Letter | Published:

Turbulent action at a distance due to stellar feedback in magnetized clouds

Nature Astronomyvolume 2pages896900 (2018) | Download Citation

Abstract

A fundamental property of molecular clouds is that they are turbulent1, but how this turbulence is generated and maintained is unknown. One possibility is that stars forming within the cloud regenerate turbulence via their outflows, winds and radiation (‘feedback’)2. However, disentangling motions created by feedback from the initial cloud turbulence is challenging. Here, we confront the relationship between stellar feedback and turbulence by identifying and separating the local and global impact of stellar winds. We analyse magnetohydrodynamic simulations in which we track wind material as it interacts with the ambient cloud. By distinguishing between launched material, gas entrained by the wind and pristine gas we show energy is transferred away from the sources via magnetic waves excited by the expanding wind shells. This action at a distance enhances the fraction of stirring motion compared with compressing motion and produces a flatter velocity power spectrum. We conclude that stellar feedback accounts for significant energy transfer within molecular clouds—an impact enhanced by magnetic waves, which have previously been neglected by observations. Overall, stellar feedback can partially offset global turbulence dissipation.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Data availability

The data that support the plots within this paper and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    McKee, C. F. & Ostriker, E. Theory of star formation. Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 45, 565–687 (2007).

  2. 2.

    Krumholz, M. R. et al. in Protostars and Planets VI (eds Beuther, H., Klessen, R. S., Dullemond, C. P. & Henning, T.) 243–266 (University of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ, 2014).

  3. 3.

    Offner, S. S. R. et al. in Protostars and Planets VI (eds Beuther, H., Klessen, R. S., Dullemond, C. P. & Henning, T.) 53–75 (University of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ, 2014).

  4. 4.

    Stone, J. M., Ostriker, E. C. & Gammie, C. F. Dissipation in compressible magnetohydrodynamic turbulence. Astrophys. J. Lett. 508, L99–L102 (1998).

  5. 5.

    Elmegreen, B. G. Star formation in a crossing time. Astrophys. J. 530, 277–281 (2000).

  6. 6.

    Vázquez-Semadeni, E. et al. Molecular cloud evolution. II. From cloud formation to the early stages of star formation in decaying conditions. Astrophys. J. 657, 870–883 (2007).

  7. 7.

    Robertson, B. & Goldreich, P. Adiabatic heating of contracting turbulent fluids. Astrophys. J. Lett. 750, L31–L36 (2012).

  8. 8.

    Heitsch, F. & Hartmann, L. Rapid molecular cloud and star formation: mechanisms and movies. Astrophys. J. 689, 290–301 (2008).

  9. 9.

    Hopkins, P. F. et al. Galaxies on FIRE (feedback in realistic environments): stellar feedback explains cosmologically inefficient star formation. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 445, 581–603 (2014).

  10. 10.

    Agertz, O. & Kravtsov, A. V. On the interplay between star formation and feedback in galaxy formation simulations. Astrophys. J. 804, 18–38 (2015).

  11. 11.

    Gatto, A. et al. The SILCC project—III. Regulation of star formation and outflows by stellar winds and supernovae. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 466, 1903–1924 (2017).

  12. 12.

    Caldú-Primo, A. et al. A high-dispersion molecular gas component in nearby galaxies. Astron. J. 146, 150–164 (2013).

  13. 13.

    Krumholz, M. R. & Burkhart, B. Is turbulence in the interstellar medium driven by feedback or gravity? An observational test. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 458, 1671–1677 (2016).

  14. 14.

    Offner, S. S. R. & Arce, H. G. Impact of winds from intermediate-mass stars on molecular cloud structure and turbulence. Astrophys. J. 811, 146–165 (2015).

  15. 15.

    Matzner, C. D. On the role of massive stars in the support and destruction of giant molecular clouds. Astrophys. J. 566, 302–314 (2002).

  16. 16.

    Heitsch, F. & Burkert, A. Alfvén-wave driven turbulence in molecular clouds. In Modes of Star Formation and the Origin of Field Populations (eds Grebel, E. K. & Brandner, W.) 13–29 (Conference Series Volume 285, Astronomical Society of the Pacific, San Francisco, CA, 2002).

  17. 17.

    Wang, P., Li, Z., Abel, T. & Nakamura, F. Outflow feedback regulated massive star formation in parsec-scale cluster-forming clumps. Astrophys. J. 709, 27–41 (2010).

  18. 18.

    Offner, S. S. R. & Chaban, J. Impact of protostellar outflows on turbulence and star formation efficiency in magnetized dense cores. Astrophys. J. 847, 104–123 (2017).

  19. 19.

    Tritsis, A. & Tassis, K. Magnetic seismology of interstellar gas clouds: unveiling a hidden dimension. Science 360, 635–638 (2018).

  20. 20.

    Larson, R. L., Evans, N. J. II, Green, J. D. & Yang, Y.-L. Evidence for decay of turbulence by MHD shocks in the ISM via CO emission. Astrophys. J. 806, 70–75 (2015).

  21. 21.

    Carroll, J. J., Frank, A., Blackman, E. G., Cunningham, A. J. & Quillen, A. C. Outflow-driven turbulence in molecular clouds. Astrophys. J. 695, 1376–1381 (2009).

  22. 22.

    Hansen, C. E., Klein, R. I., McKee, C. F. & Fisher, R. T. Feedback effects on low-mass star formation. Astrophys. J. 747, 22–40 (2012).

  23. 23.

    Boyden, R. D., Koch, E. W., Rosolowsky, E. W. & Offner, S. S. R. An exploration of the statistical signatures of stellar feedback. Astrophys. J. 833, 231–254 (2016).

  24. 24.

    Swift, J. J. & Welch, W. J. A case study of low-mass star formation. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 174, 202–222 (2008).

  25. 25.

    Arce, H. G., Borkin, M. A., Goodman, A. A., Pineda, J. E. & Beaumont, C. N. A bubbling nearby molecular cloud: COMPLETE shells in Perseus. Astrophys. J. 742, 105–134 (2011).

  26. 26.

    Gendelev, L. & Krumholz, M. R. Evolution of Blister-type H II regions in a magnetized medium. Astrophys. J. 745, 158–169 (2012).

  27. 27.

    Federrath, C. On the universality of supersonic turbulence. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 436, 1245–1257 (2013).

  28. 28.

    Federrath, C., Roman-Duval, J., Klessen, R. S., Schmidt, W. & Mac Low, M.-M. Comparing the statistics of interstellar turbulence in simulations and observations. Solenoidal versus compressive turbulence forcing. Astron. Astrophys. 512, A81–A107 (2010).

  29. 29.

    Federrath, C. & Klessen, R. S. The star formation rate of turbulent magnetized clouds: comparing theory, simulations, and observations. Astrophys. J. 761, 156–187 (2012).

  30. 30.

    Offner, S. S. R. & Arce, H. G. Investigations of protostellar outflow launching and gas entrainment: hydrodynamic simulations and molecular emission. Astrophys. J. 784, 61–75 (2014).

  31. 31.

    Li, P. S., McKee, C. F. & Klein, R. I. Magnetized interstellar molecular clouds—I. Comparison between simulations and Zeeman observations. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 452, 2500–2527 (2015).

  32. 32.

    Truelove, J. K. et al. Self-gravitational hydrodynamics with three-dimensional adaptive mesh refinement: methodology and applications to molecular cloud collapse and fragmentation. Astrophys. J. 495, 821–852 (1998).

  33. 33.

    Klein, R. I. Star formation with 3-D adaptive mesh refinement: the collapse and fragmentation of molecular clouds. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 109, 123–152 (1999).

  34. 34.

    Krumholz, M. R., McKee, C. F. & Klein, R. I. Embedding Lagrangian sink particles in Eulerian grids. Astrophys. J. 611, 399–412 (2004).

  35. 35.

    Cunningham, A. J., Klein, R. I., Krumholz, M. R. & McKee, C. F. Radiation-hydrodynamic simulations of massive star formation with protostellar outflows. Astrophys. J. 740, 107–124 (2011).

  36. 36.

    Vink, J. S., de Koter, A. & Lamers, H. J. G. L. M. Mass-loss predictions for O and B stars as a function of metallicity. Astron. Astrophys. 369, 574–588 (2001).

  37. 37.

    Rosen, A. L., Krumholz, M. R., McKee, C. F. & Klein, R. I. An unstable truth: how massive stars get their mass. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 463, 2553–2573 (2016).

  38. 38.

    Xu, D. & Offner, S. S. R. Assessing the performance of a machine learning algorithm in identifying bubbles in dust emission. Astrophys. J. 851, 149–160 (2017).

  39. 39.

    Truelove, J. K. et al. The Jeans condition: a new constraint on spatial resolution in simulations of isothermal self-gravitational hydrodynamics. Astrophys. J. Lett. 489, L179–L183 (1997).

  40. 40.

    Koo, B.-C. & McKee, C. F. Dynamics of wind bubbles and superbubbles. I—slow winds and fast winds. II—analytic theory. Astrophys. J. 388, 93–126 (1992).

Download references

Acknowledgements

S.S.R.O. thanks A. Lee, B. Gaches and P. Kumar for helpful comments. S.S.R.O. acknowledges support from NSF Career grant AST-1650486. The data analyses, images and animations were made possible by yt, an open-source Python package for analysing and visualizing volumetric data. Some of the simulations were performed on the Yale University Omega cluster, which is supported in part by the facilities and staff of the Yale University Faculty of Arts and Sciences High Performance Computing Center. The rest of the simulations were carried out on resources at the Massachusetts Green High Performance Computing Center, supported by staff at the University of Massachusetts.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Astronomy, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA

    • Stella S. R. Offner
  2. Department of Astronomy, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA

    • Yue Liu

Authors

  1. Search for Stella S. R. Offner in:

  2. Search for Yue Liu in:

Contributions

S.S.R.O. performed all the simulations without self-gravity, carried out the analyses, produced the figures and wrote the paper. Y.L. carried out the simulations with gravity and performed a preliminary analysis.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stella S. R. Offner.

Supplementary information

  1. Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Tables 1–2, Supplementary Figures 1–5, Supplementary Video 1 caption

  2. Supplementary Video 1

    Slices through the magnetic field strength for two sources in model W2T2

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

Issue Date

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-018-0566-1