Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Observing positive and negative AGN feedback

Galaxy-scale outflows powered by actively accreting supermassive black holes are routinely detected, and they have been associated with both the suppression and triggering of star formation. Recent observational evidence and simulations are favouring a delayed mechanism that connects outflows and star formation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: The ‘snakes and ladders’ game played by the participants of the discussion session on negative and positive feedback at the Lorentz Center workshop ‘The reality and myths of AGN feedback’ (Leiden, 16–20 October 2017).


  1. Woo, J.-H., Son, D. & Bae, H.-J. Astrophys. J. 839, 120–132 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Harrison, C. M. Nat. Astron. 1, 0165 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cano-Diáz, M. et al. Astron. Astrophys. 537, 8–14 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cresci, G. et al. Astrophys. J. 799, 82–90 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Carniani, S. et al. Astron. Astrophys. 591, 28–36 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brusa, M. et al. Astron. Astrophys. 578, 11–18 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Arribas, S., Colina, L., Bellocchi, E., Maiolino, R. & Villar-Martín, M. Astron. Astrophys. 568, 14–49 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Costa, T., Rosdahl, J., Sijacki, D. & Haehnelt, M. G. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 473, 4197–4219 (2018).

  9. Peng, Y., Maiolino, R. & Cochrane, R. Nature 521, 192–195 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pillepich, A. et al. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 473, 4077–4106 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Silk, J. Astrophys. J. 772, 112–121 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ishibashi, W. & Fabian, A. C. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 427, 2998–3005 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Santoro, F., Oonk, J. B. R., Morganti, R., Oosterloo, T. A. & Tadhunter, C. Astron. Astrophys. 590, 37–43 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cresci, G. et al. Astron. Astrophys. 582, 63–71 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Maiolino, R. et al. Nature 544, 202–206 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references


This Comment is based on discussions at the Lorentz Center workshop ‘The reality and myths of AGN feedback’ held in Leiden, 16–20 October 2017. We thank all of the workshop participants for their suggestions, in particular C. Harrison, C. Circosta, M. Brusa, J. Scholtz, G. Venturi, M. Perna and G. Vietri. R.M. acknowledges support from the European Research Council advanced grant 695671 ‘QUENCH’.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanni Cresci.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cresci, G., Maiolino, R. Observing positive and negative AGN feedback. Nat Astron 2, 179–180 (2018).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing