The angular size of a star is a critical factor in determining its basic properties1. Direct measurement of stellar angular diameters is difficult: at interstellar distances stars are generally too small to resolve by any individual imaging telescope. This fundamental limitation can be overcome by studying the diffraction pattern in the shadow cast when an asteroid occults a star2, but only when the photometric uncertainty is smaller than the noise added by atmospheric scintillation3. Atmospheric Cherenkov telescopes used for particle astrophysics observations have not generally been exploited for optical astronomy due to the modest optical quality of the mirror surface. However, their large mirror area makes them well suited for such high-time-resolution precision photometry measurements4. Here we report two occultations of stars observed by the Very Energetic Radiation Imaging Telescope Array System (VERITAS)5 Cherenkov telescopes with millisecond sampling, from which we are able to provide a direct measurement of the occulted stars’ angular diameter at the ≤0.1 mas scale. This is a resolution never achieved before with optical measurements and represents an order of magnitude improvement over the equivalent lunar occultation method6. We compare the resulting stellar radius with empirically derived estimates from temperature and brightness measurements, confirming the latter can be biased for stars with ambiguous stellar classifications.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
The datasets generated and/or analysed in this study are available from the corresponding authors on request.
The computer code used to analyse the data in this study is available from the corresponding authors on request.
Mozurkewich, D. et al. Angular diameters of stars from the Mark III optical interferometer. Astron. J. 126, 2502–2520 (2003).
Roques, F., Moncuquet, M. & Sicardy, B. Stellar occultations by small bodies—diffraction effects. Astron. J. 93, 1549–1558 (1987).
Morbey, C. L. Distortion mechanisms for lunar occultation diffraction patterns. Astron. J. 79, 1304–1306 (1974).
Lacki, B. C. Cherenkov telescopes as optical telescopes for bright sources: today’s specialized 30-m telescopes? Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 416, 3075–3082 (2011).
Holder, J. et al. The first VERITAS telescope. Astropart. Phys. 25, 391–401 (2006).
Ridgway, S. T. Considerations for the application of the lunar occultation technique. Astron. J. 82, 511–515 (1977).
Sturmann, L. Application of the TDI method in observations of lunar occultations. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 106, 1165–1171 (1994).
Covey, K. R. et al. Stellar SEDs from 0.3 to 2.5 μm: tracing the stellar locus and searching for color outliers in the SDSS and 2MASS. Astron. J. 134, 2398–2417 (2007).
Gaia Collaboration Gaia data release 2. Summary of the contents and survey properties. Astron. Astrophys. 616, A1 (2018).
Claret, A. & Bloemen, S. Gravity and limb-darkening coefficients for the Kepler, CoRoT, Spitzer, uvby, UBVRIJHK, and Sloan photometric systems. Astron. Astrophys. 529, A75 (2011).
Howarth, I. D. New limb-darkening coefficients and synthetic photometry for model-atmosphere grids at Galactic, LMC and SMC abundances. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 413, 1515–1523 (2011).
Neilson, H. R. & Lester, J. B. Spherically-symmetric model stellar atmospheres and limb darkening. I. Limb-darkening laws, gravity-darkening coefficients and angular diameter corrections for red giant stars. Astron. Astrophys. 554, A98 (2013).
Neilson, H. R. & Lester, J. B. Spherically symmetric model stellar atmospheres and limb darkening. II. Limb-darkening laws, gravity-darkening coefficients and angular diameter corrections for FGK dwarf stars. Astron. Astrophys. 556, A86 (2013).
Richichi, A. & Glindemann, A. Advances in the interpretation and analysis of lunar occultation light curves. Astron. Astrophys. 538, A56 (2012).
Stevens, D. J., Stassun, K. G. & Gaudi, B. S. Empirical bolometric fluxes and angular diameters of 1.6 million Tycho-2 stars and radii of 350,000 stars with Gaia DR1 Parallaxes. Astron. J. 154, 259 (2017).
Bourgés, L. et al. in Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXIII Vol. 485 (eds Manset, N. & Forshay, P.) 223–226 (2014).
Huber, D. et al. The K2 ecliptic plane input catalog (EPIC) and stellar classifications of 138,600 targets in campaigns 1-8. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 224, 2–19 (2016).
Andrae, R. et al. Gaia data release 2. First stellar parameters from Apsis. Astron. Astrophys. 616, A8 (2018).
Boyajian, T. et al. Stellar diameters and temperatures—VI. High angular resolution measurements of the transiting exoplanet host stars HD 189733 and HD 209458 and implications for models of cool dwarfs. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 447, 846–857 (2015).
Duvert, G. JMDC: JMMC measured stellar diameters catalogue. VizieR Online Data Catalog 2345 (2016); http://vizier.u-strasbg.fr/viz-bin/VizieR
Baines, E. K. et al. Angular diameters and effective temperatures of 25 K giant stars from the CHARA array. Astrophys. J. 710, 1365–1374 (2010).
Baines, E. K. et al. Fundamental parameters of 87 stars from the navy precision optical interferometer. Astron. J. 155, 30–46 (2018).
Hanbury Brown, R., Davis, J. & Allen, L. R. The angular diameters of 32 stars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 167, 121–136 (1974).
The Cherenkov Telescope Array Consortium Science with the Cherenkov Telescope Array (World Scientific, 2019); https://doi.org/10.1142/10986
Chelli, A. et al. Pseudomagnitudes and differential surface brightness: application to the apparent diameter of stars. Astron. Astrophys. 589, A112 (2016).
Elliot, J. L., Rages, K. & Veverka, J. The occultation of beta Scorpii by Jupiter. VII—the angular diameters of beta Scorpii A1 and A2. Astrophys. J. 207, 994–1001 (1976).
Reitsema, H. J., Hubbard, W. B., Zellner, B. H. & Lebofsky, L. A. High-speed photometry of the 11 December 1979 Juno occultation. Astron. J. 86, 121–126 (1981).
von Braun, K. et al. Stellar diameters and temperatures—V. 11 newly characterized exoplanet host stars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 438, 2413–2425 (2014).
Acharya, B. S. et al. Introducing the CTA concept. Astropart. Phys. 43, 3–18 (2013).
Weekes, T. C. The atmospheric Cherenkov technique in very high energy gamma-ray astronomy. Space Sci. Rev. 75, 1–15 (1996).
Hinton, J. A. & Hofmann, W. Teraelectronvolt astronomy. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 47, 523–565 (2009).
Dravins, D., Lindegren, L., Mezey, E. & Young, A. T. Atmospheric intensity scintillation of stars. III. Effects for different telescope apertures. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 110, 610–633 (1998).
Jennings, J. K. & McGruder, C. H. III Comparison of the disk diffraction pattern with the straight-edge diffraction pattern in occultations. Astron. J. 118, 3061–3067 (1999).
Nather, R. E. & Evans, D. S. Photoelectric measurement of lunar occultations. I. The process. Astron. J. 75, 575–582 (1970).
Daniel, M. K. Application of radiosonde data to VERITAS simulations. Int. Cosmic Ray Conf. 3, 1329–1332 (2008).
Roache, E. et al. Mirror facets for the VERITAS telescopes. Int. Cosmic Ray Conf. 3, 1397–1400 (2008).
Gazda, E., Nguyen, T., Otte, N. & Richards, G. Photon detection efficiency measurements of the VERITAS Cherenkov telescope photomultipliers after four years of operation. J. Instrum. 11, P11015–P11015 (2016).
Pickles, A. J. A stellar spectral flux library: 1150–25000 A. VizieR Online Data Catalog 611 (1998); http://vizier.u-strasbg.fr/viz-bin/VizieR
Kesseli, A. Y. et al. An empirical template library of stellar spectra for a wide range of spectral classes, luminosity classes, and metallicities using SDSS BOSS spectra. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 230, 16–37 (2017).
This research is supported by grants from the US Department of Energy Office of Science, the US National Science Foundation and the Smithsonian Institution, by NSERC in Canada, and by the Young Investigators Program of the Helmholtz Association. We acknowledge the excellent work of the technical support staff at the Fred Lawrence Whipple Observatory and at the collaborating institutions in the construction and operation of the instrument. This work has made use of data and updates by S. Preston from http://www.asteroidoccultation.com; data from the JPL Small-Body Database browser at http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov; data from the European Space Agency (ESA) mission Gaia (https://www.cosmos.esa.int/gaia), processed by the Gaia Data Processing and Analysis Consortium (DPAC, https://www.cosmos.esa.int/web/gaia/dpac/consortium); and the SIMBAD database, operated at CDS, Strasbourg, France. The authors acknowledge discussions with S. Cikota and J. Cortina.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Journal peer review information: Nature Astronomy thanks Gerard van Belle, Andrea Richichi and Ellyn Baines for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Benbow, W., Bird, R., Brill, A. et al. Direct measurement of stellar angular diameters by the VERITAS Cherenkov telescopes. Nat Astron 3, 511–516 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-019-0741-z
This article is cited by
Nature Astronomy (2019)