Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Science education in the 21st century

Abstract

The traditional university science curriculum was designed to train specialists in specific disciplines. However, in universities all over the world, science students are going into increasingly diverse careers and the current model does not fit their needs. Advances in technology also make certain modes of learning obsolete. In the past ten years, the Faculty of Science of the University of Hong Kong has undertaken major curriculum reforms. A sequence of science foundation courses required of all incoming science students are designed to teach science in an integrated manner, and to emphasize the concepts and utilities, not computational techniques, of mathematics. A number of non-discipline-specific common core courses have been developed to broaden students’ awareness of the relevance of science to society and the interdisciplinary nature of science. By putting the emphasis on the scientific process rather than the outcome, students are taught how to identify, formulate, and solve diverse problems.

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: An armillary sphere mobile app designed to help students understand the predictive power of the geocentric model.

Technology-Enriched Learning Initiative of the University of Hong Kong.

References

  1. Heffron, J. M. The knowledge most worth having: Otis W. Caldwell (1869–1947) and the rise of the general science course. Sci. Educ. 4, 227–252 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Education Reform (National Commission on Excellence in Education, 1983).

  3. Jaffee, D. The general education initiatives in Hong Kong: organized contradictions and emerging tensions. High. Educ. 64, 193–206 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kwok, S. Our Place in the Universe: Understanding Fundamental Astronomy from Ancient Discoveries. (Springer, Berlin, 2017).

  5. Adams, J. V. Student evaluations: the ratings game. Inquiry 1, 10–16 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Deslauriers, L., Schelew, E. & Wieman, C. Improved learning in a large-enrollment physics class. Science 332, 862–864 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank my HKU colleagues who helped me implement the curriculum reform at HKU, in particular N. K. Tsing and E. K. F. Lam, who were instrumental in the design of the science foundation courses. I am grateful to H. C. von Bergmann and C. Pennypacker of the Global Science Education Network for their advice on the reform.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sun Kwok.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kwok, S. Science education in the 21st century. Nat Astron 2, 530–533 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-018-0510-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-018-0510-4

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing