Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Hydrogen-rich supernovae beyond the neutrino-driven core-collapse paradigm

Nature Astronomy volume 1, pages 713–720 (2017)Cite this article

Subjects

A Publisher Correction to this article was published on 02 January 2018

This article has been updated

Abstract

Type II supernovae are the final stage of massive stars (above 8 M ⊙) which retain part of their hydrogen-rich envelope at the moment of explosion. They typically eject up to 15 M ⊙ of material, with peak magnitudes of −17.5 mag and energies in the order of 1051 erg, which can be explained by neutrino-driven explosions and neutron star formation. Here, we present our study of OGLE-2014-SN-073, one of the brightest type II supernovae ever discovered, with an unusually broad lightcurve combined with high ejecta velocities. From our hydrodynamical modelling, we infer a remarkable ejecta mass of \({\mathrm{60}}_{-\mathrm{16}}^{+\mathrm{42}}\) M ⊙ and a relatively high explosion energy of \(\mathrm{12}{\mathrm{.4}}_{-5\mathrm{.9}}^{+\mathrm{13}\mathrm{.0}}\times 1{0}^{\mathrm{51}}\) erg. We show that this object belongs, along with a very small number of other hydrogen-rich supernovae, to an energy regime that is not explained by standard core-collapse neutrino-driven explosions. We compare the quantities inferred by the hydrodynamical modelling with the expectations of various exploding scenarios and attempt to explain the high energy and luminosity released. We find some qualitative similarities with pair-instability supernovae, although the prompt injection of energy by a magnetar seems to be a viable alternative explanation for such an extreme event.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: RGB images of the OGLE14-073 field.
Fig. 2: Optical spectral evolution of OGLE14-073 and comparison with SN 1987A.
Fig. 3: Bolometric lightcurve of OGLE14-073 and comparison with other type II supernovae.
Fig. 4: Hydrodynamical modelling of OGLE14-073.
Fig. 5: Comparison of the lightcurve of OGLE14-073 with PISN models.
Fig. 6: Ejecta mass versus explosion energy and 56Ni mass plots.

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 02 January 2018

    In the version of this Article originally published the Fig. 6 y axis label read 'Mej' but should have read 'MNi'. This has now been corrected.

References

  1. Richardson, D. et al. A comparative study of the absolute magnitude distributions of supernovae. Astron. J. 123, 745–752 (2002).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Janka, H.-T. Explosion mechanisms of core-collapse supernovae. Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 62, 407–451 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wyrzykowski, Ł. et al. OGLE-IV real-time transient search. Acta Astron. 64, 197–232 (2014).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Udalski, A., Szymański, M. K. & Szymański, G. OGLE-IV: fourth phase of the Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment. Acta Astron. 65, 1–38 (2015).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Blagorodnova, N. et al. PESSTO spectroscopic classification of optical transients. The Astronomer’s Telegram 6489 (2014).

  6. Smartt, S. J. et al. PESSTO: survey description and products from the first data release by the Public ESO Spectroscopic Survey of Transient Objects. Astron. Astrophys. 579, A40 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dark Energy Survey Collaboration. The Dark Energy Survey: more than dark energy—an overview. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 460, 1270–1299 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Da Cunha, E., Charlot, S. & Elbaz, D. A simple model to interpret the ultraviolet, optical and infrared emission from galaxies. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 388, 1595–1617 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen, T.-W. et al. The host galaxy and late-time evolution of the superluminous supernova PTF12dam. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 452, 1567–1586 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pettini, M. & Pagel, B. E. [OIII]/[NII] as an abundance indicator at high redshift. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 348, L59–L63 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kewley, L. J. & Ellison, S. L. Metallicity calibrations and the mass–metallicity relation for star-forming galaxies. Astrophys. J. 681, 1183–1204 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hamuy, M. & Suntzeff, N. B. SN 1987A in the LMC. III—UBVRI photometry at Cerro Tololo. AJ 99, 1146–1158 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hamuy, M. Observed and physical properties of core-collapse supernovae. Astrophys. J. 582, 905–914 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pumo, M. L. et al. Radiation-hydrodynamical modelling of underluminous type II plateau supernovae. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 464, 3013–3020 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zampieri, L. et al. Peculiar, low-luminosity type II supernovae: low-energy explosions in massive progenitors? Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 338, 711–716 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Pumo, M. L. & Zampieri, L. Radiation-hydrodynamical modeling of core-collapse supernovae: light curves and the evolution of photospheric velocity and temperature. Astrophys. J. 741, 41 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Müller, B., Heger, A., Liptai, D. & Cameron, J. B. A simple approach to the supernova progenitor-explosion connection. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 460, 742–764 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Nadyozhin, D. K. Explosion energies, nickel masses and distances of type II plateau supernovae. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 346, 97–104 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Heger, A. & Woosley, S. E. The nucleosynthetic signature of population III. Astrophys. J. 567, 532–543 (2002).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Dessart, L., Waldman, R., Livne, E., Hillier, D. J. & Blondin, S. Radiative properties of pair-instability supernova explosions. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 428, 3227–3251 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kozyreva, A., Blinnikov, S., Langer, N. & Yoon, S.-C. Observational properties of low-redshift pair instability supernovae. Astron. Astrophys. 565, A70 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Woosley, S. E. Pulsational-pair instability supernovae. Astrophys. J. 836, 244 (2017).

  23. Dessart, L., Hillier, D. J., Audit, E., Livne, E. & Waldman, R. Models of interacting supernovae and their spectral diversity. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 458, 2094–2121 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Arnett, W. D. On the theory of type I supernovae. Astrophys. J. 230, L37–L40 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Galama, T. J. et al. An unusual supernova in the error box of the γ-ray burst of 25 April 1998. Nature 395, 670–672 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Botticella, M. T. et al. Supernova 2009kf: an ultraviolet bright type IIP supernova discovered with Pan-STARRS 1 and GALEX. Astrophys. J. 717, L52–L56 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Utrobin, V. P., Chugai, N. N. & Botticella, M. T. Type IIP supernova 2009kf: explosion driven by black hole accretion? Astrophys. J. 723, L89–L92 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Taddia, F. et al. Long-rising type II supernovae from Palomar Transient Factory and Caltech Core-Collapse Project. Astron. Astrophys. 588, A5 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Berger, E. et al. The spectroscopic classification and explosion properties of SN 2009nz associated with GRB 091127 at z = 0.490. Astrophys. J. 743, 204 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Fraser, M. et al. SN 2009md: another faint supernova from a low-mass progenitor. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 417, 1417–1433 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kushnir, D. The progenitors of core-collapse supernovae suggest thermonuclear origin for the explosions. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1506.02655 (2015).

  32. Thompson, T. A., Chang, P. & Quataert, E. Magnetar spin-down, hyperenergetic supernovae, and gamma-ray bursts. Astrophys. J. 611, 380–393 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. MacFadyen, A. I., Woosley, S. E. & Heger, A. Supernovae, jets, and collapsars. Astrophys. J. 550, 410–425 (2001).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. Gal-Yam, A. Luminous supernovae. Science 337, 927 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. Inserra, C. et al. Super-luminous type Ic supernovae: catching a magnetar by the tail. Astrophys. J. 770, 128 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. Kasen, D. & Bildsten, L. Supernova light curves powered by young magnetars. Astrophys. J. 717, 245–249 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. Smartt, S. J. Progenitors of core-collapse supernovae. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 47, 63–106 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. Meynet, G. et al. Red supergiants, luminous blue variables and Wolf–Rayet stars: the single massive star perspective. Bull. Soc. R. Sci. Liege 80, 266–278 (2011).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. Vink, J. S., de Koter, A. & Lamers, H. J. L. Mass-loss predictions for O and B stars as a function of metallicity. Astron. Astrophys. 369, 574–588 (2001).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. Brown, T. M. et al. Las Cumbres Observatory Global Telescope Network. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 125, 1031–1055 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. Valenti, S. et al. The diversity of type II supernova versus the similarity in their progenitors. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 459, 3939–3962 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. Cappellaro, E. SNOoPY: a package for supernova photometry (Padova-Asiago Supernova Group, 2014).

  43. Stetson, P. B. DAOPHOT—a computer program for crowded-field stellar photometry. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 99, 191–222 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. Landolt, A. U. UBVRI photometric standard stars in the magnitude range 11.5–16.0 around the celestial equator. Astron. J. 104, 340–371 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. Skrutskie, M. F. et al. The Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS). Astron. J. 131, 1163–1183 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. Chonis, T. S. & Gaskell, C. M. Setting UBVRI photometric zero-points using Sloan Digital Sky Survey ugriz magnitudes. Astron. J. 135, 264–267 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. Schlafly, E. F. & Finkbeiner, D. P. Measuring reddening with Sloan Digital Sky Survey stellar spectra and recalibrating SFD. Astrophys. J. 737, 103 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. Wright, E. L. A cosmology calculator for the world wide web. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 118, 1711–1715 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. Bruzual, G. & Charlot, S. Stellar population synthesis at the resolution of 2003. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 344, 1000–1028 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  50. Chabrier, G. Galactic stellar and substellar initial mass function. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 115, 763–795 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  51. Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A. J. & Scott, P. The chemical composition of the Sun. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 47, 481–522 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  52. Kennicutt, R. C. Jr Star formation in galaxies along the Hubble sequence. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 36, 189–232 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  53. Zampieri, L. in The Multicolored Landscape of Compact Objects and Their Explosive Origins (eds Di Salvo, T. et al.) 358–365 (2007).

  54. Pumo, M. L., Zampieri, L. & Turatto, M. Numerical calculation of sub-luminous type II- plateau supernova events. Mem. Soc. Astron. Ital. Suppl. 14, 123 (2010).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  55. Arnett, W. D. Analytic solutions for light curves of supernovae of type II. Astrophys. J. 237, 541–549 (1980).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank M. Kubiak and G. Pietrzyn′ski—former members of the OGLE team—for contributions to the collection of the OGLE photometric data. G.T., S.B., E.C., N.E.-R., A.P. and M.T. are partially supported by PRIN–INAF 2014 with the project ‘Transient Universe: unveiling new types of stellar explosions with PESSTO’. N.E.-R. acknowledges financial support from MIUR PRIN 2010–2011, ‘The dark Universe and the cosmic evolution of baryons: from current surveys to Euclid’. G.T. is also supported by the fellowship for the study of bright type II supernovae, offered by INAF–OaPD. S.J.S. acknowledges funding from EU/FP7-ERC grant agreement 291222 and Science and Technology Facilities Council of the United Kingdom grants ST/I001123/1 and ST/L000709/1. T.-W.C. acknowledges support through the Sofia Kovalevskaja Award to P. Schady from the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation of Germany. T.J.M. is supported by the Grant-in-Aid for Research Activity Start-up of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (16H07413). F.T. and J.S. acknowledge support from the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation. M.F. acknowledges support from a Royal Society—Science Foundation Ireland University Research Fellowship. Ł.W. was supported by the Polish National Science Centre grant OPUS 2015/17/B/ST9/03167. D.A.H. and C.M. are supported by NSF 1313484. G.D. and M.S. acknowledge support from EU/FP7-ERC grant 615929 and the Weizmann-UK ‘Making Connections’ programme. A.G.-Y. is supported by EU/FP7 via ERC grant 307260, the Quantum Universe I-Core programme by the Israeli Committee for planning and funding and the Israel Science Foundation, and Kimmel and YeS awards. A.J. acknowledges funding by the European Union’s Framework Programme for Research and Innovation Horizon 2020 under Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement 702538. K.M. acknowledges support from the Science and Technology Facilities Council of the United Kingdom through an Ernest Rutherford Fellowship. Z.K.-R. acknowledges support from ERC Consolidator Grant 647208. The OGLE project has received funding from the National Science Centre, Poland, grant MAESTRO 2014/14/A/ST9/00121 to A.U. This study is based on observations collected at the European Organisation for Astronomical Research in the Southern Hemisphere, Chile, as part of PESSTO (ESO programme IDs 197.D.1075, 191.D-0935 and 188.D-3003) and observations made with ESO telescopes at the Paranal Observatory under programme 096.D-0894(A). GEMINI spectra were obtained under the GS-2015A-Q-56 programme (Principal Investigator D.A.H.). We are grateful to the Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare—Laboratori Nazionali del Sud for the use of computer facilities. This project used public archival data from the DES. Funding for the DES projects was provided by the U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. National Science Foundation, Ministry of Science and Education of Spain, Science and Technology Facilities Council of the United Kingdom, Higher Education Funding Council for England, National Center for Supercomputing Applications at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics at the University of Chicago, Center of Cosmology and Astro Particle Physics at Ohio State University, Mitchell Institute for Fundamental Physics and Astronomy at Texas A&M University, Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos, Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Spain), Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Germany) and the collaborating institutions in the DES, which are the Argonne National Laboratory, University of California Santa Cruz, University of Cambridge, Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Technológicas in Madrid, University of Chicago, University College London, DES–Brazil Consortium, University of Edinburgh, ETH Zürich, Fermilab, University of Illinois, Institute of Space Sciences (Institute of Space Studies of Catalonia–Spanish National Research Council), Institute for High Energy Physics at the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich and the associated Excellence Cluster Universe, University of Michigan, National Optical Astronomy Observatory, University of Nottingham, Ohio State University, University of Pennsylvania, University of Portsmouth, SLAC National Laboratory, Stanford University, University of Sussex and Texas A&M University. This paper is also based on observations from the Las Cumbres Observatory: we thank their staff for excellent assistance. IRAF is distributed by the National Optical Astronomy Observatory, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy under cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Astrophysics Research Centre, School of Mathematics and Physics, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, BT7 1NN, UK

    G. Terreran, S. J. Smartt, C. Inserra, K. Maguire, K. W. Smith, D. R. Young & E. Kankare

  2. INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova, Vicolo dell’Osservatorio 5, 35122, Padova, Italy

    G. Terreran, M. L. Pumo, L. Zampieri, S. Benetti, E. Cappellaro, N. Elias-Rosa, A. Pastorello & M. Turatto

  3. Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia G. Galilei, Università di Padova, Vicolo dell’Osservatorio 3, 35122, Padova, Italy

    G. Terreran

  4. Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Università degli studi di Catania, Via Santa Sofia 64, 95123, Catania, Italy

    M. L. Pumo

  5. INFN - Laboratori Nazionali del Sud, Via Santa Sofia 62, 95123, Catania, Italy

    M. L. Pumo

  6. Max-Planck-Institut für Extraterrestrische Physik, Giessenbachstraß e 1, 85748, Garching, Germany

    T.-W. Chen

  7. Division of Theoretical Astronomy, National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, National Institutes of Natural Sciences, 2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo, 181-8588, Japan

    T. J. Moriya

  8. The Oskar Klein Centre, Department of Astronomy, Stockholm University, AlbaNova, 10691, Stockholm, Sweden

    F. Taddia & J. Sollerman

  9. Unidad Mixta Internacional Franco-Chilena de Astronomía (CNRS UMI 3386), Departamento de Astronomía, Universidad de Chile, Camino El Observatorio 1515, Las Condes, Santiago, Chile

    L. Dessart

  10. Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA

    M. Nicholl

  11. School of Physics, O’Brien Centre for Science North, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland

    M. Fraser

  12. Warsaw University Observatory, Al. Ujazdowskie 4, 00-478, Warszawa, Poland

    Ł. Wyrzykowski, A. Udalski, Z. Kostrzewa-Rutkowska, S. Kozłowski, P. Mróz, M. Pawlak, P. Pietrukowicz, R. Poleski, D. Skowron, J. Skowron, I. Soszyński, M. K. Szymański & K. Ulaczyk

  13. Las Cumbres Observatory, 6740 Cortona Drive Suite 102, Goleta, CA, 93117, USA

    D. A. Howell & C. McCully

  14. Department of Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, Broida Hall, Mail Code 9530, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106-9530, USA

    D. A. Howell & C. McCully

  15. Department of Physics, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA

    S. Valenti

  16. Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK

    G. Dimitriadis & M. Sullivan

  17. Department of Particle Physics and Astrophysics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, 76100, Israel

    O. Yaron & A. Gal-Yam

  18. European Southern Observatory, Alonso de Córdova 3107, Casilla 19, Santiago, Chile

    J. P. Anderson

  19. INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Capodimonte, Salita Moiariello 16, 80131, Napoli, Italy

    M. Della Valle

  20. International Center for Relativistic Astrophysics, Piazza delle Repubblica, 10, 65122, Pescara, Italy

    M. Della Valle

  21. Max-Planck-Institut fur Astrophysik, Karl-Schwarzschild-Str. 1, D-85741, Garching, Germany

    A. Jerkstrand

  22. SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research, Sorbonnelaan 2, 3584 CA, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Z. Kostrzewa-Rutkowska

  23. Department of Astrophysics, Institute for Mathematics, Astrophysics and Particle Physics, Radboud University Nijmegen, PO Box 9010, 6500 GL, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    Z. Kostrzewa-Rutkowska

  24. Department of Astronomy, Ohio State University, 140 West 18th Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA

    R. Poleski

  25. Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK

    K. Ulaczyk

Authors
  1. G. Terreran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. L. Pumo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. T.-W. Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. T. J. Moriya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. F. Taddia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. L. Dessart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. L. Zampieri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. S. J. Smartt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. S. Benetti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. C. Inserra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. E. Cappellaro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. M. Nicholl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. M. Fraser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Ł. Wyrzykowski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. A. Udalski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. D. A. Howell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. C. McCully
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. S. Valenti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. G. Dimitriadis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  20. K. Maguire
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  21. M. Sullivan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  22. K. W. Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  23. O. Yaron
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  24. D. R. Young
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  25. J. P. Anderson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  26. M. Della Valle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  27. N. Elias-Rosa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  28. A. Gal-Yam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  29. A. Jerkstrand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  30. E. Kankare
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  31. A. Pastorello
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  32. J. Sollerman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  33. M. Turatto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  34. Z. Kostrzewa-Rutkowska
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  35. S. Kozłowski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  36. P. Mróz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  37. M. Pawlak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  38. P. Pietrukowicz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  39. R. Poleski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  40. D. Skowron
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  41. J. Skowron
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  42. I. Soszyński
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  43. M. K. Szymański
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  44. K. Ulaczyk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

G.T. initiated and coordinated the project, managed the follow-up campaign, carried out the photometric and spectroscopic analyses and wrote the manuscript. M.L.P. provided the hydrodynamical modelling and contributed to the preparation of the manuscript. T.-W.C. performed the host galaxy analyses. T.J.M. proposed and investigated the PISN scenario. F.T. identified the similarities of the target with SN 1987A and suggested the scaling. L.D. highlighted the issues with the interpretation of PISN and proposed the colliding shells scenario. L.Z. performed the semi-analytical modelling as a preliminary step to the full hydrodynamical modelling. S.J.S. is the principal investigator of PESSTO, through which we gathered all the observations at NTT. S.J.S. and S.B. supervised G.T., helped to coordinate the project and contributed to preparing and editing the manuscript, including final proofreading. C.I. helped with the magnetar hypothesis. E.C. and A.P. helped with theoretical interpretations, providing during preparation of the manuscript. M.N. retrieved the PISN models and helped to perform a thorough comparison of them. M.F. provided constructive criticism during preparation of the manuscript. Ł.W. was the main interlocutor with the OGLE team, providing all the data. D.A.H. was the principal investigator of the GEMINI proposal granting time from which we obtained two spectra that were reduced by C.M. and S.V. G.D. obtained the NTT observations. K.M., M.S., K.W.S., O.Y. and D.R.Y. (the PESSTO builders) helped to coordinate the observations using the NTT and administered the aspects of the PESSTO campaign. J.P.A., M.D.V., N.E.-R., A.G.-Y., A.J., E.K., J.S. and M.T. provided useful comments and advice on the first draft of the manuscript. Z.K.-R., S.K., P.M., M.P., P.P., R.P., D.S., J.S., I.S., M.K.S., A.U. and K.U. were part of the OGLE team and helped to obtain the data.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Terreran.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

A correction to this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-017-0364-1.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures 1–4, Supplementary Table 1, Supplementary Text and Supplementary References.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Terreran, G., Pumo, M.L., Chen, TW. et al. Hydrogen-rich supernovae beyond the neutrino-driven core-collapse paradigm. Nat Astron 1, 713–720 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-017-0228-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-017-0228-8

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing