Letter | Published:

Haze production rates in super-Earth and mini-Neptune atmosphere experiments

Nature Astronomyvolume 2pages303306 (2018) | Download Citation


Numerous Solar System atmospheres possess photochemically generated hazes, including the characteristic organic hazes of Titan and Pluto. Haze particles substantially impact atmospheric temperature structures and may provide organic material to the surface of a world, potentially affecting its habitability. Observations of exoplanet atmospheres suggest the presence of aerosols, especially in cooler (<800 K), smaller (<0.3× Jupiter’s mass) exoplanets. It remains unclear whether the aerosols muting the spectroscopic features of exoplanet atmospheres are condensate clouds or photochemical hazes1,2,3, which is difficult to predict from theory alone4. Here, we present laboratory haze simulation experiments that probe a broad range of atmospheric parameters relevant to super-Earth- and mini-Neptune-type planets5, the most frequently occurring type of planet in our galaxy6. It is expected that photochemical haze will play a much greater role in the atmospheres of planets with average temperatures below 1,000 K (ref. 7), especially those planets that may have enhanced atmospheric metallicity and/or enhanced C/O ratios, such as super-Earths and Neptune-mass planets8,9,10,11,12. We explored temperatures from 300 to 600 K and a range of atmospheric metallicities (100×, 1,000× and 10,000× solar). All simulated atmospheres produced particles, and the cooler (300 and 400 K) 1,000× solar metallicity (‘H2O-dominated’ and CH4-rich) experiments exhibited haze production rates higher than our standard Titan simulation (~10 mg h–1 versus 7.4 mg h–1 for Titan13). However, the particle production rates varied greatly, with measured rates as low as 0.04 mg h–1 (for the case with 100× solar metallicity at 600 K). Here, we show that we should expect great diversity in haze production rates, as some—but not all—super-Earth and mini-Neptune atmospheres will possess photochemically generated haze.

  • Subscribe to Nature Astronomy for full access:



Additional access options:

Already a subscriber?  Log in  now or  Register  for online access.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Change history

  • Correction 16 March 2018

    In the version of this Letter originally published Table 2, which tabulates the production rates shown in Fig. 3, was mistakenly omitted. It has now been included in all versions of the Letter.


  1. 1.

    Knutson, H. A., Benneke, B., Deming, D. & Homeier, D. A featureless transmission spectrum for the Neptune-mass exoplanet GJ436b. Nature 505, 66–68 (2014).

  2. 2.

    Kreidberg, L. et al. Clouds in the atmosphere of the super-Earth exoplanet GJ1214b. Nature 505, 69–72 (2014).

  3. 3.

    Sing, D. K. et al. A continuum from clear to cloudy hot-Jupiter exoplanets without primordial water depletion. Nature 529, 59–62 (2016).

  4. 4.

    Morley, C. V. et al. Thermal emission and reflected light spectra of super Earths with flat transmission spectra. Astrophys. J. 815, 110 (2015).

  5. 5.

    Hu, R. & Seager, S. Photochemistry in terrestrial exoplanet atmospheres. III. Photochemistry and thermochemistry in thick atmospheres on super Earths and mini Neptunes. Astrophys. J. 784, 63 (2014).

  6. 6.

    Fressin, F. et al. The false positive rate of Kepler and the occurrence of planets. Astrophys. J. 766, 81 (2013).

  7. 7.

    Moses, J. I. et al. Disequilibrium carbon, oxygen, and nitrogen chemistry in the atmospheres of HD 189733b and HD 209458b. Astrophys. J. 737, 15 (2011).

  8. 8.

    Line, M. R., Vasisht, G., Chen, P., Angerhausen, D. & Yung, Y. L. Thermochemical and photochemical kinetics in cooler hydrogen-dominated extrasolar planets: a methane-poor GJ436b? Astrophys. J. 738, 32 (2011).

  9. 9.

    Miller-Ricci Kempton, E., Zahnle, K. & Fortney, J. J. The atmospheric chemistry of GJ 1214b: photochemistry and clouds. Astrophys. J. 745, 3 (2012).

  10. 10.

    Moses, J. I. et al. Compositional diversity in the atmospheres of hot Neptunes, with application to GJ 436b. Astrophys. J. 777, 34 (2013).

  11. 11.

    Venot, O., Agúndez, M., Selsis, F., Tessenyi, M. & Iro, N. The atmospheric chemistry of the warm Neptune GJ 3470b: influence of metallicity and temperature on the CH4 /CO ratio. Astron. Astrophys. 562, A51 (2014).

  12. 12.

    Morley, C. V. et al. Forward and inverse modeling of the emission and transmission spectrum of GJ 436b: investigating metal enrichment, tidal heating, and clouds. Astronom. J. 153, 86 (2017).

  13. 13.

    He, C. et al. Carbon monoxide affecting planetary atmospheric chemistry. Astrophys. J. Lett. 841, L31 (2017).

  14. 14.

    Cable, M. L. et al. Titan tholins: simulating titan organic chemistry in the Cassini–Huygens era. Chem. Rev. 112, 1882–1909 (2012).

  15. 15.

    Elkins-Tanton, L. T. & Seager, S. Ranges of atmospheric mass and composition of super-Earth exoplanets. Astrophys. J. 685, 1237–1246 (2008).

  16. 16.

    Schaefer, L., Lodders, K. & Fegley, B. Vaporization of the Earth: application to exoplanet atmospheres. Astrophys. J. Lett. 755, 41 (2012).

  17. 17.

    Fortney, J. J. et al. A framework for characterizing the atmospheres of low-mass low-density transiting planets. Astrophys. J. 775, 80 (2013).

  18. 18.

    Sullivan, P. W. et al. The Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite: simulations of planet detections and astrophysical false positives. Astrophys. J. 809, 77 (2015).

  19. 19.

    Gao, P., Marley, M. S., Zahnle, K., Robinson, T. D. & Lewis, N. K. Sulfur hazes in giant exoplanet atmospheres: impacts on reflected light spectra. Astronom. J. 153, 139 (2017).

  20. 20.

    Moses, J. I., Madhusudhan, N., Visscher, C. & Freedman, R. S. Chemical consequences of the C/O ratio on hot Jupiters: examples from WASP-12b, CoRoT-2b, XO-1b, and HD 189733b. Astrophys. J. 763, 25 (2013).

  21. 21.

    Raulin, F., Mourey, D. & Toupance, G. Organic syntheses from CH4–N2 atmospheres: implications for Titan. Orig. Life 12, 267–279 (1982).

  22. 22.

    DeWitt, H. L. et al. Reduction in haze formation rate on prebiotic Earth in the presence of hydrogen. Astrobiology 9, 447–453 (2009).

  23. 23.

    Sciamma-O’Brien, E., Carrasco, N., Szopa, C., Buch, A. & Cernogora, G. Titan’s atmosphere: an optimal gas mixture for aerosol production? Icarus 209, 704–714 (2010).

  24. 24.

    Imanaka, H. & Smith, M. A. Formation of nitrogenated organic aerosols in the Titan upper atmosphere. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 28, 12423–12428 (2010).

  25. 25.

    Trainer, M. G., Jimenez, J. L., Yung, Y. L., Toon, O. B. & Tolbert, M. A. Nitrogen incorporation in CH4–N2 photochemical aerosol produced by far ultraviolet irradiation. Astrobiology 12, 315–326 (2012).

  26. 26.

    Trainer, M. G. et al. Haze aerosols in the atmosphere of early Earth: manna from heaven. Astrobiology 4, 409–419 (2004).

  27. 27.

    Miller, S. L. A production of amino acids under possible primitive Earth conditions. Science 117, 528–529 (1953).

  28. 28.

    Hörst, S. M. & Tolbert, M. A. The effect of carbon monoxide on planetary haze formation. Astrophys. J. 781, 53 (2014).

  29. 29.

    Bar-Nun, A. & Chang, S. Photochemical reactions of water and carbon monoxide in Earth’s primitive atmosphere. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 88, 6662–6672 (1983).

  30. 30.

    Marley, M. S., Gelino, C., Stephens, D., Lunine, J. I. & Freedman, R. Reflected spectra and albedos of extrasolar giant planets. I. Clear and cloudy atmospheres. Astrophys. J. 513, 879–893 (1999).

Download references


This work was supported by National Aeronautics and Space Administration Exoplanets Research Program grant NNX16AB45G. C.H. was supported by the Morton K. and Jane Blaustein Foundation.

Author information


  1. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA

    • Sarah M. Hörst
    • , Chao He
    •  & Nikole K. Lewis
  2. Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA

    • Nikole K. Lewis
    •  & Jeff A. Valenti
  3. Grinnell College, Grinnell, IA, USA

    • Eliza M.-R. Kempton
  4. National Aeronautics and Space Administration Ames Research Center, Mountain View, CA, USA

    • Mark S. Marley
  5. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA

    • Caroline V. Morley
  6. Space Science Institute, Boulder, CO, USA

    • Julianne I. Moses
  7. Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France

    • Véronique Vuitton


  1. Search for Sarah M. Hörst in:

  2. Search for Chao He in:

  3. Search for Nikole K. Lewis in:

  4. Search for Eliza M.-R. Kempton in:

  5. Search for Mark S. Marley in:

  6. Search for Caroline V. Morley in:

  7. Search for Julianne I. Moses in:

  8. Search for Jeff A. Valenti in:

  9. Search for Véronique Vuitton in:


S.M.H., N.K.L., C.H., M.S.M. and J.I.M. conceived the study. J.I.M. calculated the starting gas mixtures. C.H. performed the experiments and measurements. S.M.H. prepared the manuscript. All authors participated in discussions regarding interpretation of the results and edited the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah M. Hörst.

About this article

Publication history






Rights and permissions

To obtain permission to re-use content from this article visit RightsLink.