Letter | Published:

An improved cosmological parameter inference scheme motivated by deep learning

Nature Astronomyvolume 3pages9398 (2019) | Download Citation

Abstract

Dark matter cannot be observed directly, but its weak gravitational lensing slightly distorts the apparent shapes of background galaxies, making weak lensing one of the most promising probes of cosmology. Several observational studies have measured the effect, and there are currently running1,2 and planned efforts3,4 to provide even larger and higher-resolution weak lensing maps. Owing to nonlinearities on small scales, the traditional analysis with two-point statistics does not fully capture all of the underlying information5. Multiple inference methods have been proposed to extract more details based on higher-order statistics6,7, peak statistics8,9,10,11,12,13, Minkowski functionals14,15,16 and recently convolutional neural networks17,18. Here we present an improved convolutional neural network that gives significantly better estimates of the Ωm and σ8 cosmological parameters from simulated weak lensing convergence maps than state-of-art methods and that is also free of systematic bias. We show that the network exploits information in the gradients around peaks, and with this insight we have constructed an easy-to-understand and robust peak-counting algorithm based on the steepness of peaks, instead of their heights. The proposed scheme is even more accurate than the neural network on high-resolution noiseless maps. With shape noise and lower resolution, its relative advantage deteriorates, but it remains more accurate than peak counting.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Data availability

The data that support the plots within this paper and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    Hildebrandt, H. et al. KiDS-450: cosmological parameter constraints from tomographic weak gravitational lensing. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 465, 1454–1498 (2016).

  2. 2.

    Abbott, T. et al. Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing. Phys. Rev. D 98, 043526 (2018).

  3. 3.

    Ivezic, Z. et al. LSST: from science drivers to reference design and anticipated data products. Preprint at http://arXiv.org/abs/0805.2366 (2008).

  4. 4.

    Laureijs, R. et al. Euclid definition study report. Preprint at http://arXiv.org/abs/1110.3193 (2011).

  5. 5.

    Kilbinger, M. Cosmology with cosmic shear observations: a review. Rep. Prop. Phys. 78, 086901 (2015).

  6. 6.

    Takada, M. & Jain, B. Three-point correlations in weak lensing surveys: model predictions and applications. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 344, 857–886 (2003).

  7. 7.

    Fu, L. et al. CFHTLenS: cosmological constraints from a combination of cosmic shear two-point and three-point correlations. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 441, 2725–2743 (2014).

  8. 8.

    Dietrich, J. & Hartlap, J. Cosmology with the shear-peak statistics. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 402, 1049–1058 (2010).

  9. 9.

    Kratochvil, J. M., Haiman, Z. & May, M. Probing cosmology with weak lensing peak counts. Phys. Rev. D 81, 043519 (2010).

  10. 10.

    Marian, L., Smith, R. E., Hilbert, S. & Schneider, P. The cosmological information of shear peaks: beyond the abundance. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 432, 1338–1350 (2013).

  11. 11.

    Shan, H. et al. Weak lensing mass map and peak statistics in Canada–France–Hawaii Telescope Stripe 82 survey. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 442, 2534–2542 (2014).

  12. 12.

    Liu, J. et al. Cosmology constraints from the weak lensing peak counts and the power spectrum in CFHTLenS data. Phys. Rev. D 91, 063507 (2015).

  13. 13.

    Kacprzak, T. et al. Cosmology constraints from shear peak statistics in Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 463, 3653–3673 (2016).

  14. 14.

    Petri, A., Haiman, Z., Hui, L., May, M. & Kratochvil, J. M. Cosmology with Minkowski functionals and moments of the weak lensing convergence field. Phys. Rev. D 88, 123002 (2013).

  15. 15.

    Kratochvil, J. M. et al. Probing cosmology with weak lensing Minkowski functionals. Phys. Rev. D 85, 103513 (2012).

  16. 16.

    Shirasaki, M. & Yoshida, N. Statistical and systematic errors in the measurement of weak-lensing Minkowski functionals: application to the Canada-France-Hawaii Lensing Survey. Astrophys. J. 786, 43 (2014).

  17. 17.

    Schmelzle, J. et al. Cosmological model discrimination with Deep Learning. Preprint at http://arXiv.org/abs/1707.05167 (2017).

  18. 18.

    Gupta, A., Matilla, J. M. Z., Hsu, D. & Haiman, Z. Non-Gaussian information from weak lensing data via deep learning. Phys. Rev. D 97, 103515 (2018).

  19. 19.

    Matilla, J. M. Z., Haiman, Z., Hsu, D., Gupta, A. & Petri, A. Do dark matter halos explain lensing peaks? Phys. Rev. D 94, 083506 (2016).

  20. 20.

    Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I. & Hinton, G. E. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In Adv. Neur. Information Processing Syst. 1097–1105 (2012).

  21. 21.

    Simonyan, K. & Zisserman, A. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. Preprint at http://arXiv.org/abs/1409.1556 (2014).

  22. 22.

    Goodfellow, I. J., Shlens, J. & Szegedy, C. Explaining and harnessing adversarial examples. Preprint at http://arXiv.org/abs/1412.6572 (2014).

  23. 23.

    Zeiler, M. D. & Fergus, R. Visualizing and understanding convolutional networks. In European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) 818–833 (Springer, Cham, 2014).

  24. 24.

    Lindeberg, T. Scale-space for discrete signals. IEEE Trans. Pattern. Anal. 12, 234–254 (1990).

  25. 25.

    Roberts, L. G. Machine Perception of Three-Dimensional Solids. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1963).

  26. 26.

    Chang, C. et al. The effective number density of galaxies for weak lensing measurements in the LSST project. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 434, 2121–2135 (2013).

  27. 27.

    MacCrann, N., Zuntz, J., Bridle, S., Jain, B. & Becker, M. R. Cosmic discordance: are Planck CMB and CFHTLenS weak lensing measurements out of tune? Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 451, 2877–2888 (2015).

  28. 28.

    Petri, A., Haiman, Z. & May, M. Sample variance in weak lensing: how many simulations are required? Phys. Rev. D 93, 063524 (2016).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by National Research, Development and Innovation Office of Hungary via grant OTKA NN 114560 and the National Quantum Technologies Program. The authors thank Z. Haiman and J. M. Z Matilla for making available the simulated weak lensing maps used in this study.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Physics of Complex Systems, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary

    • Dezső Ribli
    • , Bálint Ármin Pataki
    •  & István Csabai

Authors

  1. Search for Dezső Ribli in:

  2. Search for Bálint Ármin Pataki in:

  3. Search for István Csabai in:

Contributions

I.C., D.R. and B.A.P. contributed to the conception and design of the study; B.A.P. performed the training and evaluation of neural networks; D.R. conducted the experiments with peak steepness. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to István Csabai.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-018-0596-8

Further reading