Identification of cross reactive T cell responses in adenovirus based COVID 19 vaccines

Gardner, Joshua; Abrams, Simon Timothy; Toh, Cheng-Hock; Parker, Alan L.; Lovatt, Charlotte; Nicolson, Phillip L. R.; Watson, Steve P.; Grice, Sophie; Hering, Luisa; Pirmohamed, Munir; Naisbitt, Dean J.

doi:10.1038/s41541-024-00895-z

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 05 June 2024

Identification of cross reactive T cell responses in adenovirus based COVID 19 vaccines

npj Vaccines volume 9, Article number: 99 (2024) Cite this article

2532 Accesses
134 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

Vaccination has proven to be a valuable tool to combat SARS-CoV-2. However, reports of rare adverse reactions such as thrombosis/thrombocytopenia syndrome after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination have caused scientific, public and media concern. ChAdOx1 was vectorised from the Y25 chimpanzee adenovirus, which was selected due to low human seroprevalence to circumvent pre-existing immunity. In this study, we aimed to explore patterns of T-cell activation after SARS-CoV-2 COVID-19 vaccine exposure in vitro using PBMCs collected from pre-pandemic ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 naïve healthy donors (HDs), and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and Pfizer vaccinated controls. PBMCs were assessed for T-cell proliferation using the lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) following exposure to SARS-CoV-2 COVID-19 vaccines. Cytokine analysis was performed via intracellular cytokine staining, ELISpot assay and LEGENDplex immunoassays. T-cell assays performed in pre-pandemic vaccine naïve HDs, revealed widespread lymphocyte stimulation after exposure to ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (95%), ChAdOx-spike (90%) and the Ad26.COV2. S vaccine, but not on exposure to the BNT162b2 vaccine. ICS analysis demonstrated that CD4⁺ CD45RO⁺ memory T-cells are activated by ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 in vaccine naïve HDs. Cytometric immunoassays showed ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 exposure was associated with the release of proinflammatory and cytotoxic molecules, such as IFN-γ, IL-6, perforin, granzyme B and FasL. These studies demonstrate a ubiquitous T-cell response to ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and Ad26.COV2. S in HDs recruited prior to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, with T-cell stimulation also identified in vaccinated controls. This may be due to underlying T-cell cross-reactivity with prevalent human adenoviruses and further study will be needed to identify T-cell epitopes involved.

Immunogenicity to COVID-19 mRNA vaccine third dose in people living with HIV

Article Open access 22 August 2022

T cell and antibody responses induced by a single dose of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) vaccine in a phase 1/2 clinical trial

Article 17 December 2020

COVID-19 vaccination induces distinct T-cell responses in pediatric solid organ transplant recipients and immunocompetent children

Article Open access 05 April 2024

Introduction

The development of effective vaccines against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was crucial in tackling the Covid-19 pandemic. Several vaccines were developed with strong efficacy for protection against SARS-CoV-2 using both existing and novel vaccine technologies^1,2,3. Licensed viral vector vaccines include ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) and Ad26.COV2. S (Janssen/J&J) which are replication deficient and are based on a modified-chimpanzee adenovirus (Y25) and human adenovirus type 26 (Ad26), respectively^4,5. By contrast, other vaccines, such as the BNT162b2 (BioNTech/Pfizer) vaccine, followed more novel vaccine technology involving the use of lipid encapsulated messenger RNA (mRNA) encoding SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins⁶. Collectively, data from large scale clinical trials have documented strong immunogenicity in the form of robust antibody and T-cell responses (CD4+ and CD8+) following vaccination and subsequent exposure to SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins^5,7,8. However, data describing the intrinsic immunogenicity of Covid-19 vaccines is currently limited and little is known about pre-existing levels of cellular immunity to adenoviral vector platforms, such as ChAdOx1.

The adenoviral vector vaccines, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and Ad26.COV2. S, have been associated with the development of thrombosis and thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS). TTS is also known as vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) when a vaccine has been implicated. Studies have indicated that adenoviral vector vaccination is responsible for approximately 98.5% of all VITT cases⁹, with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination linked with a higher incidence (1/100,000) when compared to Ad26.COV2. S vaccination (1/500,000)^10,11,12. Although there have been reports of VITT associated with the use of the mRNA vaccines, these are rare, and may represent background events, and thus causality is unclear^13,14,15.

In addition to thrombotic events, immediate hypersensitivity reactions following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination have also been reported for the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, Ad26.COV2. S and BNT162b2 vaccines^16,17, with allergy to vaccine excipients cited as common cause of anaphylaxis¹⁸. Furthermore, cases of delayed onset hypersensitivity reactions to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, including drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) in severe cases^19,20 and delayed injection site reactions²¹ have been identified, but again causality is unclear in many cases²².

Prior exposure to human adenoviruses is well established²³. Initial development of adenoviral vectors focused almost entirely on human adenovirus type 5 (Ad5), but the high prevalence of prior exposure (60–98%) can increase neutralising antibody titres and reduce efficacy^24,25. The recombinant viral-vector based vaccines, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and Ad26.COV2. S, are produced using human cell lines and were selected due to the low population seroprevalence to circumvent pre-existing immunity. ChAdOx1 encompasses a chimpanzee adenoviral isolate (Y25) and its suitability for use as a vaccine candidate has been studied over several decades with evidence of low seroprevalence in humans^4,26. Similarly, Ad26.COV2. S is associated with significantly lower seroprevalence in the general population than other candidate human adenoviral vectors²⁷.

The aim of the present study was to investigate the frequency and phenotype of T-cell responses to ChAdOx1 and other SARS-CoV-2 COVID-19 vaccines using peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) stimulation assays. This allows for the detection of proliferative and cytokine-based memory T-cell responses and any underlying T-cell cross-reactivity²⁸. Proliferation and cytokine analysis were conducted using both pre- and post-pandemic PBMC samples, encompassing (i) healthy, vaccine naïve donors, (ii) ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccinated controls and (iii) ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 naïve, Pfizer vaccinated controls.

Results

Memory T-cell responses to ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and Ad26 are present in pre-pandemic vaccine naive healthy donor PBMC

To investigate frequency and phenotype of memory T-cell responses to a range of SARS-CoV-2 COVID-19 vaccines a panel of vaccine naïve healthy donors (HDs) were randomly selected from a cohort of cryopreserved PBMC collected by the Liverpool Healthy Donor Biobank in 2013 (Fig. 1). In the panel of 3 HDs initially studied, high levels of lymphocyte proliferation were identified in each HD after 5-day exposure to ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and Ad26.COV2. S using the lymphocyte transformation test (Fig. 1a). For ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, maximal T-cell stimulation (cpm > 4 × 10⁴) was present at 10³ vp/cell, whereas Ad26.COV2. S produced maximal stimulation at 500 vp/cell (cpm > 3 × 10⁴). Memory T-cell responses using the LTT were absent after exposure to BNT162b2 (1–10 µg/mL). No evidence of T-cell activation was found after PBMC incubation with SARS-CoV-2 spike protein peptide pools (SP1 and SP2), providing confirmation that HDs selected had not previously been exposed to SARS-CoV-2. Furthermore, cytokine release was observed after 48 h stimulation with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and Ad26.COV2. S, but not after exposure to BNT162b2, SP1 and SP2 (Fig. 1b). Differences in T-cell reactivity following exposure to Ad26.COV2. S were observed in HD-3, with cytokine release notably absent. This may be a result of the weak proliferative responses associated with HD-3 and general inter-individual variability between healthy donor samples with differing levels of prior exposure. After removal of the T-cell component (CD3⁺ T-cells) from whole PBMC populations, no lymphocyte proliferation or cytokine release (IFN-γ) was observed after stimulation with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (Supplementary Fig. 1).

**Fig. 1: T-cell responses to ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, Ad26.COV2. S, BNT162b2 and SARS-CoV-2 spike protein peptide pools in healthy, vaccine naïve donors determined by lymphocyte transformation test.**

Intracellular cytokine staining demonstrated ChAdOx1 nCoV-19-mediated activation of memory CD4⁺ CD45RO⁺ T-cell populations

To identify specific T-cell populations activated by ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 within the conventional proliferative and cytokine-based T-cell assays performed, ICS analysis was conducted (Fig. 2). In the panel of 4 vaccine naïve HDs studied, CD4⁺ CD45RO⁺ memory T-cells were isolated as the primary activated population after stimulation with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (100 vp/cell) and assessment of IFN-γ secretion as marker of T-cell activation. In HD-1, >1% (1 × 10⁴ cells/10⁶) of memory CD4⁺ CD45RO⁺ cells were activated after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 exposure, with PMAI successfully inducing widespread IFN-γ secretion as a positive control (Fig. 2a). This trend was consistent across all HDs studied, for which IFN-γ secretion was observed in 0.14–1% (1.4 × 10⁴–1 × 10⁴ cells/10⁶) of circulating CD4⁺ CD45RO⁺ memory T-cells (Fig. 2b).

**Fig. 2: Intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) demonstrating IFN-γ secretion from circulating CD4⁺ CD45RO⁺ T-cells after stimulation with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19.**

T-cells stimulated with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and Ad26.COV2. S secrete pro-inflammatory and cytotoxic cytokine mediators

Cytokine profiling was performed using PBMCs (2 × 10⁵ cells/well) isolated from 3 vaccine naïve HDs. Fluorospot Flex assays revealed the secretion of Th1 (IFN-γ) and cytotoxic effector molecules (granzyme B) after incubation with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and Ad26.COV2. S, with the release of Th2 (IL-13) cytokines notably absent (Fig. 3a). Additionally, cytokine release from PBMC taken from 3 vaccine naïve HDs was studied in greater depth using the LEGENDplex BioLegend Custom Human 11-plex cytokine panel after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (100 vp/cell) exposure (Fig. 3b). FACS analysis of the supernatant revealed the secretion of IFN-γ (>2000 pg/mL; n = 3), perforin (>1000 pg/mL; n = 3) and granzyme B (>10,000 pg/mL; n = 3) at high levels from stimulated T-cells. Additionally, the release of IL-5, IL-6, IL-10, IL-22, TNF-α and FasL was detected above background levels. Secretion of IL-13 and IL-17A was observed at reduced levels compared with other cytokines (2–20 pg/mL).

**Fig. 3: Cytokine profile displaying T-cell responses to ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and Ad26.COV2. S in vaccine naïve donors.**

Memory T-cell responses to ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and purified ChAdOx1 are widespread in an extended cohort of pre-pandemic vaccine naive healthy donor PBMC

Due to T-cell stimulation observed after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 exposure in 3 HDs, in combination with the low seroprevelence of ChAdY25 reported in the literature, further LTTs were conducted using an extended panel of 20 HDs (Fig. 4). The demographics of the healthy donor cohort used for this study can be viewed in Supplementary Table 1. IFN-γ was utilised as universal marker of immune stimulation. IFN-γ release was detected in all 20 HDs studied with strong responses present at both 100 and 1000 vp/cell of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (Fig. 4a). In the same HDs, proliferative T-cell responses were highly consistent, with 19/20 HDs displaying significant increases in lymphocyte proliferation (P < 0.05) (Fig. 4b). To exclude the activity of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 excipients, T-cell responses were assessed after treatment with purified ChAdOx1 (1000 vp/cell) which possessed a genetically identical phenotype (Fig. 5). Analysis of a different panel of vaccine naïve HDs revealed cytokine release (IFN-γ) in <50% of selected donors after purified ChAdOx1 incubation (Fig. 5a). When studying proliferative T-cell responses 18/20 HDs demonstrated high levels of lymphocyte stimulation, with 12/20 responses reaching the threshold for statistical significance (Fig. 5b).

**Fig. 4: Proliferative and cytokine-based T-cell responses to ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 in healthy, vaccine naïve donors using extended PBMC cohort collected prior to the Covid-19 pandemic.**

**Fig. 5: T-cell stimulation in vaccine naïve HDs after exposure to purified ChAdOx spike.**

ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 induces proliferative and cytokine-based T-cell stimulation in ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccinated and Pfizer vaccinated controls

To delve deeper into the immunogenic nature of ChAdOx1, it was necessary to study T-cell responses in ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccinated and Pfizer vaccinated controls (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 naïve) for comparative analysis with data generated using pre-pandemic PBMC collected from vaccine naïve healthy donor models (Fig. 6). In PBMC samples collected from individuals vaccinated with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 only (n = 3), lymphocyte responses were identified in all 3 donors after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 incubation, with maximal T-cell proliferation (cpm > 1.8 × 10⁴) universally observed at 100 vp/cell (Fig. 6a). Cytokine release (IFN-γ and granzyme B) was studied in the same vaccinated individuals at optimal ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 concentrations (100–1000 vp/cell), with strong levels of Th1 and cytotoxic molecule secretion recorded (Fig. 6a). For individuals vaccinated with BNT162b2 and therefore naïve for ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 exposure, data was consistent with healthy donor models as proliferative (cpm > 1.6 × 10⁴) and cytokine-based (IFN-γ and granzyme B) T-cell activation was observed across all 3 Pfizer vaccinated controls at similar levels (Fig. 6b). Pfizer vaccinated controls were also assessed for memory T-cell stimulation following exposure to BNT162b2 (1–20 µg/mL) (Supplementary Fig. 2). Cytokine release assays (IFN-γ) demonstrated that BNT162b2 (20 µg/mL) was capable of inducing T-cell activation, with dose-dependent cytokine release observed within PBMC obtained from HC1 and HC2 (Supplementary Fig. 2a). No T-cell proliferation was observed after 5-day BNT162b2 exposure, with phytohemagglutinin (PHA) successfully demonstrating the proliferative capacity of T-cells within the assay (Supplementary Fig. 2b).

**Fig. 6: T-cell responses after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 rechallenge in ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccinated and Pfizer vaccinated (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 naïve) controls.**

Discussion

To date, studies investigating T-cell responses to SARS-CoV2 vaccines have almost exclusively focused on the activation of T-cells after SARS-CoV-2 Covid-19 vaccination and subsequent rechallange with SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins^5,7,8. Here, we report that vaccines based on adenoviral vector delivery systems, specifically ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and Ad26.COV2. S, directly activate T-cells from pre-pandemic vaccine naïve healthy donor PBMC. No memory T-cell responses were present after incubation with SARS-CoV-2 spike protein peptide pools (Fig. 1a, b) indicating no prior SARS-CoV-2 spike exposure. Proliferative and cytokine-based T-cell responses to ChAdOx1 were ubiquitous amongst the cohort of vaccine naïve HDs (Figs. 1, 3 and 4). This suggests the observed T-cell reactivity may be a result of cross-reactivity as humans are not frequently infected with ChAdY25 and therefore seroprevalence is low, although cross-species transmission is possible²⁹. Differences in T-cell reactivity following exposure to Ad26.COV2. S were observed in HD-3 (Fig. 1), with cytokine release notably absent. This may be a result of the weak proliferative responses associated with HD-3 and inter-individual variability between healthy donor samples with differing levels of prior exposure.

Deletion of the E1 gene followed by the insertion of a transgene makes ChAdOx1 replication deficient and necessitates propagation in complementing cell lines, namely the HEK293 cell line³⁰. Proteomic analysis performed by Greinacher et al., has now identified large numbers of virus production-derived HEK293 protein impurities present within ChAdOx1 nCoV-19. Interestingly, this study found that between 43% and 60% of the protein content of each ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 dose was attributed to proteins of HEK293 origin³¹, raising the question of the substantial, unknown, immunogenic potential of non-self-proteins incorporated within ChAdOx1.

ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 contains high levels of impurities, such as adenoviral and host-cell proteins, when compared to Ad26.COV2. S. It has been hypothesised that ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 contamination with adenovirus hexons and HEK293 cellular debris may be involved in VITT pathogenesis, arising from complex formation with platelets and the formation of polyanions that propagate an inflammatory environment^12,32. Here, aberrant T-cell responses to excipients and impurities of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 were ruled out after exposure to a genetically identical purified version of ChAdOx1, produced using a caesium chloride purification protocol (Fig. 5). It was also important to determine that the observed lymphocyte proliferation and cytokine activity following ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 exposure was of T-cell origin and not as a result of innate stimulation. Using CD3^- populations isolated from whole PBMC, lymphocyte activation was absent after incubation with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 exposure (Supplementary Fig. 1). This demonstrates the importance of T-cells within response elicitation and excludes the possibility of activated NK cells masking proliferative and cytokine-based readouts.

The attachment of adenoviral vectors to cellular receptors, such as the T-cell receptor, is mediated by the adenovirus fibre knob protein³³. Crystallography studies have indicated homology between the fibre knob protein associated with ChAdOx1 and other human adenoviruses, such as Ad5, despite sharing a relatively dissimilar amino acid sequence of 65%³⁴. Candidate adenoviral vector platforms such as Ad26 and Ad35 have demonstrated genetic segregation from Ad5 with the aim of negating pre-existing immunity³⁵. Additionally, several human adenoviruses are known to circulate at high levels, with Ad4 being the closest human relative to ChAdOx1 associated with cross-species transmission³⁶. Therefore, it is possible that ChAdOx1 mediated T-cell activation may be caused by pre-existing cross-reactive immunity to specific T-cell epitopes present within circulating human adenoviruses. This is further reinforced by ICS studies that have demonstrated the activation of CD4⁺ CD45RO⁺ memory T-cell populations following short-term exposure (<24 h) to ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 within PBMC collected from vaccine naïve HDs pre-pandemic (Fig. 2). The presence of small fractions of reactive CD4⁺ CD45RO⁺ CD4+ T-cells is indicative of long-lived immunological memory to human adenoviruses with shared homology to ChAdOx1³⁷.

Reactogenicity studies exploring the activation and phenotype of lymphocyte populations following ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination have reported activation of the adaptive immune system, confirmed by upregulation of activation (CD69) and proliferative markers (Ki-67⁺) in CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells⁸, with immune activation observed between 7 and 28 days post ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination. Our findings indicate lymphocyte responses after between 2-5 days of in vitro exposure in all groups assessed (pre-pandemic vaccine naïve HDs, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccinated controls and Pfizer vaccinated controls). This suggests the presence of pre-existing immunity as strong memory T-cell responses were detected a timepoints that exclude the possibility of a primed a T-cell response to ChAdOx1.

The Ad26.COV2. S vaccine was also associated with T-cell stimulation in HDs (Fig. 1a). As previously stated, the selection of Ad26 as a platform was due to the low seroprevalence associated with wild type Ad26 infection compared to other more commonly used serotypes such as Ad5, for which pre-existing immunity has long been a cause for concern³⁸. Seroepidemiology studies have identified an Ad26 seropositive rate of between 50% and 70% in sub-Saharan African populations²⁴. It should be noted that serological prevalence does not always equate to detectable T-cell reactivity as it is unlikely that every individual will be sensitised and possess antigen/peptide-specific T-cells circulating at the levels necessary for detection within T-cell assays. However, T-cell stimulation arising from Ad26.COV2. S exposure was perhaps surprising within the context of this study, with participants predominately of European origin. Proliferative T-cell responses were absent when studying responses in the same individuals to BNT162b2, as memory T-cell function would be negated within unexposed individuals and no possibility of viral cross-reactivity due to the nature of mRNA vaccines.

Exposure to both adenoviral vector vaccines, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and Ad26.COV2. S, was associated with the release of IFN-γ and granzyme B (Fig. 3a). T-cells from pre-pandemic vaccine naïve HDs were found to exhibit a cytokine profile aligned with a cytotoxic T-cell response, with the release of pro-inflammatory mediator’s indicative of early signalling for the amplification of both innate and adaptive immune responses to adenovirus vectors³⁹. In the case of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, these findings were further reinforced by flow cytometric studies analysing supernatant obtained from ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 stimulated PBMCs using LEGENDplex multi-panel cytokine immunoassays (Fig. 3b). Here, cytokine release was quantified and indicated that cytotoxic and cytolytic molecules, such as granzyme B, perforin and FasL, were secreted at high levels. The observed release of effector molecules from T-cells after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 exposure aligns with known pathways of viral infection⁴⁰, potentially mimicked in vitro by ChAdOx nCoV-19 within our studies. Adverse events, such as fever, swelling and localised pain, have been widely reported following ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination and recent studies have linked both local and systemic reactions with a vaccine-mediated inflammatory response^41,42. In our study, the release of pro-inflammatory (IFN-γ and IL-6) and cytotoxic cytokine mediators from vaccine naïve HD PBMCs after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 exposure may explain the reactogenicity associated with ChAdOx1.

It was important to compare T-cell responses to ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 between recently obtained vaccine naïve controls and vaccinated controls to further explore the widespread nature of lymphocyte activation and assess the validity of data produced from HD models (Fig. 6). Both proliferative and cytokine-based (IFN-γ and granzyme B) T-cell readouts were consistent between ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccinated and Pfizer vaccinated controls, with no noticeable differences observed regarding the intensity and dosage at which T-cells are stimulated (Fig. 6a, b). These data are strongly aligned with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19-induced T-cell responses in pre-pandemic vaccine naive HD models and also concordant with prior ChAdOx1 exposure due to ability of immune cells to mount a strong memory T-cell response. These findings are most likely a result of cross-reactive T-cell responses that are pan-adenovirus in nature without direct specificity for ChAdOx1 (Y25). Studies assessing memory T-cell responses to Pfizer vaccinated (ChAdOx1 naïve) controls identified dose-dependent immune stimulation (IFN-γ release) after rechallange with BNT162b2 (Supplementary Fig. 2). This is consistent with prior BNT162b2 exposure which leads to long-lasting immunological memory in the form of a robust T-cell response^43,44.

Previous studies have defined immunodominant T-cell epitopes on both the hexon and penton proteins derived from human adenoviruses, restricted by HLA class I (HLA-A*02) and II (HLA-DP4) alleles of high prevalence^45,46. Here, we speculate that T-cell reactivity to adenoviral-based COVID-19 vaccines within our cohort of unexposed healthy donors are most likely a result of widespread recognition of immunodominant T-cell epitopes present at high levels within the population. A similar phenomenon has been reported when studying IgG antibody responses to conserved SARS-CoV-2 spike subdomains⁴⁷. In this study, SARS-CoV-2 was not recognised by the adaptive immune system as a novel pathogen and cross-reactivity with shared immunodominant regions between seasonal betacoronaviruses correlated with COVID-19 disease severity.

In summary, our findings demonstrate the omnipresent nature of strong, cross-reactive CD4⁺ CD45RO⁺ memory T-cell responses to ChAdOx1 and Ad26 in healthy, vaccine naïve PBMC samples collected prior to the Covid-19 pandemic. Although previous exposure to chimpanzee adenoviruses has been reported in certain demographics, seroprevalence is low and inconsistent with the level of responses observed in vaccine naïve donors. Consequently, this suggests that immune stimulation after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 exposure may arise from pre-existing immunity to prevalent human adenoviruses with shared homology between T-cell epitopes. Moving forward, it will be necessary to define specific epitope(s) involved to potentially inform on vaccine development. This may be achieved using a proteomic-based approach to elute and synthesise MHC-bound peptides spanning the major structural proteins of adenoviral vectors.

Methods

Sample collection and ethical approval

Vaccine naïve PBMCs were accessed through the Liverpool healthy donor biobank which contained 1200+ cryopreserved and HLA typed PBMC samples collected prior to the Covid-19 pandemic. Fresh venous blood samples (40 mL) were taken from vaccinated controls using lithium heparin coated tubes. Written, informed consent was given by all healthy volunteers used in this study and ethical approval was obtained from the Liverpool research ethics committee.

Isolation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells

Whole venous blood was collected using vacutainer heparinised tubes from ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccinated and Pfizer vaccinated controls. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated by density gradient centrifugation, during which whole blood was layered onto an equal volume of lymphoprep™ (STEMCELL^™ Technologies) and then centrifuged for 25 min at 2000 rpm with no brake applied. The resulting buffy coat, comprising the lymphocyte layer, was carefully removed by gentle resuspension using a Pasteur pipette. Cells were washed twice with HBBS buffer solution before resuspension in RPMI-based T-cell culture media supplemented with penicillin (100 μg/mL), streptomycin (100 U/mL), holo-transferrin (12.5 mg/mL), HEPES buffer (25 mM), L-glutamine (2 mM) and 10% human AB serum. The cell suspension was stained with trypan blue (0.2% w/v) and counted using a Neubauer haemocytometer. The overall cell viability was determined using trypan blue exclusion, in which uptake of trypan by cells indicated a permeabilized membrane and was indicative of cell death, with viabilities >95% typically achieved. CD3^- populations were isolated from whole PBMC populations using magnetic bead separation. This was achieved by negative selection of CD3⁺ cells using a Pan-T antibody cocktail and performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Miltenyi Biotec, UK).

ChAdOx1 purification

Purified ChAdOx1 was generated using a double caesium chloride gradient virus purification protocol according to methodologies previously described³⁴. HEK-293 T-Rex cells grown in DMEM media (Sigma Aldrich) supplemented with 10% FCS (Sigma Aldrich), 1% Penicillin/Streptomycin (Gibco) (complete media) were used to grow the ChAdOx1 vector. For infection, media was removed from ten 150 cm² flasks of HEK-293 T-Rex cells at 60–70% confluence were washed with PBS, and the media replaced with 15 ml of complete media containing ChAdOx1 at 0.1–1 vp/cell. Cells were observed until a noticeable cytopathic effect (CPE) was evident, at which point the cells were pooled and were collected by centrifugation (1,5000 rpm; 5 min). Media was discarded and the cell pellet was resuspended in 5 mL phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) before thorough mixing with tetrachloroethylene (1:1). The resultant mixture was centrifuged (2000 rpm; 20 min) followed by removal of the top layer of aqueous solution. The sample was further purified by additional centrifugation and removal of the solutions top aqueous layer, with the remaining steps of the purification protocol performed according to the two-step caesium chloride gradient methodology described by Uusi-Kerttula et al.⁴⁸. Virus was titered using a micro BCA assay against a range of protein standards with viral titer deduced assuming that 1 μg protein = 4 × 10⁹ viral particles. Viral purity and homogeneity were additionally confirmed using a Nanosight NS300 (Malvern Panalytical).

Lymphocyte transformation test

PBMCs from vaccine naïve healthy volunteers and vaccinated controls were isolated from fresh venous blood by density gradient centrifugation as previously described. For the assessment of T-cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 COVID-19 vaccines using samples collected pre-pandemic, PBMCs were previously cryopreserved in a solution containing 80% FBS and 20% DMSO. Cryopreserved PBMCs were thawed, washed in T-cell culture medium and incubated for 6 h prior to assay commencement. PBMC were diluted in T-cell culture medium to achieve a seeding density of 1.5 × 10⁵ cells/well and transferred into a U-bottomed 96 well-plate in triplicate cultures. PBMC were incubated with SARS-CoV-2 COVID-19 vaccines at graded concentrations for a period of 5 days (37 °C, 5% CO2). The inclusion of conditions in which PBMC were exposed to phytohemagglutinin (10 μg/mL) represented a positive control for the assay by way of detecting non-specific lymphocyte proliferation. On day 5, [3H]-thymidine was added to each assay condition at a concentration of 0.5 μCi/well, and incubated for a further 16 h. On day 6, plates were harvested onto printed fibreglass filter mats using a cell harvester (Harvester 96 Tomtec; Tomtec Imaging Systems GMbH, Unterschleissheim, Germany) and dried at 80 °C. Fibreglass mats were heat sealed inside Wallac sample bags with MeltiLex scintillator sheets using a Wallac 1495-021 Microsealer (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA). Radioactivity incorporated within the DNA of proliferating cells was detected and quantified using a MicroBeta 2450 microplate counter and readouts were given by counts per minute (cpm).

Enzyme-linked immunospot assay

Cytokine release from PBMCs after SARS-CoV-2 COVID-19 vaccine exposure was performed by enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISpot) assay. Protein Binding Immobilon-P Membrane 96-well Multiscreen® filter plates were activated by the addition of 35% ethanol solution before thorough washing (5x) with 200 μL distilled water. Activated Multiscreen® filter plates were then coated with 100 μL of IFN-y (Cat. No 3420-3, 1:100 dilution) or granzyme B (Cat. No 3486-1, 1:50 dilution) capture antibody diluted in sterile HBSS according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Mabtech, Nacka Strand, Sweden). Coated plates were then incubated for 24 h at 4 °C. On the day of the assay PBMCs were washed in T-cell culture medium to exclude any cytokine milieu and seeded at 2 × 10⁵ cells/well. PBMCs were incubated in pre-coated Multiscreen® filter plates with SARS-CoV-2 COVID-19 vaccines at graded concentrations for 48 h. For assay development, cells were discarded and ELISpot plates were washed with 200 μL HBSS. Detection antibodies were conjugated with biotin corresponding to the cytokines of interest and diluted in HBSS supplemented with 0.5% FBS according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Biotinylated antibody solution was added to each well and incubated for 2 h. Following incubation, plates were washed with HBSS and streptavidin conjugated alkaline phosphatase (1:1000 dilution) was added to each well of the assay and plates were incubated for 1 h. Sterile filtered (0.45 μM) BCIP-NBT substrate solution was added to the assay and plates were incubated at RT for 15–20 min in the dark to allow colorimetric reaction to occur. Spots were imaged using an AID ELISpot reader (Cadima Madical, Stourbridge, UK).

Intracellular cytokine staining

Intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) assays were performed according to methods described by Peng et al., using PBMC from vaccine naïve HDs collected pre-pandemic⁸. Briefly, PBMCs (1 × 10⁶) were stimulated with either cell culture medium, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (100 vp/cell) or PMAI, in the presence of costimulatory anti-CD28 and anti-CD49 (BD Biosciences; 1 µg/mL) for 2 h (37 °C, 5% CO2). After incubation, brefeldin A (10 µg/mL) was added and cells were incubated for a further 18 h. Samples were then stained to isolate specific T-cell populations including CD3 (Cat. No. 300448, 1:50 dilution), CD4 (Cat. No. 555346, 1:30 dilution), CD8 (Cat. No. 301036, 1:100 dilution) and CD45RO (Cat. No. 304222, 1:50 dilution) populations (BioLegend®). Intracellular cytokine secretion from individual immune populations was identified using IFN-γ (Cat. No. 17-7619-82, 1:200 dilution) and IL-13 (Cat. No. 12-7136-42, 1:25 dilution) fluorophore-conjugated antibodies (eBioScience). Fluorescent signals were measured using BD FACSCanto II and analysed using FlowJo version 10 software. The gating strategy used can be viewed in Supplementary Fig. 3.

Fluorospot Flex assay

To study the release of multiple cytokines from a single PBMC population after 48 h SARS-CoV-2 COVID-19 vaccine exposure, Fluorospot Flex assays, customised for the simultaneous detection of IFN-γ, IL-13 and granzyme B, were performed. Capture and biotinylated antibodies were amalgamated for the cytokines of interest and diluted using 0.1% BSA. Otherwise, Fluorospot Flex assays were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions and in line with methodologies previously described for the ELISpot assay. Fluorescent Spots were imaged using an AID iSpot Fluorospot reader (Cadima Madical, Stourbridge, UK).

Cytometric bead array immunoassay

Supernatant from vaccine naïve HD PBMC (n = 3) were incubated (37 °C, 5% CO2) for 5 days with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (100 vp/cell), according to the experimental procedure previously described for the LTT. Harvested supernatant (25 μL) was used for cytokine quantification using a bead-based immunoassay according to the manufacturer’s instructions (LEGENDplex, BioLegend Custom Human 11-plex panel). Specific antibody coated beads were incubated with supernatant pooled from triplicate wells for each condition forming an analyte-antibody complex. After washing, a biotinylated detection antibody cocktail was added which bound to the specific analyte-antibody complexes. Streptavidin-phycoerythrin was subsequently added which bound to the biotinylated detection antibodies, providing fluorescent signal intensities in proportion to the bound analyte amount. Fluorescent signals were measured using BD FACSCanto II and analysed using LEGENDplex data analysis software where concentrations of each analyte were determined using a standard curve generated from the same assay.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 9.0 software and data are presented as mean ± standard deviation of 3 experimental replicates. To evaluate proliferative T-cell responses for which data was found to be normally distributed, one-way ANOVA and students t-tests were performed. For data containing identical values that are not due to chance, a one sample Wilcoxon test was performed. For these tests, *p < 0.05 was deemed to be the threshold for statistical significance.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Voysey, M. et al. Safety and efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AZD1222) against SARS-CoV-2: an interim analysis of four randomised controlled trials in Brazil, South Africa, and the UK. Lancet 397, 99–111 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sadoff, J. et al. Safety and Efficacy of Single-Dose Ad26.COV2.S Vaccine against Covid-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 384, 2187–2201 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Polack, F. P. et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N. Engl. J. Med. 383, 2603–2615 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Dicks, M. D. et al. A novel chimpanzee adenovirus vector with low human seroprevalence: improved systems for vector derivation and comparative immunogenicity. PLoS One 7, e40385 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Alter, G. et al. Immunogenicity of Ad26.COV2.S vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 variants in humans. Nature 596, 268–272 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Chaudhary, N., Weissman, D. & Whitehead, K. A. mRNA vaccines for infectious diseases: principles, delivery and clinical translation. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 20, 817–838 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sahin, U. et al. COVID-19 vaccine BNT162b1 elicits human antibody and TH1 T cell responses. Nature 586, 594–599 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ewer, K. J. et al. T cell and antibody responses induced by a single dose of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) vaccine in a phase 1/2 clinical trial. Nat. Med. 27, 270–278 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
van de Munckhof, A. et al. Declining mortality of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis with thrombocytopenia after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Eur. J. Neurol. 29, 339–344 (2022).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Toh, C. H., Wang, G. & Parker, A. L. The aetiopathogenesis of vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia. Clin. Med. 22, 140–144 (2022).
Article Google Scholar
Makris, M. & Pavord, S. Most cases of Thrombosis and Thrombocytopenia Syndrome (TTS) post ChAdOx-1 nCov-19 are Vaccine-induced Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia (VITT). Lancet Reg. Health Eur. 12, 100274 (2022).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Michalik, S. et al. Comparative analysis of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and Ad26.COV2.S SARS-CoV-2 vector vaccines. Haematologica 107, 947–957 (2022).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Nicholson, M., Goubran, H., Chan, N. & Siegal, D. No apparent association between mRNA COVID-19 vaccination and venous thromboembolism. Blood Rev. 56, 100970 (2022).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
See, I. et al. Case Series of Thrombosis With Thrombocytopenia Syndrome After COVID-19 Vaccination-United States, December 2020 to August 2021. Ann. Intern. Med. 175, 513–522 (2022).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Thiele, T. et al. Laboratory confirmed vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia: Retrospective analysis of reported cases after vaccination with ChAdOx-1 nCoV-19 in Germany. Lancet Reg. Health Eur. 12, 100270 (2022).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Castells, M. C. & Phillips, E. J. Maintaining Safety with SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines. N. Engl. J. Med. 384, 643–649 (2020).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Tanno, L. K., Berard, F., Beaudoin, E., Didier, A. & Demoly, P. SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination and Anaphylaxis: Recommendations of the French Allergy Community and the Montpellier World Health Organization Collaborating Center. Vaccines 9, 560 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Caballero, M. L. & Quirce, S. Excipients as Potential Agents of Anaphylaxis in Vaccines: Analyzing the Formulations of Currently Authorized COVID-19 Vaccines. J. Investig. Allergol. Clin. Immunol. 31, 92–93 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
O’Connor, T., O’Callaghan-Maher, M., Ryan, P. & Gibson, G. Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome following vaccination with the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine. JAAD Case Rep. 20, 14–16 (2022).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Seque, C. A., Enokihara, M., Nascimento, M. M., Porro, A. M. & Tomimori, J. Rare cutaneous reactions after ChAdOx1 (Oxford-AstraZeneca) vaccine: 12 case series from Brazil. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol Venereol. 36, e601–e603 (2022).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kim, J. E. et al. Delayed cutaneous reaction to ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine: Is it an ‘AstraZeneca arm’? J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 35, e711–e714 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sprute, R., Schumacher, S., Pauls, M., Pauls, W. & Cornely, O. A. Delayed Cutaneous Hypersensitivity Reaction to Vaxzevria (ChAdOx1-S) Vaccine against SARS-CoV-2. Drugs R. D. 21, 371–374 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Mendonça, S. A., Lorincz, R., Boucher, P. & Curiel, D. T. Adenoviral vector vaccine platforms in the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. npj Vaccines 6, 97 (2021).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Barouch, D. H. et al. International seroepidemiology of adenovirus serotypes 5, 26, 35, and 48 in pediatric and adult populations. Vaccine 29, 5203–5209 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Yu, B. et al. Seroprevalence of neutralizing antibodies to human adenovirus type 5 in healthy adults in China. J. Med. Virol. 84, 1408–1414 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hillis, W. D. & Goodman, R. Serologic Classification of Chimpanzee Adenoviruses by Hemagglutination and Hemagglutination Inhibition1. J. Immunol. 103, 1089–1095 (1969).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Byazrova, M. G. et al. Anti-Ad26 humoral immunity does not compromise SARS-COV-2 neutralizing antibody responses following Gam-COVID-Vac booster vaccination. npj Vaccines 7, 145 (2022).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Pichler, W. J. & Tilch, J. The lymphocyte transformation test in the diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity. Allergy 59, 809–820 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Xiang, Z. et al. Chimpanzee adenovirus antibodies in humans, sub-Saharan Africa. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 12, 1596–1599 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Almuqrin, A. et al. SARS-CoV-2 vaccine ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 infection of human cell lines reveals low levels of viral backbone gene transcription alongside very high levels of SARS-CoV-2 S glycoprotein gene transcription. Genome Med. 13, 43 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Greinacher, A. et al. Insights in ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia. Blood 138, 2256–2268 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Krutzke, L. et al. Process- and product-related impurities in the ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccine. eLife 11, e78513 (2022).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Henry, L. J., Xia, D., Wilke, M. E., Deisenhofer, J. & Gerard, R. D. Characterization of the knob domain of the adenovirus type 5 fiber protein expressed in Escherichia coli. J. Virol. 68, 5239–5246 (1994).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Baker, A. T. et al. ChAdOx1 interacts with CAR and PF4 with implications for thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome. Sci. Adv. 7, eabl8213 (2021).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Geisbert, T. W. et al. Recombinant Adenovirus Serotype 26 (Ad26) and Ad35 Vaccine Vectors Bypass Immunity to Ad5 and Protect Nonhuman Primates against Ebolavirus Challenge. J. Virol. 85, 4222–4233 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Purkayastha, A. et al. Genomic and bioinformatics analysis of HAdV-4, a human adenovirus causing acute respiratory disease: implications for gene therapy and vaccine vector development. J. Virol. 79, 2559–2572 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ahmed, R. & Gray, D. Immunological memory and protective immunity: understanding their relation. Science 272, 54–60 (1996).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Abbink, P. et al. Comparative seroprevalence and immunogenicity of six rare serotype recombinant adenovirus vaccine vectors from subgroups B and D. J. Virol. 81, 4654–4663 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hemmi, M. et al. The early activation of CD8+ T cells is dependent on type I IFN signaling following intramuscular vaccination of adenovirus vector. Biomed. Res. Int. 2014, 158128–158128 (2014).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Shrestha, B. & Diamond, M. S. Fas ligand interactions contribute to CD8+ T-cell-mediated control of West Nile virus infection in the central nervous system. J. Virol. 81, 11749–11757 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hervé, C., Laupèze, B., Del Giudice, G., Didierlaurent, A. M. & Tavares Da Silva, F. The how’s and what’s of vaccine reactogenicity. npj Vaccines 4, 39 (2019).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Heo, J. Y. et al. COVID-19 vaccine type-dependent differences in immunogenicity and inflammatory response: BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19. Front. Immunol. 13, 975363 (2022).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sette, A. & Crotty, S. Immunological memory to SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccines. Immunol. Rev. 310, 27–46 (2022).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hurme, A. et al. Long-Lasting T Cell Responses in BNT162b2 COVID-19 mRNA Vaccinees and COVID-19 Convalescent Patients. Front. Immunol. 13, 869990 (2022).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Tang, J. et al. Adenovirus hexon T-cell epitope is recognized by most adults and is restricted by HLA DP4, the most common class II allele. Gene Ther. 11, 1408–1415 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Tischer, S. et al. Discovery of immunodominant T-cell epitopes reveals penton protein as a second immunodominant target in human adenovirus infection. J. Transl. Med. 14, 286 (2016).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Garrido, J. L. et al. IgG targeting distinct seasonal coronavirus- conserved SARS-CoV-2 spike subdomains correlates with differential COVID-19 disease outcomes. Cell Rep. 39, 110904 (2022).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Uusi-Kerttula, H. et al. Incorporation of Peptides Targeting EGFR and FGFR1 into the Adenoviral Fiber Knob Domain and Their Evaluation as Targeted Cancer Therapies. Hum. Gene Ther. 26, 320–329 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) and supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) (NIHR135073). The authors would like to thank all volunteers for their generous donations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Centre for Drug Safety Science, Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
Joshua Gardner, Sophie Grice, Luisa Hering, Munir Pirmohamed & Dean J. Naisbitt
Institute of Infection, Veterinary Sciences and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
Simon Timothy Abrams & Cheng-Hock Toh
Division of Cancer and Genetics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
Alan L. Parker & Charlotte Lovatt
Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
Phillip L. R. Nicolson & Steve P. Watson
Department of Haematology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
Phillip L. R. Nicolson

Authors

Joshua Gardner
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Simon Timothy Abrams
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Cheng-Hock Toh
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Alan L. Parker
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Charlotte Lovatt
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Phillip L. R. Nicolson
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Steve P. Watson
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Sophie Grice
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Luisa Hering
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Munir Pirmohamed
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Dean J. Naisbitt
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J.G., S.G. and L.H. conducted the biological experiments. S.T.A., C.-H.T., A.P., C.L., P.N. and S.P.W. contributed to study design and assisted with access to SARS-CoV-2 COVID-19 vaccines. M.P. and D.J.N. supervised the project. M.P. was chair of the TTS consortium funded by the DHSC and supported by the NIHR. J.G. analysed the data and drafted the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joshua Gardner.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

M.P. has received partnership funding for the following: MRC Clinical Pharmacology Training Scheme (co‐funded by MRC and Roche, UCB, Eli Lilly and Novartis). He has developed an HLA genotyping panel with MC Diagnostics, but does not benefit financially from this. M.P. and D.J.N. are part of the IMI Consortium ARDAT (www.ardat.org). All other authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Material

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gardner, J., Abrams, S.T., Toh, CH. et al. Identification of cross reactive T cell responses in adenovirus based COVID 19 vaccines. npj Vaccines 9, 99 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41541-024-00895-z

Download citation

Received: 09 January 2024
Accepted: 28 May 2024
Published: 05 June 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41541-024-00895-z