity on HD 179949. Astrophys. J. 597, 1092–1096 (2003).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Shkolnik, E., Walker, G. A. H., Bohlender, D. A., Gu, P.-G. & Kürster, M. Hot Jupiters and hot spots: the short- and long-term chromospheric activity on stars with giant planets. Astrophys. J. 622, 1075–1090 (2005).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gurdemir, L., Redfield, S. & Cuntz, M. Planet-induced emission enhancements in HD 179949: results from McDonald observations. Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust. 29, 141–149 (2012).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Shkolnik, E., Bohlender, D. A., Walker, G. A. H. & Collier Cameron, A. The on/off nature of star–planet interactions. Astrophys. J. 676, 628–638 (2008).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cauley, P. W., Shkolnik, E. S., Llama, J., Bourrier, V. & Moutou, C. Evidence of magnetic star–planet interactions in the HD 189733 system from orbitally phased Ca ii K variations. Astron. J. 156, 262–273 (2018).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Walker, G. A. H. et al. MOST detects variability on τ Bootis A possibly induced by its planetary companion. Astron. Astrophys. 482, 691–697 (2008).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pagano, I. et al. CoRoT-2a magnetic activity: hints for possible star–planet interaction. Earth Moon Planets 105, 373–378 (2009).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Scandariato, G. et al. A coordinated optical and X-ray spectroscopic campaign on HD 179949: searching for planet-induced chromospheric and coronal activity. Astron. Astrophys. 552, 7–20 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Maggio, A. et al. Coordinated X-ray and optical observations of star–planet interaction in HD 17156. Astro. J. 811, L2–L7 (2015).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Pillitteri, I. et al. FUV variability of HD 189733. Is the star accreting material from its hot Jupiter? Astrophys. J. 805, 52–70 (2015).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Cranmer, S. R. & Saar, S. H. Exoplanet-induced chromospheric activity: realistic light curves from solar-type magnetic fields. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0702530 (2007).

  23. Llama, J. et al. Exoplanet transit variability: bow shocks and winds around HD 189733 b. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 436, 2179–2187 (2013).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Fares, R. et al. A small survey of the magnetic fields of planet-host stars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 435, 1451–1462 (2013).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lanza, A. F. Stellar coronal magnetic fields and star–planet interaction. Astron. Astrophys. 505, 339–350 (2009).

    ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Lanza, A. F. Star–planet magnetic interaction and activity in late-type stars with close-in planets. Astron. Astrophys. 544, 23–39 (2012).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Cohen, O. et al. The dynamics of stellar coronae harboring hot Jupiters. I. A time-dependent magnetohydrodynamic simulation of the interplanetary environment in the HD 189733 planetary system. Astrophys. J. 733, 67–79 (2011).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Scharf, C. A. Possible constraints on exoplanet magnetic field strengths from planet–star interaction. Astrophys. J. 722, 1547–1555 (2010).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. van Haarlem, M. P. et al. LOFAR: The LOw-Frequency ARray. Astron. Astrophys. 556, 2–55 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zaghoo, M. & Collins, G. W. Size and strength of self-excited dynamos in Jupiter-like extrasolar planets. Astrophys. J. 862, 19–29 (2018).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Sánchez-Lavega, A. The magnetic field in giant extrasolar planets. Astrophys. J. 609, L87–L90 (2004).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Saur, J., Grambusch, T., Duling, S., Neubauer, F. M. & Simon, S. Magnetic energy fluxes in sub-Alfvénic planet–star and moon–planet interactions. Astron. Astrophys. 552, 119–139 (2013).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. Lanza, A. F. Star–planet magnetic interactions and evaporation of planetary atmospheres. Astron. Astrophys. 557, 31–44 (2013).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. Aschwanden, M. J., Xu, Y. & Jing, J. Global energetics of solar flares. I. Magnetic energies. Astrophys. J. 797, 50–85 (2014).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. Veronig, A., Temmer, M., Hanslmeier, A., Otruba, W. & Messerotti, M. Temporal aspects and frequency distributions of solar soft X-ray flares. Astron. Astrophys. 382, 1070–1080 (2002).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. Johns-Krull, C. M., Hawley, S. L., Basri, G. & Valenti, J. A. Hamilton echelle spectroscopy of the 1993 March 6 solar flare. Astrophys. J. Supp. 112, 221–243 (1997).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. Klocová, T., Czesla, S., Khalafinejad, S., Wolter, U. & Schmitt, J. H. M. M. Time-resolved UVES observations of a stellar flare on the planet host HD 189733 during primary transit. Astron. Astrophys. 607, 66–78 (2017).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. Yadav, R. K. & Thorngren, D. P. Estimating the magnetic field strengths in hot Jupiters. Astrophys. J. Lett. 849, L12–L16 (2017).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. Christensen, U. R., Holzwarth, V. & Reiners, A. Energy flux determines magnetic field strength of planets and stars. Nature 457, 167–169 (2009).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. Reiners, A. & Christensen, U. R. A magnetic field evolution scenario for brown dwarfs and giant planets. Astron. Astrophys. 522, 13–20 (2010).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. Thorngren, D. P. & Fortney, J. J. Bayesian analysis of hot-Jupiter radius anomalies: evidence for Ohmic dissipation? Astron. J. 155, 214–224 (2018).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. Kislyakova, K. G., Holmström, M., Lammer, H., Odert, P. & Khodachenko, M. L. Magnetic moment and plasma environment of HD 209458b as determined from Lyα observations. Science 346, 981–984 (2014).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. Bourrier, V., Lecavelier des Etangs, A., Ehrenreich, D., Tanaka, Y. A. & Vidotto, A. A. An evaporating planet in the wind: stellar wind interactions with the radiatively braked exosphere of GJ 436 b. Astron. Astrophys. 591, 121–135 (2016).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. Weber, C. et al. How expanded ionospheres of hot Jupiters can prevent escape of radio emission generated by the cyclotron maser instability. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 469, 3505–3517 (2017).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. Daley-Yates, S. & Stevens, I. R. Inhibition of the electron cyclotron maser instability in the dense magnetosphere of a hot Jupiter. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 479, 1194–1209 (2018).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. Weber, C. et al. Supermassive hot Jupiters provide more favourable conditions for the generation of radio emission via the cyclotron maser instability—a case study based on Tau Bootis b. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 480, 3680–3688 (2018).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. Chen, J. & Kipping, D. Probabilistic forecasting of the masses and radii of other worlds. Astrophys. J. 834, 17–30 (2017).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. Mittag, M., Schmitt, J. H. M. M. & Schröder, K.-P. Ca ii H + K fluxes from S-indices of large samples: a reliable and consistent conversion based on PHOENIX model atmospheres. Astron. Astrophys. 549, 117–129 (2013).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. Scandariato, G. et al. HADES RV programme with HARPS-N at TNG. IV. Time resolved analysis of the Ca ii H&K and Hα chromospheric emission of low-activity early-type M dwarfs. Astron. Astrophys. 598, 28–42 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Husser, T.-O. et al. A new extensive library of PHOENIX stellar atmospheres and synthetic spectra. Astron. Astrophys. 553, 6–15 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Soubiran, C., Le Campion, J.-F., Brouillet, N. & Chemin, L. The PASTEL catalogue: 2016 version. Astron. Astrophys. 591, 118–125 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Eker, Z. et al. Main-sequence effective temperatures from a revised mass–luminosity relation based on accurate properties. Astron. J. 149, 131–147 (2015).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  53. Goodman, J. & Weare, J. Ensemble samplers with affine invariance. Comm. Appl. Math. Comp. Sci. 5, 65–80 (2010).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  54. Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. emcee: the MCMC hammer. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 125, 306–312 (2013).

  55. Butler, R. P. et al. Catalog of nearby exoplanets. Astrophys. J. 646, 505–522 (2006).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  56. Fares, R. et al. MOVES. I. The evolving magnetic field of the planet-hosting star HD 189733. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 471, 1246–1257 (2017).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  57. Bouchy, F. et al. ELODIE metallicity-biased search for transiting hot Jupiters. II. A very hot Jupiter transiting the bright K star HD 189733. Astron. Astrophys. 444, L15–L19 (2005).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  58. Winn, J. et al. The Transit Light Curve Project. V. System parameters and stellar rotation period of HD 189733. Astron. J. 133, 1828–1835 (2007).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  59. Boisse, I. et al. Stellar activity of planetary host star HD 189733. Astron. Astrophys. 495, 959–966 (2009).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  60. Catala, C., Donati, J.-F., Shkolnik, E., Bohlender, D. & Alecian, E. The magnetic field of the planet-hosting star τ Bootis. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 374, L42–L46 (2007).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  61. Jeffers, S. V. et al. The relation between stellar magnetic field geometry and chromospheric activity cycles. II. The rapid 120-day magnetic cycle of τ Bootis. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 479, 5266–5271 (2018).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  62. Marsden, S. C. et al. A BCool magnetic snapshot survey of solar-type stars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 444, 3517–3536 (2014).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  63. Fares, R. et al. Magnetic field, differential rotation and activity of the hot-Jupiter-hosting star HD 179949. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 423, 1006–1017 (2012).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank T. Barman for discussions concerning details of the PHOENIX models. P.W.C. and E.L.S. acknowledge support from NASA Origins of the Solar System grant no. NNX13AH79G (PI: E.L.S.). This work has made use of NASA’s Astrophysics Data System and used the facilities of the Canadian Astronomy Data Centre operated by the National Research Council of Canada with the support of the Canadian Space Agency.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Atmospheric and Space Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA

    P. Wilson Cauley

  2. School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA

    Evgenya L. Shkolnik

  3. Lowell Observatory, Flagstaff, AZ, USA

    Joe Llama

  4. INAF-Osservatorio Astrofisico di Catania, Catania, Italy

    Antonino F. Lanza

Authors
  1. P. Wilson Cauley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Evgenya L. Shkolnik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Joe Llama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Antonino F. Lanza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

E.L.S. was responsible for most of the original observing proposals and data collection. P.W.C. was responsible for the flux-calibration and SPI signal analysis, as well as the manuscript preparation. J.L. was responsible for some original SPI signal analysis and also contributed to the manuscript. A.F.L. provided interpretation of the SPI theories and oversight of the theory application. All authors contributed material to the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Wilson Cauley.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information: Nature Astronomy thanks Scott Wolk and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Table 1; Supplementary Figs. 1–3.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cauley, P.W., Shkolnik, E.L., Llama, J. et al. Magnetic field strengths of hot Jupiters from signals of star–planet interactions. Nat Astron 3, 1128–1134 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-019-0840-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-019-0840-x

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing